| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Have you had a bad Krueger experience
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Thanks for showing that you can't tell the diference between speculations and delusions, Richman. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Pehaps your speaking out of he back of your neck again, Richman. I'm not retired As far as we know, you've never worked. and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. As far as we know, you've never practiced anything but, well never mind. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. No, Scott Wheeler is uniquely arrogant and stupid. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? He isn't one of my best friends, just someone who posts here, who isn't in love with Middius. LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Thanks for showing that you can't tell the diference between speculations and delusions, Richman. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Pehaps your speaking out of he back of your neck again, Richman. Or perhaps I'm telling the truth, Krueger. Other than McKelvy, Ferstler, and Lionel, there is no evidence to indicate that Pooh Bear and Torresists are not simply sockpuppets you've created to bring your support up from microscopically negligible to strikingly insignificant. I'm not retired As far as we know, you've never worked. Does "we" include the voices in your head, your sockpuppets (see above), or just your pathetic attempts to speak for others who don't exist. You don't know how to read and/or verify information either. and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. As far as we know, you've never practiced anything but, well never mind. See above. If that were true, than the previous comment from Torresists about malpractice, with which you agreed, makes you an even greater fool. Q.E.D. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. No, Scott Wheeler is uniquely arrogant and stupid. Prove that he's the only person that has sued you for libel. You're probably lying again. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? He isn't one of my best friends, just someone who posts here, who isn't in love with Middius. Prove it. Prove that he's not a sockpuppet that you've created to give the false impression that you have more than 3 supporters that actually have independent identities. LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman Bruce J. Richman |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Is that what your voices tell you? I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. Of course not, you don't really belong to the name you use. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. Blind speculation is a specialty of yours, isn't it? That's really all you can do when you don't know anything. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? Like you with Middius? LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman, frequent violator of medical ethics. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McStupid quickly leaps to Krueger's defense:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Is that what your voices tell you? Unlike you, I don't have any. Did your antipsychotic medications run out again? I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. Of course not, you don't really belong to the name you use. Prove it. Publish that claim in an American print publication. And be sure and include your address so my lawyers will know how to find you. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. Blind speculation is a specialty of yours, isn't it? That's really all you can do when you don't know anything. Projection of your 7 year history of posting on RAO is duly noted. You've just very cogently described your own behavior on RAO. Why don't you print your false, libelous claims in an American print publication? If you're telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? Like you with Middius? There is no credible evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman, frequent violator of medical ethics. The above signature is a forgery of Michael McKelvy, a known pathological liar and purveyor of libel. Since I have never claimed that I practice medicine, McKelvy can't even lie and libel others in a way that is accurate. His disconnect from reality is pretty obvious. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McStupid quickly leaps to Krueger's defense: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Is that what your voices tell you? Unlike you, I don't have any. Did your antipsychotic medications run out again? Don't have any. I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. Of course not, you don't really belong to the name you use. Prove it. Publish that claim in an American print publication. And be sure and include your address so my lawyers will know how to find you. You have the burden of proof, you claim to be a shrink and yet act like one who needs to be shrunk. