"ScottW" wrote in message
news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...
You're a liar and an idiot.

ScottW



Hey Arny,
No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

ScottW

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...

You're a liar and an idiot.

Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.

ScottW

Hey Arny,

No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb, obsessing
over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess what? I was
off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later making my rounds...

BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so completely and
ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his point that he's
unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the one that
Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text and moved it
around until it told the story he wanted. He's obviously taking his lessons
in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he said at
the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:10:50 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...

You're a liar and an idiot.

Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.

ScottW

Hey Arny,

No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb, obsessing
over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess what? I was
off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later making my rounds...

BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so completely and
ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his point that he's
unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the one that
Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text and moved it
around until it told the story he wanted. He's obviously taking his lessons
in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he said at
the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

I'm still waiting for you to produce any proof of your claim.

This is what you do when you *can't* back up claims. You start
blustering about other things.

It's simple, Arnold - produce the claim or apologize. I didn't edit
anything here - I'm asking you a direct question. Can you or can you
not produce a quote where he dissed equipment simply based on its
country of origin?

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:10:50 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...

You're a liar and an idiot.

Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.

Hey Arny,

No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb,
obsessing over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess
what? I was off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later
making my rounds...

BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so
completely and ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his
point that he's unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the
one that Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text
and moved it around until it told the story he wanted. He's
obviously taking his lessons in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he
said at the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

I'm still waiting for you to produce any proof of your claim.

The fact that Scotty is so clearly in the post-butchering business will tell
most people what they need to know about him. The fact that you Weil shortly
lie about the topic of the dispute between Scott and I should tell most
people what they need to know about you.

This is what you do when you *can't* back up claims. You start
blustering about other things.

Like I said, I had the proof in another window when I wrote the post. Scott
dropped the ball after I waited a reasonable amount of time.

However from working with you Weil for years, I know the next step. I
provide the proof and it's responded to by denial and dissembling.

It's simple, Arnold - produce the claim or apologize.

Sorry Ms. Dominatrix, I don't jump when you demand it.

I didn't edit anything here - I'm asking you a direct question.

You're not even really part of the discussion Weil. If you want to try to
play second for Scotty you can attempt to pull what you will, but I don't
have to honor it. You deserve dishonor. I'm glad to give you your just
deserts.

This is a common game around here - I provide the proof for a buttinsky, and
that allows the person who made the original deceptive claim to be free to
ignore it.

I've cornered just about every regular here, so I know exactly what happens
from long experience.

Can you or can you
not produce a quote where he dissed equipment simply based on its
country of origin?

That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

And this folks is how the RAO twist-him, turn-him tag-team attack game is
played. I learned of this game by watching people work over "Gene" when I
first started posting here.

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing. Because I
didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claimed you didn't
use the word "diss" or something like it. But I decided not to simply
to watch you do this. That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
tactic of yours.

Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
the group.

He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
the hook to supply the proof.

Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
EXIST.

I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing.

Sure Weil, and that's because you knew you were lying. You know that I tend
to catch you lying and complain about it. Obviously you know that you are
lying, or it wouldn't be a lie. That makes it easy for you to predict that I
will catch you lying and then I will complain about your lie(s).

Because I
didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claimed you didn't
use the word "diss" or something like it.

You're lying again, Weil. You've shifted focus from an entire sentence to
just one word: "diss". Predictably, you deleted what you had just claimed.
Now you're trying to change the focus from what you just said in your
previous post, to this one trivial word.

But I decided not to simply to watch you do this.

No Weil, you decided to do some more deceptive editing, and then you told
another lie.

That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
tactic of yours.

Given Weil that it's predictable that you'll lie and delete relevant text
and lie again, my tactics are indeed quite predictable. I take exception to
your lying and point out your simple-minded and utterly transparent
strategy.

Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
the group.

What to do when there are so many simpletons telling so many transparent
lies?

He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
the hook to supply the proof.

Oh come on Weil. My strategy is a lot more complex than that. I hold the
issue out as bait and put pressure on you guys until you tell lots and lots
of transparent lies. If any of you gets desperate enough to actually argue
based on the original facts, the whole situation blows up in your faces,
because I've got my facts straight. You just have to reward me by letting me
catch you lying enough, and then if I'm in the mood, I deliver what I had in
my pocket all along.

Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
EXIST.

By this time Weil you've told enough lies that I suspect that you've even
found the proof I've had in my pocket all along. Look at all the lies you've
told just this morning!

I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.

What would the "RAHE solution" be?

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:02:24 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:57:40 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

That's not what I claimed about Scotty in this case, Weil. Thanks for
showing your true deceptive colors so quickly.

You know, I almost wrote that you would do this exact thing.

Sure Weil, and that's because you knew you were lying. You know that I tend
to catch you lying and complain about it. Obviously you know that you are
lying, or it wouldn't be a lie.

Krooglish. What a wonderful thing.

That makes it easy for you to predict that I
will catch you lying and then I will complain about your lie(s).

No, it makes it easy for me to watch you implode.

Because I
didn't go back and get an *exact* quote, you can claim you didn't
use the word "diss" or something like it.

You're lying again, Weil. You've shifted focus from an entire sentence to
just one word: "diss".

No, I used that as an example.

Predictably, you deleted what you had just claimed.
Now you're trying to change the focus from what you just said in your
previous post, to this one trivial word.

No, it was an example.

Maybe you could compare what I said you said with what you actually
said.

But I decided not to simply to watch you do this.

No Weil, you decided to do some more deceptive editing, and then you told
another lie.

