Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
In the dead of summer a fly was resting on a leaf
beside a lake. The hot, dry fly who said to no one in particular, "Gosh....if I go down three inches, I will feel the mist from the water and I will be refreshed." There was a fish in the water thinking, "Gosh...if that fly goes down three inches I can jump up and eat him." There was also a bear resting on the shore thinking "Gosh...if that fly goes down three inches...that fish will jump for the fly....and I will eat him." It also happened that there was a hunter was further up the bank of the lake preparing to eat a cheese sandwich. "Gosh" he thought "if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish leaps for it....that bear will expose himself and grab fo! r the fish. I'll shoot the bear and then have a proper lunch." You probably think this is enough activity for one bank of a lake, but I can tell you there was more. A wee mouse by the hunter's foot was thinking "Gosh....if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish jumps for that fly....and that bear grabs for that fish....the dumb hunter will shoot the bear and drop his cheese sandwich, which I c! an then eat." Finally, there was a cat lurking in the bushes took in this scene and thought "Gosh....if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish jumps for that fly....and that bear grabs for that fish...and that hunters shoots that bear... and that mouse makes off with the cheese sandwich....then I can have mouse for lunch while he's distracted." The poor fly, who is oblivious to all this activity around him, is finally so hot and so dry that he heads down for the cooling mist of the water. The fish then swallows the fly....the bear grabs the fish....the hunter shoots the bear....the mouse grabs the cheese sandwich....the cat jumps for the mouse....the mouse ducks....the cat falls into the water and drowns. The moral of the story is.....whenever a fly goes down three inches some pussy is probably in danger Bruce J. Richman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... In the dead of summer a fly was resting on a leaf beside a lake. The hot, dry fly who said to no one in particular, "Gosh....if I go down three inches, I will feel the mist from the water and I will be refreshed." There was a fish in the water thinking, "Gosh...if that fly goes down three inches I can jump up and eat him." There was also a bear resting on the shore thinking "Gosh...if that fly goes down three inches...that fish will jump for the fly....and I will eat him." It also happened that there was a hunter was further up the bank of the lake preparing to eat a cheese sandwich. "Gosh" he thought "if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish leaps for it....that bear will expose himself and grab fo! r the fish. I'll shoot the bear and then have a proper lunch." You probably think this is enough activity for one bank of a lake, but I can tell you there was more. A wee mouse by the hunter's foot was thinking "Gosh....if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish jumps for that fly....and that bear grabs for that fish....the dumb hunter will shoot the bear and drop his cheese sandwich, which I c! an then eat." Finally, there was a cat lurking in the bushes took in this scene and thought "Gosh....if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish jumps for that fly....and that bear grabs for that fish...and that hunters shoots that bear... and that mouse makes off with the cheese sandwich....then I can have mouse for lunch while he's distracted." The poor fly, who is oblivious to all this activity around him, is finally so hot and so dry that he heads down for the cooling mist of the water. The fish then swallows the fly....the bear grabs the fish....the hunter shoots the bear....the mouse grabs the cheese sandwich....the cat jumps for the mouse....the mouse ducks....the cat falls into the water and drowns. The moral of the story is.....whenever a fly goes down three inches some pussy is probably in danger LOL! Some pussies can be very cunning...just ask poor Kobe. Cheers, MvB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
snip lots of boring stuff The moral of the story is.....whenever a fly goes down three inches some pussy is probably in danger Bruce J. Richman Richman, are you a class act or what? ;-( |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
Arny Krueger wrote:
snip Krueger's deliberate selective editing typical of his pathological distortion of information Richman, are you a class act or what? A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. Thanks for illustrating once again your psychopathology for all to observe. Just another predictable example of why this sociopath is hated by most of RAO's posters. For further documentation, see the following historical account. The comments there are as valid today as when they were first made. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.worldnet.a tt.net&output=gplain Bruce J. Richman |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger Experiences: Unforgiven
Bruce J. Richman said: A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston 2. Joseph Oberländer 3. Stewart Pinkerton 4. Gary Bosemeier I'm sure there are others as well. The only contributors to RAO who avoid getting Kroo-slimed are the ones who post only rarely. Krooger is, apparently, as threatened by those who know more than him as by those who actively embrace his crackpot agendas. In short, speak your mind on RAO at your own risk -- no matter what you say, Krooger will eventually attack you for your words. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger Experiences: Unforgiven
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