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. Blind speculation is a specialty of yours, isn't it? That's really all you can do when you don't know anything. Projection of your 7 year history of posting on RAO is duly noted. You've just very cogently described your own behavior on RAO. Nows who's projecting? Why don't you print your false, libelous claims in an American print publication? If you're telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about. Why don't you prove you are who you say you are in a verifiable way? As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? Like you with Middius? There is no credible evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. Ah, so you're blind and stupid. LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman, frequent violator of medical ethics. The above signature is a forgery of Michael McKelvy, a known pathological liar and purveyor of libel. Inability to once again recognize satire noted. Since I have never claimed that I practice medicine, McKelvy can't even lie and libel others in a way that is accurate. His disconnect from reality is pretty obvious. See above. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McStupid quickly leaps to Krueger's defense: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Is that what your voices tell you? Unlike you, I don't have any. Did your antipsychotic medications run out again? Don't have any. I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. Of course not, you don't really belong to the name you use. Prove it. Publish that claim in an American print publication. And be sure and include your address so my lawyers will know how to find you. You have the burden of proof, you claim to be a shrink and yet act like one who needs to be shrunk. Is that your unprofessional, worthless opinion, Dr. Demento? (I mean McKelvy). No, the burden of proof is always on those that have a 7 year history of making false libelous claims about others, as you have repeatedly done. You're repeating your libel, so you need to back it up with evidence. And you're unqualified due to both lack of training and lack of honesty to evaluate the mental status of anybody. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. Blind speculation is a specialty of yours, isn't it? That's really all you can do when you don't know anything. Projection of your 7 year history of posting on RAO is duly noted. You've just very cogently described your own behavior on RAO. Nows who's projecting? You are. As is always the case since you can't admit to the despicable behavior for which you're well known. Why don't you print your false, libelous claims in an American print publication? If you're telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about. Why don't you prove you are who you say you are in a verifiable way? That was done many years ago, fool. Like your hero and role model, Krueger, you will never accept valid evidence anyhow. Why don't you report my behavior to the legal authorities in Florida, since you think somebody is impersonating Dr. Bruce J. Richman, a licensed psychologist according to the Florida state records. I suggest you consult with Howard Ferstler, who lives in Florida also. I've invited him to do the same thing. Since impersonating a psychologist publically is a criminal offense, here's your big chance, Mikey. LOL !!!! Oh, in case you don't realize it, fool, filing false complaints to the authorities is *also* a criminal offense. So, please, I'm encouraging you to file your complaints with the authorities. My attornies will appreciate it also.  As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? Like you with Middius? There is no credible evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. Ah, so you're blind and stupid. Your projections are not my concern. Provide verifiable evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. You made the claim, so the burden of proof is yours. LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman, frequent violator of medical ethics. The above signature is a forgery of Michael McKelvy, a known pathological liar and purveyor of libel. Inability to once again recognize satire noted. Inability to distinguish between medial ethics and other types of ethics is noted. Since McKelvy has a 7 year documented history of lies and libel directed at this writer, there is no evidence that he has ever engaged in satire. He has no idea of what the word even means, let alone any idea of how to use it. Since I have never claimed that I practice medicine, McKelvy can't even lie and libel others in a way that is accurate. His disconnect from reality is pretty obvious. See above. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Oh, in case you don't realize it, fool, filing false complaints to the authorities is *also* a criminal offense. This remembers me a failed lawsuit. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McStupid quickly leaps to Krueger's defense: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Is that what your voices tell you? Unlike you, I don't have any. Did your antipsychotic medications run out again? Don't have any. I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. Of course not, you don't really belong to the name you use. Prove it. Publish that claim in an American print publication. And be sure and include your address so my lawyers will know how to find you. You have the burden of proof, you claim to be a shrink and yet act like one who needs to be shrunk. Is that your unprofessional, worthless opinion, Dr. Demento? (I mean McKelvy). At least as valuable as your opinions of myself or anyone else on RAO you've cried about. No, the burden of proof is always on those that have a 7 year history of making false libelous claims about others, as you have repeatedly done. You've been here 7 years? Haven't found a life yet? You're repeating your libel, so you need to back it up with evidence. And you're unqualified due to both lack of training and lack of honesty to evaluate the mental status of anybody. So we have that in common. Blind speculation is a