Liar.

That's also why I didn't bother to go back and
cut and paste your exact quote. I wanted to see you pull this common
tactic of yours.

Given Weil that it's predictable that you'll lie and delete relevant text
and lie again, my tactics are indeed quite predictable. I take exception to
your lying and point out your simple-minded and utterly transparent
strategy.

You don't even know which end is up.

Well guys, this is *exactly* the sort of thing that Arnold foists on
the group.

What to do when there are so many simpletons telling so many transparent
lies?

Fart on the group again, I guess. Way to go, Arnold. You should go
back to your role on Green Acres.

He claims that he *had* the proof in a window and was ready to send
it, but ScottW didn't reply in a timely fashion. So suddenly, he's off
the hook to supply the proof.

Oh come on Weil. My strategy is a lot more complex than that. I hold the
issue out as bait and put pressure on you guys until you tell lots and lots
of transparent lies. If any of you gets desperate enough to actually argue
based on the original facts, the whole situation blows up in your faces,
because I've got my facts straight. You just have to reward me by letting me
catch you lying enough, and then if I'm in the mood, I deliver what I had in
my pocket all along.

Please. Pulling out a cum-covered hand doesn't count.

Put up or shut up. Play all the games you want, but until you
"deliver", you're nothing but an impotent fool. Cumming in your pocket
doesn't count towards ending the impotence.

Well, the point is, Arnold doesn't have the proof because IT DOESN'T
EXIST.

By this time Weil you've told enough lies that I suspect that you've even
found the proof I've had in my pocket all along. Look at all the lies you've
told just this morning!

Haven't told a single lie.

Sorry.

You lose.

Again.

I wish you would take the RAHE solution. Now.

What would the "RAHE solution" be?

Leave.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:OEBsb.140$Ue4.136@fed1read01

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:6oBsb.100$Ue4.34@fed1read01...

You're a liar and an idiot.

Cut to the chase, that's the story that Scott wants to tell.

ScottW

Hey Arny,

No response yet. You must be a coward as well.

It's so ironic to see Scott who claims he's not an internet dweeb,
obsessing
over the fact that I didn't reply within 20 minutes. Guess what? I was
off-Usenet, enjoying my life. About 12 hours later making my rounds...

Yesterday you used an hour delayed response as reason you didn't need to
provide evidence to support your accusation.
You're a hypocrite as well.

BTW, note that Scott our self-proclaimed minion of truth, so completely
and
ruthlessly edited and *******ized my post to make his point that he's
unwilling to provide a link to the original text.

Here's the exchange with a little extra depth so the world can
see what a lying turd you a

I said:
Trots is so knowledgeable about audio he can pass judgment on
equipment he has never heard, all he needs to know is the
country of origin. How can you compete with knowledge
like that?

Arny replied:
And Scotty, how much audio gear have you passed judgment on here,
under the same conditions?

To which I replied:
None

Arny responded falsely:
Wrong. Do I need to provide quotes from google? I researched this issue
before I made my comment.

Which I then challenged:
Go for it. Show where I trashed any gear based solely on country
origin.


This exchange can be found in message ID:

QAdsb.28130$Zb7.7416@fed1read01


Hint: the original text tells a completely different story than the one
that
Scott wants it to tell. So Scott deceptively deleted text and moved it
around until it told the story he wanted. He's obviously taking his
lessons
in lying from Middius, Dormer, etc.

The facts are clear to anyone who isn't delusioned.


What does transparent lying like this make Scott? Just read what he said
at
the top of the post. It's auto-biographical. He's projecting.

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

ScottW

Scottie said to ****-for-Brains:

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

And, of course, exploring the bottom of Lake Superior.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Scottie said to ****-for-Brains:

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

And, of course, exploring the bottom of Lake Superior.

Lake Superior does not deserve to be the respository of
such toxic waste. Ship him to England in one those
old garbage scows.

ScottW

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:29:47 -0800, "ScottW"
wrote:


"George M. Middius" wrote in message
.. .


Scottie said to ****-for-Brains:

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

And, of course, exploring the bottom of Lake Superior.

Lake Superior does not deserve to be the respository of
such toxic waste. Ship him to England in one those
old garbage scows.

Excuse England??

--
td

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any evidence
or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to provide
any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
discussion.

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:32:13 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any evidence
or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to provide
any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
discussion.

IOW, he's right and you're wrong.

End of discussion.

dave weil said to ****-for-Brains:

IOW, he's right and you're wrong.
End of discussion.

That I'd like to see. There's a first time for everything.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any
evidence
or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to
provide
any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
discussion.

I presented the evidence. It is irrefutable fact.
Rather than admit your error, you slink away muttering
nonsense.

You're a liar, an idiot, a coward, a hypocrite,
and a pussy.

Is there anything left for you?
Besides Trots I mean.

ScottW

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:9ZWsb.661$Ue4.222@fed1read01

You're a liar, an idiot, and a coward.
You should be embarrassed and ashamed.

Scotty, since you've rendered your judgement without regard for any
evidence
or discussion I might present, there is obviously no need for me to
provide
any evidence or discussion. Your mind is made up and that is that. End of
discussion.



Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole you
are.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message


Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole
you are.

Which week was that? Give us a date.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message


Arny, it only took me about a week to figure you out what an asshole
you are.

Which week was that? Give us a date.


Look moron, it was the first week I ran into you,
It dosan't matter what the particular date was, unless
you want to celebrate the anniversary with a cake.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---