| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
In May, 20003, a post was initiated by JBotg dealing with ABX test methodology. The Google record clearly indicates that I was not involved in this thread at all and not mentioned Krueger's name prior to the following unprovoked personal attack from Krueger: From: Arny Krueger ) Subject: Re... What's wrong with AXB test methodology. Attn: Jim West View: Complete Thread (397 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 2003-05-16 03:13:29 PST "JBorg, Jr." wrote in message om [It worked. Sorry GM- nothing personal and I apologize.] "Nousaine" wrote Stress js only a problem in any testing environment ONLY when the subject has made a claim or holds a prior held position. #1 Disagree. Stress is innate in human behaviour. Yup. Humans are just like land crabs. Stress them too much, they evacuate their digestive systems and die. Happens every time. Human has no control when a stress can occur. Stress kills, immediately. There are no known occasions where a human under stress didn't just fold up and die. It can occur anytime at various degrees. Scientifically speaking, there are no known occasions where stress in improved listener performance. Athletes, workers, children at play never perform better under stress. In fact stress kills them all immediately. There are no known instances where people have performed better under stress. In fact, when put under stress, humans die immediately. Stress is the end of life. Humans should avoid even the tiniest vestigages of stress. A testee looking forward to a DBT indeed may not have stress. This is a good thing, because even the anticipation of stress can cause immediate and painful death. But when a disappointment occur, for example and for whatever reasons, before or during the test- stress can occur. And then the listener dies! Last time I organized an ABX test, we had 22 deaths due to stress. We were carting the bodies out with wheelbarrows. There are cemeteries all around my house, filled with people who died of stress during ABX tests. Confusion and fatigue during the test can happen at any time. When it does, stress will occur. Followed immediately by a horrible, excruciatingly painful death due to stress. Stress is too horrible to even think about. Stress must be avoided at all costs. ....and if you believe this, you probably believe that Bruce Richman is a board-certified health care professional! LOL! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Google Home - Advertise with Us - Business Solutions - Services & Tools - Jobs, Press, & Help ©2003 Google, a lengfhy thread about ABX test methdology was started by JBorg. I was not involved in any way in this post nor had I posted there prior to the following post by Krueger . Note that Krueger waited until the end of his post to launch an unprovoked personal attack against me by repeating his usual libel re. my credentials. it is necessary to state the obvious - I was not involved in this thread at all prior to Krueger's unprovoked personal attack. Therefore, any responses I made after that were in response to his libelous and false claims. It is also worth noting that although this thread eventually contained over 300 posts, Krueger couldn't wait to attack me and did so in only the 2nd post he wrote in this thread. The rest, as they say, is history. Of course, I could have easily found more examples - both prior to and since this unprovoked personal attack from Krueger in the Google record. But one example is enough to prove 2 essential facts of RAO life: (1) Krueger has been proven to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against me. (2) His puppet, McKelvy, has been easily shown to be a liar when he tries to claim that his hero, Krueger, has not engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me. No doubt these 2 pathological liars will try and spindoctor, modify the text, or delete sections of this post in an effort to cover up their obvious history of fraud, libel and compulsive lying. However, they can't delete the Google record that demonstrates their sociopathic behavior for all to see. Q.E.D. Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
In May, 20003, a post was initiated by JBotg dealing with ABX test methodology. The Google record clearly indicates that I was not involved in this thread at all and not mentioned Krueger's name prior to the following unprovoked personal attack from Krueger: Time and date of the post I made was: 2003-05-16 03:13:29 PST What Richman doesn't say is that he had attacked me any number of times in other threads previously on the same day and on previous days. Here's the proof: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...uauthors=richm an%20&as_drrb=b&as_mind=14&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003& as_maxd=16&as_maxm=5&as_ma xy=2003 My claim is that I can leave Richman alone for days and weeks and he'll still try to gratuitously firebomb my posts. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message In May, 20003, a post was initiated by JBotg dealing with ABX test methodology. The Google record clearly indicates that I was not involved in this thread at all and not mentioned Krueger's name prior to the following unprovoked personal attack from Krueger: since Krueger has engaged in deceptive deletion of the evidence - as is his custom - it is repeated below Groups Advanced Groups Search Preferences Groups Help 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293 031JanFebMarAprMayJunJul AugSepOctNovDec19811982198319841985198619871988198 919901991199219931994199 519961997199819992000200120022003€“ 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293 031JanFebMarAprMayJunJul AugSepOctNovDec19811982198319841985198619871988198 919901991199219931994199 519961997199819992000200120022003 Viewing message From: Arny Krueger ) Subject: Re... What's wrong with AXB test methodology. Attn: Jim West View: Complete Thread (397 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 2003-05-16 03:13:29 PST "JBorg, Jr." wrote in message om [It worked. Sorry GM- nothing personal and I apologize.] "Nousaine" wrote Stress js only a problem in any testing environment ONLY when the subject has made a claim or holds a prior held position. #1 Disagree. Stress is innate in human behaviour. Yup. Humans are just like land crabs. Stress them too much, they evacuate their digestive systems and die. Happens every time. Human has no control when a stress can occur. Stress kills, immediately. There are no known occasions where a human under stress didn't just fold up and die. It can occur anytime at various degrees. Scientifically speaking, there are no known occasions where stress in improved listener performance. Athletes, workers, children at play never perform better under stress. In fact stress kills them all immediately. There are no known instances where people have performed better under stress. In fact, when put under stress, humans die immediately. Stress is the end of life. Humans should avoid even the tiniest vestigages of stress. A testee looking forward to a DBT indeed may not have stress. This is a good thing, because even the anticipation of stress can cause immediate and painful death. But when a disappointment occur, for example and for whatever reasons, before or during the test- stress can occur. And then the listener dies! Last time I organized an ABX test, we had 22 deaths due to stress. We were carting the bodies out with wheelbarrows. There are cemeteries all around my house, filled with people who died of stress during ABX tests. Confusion and fatigue during the test can happen at any time. When it does, stress will occur. Followed immediately by a horrible, excruciatingly painful death due to stress. Stress is too horrible to even think about. Stress must be avoided at all costs. ....and if you believe this, you probably believe that