"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Arny Krueger wrote:



Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Any and all professional activities and/or credentials I've
previously described on RAO are a matter of public record and
quite easily verified.

How about giving us a brief review?

And if I did, what would you say?

I can't predict the future.


Sure you can, since the only reason you asked the question was to
practice what has been referred to here as the "debating trade", i.e.
to try and elicit a response that you can then attack.



Kreuger's inability to refute this response, based on a documented history of
his online RAO behavior is duly noted.


Prove it?

I can't predict the future.


Not true.

Absolutely true. I can't predict the future. However people with mental
problems sometimes say they think they can.

Given your lenghty RAO demonstration of mental problems, your paranoid
conspiracy theories about Atkinson, cloiques controlled by Middius, and
numerous other symptoms of mental illness, your denial is similar to that of a
person addicted to prescription pani-killers who denies what is painfully
obvious to all who observe him.

Your past record of saying "Prove it" on numerous occasions when confronted
with factual information that exposes your lies is a matter of Google public
record. You have tried this evasie tactic designed to deny that you have lied
or simply been caught in another factual error on many occasioins.

Further, it is well known through empirical research in the field that you have
repeatedly smeared, psychology, that past behavior, due to conditioning
effects, is a very strong predictor of future behavior. It is also well known
that when trying to spread your anti-subjectivist, anti-individual-preference
bigotry on RAO you make PREDICTIONS frequently about the sounds of amplifiers,
cables, and other products you have never personally evaljuated in any way.



You have a documented Google record of saying "Prove it"
numerous times to statements made by many people.

This approach oftern works because people say many things for which they
have not one iota of proof. Richman, its not my fault that you happen to be
a leading example of people with that mental difficulty.

You;re lying again, Krueger. Your inability to tell the truth has been
repeatedly demonstrated on RAO. A number of both laymen and professional
psychologists posting on RAO have rather quickly, after observing your online
behavior, concluded that you are mentally ill. Symptoms characteristic of
those suffering from Paranoid Personality Disorder have been quoted from an
officila psychiatric source by at least 2 independent licensed psychologists
and the similarities between your online behavior and the symptoms described
has been discussed.by many that of observed your constant tendencies to engage
in unprovoked personal attacks upon both old and new posters alike - all in the
name of one of the many paranoid conspiracy theories you have invented from
your delusional view of the world.



Generally
speaking, you do this whenever you disagree with them or simply want
to avoid admission of a mistake or false claim you've previously made.

Responding to a request for proof is easy if one has the appropriate facts
at their command. If you got the cards you can play and if you don't you
better fold. Around here we've got a problem with people like you Richman,
who don't have the relevant facts, but who also don't want to admit that
they were just posturing. If you've got the relevant facts on your side,
just lay them out.

Practice what you preach, Krueger. Your constant evasions of requests for
proof for the many lies you have told over the years is one of the major
reasons that you are held in the widespread contempt and scorn by more RAO
posters than anybody else that has posted here. Proof for this has been
documented by Ed Shain and others. And while you may think you are fooling
people, Krueger, by referring to yourself and McKelvy as "we", it is pretty
obvious that the only people on RAO that seem to share your delusional,
libelous lies about be are the 2 of you.

LOL!


You can see my detailed response in a post directed at Ferstler some
months ago.

Sorry Bruce, but if this is how little you care about your
credentials, why would anybody respect them?

Apparently, Kreuger, you're are now trying to engage in mind-reading
my trying to interpret my refusal to do your howework for you.

It's not mind-reading Bruce, its observation of what is now a proven fact. I
make a polite request for you to just make some claims. I didn't even ask
for facts s to back them up. You've run away from the challenge, and
attacked me personally for my trouble.

That is a lie, Krueger. You were given an easy way for a person with your
self-professed Google search skills, which you chose not to use to avoid
reality at times. As stated before, although nobody on RAO is obligated in any
way to respond to the questions of a documented liar and flamer like yourself,
my professiional credentials are a matter of public record and have been posted
previously on Google. Since you have seen fit to make libelous claims about me
in the past, you obviously don't believe them and choose to avoid reality. It
is also a documented fact that you have harassed Scott Wheeler for personal
information such as various banking data, social security number, etc. for
which you have no possible use - in an effort to divert the attention of both
Mr. Wheeler and RAO readers that you are now being sued for libel for making
false statements about his behavior. Of course, you have made similar libelous
statements about my professional activities with clear malicious intent - and
have done so against others as well. It has also been reported that you have
filed complaints against the ISP providers of various RAO members whom you
oppose without any valid reason for doing so.



How
hypocritical since you have in the past, when asked for Google
references, to support some of your claims, refused to provide them.

So what? I've tirelessly documented my claims for years, only to have the
documentation dismissed or abused. I've no doubt documented more claims on
RAO than any other person ever has. I've therefore seen that documentation
dismissed more than anybody else has. Enough is enough!

Although most of us here would disagree with this, you now expect others such
as myself to document my claims so that you can dismiss it as you've done in
the past? Your obvious need to invoke a double standard here in which
avoidance of providing proof is ok for you, but not acceptable for those whom
you constantly attack. You have just admitted to frequent avoidance of
requests for proof when you have lied about others and engaged in character
assassination. You also now appear to be saying that you will not respond to
request for proof because people dismiss your attempts. This sure sounds like
you are now predictin how other people will act in the future.



I have no need to advertise my credentials repeatedly on RAO.

Answering simple relevant questions isn't advertising, Richman.

Avoidance of requests for proof of your lies on numerous prior occasions, can
not be rationalized, Krueger. How do you define repeated posts about a
person's credentials, Krueger? Many would call that advertising.





You,
OTOH, apparently have a need to try and invent interpretations that
will support your personal attacks. Why should anybody believe that
you can read my mind or interpret my behavior in a valid way?

I don't need to be a rocket scientist Richman, to correctly perceive that
you're running away from a challenge that would be simple to satisfy if you
were who you say you are. You say that you've already posted this
information once for Ferstler, and he hasn't posted here more than once or
twice in a long time. So, its been a long time since you answered questions
like these.

There is no need to repeat what alol other RAO posters except you and McKelvy
have long accepted as factual. Why don't you admit that your sole reason for
asking any questions about my background is to support your friend, McKelvy's,
latest attempts to promote libelous, false claims about my activities. It's
been a long time since you've responded in an honest manner to the numerous
requests for proof of your lies on RAO. In point of fact, as others have
pointed out, you have never admitted that you've purposely lied about the
activities and views of others, even when shown clearly to have done so.



But Richman, you already gave us your answer, and now we're going to hold
you responsible for the proven fact that when simply and relevantly asked
for relevant information about yourself, you just ran away screaming like a
mad man!

LOL!


You're laughing at yourself, Krueger, and many of us are laughing at you. And
unlike your use of the word "we" to desribe only yourself and McKelvy, I'm
using the term "rest of us" to convey the message that a significant number of
those
posting on RAO have quickly determined that you are a compulsive liar, engage
in delusional, paranoid conspiracy theories that drive your smear campaigns,
and exhibit many symptoms of a mentally ill person, with significant
similarities to the personality characteristics officially descried by
professional psychologists and psychiatrists as Paranoid Personality Disorder.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist (Florida)