specialty of yours, isn't it? That's really all you can do when you don't know anything. Projection of your 7 year history of posting on RAO is duly noted. You've just very cogently described your own behavior on RAO. Nows who's projecting? You are. As is always the case since you can't admit to the despicable behavior for which you're well known. If I'm despised by people like you, I take that as a badge of honor. Why don't you print your false, libelous claims in an American print publication? If you're telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about. Why don't you prove you are who you say you are in a verifiable way? That was done many years ago, fool. Where? How? Like your hero and role model, Krueger, you will never accept valid evidence anyhow. That's where you're wrong, again. Why don't you report my behavior to the legal authorities in Florida, since you think somebody is impersonating Dr. Bruce J. Richman, a licensed psychologist according to the Florida state records. Becuase they don't investigate people who don't exist. I suggest you consult with Howard Ferstler, who lives in Florida also. I've invited him to do the same thing. Since impersonating a psychologist publically is a criminal offense, here's your big chance, Mikey. Only if you actually try to practice. Your rants here are no threat to anybody's mental health. LOL !!!! Oh, in case you don't realize it, fool, filing false complaints to the authorities is *also* a criminal offense. Which is why you won't be filing libel suits against me or anybody. So, please, I'm encouraging you to file your complaints with the authorities. My attornies will appreciate it also. The ones that live under your stairs? As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? Like you with Middius? There is no credible evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. Ah, so you're blind and stupid. Your projections are not my concern. Provide verifiable evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. You made the claim, so the burden of proof is yours. Where does he live? LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman, frequent violator of medical ethics. The above signature is a forgery of Michael McKelvy, a known pathological liar and purveyor of libel. Inability to once again recognize satire noted. Inability to distinguish between medial ethics and other types of ethics is noted. Since McKelvy has a 7 year documented history of lies and libel directed at this writer, there is no evidence that he has ever engaged in satire. He has no idea of what the word even means, let alone any idea of how to use it. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Since I have never claimed that I practice medicine, McKelvy can't even lie and libel others in a way that is accurate. His disconnect from reality is pretty obvious. See above. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McStupid quickly leaps to Krueger's defense: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Subject: Have you had a bad Richman experience? From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/18/2004 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message Do tell! ;-) All of RAO but the *Normals*. He's freely heaped abuse on numerous newbies. If this guy really is a "licensed mental health professional", it's pretty darn scary, eh? I wonder how many malpractice cases he has lost? Probably forced into retirement for patient abuse. Perhaps the resultant high cost of malpractice insurance has forced him to cease practicing, which would free him up to post on RAO all day. :-( Early retirment isn't necessarily a vow of poverty, they tell me. His biggest limitations seem to be in his mind. Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Is that what your voices tell you? Unlike you, I don't have any. Did your antipsychotic medications run out again? Don't have any. I'm not retired and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. Of course not, you don't really belong to the name you use. Prove it. Publish that claim in an American print publication. And be sure and include your address so my lawyers will know how to find you. You have the burden of proof, you claim to be a shrink and yet act like one who needs to be shrunk. Is that your unprofessional, worthless opinion, Dr. Demento? (I mean McKelvy). At least as valuable as your opinions of myself or anyone else on RAO you've cried about. Wrong again, moron. I've cried about nobody, while you've engagedi in a 7 year term of patholovgical lying and defense of documented pathological liar, Krueger. I'm qualified to evaluate your online behavior, you are *not* qualified to evaluate mine or anybody elses. Your attempts to cover up your gross deficienceis in the evluation of others are duly noted. No, the burden of proof is always on those that have a 7 year history of making false libelous claims about others, as you have repeatedly done. You've been here 7 years? Haven't found a life yet? Much more fulfilling than yours, no doubt. Your RAO existence is pretty much predicated on smear others in defense of Krueger. You've been doing it for a long time - on RAO. That doesn't say much for your credibility which is nonexistent. You're repeating your libel, so you need to back it up with evidence. And you're unqualified due to both lack of training and lack of honesty to evaluate the mental status of anybody. So we have that in common. Another pathological and libelous false claim. Let's allow the courts to decidee who is qualified and who is not. I'm still