Bruce Richman is a board-certified health care professional! LOL! ------------------------------------------------------------- Time and date of the post I made was: 2003-05-16 03:13:29 PST What Richman doesn't say is that he had attacked me any number of times in other threads previously on the same day and on previous days. Here's the proof: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...uauthors=richm an%20&as_drrb=b&as_mind=14&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003 &as_maxd=16&as_maxm=5&as_ma xy=2003 Actually, this is just another blatant lie. While I'm not going to reproduce the posts listed in Krueger's reference - here's a brief description of his so-called "proof": Search Result 1 From: Bruce J. Richman ) Subject: Daniel Lanois View: Complete Thread (5 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 2003-05-16 19:39:47 PST In this post by me, there is no mention of Krueger whatsoever. Also, note the time stamp - it was made AFTER, not BEFORE Krueger's unprovoked personal atack against me. Search Result 2 From: Bruce J. Richman ) Subject: Arnold B. Krueger - My tormentor View: Complete Thread (31 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 2003-05-16 19:36:47 PST Note the time stamp. As with the previous post for which Krueger has made a fale claim, this post was made AFTER Krueger's unprovoked personal attack against me, not BEFORE it. Therefore, as in most of his statements about me, this claim by Krueger is bogus. Of course, using Krueger's tenuous type of rationalization, anybody could claim that a personal attack at some other time previously, on some other topic, gives them the right forever to engage in future unprovoked personal attacks - IOW, a lifetime pass for unprovoked character assassination and libel. Virtually all of RAO, except Krueger and McKelvy, can see this type of lame defense for what it is - a pathological attempt to avoid responsibility for a 6+ year history of unprovoked personal attacks against me by these 2 hatemongers. From: Bruce J. Richman ) Subject: Oakland University View: Complete Thread (103 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 2003-05-16 19:24:47 PST Note that as in the previous post, the time stamp clearly indicates that this post was made AFTER, NOT BEFORE Krueger's unprovoked personal attack against me on the same day. Rather than prove the point ad nauseum, we have above a sample of 3 of Krueger's false claims of "proof". In the 1st, his name isnot mentioned by me at all and indeed, there is no attack of any kind. In the 2nd and 3r4 posts, my attacks on him occurred AFTER, not BEFORE, he had previously enagaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me on the same day. That is the kind of "proof" Krueger tries to fool the readership of RAO with in the course of his paranoid vendetta against me and others. LOL!!!! My claim is that I can leave Richman alone for days and weeks and he'll still try to gratuitously firebomb my posts. Prove it - just like you "proved" your other false claim. LOL !!!! Bruce J. Richman |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Arny Krueger wrote:
My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
"JBorg" wrote in message
om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence want's you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Arny Krueger wrote:
"JBorg" wrote in message . com Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence want's you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! Bruce J. Richman |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Arny Krueger wrote:
Notice that First of All, **** you, for having live this long. Second of all, you are a cumstain that must be flush unto the toilet bowl as soon as possible. Now that that's cleared... Let's talk about self delusion and the fact that no matter how much you have been exposed doing it, you continuously believe that these accustions were simply propelled as a result of your stupidity. Actually, it's more than that, this is about you who happens to be a meaningless freak with marked impairments in cognitive function. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message . com Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence want's you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. A comment on lyour lack of condemnation for an unprovoked personal attack is not in itself an unprovoked personal attack. An unprovoked personal attack is when you sya something nasty for no reason as Borg jr. did. Or like you did in the Julian Hirsch thread. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. Maybe nobody saw it until now. Maybe people are avoiding this thread because they see your name attched to it and know that if they make any comment about you other than to say good boy BJ, you will launch into one of your demented screeds. YMMV We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. As do__anyone with a conscience___ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! Bruce J. Richman complete crackpot and sockpuppet |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Compulsive liar, fraud and sociopath McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message . com Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence want's you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. A comment on lyour lack of condemnation for an unprovoked personal attack is not in itself an unprovoked personal attack. That is a lie typical of most coming from duh-Mikey McKelvy, who does not admit unprovoked personal attacks over a 7 year history against me, although they are clearly documenhted in the Google record. An unprovoked personal attack is when you sya something nasty for no reason as Borg jr. did. Or like you did in the Julian Hirsch thread. Or as you have here, as you do in every post you write containing my name, imbecile? Recent Google proof of just one of your numerous unprovoked personal attacks has been posted for all to see. Your lies about unprovoked personal attacks in whih you try to claim that you have the right to attack anybody fo any reason that has attacked you in the past are hypocritical, self-serving, and as irrational as the rest of your unadulterated baloney. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. Maybe nobody saw it until now. A ridiculous, stupid assertion in light of the number of RAO readers there would probably be. Maybe you are trying to advance another set of lies about the behavior of others that hate your guts. Maybe people are avoiding this thread because they see your name attched to it and know that if they make any comment about you other than to say good boy BJ, you will launch into one of your demented screeds. YMMV Perhaps you are so far removed from reality that you use terms like "demented" without having the slightest idea what they mean, duh-Mikey. More than likely is the notion that most people could care less what you have to say about anything, since you have repeatedly demonstrated that you are out of touch with reality. We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. As does anybody_________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). The fool, McKelvy, in the line above, tried once again, to engage in forgery. It has been corrected. Note that he didn't lie and call it satire since that particular piece of deviant behavior which he tries to promote has been exposed. LOL! Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist (signed this way (1) because it's the truth, (2) to elicit a Pavlovian conditioned response from McKelvy in which he tries to modify, delete or otherwise deny this reality, (3) because it exposes his desperation to try and change or eliminate truthful information posted by others). |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any judgement, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and commendable behavior? It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly as he does. It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive regiemes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide. Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that Richman is right there with you in spirit! |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any judgement, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and commendable behavior? That is a lie. Show where I have claimed it is normal and commendable behavior. However, your mindfreading effort to infer what I am thinking and criticize me (and by extension, all others) for not criticizing JBorg's post is of course, ridiculous and assumes facts not in evidence. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly as he does. In other words, you cannot defense your ridiculous false and probably delusional claim that all who have not commented on JBorg's post approve of it. This would suggest to most people that Krueger's claim that others condone this post - without any evidence of course - is simply another example of his paranoid views of what happens on RAO. It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive regiemes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide. Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that Richman is right there with you in spirit! Paranoid ideation and conspiracy theories duly noted. I'm sure that all of the posters on RAO that have chosen not to comment on JBorg's post about Krueger will be surprised to find out that we have all been equated with "repressive regimes". No doubt Krueger also thinks tha RAHE, from which he has been banned, is also a repressive regime. And as Bob Morein has recently pointed out, it appears that on rec.audio.tech, Krueger is attempting to restrict free speech and start his *own* repressive regime. LOL !!!! Bruce J. Richman |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Michael Mckelvy wrote:
Bruce J. Richman wrote Arny Krueger wrote: Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence want's you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Certainly! Krooger is making unfounded accusations. A comment on your lack of condemnation for an unprovoked personal attack is not in itself an unprovoked personal attack. A comment? See above. An unprovoked personal attack is when you say something nasty for no reason as Borg jr. did. [...] That is incorrect. And you are crossing my line. You will need a better strategy if you wish to aid Krooger in the middle one of his mental spasm. I was provoke after re-reading and remembering how Arnii denigrated the opinions I expressed about stress and its effect towards behavior with regards to dbt. Comments that Arnii made to the post in question do not require a direct yes or no answer. It was made solely to ridicule myself and so, I choose that opening to pay him back in kind. He also made numerous umprovoked attack to me on that thread. For his atrocities and malevolence of time past, should Arnii be exempt for payback at later time? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
"JBorg" wrote in message
om I was provoke after re-reading and remembering how Arnii denigrated the opinions I expressed about stress and its effect towards behavior with regards to dbt. You call them denigrations, I call them alternative opinions and relevant facts. Comments that Arnii made to the post in question do not require a direct yes or no answer. Somehow I managed to deal with the technical issue without a discussion of sexual parts. Too bad you lack the maturity and sanity to do the same, Borg. It was made solely to ridicule myself Really. So you are such a paranoid Borg that anybody who disagrees with you is denigrating you, your family, your sexuality, etc? and so, I choose that opening to pay him back in kind. Except that there was no such kind of post to pay back. He also made numerous umprovoked attack to me on that thread. I believe I pointed out that you got some severe problems expressing yourself, such as evidenced in this sentence of yours just above. Now remind of how this equates to your filthy post of yesterday? For his atrocities and malevolence of time past, should Arnii be exempt for payback at later time? In the case I'm looking at here JBorg, you made plenty of provocations. Here's an example: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=ff...0posting .goo gle.com Bottom line JBorg is that you get your thrills making filthy posts, and I just happen to be a convenient target for your antisocial, immature weirdness. You seem to know that no matter what kind of reprehensible, filthy things you say, people like Richman and sockpuppet Wheel will applaud you, as they have here. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence want's you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Deception noted. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. Not everybody has set themselves up as a mental health professional and protector of the public interest as you have, Richman. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any judgment, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and commendable behavior? That is a lie. Show where I have claimed it is normal and commendable behavior. Richman you've set yourself up as our resident mental health expert. Interestingly enough, you seem to only be able to comment on the mental health of people who disagree with you. In the process you let any amount of reprehensible behavior go scott free. However, your mindfreading effort to infer what I am thinking and criticize me (and by extension, all others) for not criticizing JBorg's post is of course, ridiculous and assumes facts not in evidence. Richman, I notice that even when prompted, you still can't bring yourself to comment on JBorg's post. You dance around it, but you won't address it. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. McKelvy commented on it, but you still haven't, Richman. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly as he does. In other words, you cannot defense your ridiculous false and probably delusional claim that all who have not commented on JBorg's post approve of it. I never said any such thing. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. This would suggest to most people that Krueger's claim that others condone this post - without any evidence of course - is simply another example of his paranoid views of what happens on RAO. The fact that you've mentioned it so many times without actually commenting on it tells a lot of about your character Richman, or lack thereof. It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive regimes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide. Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that Richman is right there with you in spirit! Paranoid ideation and conspiracy theories duly noted. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. I'm sure that all of the posters on RAO that have chosen not to comment on JBorg's post about Krueger will be surprised to find out that we have all been equated with "repressive regimes". They don't hold themselves out as mental health professionals and guardians of the public good like you do, Richman. No doubt Krueger also thinks tha RAHE, from which he has been banned, is also a repressive regime. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that Richman is so excited that he can't even spell simple words right. Note Richman's attempt to distract the discussion from his inability to comment on the contents of the morally reprehensible JBorg post, even though he's now mentioned its existence many times. And as Bob Morein has recently pointed out, it appears that on rec.audio.tech, Krueger is attempting to restrict free speech and start his *own* repressive regime. No, my goal has been to provide a demonstration of how Bruce Richman is highly selective in his public judgments, and won't say one critical word about someone who viciously and gratuitously attacks the same people that Bruce Richman likes to gratuitously attack. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Arny Krueger wrote:
"JBorg" wrote in message . com I was provoke after re-reading and remembering how Arnii denigrated the opinions I expressed about stress and its effect towards behavior with regards to dbt. You call them denigrations, I call them alternative opinions and relevant facts. Comments that Arnii made to the post in question do not require a direct yes or no answer. Somehow I managed to deal with the technical issue without a discussion of sexual parts. Too bad you lack the maturity and sanity to do the same, Borg. It was made solely to ridicule myself Really. So you are such a paranoid Borg that anybody who disagrees with you is denigrating you, your family, your sexuality, etc? and so, I choose that opening to pay him back in kind. Except that there was no such kind of post to pay back. He also made numerous umprovoked attack to me on that thread. I believe I pointed out that you got some severe problems expressing yourself, such as evidenced in this sentence of yours just above. Now remind of how this equates to your filthy post of yesterday? For his atrocities and malevolence of time past, should Arnii be exempt for payback at later time? In the case I'm looking at here JBorg, you made plenty of provocations. Here's an example: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=ff...0posting .goo gle.com Bottom line JBorg is that you get your thrills making filthy posts, and I just happen to be a convenient target for your antisocial, immature weirdness. You seem to know that no matter what kind of reprehensible, filthy things you say, people like Richman and sockpuppet Wheel will applaud you, as they have here. Once again, Krueger posts a false, unsubstantiated lie. In another recent post, he has claimed, and I quote "I can't predict the future". It appeas that in his latest compulsive need to post additional lies about Middius and myself, he has attempt to do just that. Not that this surprises anybody who has observed his self-serving, hypocritical, and false statements over the years. Note that there is no documented evidence that either George Middius or I have "complimented" Mr. Borg for his recent analysis of Krueger's behavior. As is normally the case, compulsive liar Krueger has simply attempted to engage in mind-reading once again, while at the same time making predictiosn the topic of a hypocritical double standard - one rule for Krueger and another for his many enemies. The only thing he forgot to mention was whether he used a Ouija Board, tea leaves, crystal ball, or perhaps tarot cards in making his latest self-serving prediction. LOL !! Bruce J. Richman |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Bruce J. Richman said: Note that there is no documented evidence that either George Middius or I have "complimented" Mr. Borg for his recent analysis of Krueger's behavior. Did "jborg" say Krooger is a piece of **** or something similar? If so, I offer felicitations for an accurate analysis. As is normally the case, compulsive liar Krueger has simply attempted to engage in mind-reading once again, while at the same time making predictiosn the topic of a hypocritical double standard - one rule for Krueger and another for his many enemies. Would you like me to mind-control you into saying what you really think about Krooger? That's what I'm best at in my role as RAO Cliquemaster. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any judgment, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and commendable behavior? That is a lie. Show where I have claimed it is normal and commendable behavior. Richman you've set yourself up as our resident mental health expert. Interestingly enough, you seem to only be able to comment on the mental health of people who disagree with you. In the process you let any amount of reprehensible behavior go scott free. Actually, Krueger, your claim that I have set myself up as RAO's resident mental health expert is just another lie and a figment of your imagination. Comments about the mental health of a few people on RAO in recent times (you and McKelvy) have absolutely nothing to do with agreement or disagreement as you incorrectly assert. If your claim were true, which it is not, I would then be making comments on the mental health of other people whose views on individual prefernces, politics and a host of other topics talked about here do not correspond to mine. As others here have pointed out, the reason you are held in contempt my many has nothing to do with your anti-tube, anti-vinyl, anti-individual-prefernce bisases. Rather, it has come about because of your compulsive tendncy to engage in personal attacks against people who don't agree with your biases and endorse your agenda. However, your mindfreading effort to infer what I am thinking and criticize me (and by extension, all others) for not criticizing JBorg's post is of course, ridiculous and assumes facts not in evidence. Richman, I notice that even when prompted, you still can't bring yourself to comment on JBorg's post. You dance around it, but you won't address it. Krueger, you were not engaging in a prompt, you were engaging in making a false claim not borne out by any evidence. And once again, here, you try and distract others from seeing that basic reality. It would appear that the vast majority of RAO's readership has failed to comment on JBorg's post as well, yet you have failed to make the same false claim about them. Therefore, it would appear that you are not really interested in condemnation, you are simply trying (and failing) to rationalize another one of your unprovoked personal attacks. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. lack of Krueger to dispute this valid observation is glaringly obvious in his failure to respond We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. McKelvy commented on it, but you still haven't, Richman. McKelvy also has claimed that I don't exist and has made numerous reprehensible false claims about me. Did y somehow miss your condemnation of those posts? It is also a fact that the majority of the RAO readership has also not commented on Mr. Borg's recent post about you. Therefore, it is obvious that you are simply posturing and attempting to engage in another unprovoked personal attack. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly as he does. In other words, you cannot defense your ridiculous false and probably delusional claim that all who have not commented on JBorg's post approve of it. I never said any such thing. In other words, you approve of the fact that others have not commented on Borg's post, but somehow have managed to single me out for a personal attack for the same behavior. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that Krueger continues to try and promote his latest self-serving unprovoked personal attack in which he fails to mention the documented fact that almot nobody has commented on the Borg post. Note further that Krueger has never raised one word of protest concerning the patently false personal attacks and libelous claims made in numerous attack threads perpetuated by McKelvy. This would suggest to most people that Krueger's claim that others condone this post - without any evidence of course - is simply another example of his paranoid views of what happens on RAO. The fact that you've mentioned it so many times without actually commenting on it tells a lot of about your character Richman, or lack thereof. Actually, Krueger, my mention has simply been in response to your false claims about my behavior. Your attempt to in personality evaluation based on something I haven't done (comment on Borg's post) is as ridiculous as your numerous attempts over the years to evaluate and smear the behaviors of all that disagree with you in any way. It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive regimes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide. Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that Richman is right there with you in spirit! Paranoid ideation and conspiracy theories duly noted. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that the vast majority of RAO readers have not commented on Borg's post. Note that Krueger has failed to establish any causal connection between failure to comment on a post and approving that post. Note that he has simply given RAO additional evidence of what Bob Morein has referred to as "bad science". I'm sure that all of the posters on RAO that have chosen not to comment on JBorg's post about Krueger will be surprised to find out that we have all been equated with "repressive regimes". They don't hold themselves out as mental health professionals and guardians of the public good like you do, Richman. Of courwe not, Krueger. Most of the people here have other occupations. The fact that I am a mental health professional has nothing to do with repressive regimes. Your silly attempt to equate attempts at repression with that profession simply illustrate your woeful ignorance about what clinical psychologists actually do. Of course, you've also made false statements about the licensing requirements for psychologists so that is not surprising. And, of course, no attempts have been made by me or any other rational person here to talk about the public good - which you fail to define in any way. And as you are probably aware, antiSemitism is unlikely to be a cause I would champion or support. So your pathological attempts to equate my behavior with that of a repressive regime are ludicrous. Further, as Bob Morein has recently documented, it appears that you have tried to restrict and repress the free flow of information on another audio NG so your comments about repressive regimes have been shown to be hypocritical. No doubt Krueger also thinks tha RAHE, from which he has been banned, is also a repressive regime. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that, in an effort to avoid responding to salient observations made by me, Krueger engages in attempts to distract readers by his customary cut-and-paste dronig of irrelevant statements made earlier in the post. Note that Richman is so excited that he can't even spell simple words right. Note Richman's attempt to distract the discussion from his inability to comment on the contents of the morally reprehensible JBorg post, even though he's now mentioned its existence many times. Note that Krueger's pathetic attempt to talk about typographical errors conveniently ignores the fact that he has been freuently observed to engage in botched grammar, incoherent sentences, and of course, spelling errors. Note also that mentions of Borg's post have only been made in response to Krueger's paranoid accuasations about silence equaling commenation. Note further that Krueger has failed repeatedly to establish a causal connection between failure to condemn a post and approval of the same post. Note also that his attempt to make the ridiculous false claim that failure to codemn a post equals approval of that post is just another example of "Bad Science". And as Bob Morein has recently pointed out, it appears that on rec.audio.tech, Krueger is attempting to restrict free speech and start his *own* repressive regime. No, my goal has been to provide a demonstration of how Bruce Richman is highly selective in his public judgments, and won't say one critical word about someone who viciously and gratuitously attacks the same people that Bruce Richman likes to gratuitously attack. The above satements are blatantly false, as any rational reader can easily discern. Krueger recently attempted to provide proof of gratuitous attacks that he wrongfully imaged I have made. He and McKelvy have made this false claim many times over the years. And the first post he listed as evidence of an unprovoked attack contained a discussion of the music of Daniel Lanois between myself and another poster. It had nothign to do wit Krueger. LOL !! Theefore Krueger's false claims about my judgments and posts are serioulsy lacking in credibility. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that as Krueger has done in he past in attempts to promote his self-serving and quite paranoid propaganda, he has engaged in cut-and-paste repetition of the same claims ad nauseum. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
George M. Middius wrote:
Bruce J. Richman said: Note that there is no documented evidence that either George Middius or I have "complimented" Mr. Borg for his recent analysis of Krueger's behavior. Did "jborg" say Krooger is a piece of **** or something similar? If so, I offer felicitations for an accurate analysis. As is normally the case, compulsive liar Krueger has simply attempted to engage in mind-reading once again, while at the same time making predictiosn the topic of a hypocritical double standard - one rule for Krueger and another for his many enemies. Would you like me to mind-control you into saying what you really think about Krooger? That's what I'm best at in my role as RAO Cliquemaster. We are all part of a repressive regime populated with racists, antiSemites, liberals, radical Islam fundamentalists, tube bigots, vinyl bigots, and subjectivists that are conspiring against him. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any judgment, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and commendable behavior? That is a lie. Show where I have claimed it is normal and commendable behavior. Richman you've set yourself up as our resident mental health expert. Interestingly enough, you seem to only be able to comment on the mental health of people who disagree with you. In the process you let any amount of reprehensible behavior go scott free. Actually, Krueger, your claim that I have set myself up as RAO's resident mental health expert is just another lie and a figment of your imagination. Comments about the mental health of a few people on RAO in recent times (you and McKelvy) have absolutely nothing to do with agreement or disagreement as you incorrectly assert. If your claim were true, which it is not, I would then be making comments on the mental health of other people whose views on individual prefernces, politics and a host of other topics talked about here do not correspond to mine. As others here have pointed out, the reason you are held in contempt my many has nothing to do with your anti-tube, anti-vinyl, anti-individual-prefernce bisases. Rather, it has come about because of your compulsive tendncy to engage in personal attacks against people who don't agree with your biases and endorse your agenda. However, your mindfreading effort to infer what I am thinking and criticize me (and by extension, all others) for not criticizing JBorg's post is of course, ridiculous and assumes facts not in evidence. Richman, I notice that even when prompted, you still can't bring yourself to comment on JBorg's post. You dance around it, but you won't address it. Krueger, you were not engaging in a prompt, you were engaging in making a false claim not borne out by any evidence. And once again, here, you try and distract others from seeing that basic reality. It would appear that the vast majority of RAO's readership has failed to comment on JBorg's post as well, yet you have failed to make the same false claim about them. Therefore, it would appear that you are not really interested in condemnation, you are simply trying (and failing) to rationalize another one of your unprovoked personal attacks. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. lack of Krueger to dispute this valid observation is glaringly obvious in his failure to respond We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. McKelvy commented on it, but you still haven't, Richman. McKelvy also has claimed that I don't exist and has made numerous reprehensible false claims about me. Did y somehow miss your condemnation of those posts? It is also a fact that the majority of the RAO readership has also not commented on Mr. Borg's recent post about you. Therefore, it is obvious that you are simply posturing and attempting to engage in another unprovoked personal attack. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly as he does. In other words, you cannot defense your ridiculous false and probably delusional claim that all who have not commented on JBorg's post approve of it. I never said any such thing. In other words, you approve of the fact that others have not commented on Borg's post, but somehow have managed to single me out for a personal attack for the same behavior. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that Krueger continues to try and promote his latest self-serving unprovoked personal attack in which he fails to mention the documented fact that almot nobody has commented on the Borg post. Note further that Krueger has never raised one word of protest concerning the patently false personal attacks and libelous claims made in numerous attack threads perpetuated by McKelvy. This would suggest to most people that Krueger's claim that others condone this post - without any evidence of course - is simply another example of his paranoid views of what happens on RAO. The fact that you've mentioned it so many times without actually commenting on it tells a lot of about your character Richman, or lack thereof. Actually, Krueger, my mention has simply been in response to your false claims about my behavior. Your attempt to in personality evaluation based on something I haven't done (comment on Borg's post) is as ridiculous as your numerous attempts over the years to evaluate and smear the behaviors of all that disagree with you in any way. It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive regimes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide. Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that Richman is right there with you in spirit! Paranoid ideation and conspiracy theories duly noted. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that the vast majority of RAO readers have not commented on Borg's post. Note that Krueger has failed to establish any causal connection between failure to comment on a post and approving that post. Note that he has simply given RAO additional evidence of what Bob Morein has referred to as "bad science". I'm sure that all of the posters on RAO that have chosen not to comment on JBorg's post about Krueger will be surprised to find out that we have all been equated with "repressive regimes". They don't hold themselves out as mental health professionals and guardians of the public good like you do, Richman. Of courwe not, Krueger. Most of the people here have other occupations. The fact that I am a mental health professional has nothing to do with repressive regimes. Your silly attempt to equate attempts at repression with that profession simply illustrate your woeful ignorance about what clinical psychologists actually do. Of course, you've also made false statements about the licensing requirements for psychologists so that is not surprising. And, of course, no attempts have been made by me or any other rational person here to talk about the public good - which you fail to define in any way. And as you are probably aware, antiSemitism is unlikely to be a cause I would champion or support. So your pathological attempts to equate my behavior with that of a repressive regime are ludicrous. Further, as Bob Morein has recently documented, it appears that you have tried to restrict and repress the free flow of information on another audio NG so your comments about repressive regimes have been shown to be hypocritical. No doubt Krueger also thinks tha RAHE, from which he has been banned, is also a repressive regime. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that, in an effort to avoid responding to salient observations made by me, Krueger engages in attempts to distract readers by his customary cut-and-paste dronig of irrelevant statements made earlier in the post. Note that Richman is so excited that he can't even spell simple words right. Note Richman's attempt to distract the discussion from his inability to comment on the contents of the morally reprehensible JBorg post, even though he's now mentioned its existence many times. Note that Krueger's pathetic attempt to talk about typographical errors conveniently ignores the fact that he has been freuently observed to engage in botched grammar, incoherent sentences, and of course, spelling errors. Note also that mentions of Borg's post have only been made in response to Krueger's paranoid accuasations about silence equaling commenation. Note further that Krueger has failed repeatedly to establish a causal connection between failure to condemn a post and approval of the same post. Note also that his attempt to make the ridiculous false claim that failure to codemn a post equals approval of that post is just another example of "Bad Science". And as Bob Morein has recently pointed out, it appears that on rec.audio.tech, Krueger is attempting to restrict free speech and start his *own* repressive regime. No, my goal has been to provide a demonstration of how Bruce Richman is highly selective in his public judgments, and won't say one critical word about someone who viciously and gratuitously attacks the same people that Bruce Richman likes to gratuitously attack. The above satements are blatantly false, as any rational reader can easily discern. Krueger recently attempted to provide proof of gratuitous attacks that he wrongfully imaged I have made. He and McKelvy have made this false claim many times over the years. And the first post he listed as evidence of an unprovoked attack contained a discussion of the music of Daniel Lanois between myself and another poster. It had nothign to do wit Krueger. LOL !! Theefore Krueger's false claims about my judgments and posts are serioulsy lacking in credibility. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that as Krueger has done in he past in attempts to promote his self-serving and quite paranoid propaganda, he has engaged in cut-and-paste repetition of the same claims ad nauseum. Bruce J. Richman Pretty much what you do. You keep repeating the same gibberish over and over expecting that it will make a difference. Psychotic, blah, blah, slander, blah, blah, blah, libel, blah, blah, liar, blah, blah. No wonder you like vinyl, you;re a broken record. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
Kroo**** wrote:
JBorg wrote: I was provoke after re-reading and remembering how Arnii denigrated the opinions I expressed about stress and its effect towards behavior with regards to dbt. You call them denigrations, I call them alternative opinions and relevant facts. You mean that crabs, when stressed, evacuate their digestive systems and die? You stupid fool. I had crabs last week and after I cooked 'em and turn red, everything is still inside, idiot, so I ate them all you witless dip****. Comments that Arnii made to the post in question do not require a direct yes or no answer. Somehow I managed to deal with the technical issue without a discussion of sexual parts. Too bad you lack the maturity and sanity to do the same, Borg. It was made solely to ridicule myself Really. So you are such a paranoid Borg that anybody who disagrees with you is denigrating you, your family, your sexuality, etc? and so, I choose that opening to pay him back in kind. Except that there was no such kind of post to pay back. You do not set the criterion or the types of reaction you get for your obnoxious behaviour. At the beginning of time, you have insulted me, you deliberately spat on me, and you maliciously misrepresented my beliefs about high-end audio. He also made numerous umprovoked attack to me on that thread. I believe I pointed out that you got some severe problems expressing yourself, such as evidenced in this sentence of yours just above. Now remind of how this equates to your filthy post of yesterday? If I have problems expressing myself, why else would you be so riled up pasting and re-pasting the post about Kroobitch and the pastor all over Rao asking for pity? For his atrocities and malevolence of time past, should Arnii be exempt for payback at later time? In the case I'm looking at here JBorg, you made plenty of provocations. Here's an example: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=ff...0posting .goo gle.com Bottom line JBorg is that you get your thrills making filthy posts, and I just happen to be a convenient target for your antisocial, immature weirdness. You seem to know that no matter what kind of reprehensible, filthy things you say, people like Richman and sockpuppet Wheel will applaud you, as they have here. Here's the other end of that line: "You" will not define the kind of treatment you get and deserve in return. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
George M. Middius wrote:
Bruce J. Richman said: Note that there is no documented evidence that either George Middius or I have "complimented" Mr. Borg for his recent analysis of Krueger's behavior. Did "jborg" say Krooger is a piece of **** or something similar? If so, I offer felicitations for an accurate analysis. Krooger continuously redefine the true meaning of what a piece of **** should be. So in a way, he's a remarkably wonderful kind of one piece of ****. A phenomenal ****, if I may. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
JBorg said: Did "jborg" say Krooger is a piece of **** or something similar? If so, I offer felicitations for an accurate analysis. A phenomenal ****, if I may. An epochal ****, indeed. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
Michael McKelvy wrote:
Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "JBorg" wrote in message om Arny Krueger wrote: My claim is that I Shut the **** up. Is there a problem here, you retarded simpleton? My claim is that Susan Kroobitch is not takin in enough dough from her nightly rounds in the back alleys there in Detroit. What a stupid ****. Therefore here's a thing to do: Have a gynecologist and proctologist detach, retouch and reattach her vagina away from her asshole and stitch them both back to their normal, original position. That might do the trick. Then have the pastor from your local church give that wrinkled gaping vagina his blessing by asking her next Sunday to come forward during the mass and order her to spread her pussy apart in front of the congregation for everyones full view. If the pastor's cock rise immediately after pulling his own pants down while standing next to her, that means she has his blessing. She is good to go, you incoherent, staggering cumstain. That's the advice for Arnii Kroo**** the embittered pederast. Notice that Bruce Richman, by his silence wants you to believe that this is perfectly normal and commendable behavior. Unprovoked personal attack duly noted. Richman, how is a personal attack since I present it without any judgment, and you claim that it is indeed perfectly normal and commendable behavior? That is a lie. Show where I have claimed it is normal and commendable behavior. Richman you've set yourself up as our resident mental health expert. Interestingly enough, you seem to only be able to comment on the mental health of people who disagree with you. In the process you let any amount of reprehensible behavior go scott free. Actually, Krueger, your claim that I have set myself up as RAO's resident mental health expert is just another lie and a figment of your imagination. Comments about the mental health of a few people on RAO in recent times (you and McKelvy) have absolutely nothing to do with agreement or disagreement as you incorrectly assert. If your claim were true, which it is not, I would then be making comments on the mental health of other people whose views on individual prefernces, politics and a host of other topics talked about here do not correspond to mine. As others here have pointed out, the reason you are held in contempt my many has nothing to do with your anti-tube, anti-vinyl, anti-individual-prefernce bisases. Rather, it has come about because of your compulsive tendncy to engage in personal attacks against people who don't agree with your biases and endorse your agenda. However, your mindfreading effort to infer what I am thinking and criticize me (and by extension, all others) for not criticizing JBorg's post is of course, ridiculous and assumes facts not in evidence. Richman, I notice that even when prompted, you still can't bring yourself to comment on JBorg's post. You dance around it, but you won't address it. Krueger, you were not engaging in a prompt, you were engaging in making a false claim not borne out by any evidence. And once again, here, you try and distract others from seeing that basic reality. It would appear that the vast majority of RAO's readership has failed to comment on JBorg's post as well, yet you have failed to make the same false claim about them. Therefore, it would appear that you are not really interested in condemnation, you are simply trying (and failing) to rationalize another one of your unprovoked personal attacks. It is noteworthy that Krueger has neglected to mention that so far, EVERYBODY POSTING OR LURKING ON RAO has also been silent about this post. Therefore, it would appear that Krueger thinks that all on RAO beiieve this is normal and commendable behavior. lack of Krueger to dispute this valid observation is glaringly obvious in his failure to respond We shall all eagerly await Krueger's advancing the theory that by his silence, Michael McKelvy also thinks this is normal and commendable behavior. McKelvy commented on it, but you still haven't, Richman. McKelvy also has claimed that I don't exist and has made numerous reprehensible false claims about me. Did y somehow miss your condemnation of those posts? It is also a fact that the majority of the RAO readership has also not commented on Mr. Borg's recent post about you. Therefore, it is obvious that you are simply posturing and attempting to engage in another unprovoked personal attack. As do____________________ (fill in the blank of any RAO poster not named either Krueger or McKelvy). LOL! It's easy to conclude that Richman feels he is perfectly justified as long as there is one other person who acts as spinelessly as he does, or if there are even many other people who act as spinelessly as he does. In other words, you cannot defense your ridiculous false and probably delusional claim that all who have not commented on JBorg's post approve of it. I never said any such thing. In other words, you approve of the fact that others have not commented on Borg's post, but somehow have managed to single me out for a personal attack for the same behavior. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that Krueger continues to try and promote his latest self-serving unprovoked personal attack in which he fails to mention the documented fact that almot nobody has commented on the Borg post. Note further that Krueger has never raised one word of protest concerning the patently false personal attacks and libelous claims made in numerous attack threads perpetuated by McKelvy. This would suggest to most people that Krueger's claim that others condone this post - without any evidence of course - is simply another example of his paranoid views of what happens on RAO. The fact that you've mentioned it so many times without actually commenting on it tells a lot of about your character Richman, or lack thereof. Actually, Krueger, my mention has simply been in response to your false claims about my behavior. Your attempt to in personality evaluation based on something I haven't done (comment on Borg's post) is as ridiculous as your numerous attempts over the years to evaluate and smear the behaviors of all that disagree with you in any way. It's thinking like this that has empowered any number of repressive regimes throughout history. It's thinking like this that empowers the KKK, Hamas, and any number of other terrorist groups worldwide. Racists and anti-Semites of the world, do what you will knowing that Richman is right there with you in spirit! Paranoid ideation and conspiracy theories duly noted. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that the vast majority of RAO readers have not commented on Borg's post. Note that Krueger has failed to establish any causal connection between failure to comment on a post and approving that post. Note that he has simply given RAO additional evidence of what Bob Morein has referred to as "bad science". I'm sure that all of the posters on RAO that have chosen not to comment on JBorg's post about Krueger will be surprised to find out that we have all been equated with "repressive regimes". They don't hold themselves out as mental health professionals and guardians of the public good like you do, Richman. Of courwe not, Krueger. Most of the people here have other occupations. The fact that I am a mental health professional has nothing to do with repressive regimes. Your silly attempt to equate attempts at repression with that profession simply illustrate your woeful ignorance about what clinical psychologists actually do. Of course, you've also made false statements about the licensing requirements for psychologists so that is not surprising. And, of course, no attempts have been made by me or any other rational person here to talk about the public good - which you fail to define in any way. And as you are probably aware, antiSemitism is unlikely to be a cause I would champion or support. So your pathological attempts to equate my behavior with that of a repressive regime are ludicrous. Further, as Bob Morein has recently documented, it appears that you have tried to restrict and repress the free flow of information on another audio NG so your comments about repressive regimes have been shown to be hypocritical. No doubt Krueger also thinks tha RAHE, from which he has been banned, is also a repressive regime. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that, in an effort to avoid responding to salient observations made by me, Krueger engages in attempts to distract readers by his customary cut-and-paste dronig of irrelevant statements made earlier in the post. Note that Richman is so excited that he can't even spell simple words right. Note Richman's attempt to distract the discussion from his inability to comment on the contents of the morally reprehensible JBorg post, even though he's now mentioned its existence many times. Note that Krueger's pathetic attempt to talk about typographical errors conveniently ignores the fact that he has been freuently observed to engage in botched grammar, incoherent sentences, and of course, spelling errors. Note also that mentions of Borg's post have only been made in response to Krueger's paranoid accuasations about silence equaling commenation. Note further that Krueger has failed repeatedly to establish a causal connection between failure to condemn a post and approval of the same post. Note also that his attempt to make the ridiculous false claim that failure to codemn a post equals approval of that post is just another example of "Bad Science". And as Bob Morein has recently pointed out, it appears that on rec.audio.tech, Krueger is attempting to restrict free speech and start his *own* repressive regime. No, my goal has been to provide a demonstration of how Bruce Richman is highly selective in his public judgments, and won't say one critical word about someone who viciously and gratuitously attacks the same people that Bruce Richman likes to gratuitously attack. The above satements are blatantly false, as any rational reader can easily discern. Krueger recently attempted to provide proof of gratuitous attacks that he wrongfully imaged I have made. He and McKelvy have made this false claim many times over the years. And the first post he listed as evidence of an unprovoked attack contained a discussion of the music of Daniel Lanois between myself and another poster. It had nothign to do wit Krueger. LOL !! Theefore Krueger's false claims about my judgments and posts are serioulsy lacking in credibility. Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post. Note that as Krueger has done in he past in attempts to promote his self-serving and quite paranoid propaganda, he has engaged in cut-and-paste repetition of the same claims ad nauseum. Bruce J. Richman Pretty much what you do. You keep repeating the same gibberish over and over expecting that it will make a difference. Psychotic, blah, blah, slander, blah, blah, blah, libel, blah, blah, liar, blah, blah. No wonder you like vinyl, you;re a broken record. Another delusional IKYABWAI from the delusional compulsive liar, McKelvy, who is currently engaged in trying to perpetuate forever a smear campaign against me on RAO. He's failed in that regard and he's also failed to convince anybvody other than Krueger of any of his idootic claims. Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist Bruce J. Richman |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:58 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy"
wrote: Psychotic, blah, blah, slander, blah, blah, blah, libel, blah, blah, liar, blah, blah. Well, that's more coherent than you usually are. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
Dave Weil wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:58 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy" wrote: Psychotic, blah, blah, slander, blah, blah, blah, libel, blah, blah, liar, blah, blah. Well, that's more coherent than you usually are. Agreed. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Note that Richman still hasn't commented on the contents of the reprehensible JBorg post.
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:08:58 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy" wrote: Psychotic, blah, blah, slander, blah, blah, blah, libel, blah, blah, liar, blah, blah. Well, that's more coherent than you usually are. At least now I know your level of comprehension. :-( |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Google Proof of An Unprovoked Personal Attack from Krueger
*sigh*.. we could use a moderator
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message In May, 20003, a post was initiated by JBotg dealing with ABX test methodology. The Google record clearly indicates that I was not involved in this thread at all and not mentioned Krueger's name prior to the following unprovoked personal attack from Krueger: Time and date of the post I made was: 2003-05-16 03:13:29 PST What Richman doesn't say is that he had attacked me any number of times in other threads previously on the same day and on previous days. Here's the proof: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...uauthors=richm an%20&as_drrb=b&as_mind=14&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003& as_maxd=16&as_maxm=5&as_ma xy=2003 My claim is that I can leave Richman alone for days and weeks and he'll still try to gratuitously firebomb my posts. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Krueger - Defendant in RAO Libel Suit - Exhibits His Delusions | Audio Opinions | |||
| Memo to Krooborg | Audio Opinions | |||
| For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post | Audio Opinions | |||
Linear Mode