waiting for you to file your complaints with the legal authorities, libeler. Blind speculation is a specialty of yours, isn't it? That's really all you can do when you don't know anything. Projection of your 7 year history of posting on RAO is duly noted. You've just very cogently described your own behavior on RAO. Nows who's projecting? You are. As is always the case since you can't admit to the despicable behavior for which you're well known. If I'm despised by people like you, I take that as a badge of honor. Pathological liars and libelers like you and Krueger are despised by many. That's what you and he live for. Your masochistic behavior in which you're cotinually exposed for the hatemonger, flamer, liar and libeler you are is matter of Google record. Thanks for conferring a "Badge of Honor" upon me and many other RAO posters. Your hatred validates our correct analysis of your pathology. Why don't you print your false, libelous claims in an American print publication? If you're telling the truth, you have nothing to worry about. Why don't you prove you are who you say you are in a verifiable way? That was done many years ago, fool. Where? How? Look it up in Google, you worthless libeler. I don't have to do your homework for you. You've been challenged to make your claims in a public print publicationj, or to complain to the authorities, or to complain about my ethics. Do you honestly "think" (and in your case, I use that word advisedly) that I'd be challenging you to do these things if I wasn't totally confident of suing your ass off and then filing complaints against you for filing false charges. Oh, wait - I almost forgot. This is McKelvy I'm talking to. I apologize. You denfitely *would* be stupid enough to believe the bull**** you've tried to peddle about me for so many years. People who believe their own false claims to the extent that you do are delusional. Like your hero and role model, Krueger, you will never accept valid evidence anyhow. That's where you're wrong, again. Prove it. Why don't you report my behavior to the legal authorities in Florida, since you think somebody is impersonating Dr. Bruce J. Richman, a licensed psychologist according to the Florida state records. Becuase they don't investigate people who don't exist. ACtually, the reason is because you don't have the cajones to stand behind your bull****. Another reason would be because, as usual, you're don't have one iota of concrete evidence that any of the libelous claims you've made about me are even remotely true. Not even a good evasion, pathological liar and libeler. I suggest you consult with Howard Ferstler, who lives in Florida also. I've invited him to do the same thing. Since impersonating a psychologist publically is a criminal offense, here's your big chance, Mikey. Only if you actually try to practice. Your rants here are no threat to anybody's mental health. There have been no rants, and certainly nobody can threaten your mental health. Since you're out of touch with reality, little information if any filters through from the outside world. And I'm in very active practice as this is written, and have been for many years, and have held a number of jobs also that I've occasionally described on RAO. Unlike you, I don't have that much to hide, because what I've said about myself is true. You, on the other hand are a documented liar and libeler. LOL !!!! Oh, in case you don't realize it, fool, filing false complaints to the authorities is *also* a criminal offense. Which is why you won't be filing libel suits against me or anybody. Print your libelous claims in an American print publication, report my impersonation of a psychologist to the legal authorities, and/or complain to the Board of Ethics in Florida about my clinical activities. And then hire an attorney, you'll need one. So, please, I'm encouraging you to file your complaints with the authorities. My attornies will appreciate it also. The ones that live under your stairs? Psychotic non sequitur and evidence of thougt disorder noted. Visual hallucinations indicative of possible organic brain syndrome noted. Just a hypothesis at this point, but no doubt you'll provide us with more bizarre verbalizations to confirm our hypotheses. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? Like you with Middius? There is no credible evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. Ah, so you're blind and stupid. Your projections are not my concern. Provide verifiable evidence that Middius is a sockpuppet. You made the claim, so the burden of proof is yours. Where does he live? Prove that he has no verifiable address, and no verifiable telephone number. You made the claim that he is a sockpuppet, so back it up, liar. I wouldn't tell you anyhow, since you're a sociopath and might very well end up stalking him just so you can get a "Badge of Honor". LOL !!! Bruce J. Richman, frequent violator of medical ethics. The above signature is a forgery of Michael McKelvy, a known pathological liar and purveyor of libel. Inability to once again recognize satire noted. Inability to distinguish between medial ethics and other types of ethics is noted. Since McKelvy has a 7 year documented history of lies and libel directed at this writer, there is no evidence that he has ever engaged in satire. He has no idea of what the word even means, let alone any idea of how to use it. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. The above represent EEG results taken from McKelvy during one of his RAO visits. Since I have never claimed that I practice medicine, McKelvy can't even lie and libel others in a way that is accurate. His disconnect from reality is pretty obvious. See above. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Torresists" wrote in message
Google indicates that Richman melts down early and often. I guess you could design a meltdown quotient - based on the size of the flame divided by the size of the flame that simulated it. Based on that quotient, Richman is da man! |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Torresists" wrote in message Google indicates that Richman melts down early and often. I guess you could design a meltdown quotient - based on the size of the flame divided by the size of the flame that simulated it. Based on that quotient, Richman is da man! It's always quite revealing to see who quickly Krueger and one of his delusional, anonymous sycophants, can very quickly share a mutual set of behavors totally out of contact with reality. Krueger seems to be trying to deal with paranoia by giving one of the voices in his head a name - "Torresists". Then he ends up essentially talking to himself. It is sort of reminiscent of the following saying: When somebody talks to God it is called "praying". But when God talks to somebody it is called "schizophrenia". When Krueger and his alter ego "Torresists" talk to each other it can be called "Folie a deux". Bruce J. Richman |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Google indicates that Richman melts down early and often. I guess you could design a meltdown quotient - based on the size of the flame divided by the size of the flame that simulated it. Based on that quotient, Richman is da man! It's always quite revealing to see who quickly Krueger and one of his delusional, anonymous sycophants, can very quickly share a mutual set of behavors totally out of contact with reality. Krueger seems to be trying to deal with paranoia by giving one of the voices in his head a name - "Torresists". Then he ends up essentially talking to himself. It is sort of reminiscent of the following saying: When somebody talks to God it is called "praying". But when God talks to somebody it is called "schizophrenia". Is it also true for Abraham, Noe and Moïse ? When Krueger and his alter ego "Torresists" talk to each other it can be called "Folie a deux". And when Richman talk alone it can be called drivel. ;-) |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Arny Krueger wrote: "Torresists" wrote in message Google indicates that Richman melts down early and often. I guess you could design a meltdown quotient - based on the size of the flame divided by the size of the flame that simulated it. Based on that quotient, Richman is da man! It's always quite revealing to see who quickly Krueger and one of his delusional, anonymous sycophants, can very quickly share a mutual set of behavors totally out of contact with reality. Krueger seems to be trying to deal with paranoia by giving one of the voices in his head a name - "Torresists". Then he ends up essentially talking to himself. It is sort of reminiscent of the following saying: When somebody talks to God it is called "praying". But when God talks to somebody it is called "schizophrenia". Is it also true for Abraham, Noe and Moïse ? and how about Moe, Larry and Curly? |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Thanks for demonstrating your delusions with RAO. Thanks for showing that you can't tell the diference between speculations and delusions, Richman. Perhaps Torreists is just another name you use to communicate with the voices in your head that lie to you about all the RAO "Normals". Pehaps your speaking out of he back of your neck again, Richman. Or perhaps I'm telling the truth, Krueger. Other than McKelvy, Ferstler, and Lionel, there is no evidence to indicate that Pooh Bear and Torresists are not simply sockpuppets you've created to bring your support up from microscopically negligible to strikingly insignificant. There's no evidence they were created by Arny either. I'm not retired As far as we know, you've never worked. As far as we know neither have you. Does "we" include the voices in your head, your sockpuppets (see above), or just your pathetic attempts to speak for others who don't exist. You don't know how to read and/or verify information either. and I've never been the subject of any malpractice suit. As far aw we know you have never seen a patient. As far as we know, you've never practiced anything but, well never mind. See above. If that were true, than the previous comment from Torresists about malpractice, with which you agreed, makes you an even greater fool. Q.E.D. But you've been the subject of at least one libel suit that we know about, and probably many others that you don't want to talk about on RAO. As far as we know you've been sued 1000 times for libel. No, Scott Wheeler is uniquely arrogant and stupid. Prove that he's the only person that has sued you for libel. You're probably lying again. Prove you've ever told the truth. As for Torresists, how does it feel to count a cowardly sockpuppet as one of your best friends? How does it feel to count Middius among yours? He isn't one of my best friends, just someone who posts here, who isn't in love with Middius. Prove it. Prove that he's not a sockpuppet that you've created to give the false impression that you have more than 3 supporters that actually have independent identities. Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Thanks for helping me make my point. Richman is asking for proof of a negative. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. The gratuitous insult does not prove you point, Art. In fact, its a tacit admissing that you don't have anything to back your posturing up with. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. Except the question is completely answerable. If I were asked the question I could answer it in a heartbeat, and do so completely honestly and without embarassment. Here, I'll do it: I'm not at sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi or anybody else. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. I agree that being a Middius or Gindi sockpuppet would be like being a back alley whore. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. The gratuitous insult does not prove you point, Art. In fact, its a tacit admissing that you don't have anything to back your posturing up with. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. Except the question is completely answerable. If I were asked the question I could answer it in a heartbeat, and do so completely honestly and without embarassment. Here, I'll do it: I'm not at sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi or anybody else. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. I agree that being a Middius or Gindi sockpuppet would be like being a back alley whore. Inability to understand simple English duly noted. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. I agree that being a Middius or Gindi sockpuppet would be like being a back alley whore. Inability to understand simple English duly noted. Irrelevance of comment, noted. I doubt that you comprehend the irrelevance of your response. And I doubt that you comprehend the relevance of my analogy. And no, I am not going to give you free english lessons. Go hire your own tutor. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. I agree that being a Middius or Gindi sockpuppet would be like being a back alley whore. Inability to understand simple English duly noted. Irrelevance of comment, noted. I doubt that you comprehend the irrelevance of your response. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question. And I doubt that you comprehend the relevance of my analogy. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question, part deaux. And no, I am not going to give you free english lessons. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question, part tres. Go hire your own tutor. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question, part quatro. Yawn. One problem with Gindian sockpuppets is that their intelligence can never exceed that of their perp. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. I agree that being a Middius or Gindi sockpuppet would be like being a back alley whore. Inability to understand simple English duly noted. Irrelevance of comment, noted. I doubt that you comprehend the irrelevance of your response. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question. And I doubt that you comprehend the relevance of my analogy. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question, part deaux. And no, I am not going to give you free english lessons. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question, part tres. Go hire your own tutor. Usual Sacklish debating trade approach of attacking the questioner instead of answering a probing question, part quatro. Yawn. One problem with Gindian sockpuppets is that their intelligence can never exceed that of their perp. You had NOT asked a question. But if you had, it would have probably been too poorly written, too ambiguous, or biased and loaded a questionb for me to have wanted to answer it. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clyde wrote:
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message link.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Indeed he was. duh-Mikey McStupid has been exhibiting his own unique brand of mental retardation on RAO for a long time. McStupid's pathological lying and libel, when challenged, are usually met with imbecilic requests for "proof". Sad to say, he never provides any for his idiotic false claims. Since Krueger has lately been claiming "Google is my friend" and as we all know, duh Mikey McStupid's imitation and loyalty to Krueger knows no bounds, perhaps the 2 of them can benefit from this little URL: http://www.mhsanctuary.com/therapist/543.htm Bruce J. Richman |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Sorry that you underestimated me. Even sorrier that think they way to win is to become worse than what you despise. BTW those are the same kind of questions that BJ asks in seriousness, why aren't you taking him on for his idiocy? |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message link.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Indeed he was. duh-Mikey McStupid has been exhibiting his own unique brand of mental retardation on RAO for a long time. McStupid's pathological lying and libel, when challenged, are usually met with imbecilic requests for "proof". Sad to say, he never provides any for his idiotic false claims. Another non-audio post by the retard who was going to try so hard to be relevant. Since Krueger has lately been claiming "Google is my friend" and as we all know, duh Mikey McStupid's imitation and loyalty to Krueger knows no bounds, perhaps the 2 of them can benefit from this little URL: http://www.mhsanctuary.com/therapist/543.htm The author seemed to have you in mind since the story fits you to a "T". Bruce J. Richman |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Sorry that you underestimated me. Even sorrier that think they way to win is to become worse than what you despise. By taking the same form of question, and turning the absurdity around back to Arny, I am showing how ridiculous his original question was. BTW those are the same kind of questions that BJ asks in seriousness, why aren't you taking him on for his idiocy? That's your opinion of what he is doing. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Art wrote:
Michael McKelvy" wrote in message link.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Sorry that you underestimated me. Even sorrier that think they way to win is to become worse than what you despise. By taking the same form of question, and turning the absurdity around back to Arny, I am showing how ridiculous his original question was. BTW those are the same kind of questions that BJ asks in seriousness, why aren't you taking him on for his idiocy? That's your opinion of what he is doing. McStupid does not have one scintilla of evidence to suggest that any questions I've asked are inappropriate. As usual, he's just making up more lies to perpetuate his libelous hatemongering. He's clearly delusional when he tries to smear me and others with his phony propaganda. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Sorry that you underestimated me. Even sorrier that think they way to win is to become worse than what you despise. By taking the same form of question, and turning the absurdity around back to Arny, I am showing how ridiculous his original question was. That's your opinion of what you're doing. BTW those are the same kind of questions that BJ asks in seriousness, why aren't you taking him on for his idiocy? That's your opinion of what he is doing. That's is how it appears. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Art wrote: Michael McKelvy" wrote in message hlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Sorry that you underestimated me. Even sorrier that think they way to win is to become worse than what you despise. By taking the same form of question, and turning the absurdity around back to Arny, I am showing how ridiculous his original question was. BTW those are the same kind of questions that BJ asks in seriousness, why aren't you taking him on for his idiocy? That's your opinion of what he is doing. McStupid does not have one scintilla of evidence to suggest that any questions I've asked are inappropriate. Still more of the famous professionalism. When you make personal attacks in threads like the one in memory of a magazine editor, you're inappropriate. When you ask people to prove negatives, you're not only inappropriate, your a ****ing idiot. As usual, he's just making up more lies to perpetuate his libelous hatemongering. OSAF. He's clearly delusional when he tries to smear me and others with his phony propaganda. I'm just calling you on your unprofessionalism and constant bashing. Most of the time I ignore you completely. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Art wrote: Michael McKelvy" wrote in message hlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... Prove that you're not a sockpuppet of Middius or Gindi, created to give the false impression that they have any grasp of truth. Duh Mikey, prove that you are not an alien sockpuppet of Mork from Ork Inability to give a straight answer noted. If you had half a brain, you would realize i gave a straight answer within my response. It is that Duh Mikey's question was imbecilic, and unanswerable. It was supposed to be in response to the idiotic questions posed by Quackenbush. It would be as if I asked you to prove that you are not whoring out your wife in the back alley, so that she could earn enough money to support your crack habit. Thanks for demonstrating the more offensive behavior I was referring to elsewhere. I was merely making a point by giving a demonstrative lesson in Krooglish/Kroologic. "See Spot run" would not have done the trick. If you don't like Krooglish/Kroologic, don't blame me. what I was pointing out, is the logical absurdity of the type of question that Krooger often asks. I am sorry that you were too stupid to undserstand that. Sorry that you underestimated me. Even sorrier that think they way to win is to become worse than what you despise. By taking the same form of question, and turning the absurdity around back to Arny, I am showing how ridiculous his original question was. BTW those are the same kind of questions that BJ asks in seriousness, why aren't you taking him on for his idiocy? That's your opinion of what he is doing. McStupid does not have one scintilla of evidence to suggest that any questions I've asked are inappropriate. Still more of the famous professionalism. When you make personal attacks in threads like the one in memory of a magazine editor, you're inappropriate. When you ask people to prove negatives, you're not only inappropriate, your a ****ing idiot. As usual, he's just making up more lies to perpetuate his libelous hatemongering. OSAF. He's clearly delusional when he tries to smear me and others with his phony propaganda. I'm just calling you on your unprofessionalism and constant bashing. Most of the time I ignore you completely. Bruce J. Richman |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Magazine Statitistics | Audio Opinions | |||
| Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger | Audio Opinions | |||
| Krueger - Defendant in RAO Libel Suit - Exhibits His Delusions | Audio Opinions | |||
| For Mr Krueger | Audio Opinions | |||
Linear Mode