Bruce J. Richman said: A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston There is no such person. 2. Joseph Oberländer Sometimes he screws up like his claim that it was our military leaders who kept us in Vietnam, and so I correct him. How is that what you claim, Middius? 3. Stewart Pinkerton Pinkerton has repeatedly said that he despises me. Here's one example: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ws.fsnet.co.uk "Arny, you are the most despicable pile of snot on the newsgroups." Since you immediately quote his post Middius, we've got proof again that you're a habitual liar. 4. Gary Bosemeier Proof? I'm sure there are others as well. I'm sure that you're a habitual liar, Middiot. But that's hardly news to most RAO regulars, right? The only contributors to RAO who avoid getting Kroo-slimed are the ones who post only rarely. Krooger is, apparently, as threatened by those who know more than him as by those who actively embrace his crackpot agendas. In short, speak your mind on RAO at your own risk -- no matter what you say, Krooger will eventually attack you for your words. I don't attack people for their words unless they are unbelievably foul or reprehensible lies. That puts you right in the middle of my sights on both counts, Middiot. As far as your general RAO poster goes, if I disagree with what they say, I just might say so. I realize that honest reasoned disagreement is something that you don't understand Middiot, but for appearances sake, you might want to act like you do understand it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger Experiences: Unforgiven
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger & Phoebe Johnston Experiences: Unforgiven
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston Agreed. "despite their good intentions"... Gack! Why is he on the list? He made his employer (ATT) look bad... just ask George. But do so only in hushed tones. Talking about it (Phoebe) can make George go ballistic for many posts to come otherwise . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger & Phoebe Johnston Experiences: Unforgiven
Powell lied: A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston Agreed. "despite their good intentions"... Gack! Why is he on the list? Because you are a much bigger idiot than Phoebe ever was. Want proof? Just imagine yourself in the same room with her, and poof! in flies a rabid vampire bat. Which one of you does it bite? Since you've never experienced insight into the physical nature of the universe, you shouldn't be able to divine Phoebe's thoughts. That's why the bat bites you. He made his employer (ATT) look bad... just ask George. Yes, you confessed that you attacked the Witch at her place of employment. That makes you fully the equal of Bwian McDip****. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger & Phoebe Johnston Experiences: Unforgiven
Powell wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston Agreed. "despite their good intentions"... Gack! Why is he on the list? He made his employer (ATT) look bad... just ask George. But do so only in hushed tones. Talking about it (Phoebe) can make George go ballistic for many posts to come otherwise . Just as a point of clarification, Powell, George wrote almost all of the above, not me. My only comment above was the word, "agreed". Apparently, Mr. Lynch is just the most recent example of Krueger's unprovoked smears and personal attacks - and this is a guy who claims he supported him. So George's point re. Krueger's typical hatemongering campaigns appears to be pretty well supported IMHO. Bruce J. Richman |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger & Phoebe Johnston Experiences: Unforgiven
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote Just as a point of clarification, Powell, George wrote almost all of the above, not me. My only comment above was the word, "agreed". Acknowledged. I was trolling for flounder fish (George) . |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger & Phoebe Johnston Experiences: Unforgiven
"George M. Middius" wrote A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston Agreed. "despite their good intentions"... Gack! Why is he on the list? Because you are a much bigger idiot than Phoebe ever was. Want proof? Just imagine yourself in the same room with her, and poof! in flies a rabid vampire bat. Which one of you does it bite? -Since you've never experienced insight into the physical nature of the universe, you shouldn't be able to divine Phoebe's thoughts. That's why the bat bites you. Hehehe... "rabid vampire bat?" Time to increase your psychotic medication intake, George. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Krooger & Phoebe Johnston Experiences: Unforgiven
Powell said: A more interesting list would be the Kroopologists and would-be allies of Turdy whom Krooger has shat upon despite their good intentions towards him. 1. Phoebe Johnston Agreed. "despite their good intentions"... Gack! Why is he on the list? Because you are a much bigger idiot than Phoebe ever was. Want proof? Just imagine yourself in the same room with her, and poof! in flies a rabid vampire bat. Which one of you does it bite? -Since you've never experienced insight into the physical nature of the universe, you shouldn't be able to divine Phoebe's thoughts. That's why the bat bites you. Hehehe... "rabid vampire bat?" Time to increase your psychotic medication intake, George. zzzzzz |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: snip Krueger's deliberate selective editing typical of his pathological distortion of information Richman, are you a class act or what? A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. Thanks for illustrating once again your psychopathology for all to observe. Just another predictable example of why this sociopath is hated by most of RAO's posters. For further documentation, see the following historical account. The comments there are as valid today as when they were first made. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.worldnet.a tt.net&output=gplain Bruce J. Richman |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: snip Krueger's deliberate selective editing typical of his pathological distortion of information Richman, are you a class act or what? A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. Only by a certain few. Thanks for illustrating once again your psychopathology for all to observe. That he can edit down to a few words to ge is point across? They have term for for that? Wow! Just another predictable example of why this sociopath is hated by most of RAO's posters. Speak for yourself, you're marginally qualified there. For further documentation, see the following historical account. The comments there are as valid today as when they were first made. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.worldnet.a tt.net&output=gplain Bruce J. Richman For furter reference on what a dickhead Quackenbush is, read any three responses of his to anything AK says. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: snip Krueger's deliberate selective editing typical of his pathological distortion of information Notice Richman's deliberate total obliteration of the post he claims to be commenting on. I guess he's trying to claim that selective editing (done for the sake of clarity and brevity) is morally worse than totally obliterating the facts so that people have to scout around to find them. Richman, are you a class act or what? A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. So what are you claiming Richman - that you're not hated or that you're not a leading purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters? Both claims would be lies, of course. Thanks for illustrating once again your psychopathology for all to observe. To review, one symptom of a pathology would be that it makes the pathological person unhappy and unable to form stable relationships, etc. Now I'm obviously pretty happy (having this romp at Richman's expense) and its well-known that in the real world I have many stable and lengthy relationships. OTOH, in this post Richman seems to be very unhappy and in fact we know nothing about Richman's real-world relationships. So who's more pathological, Richman or Krueger? Just another predictable example of why this sociopath is hated by most of RAO's posters. Most of RAO's regular posters are sociopaths or borderline sociopaths, like Phillips, Richman, Weil, Middius, Devil, Maggie, etc. So the fact that they would have problems with a person who is reasonably sane and well-adjusted should be no surprise. For further documentation, see the following historical account. The comments there are as valid today as when they were first made. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.worldnet.a tt.net&output=gplain Just another unhappy sociopath (who seems to have almost completely disappeared off the face of Usenet) venting his frustrations. BTW, it appears that one of Ed's current ventures (after the collapse of Vergence) can be examined by visiting www.metropolisdvd.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
Arny Krueger wrote:
Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: snip Krueger's deliberate selective editing typical of his pathological distortion of information Notice Richman's deliberate total obliteration of the post he claims to be commenting on. I guess he's trying to claim that selective editing (done for the sake of clarity and brevity) is morally worse than totally obliterating the facts so that people have to scout around to find them. Just more obfuscation and blather from RAO's most detested poster. Note that Krueger once again fails to take responsibility for leveling an provoked attack against me after I posted a joke on RAO which had no reference to him whatsoever. All that has followed since from his lying responses has been a pathetic attempt to avoid dealing with this basic fact. Richman, are you a class act or what? A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. So what are you claiming Richman - that you're not hated or that you're not a leading purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters? Note Krueger's attempt to change the subject. His comment above about class acts in reesponse to a joke I posted on RAO was just one of a 7 year history of unprovoked personal attacks made against me - as well as many other posters - by this obnoxious liar and hatemonger. There is no evidene, as usual, to support any of his claims about hatred directed at me except by him , of course, and one or two parasitic clones such as McKelvey. OTOH, we have a thead entitled, "Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience?" which outlines quite clearly the vast number of different posters that have been slandered, defamed, smeared, and attacked by Krueger for no logical reason. Both claims would be lies, of course. Thanks for illustrating once again your psychopathology for all to observe. To review, one symptom of a pathology would be that it makes the pathological person unhappy and unable to form stable relationships, etc. This is not necessaril;y true, even allowing for your total lack of insight re. your own psychopathology. It's also circular and unsupported by any facts. Many scientifically accepted and validated symptoms of psychopathology do not, as far as has been proven, make people unhappy. For example, Krueger posts delusional thoughts about sockpuppet conspiracies here on a fairly regular basis. (See his comments about Middius, Atkinson, etc. in which he accuses them of running sockpuppets). There is no evidence that his delusional rantings on this subject make him unhappy. If, as he claims, without any empricial evidence to support it (see below), he has no trouble forming interpersonal relationships that are stable, then apparently his delusiional rantings about sockpuppets don't interfere with "ability". Of course, one could also point out that "stable interpersonal relationships" don't indicate that the other people involve even LIKE Krueger. Once could say he has *many* stable interpersonal relationships on RAO - and almost all of them involve people that are disgusted and revolted by his obnoxious and irrational behavior. LOL!. Now I'm obviously pretty happy (having this romp at Richman's expense) and its well-known that in the real world I have many stable and lengthy relationships. There is no eviudence whatsoever, other than in the diseased and empty cavities of Krueger's "mind" (such as it is) that he has accomplished anything here other than make a fool of himself by pretending to (a) know something about psychopathology, (b) know something about how interpersonal relationships develop), and (c) insult the intelligence of all RAO readers by once again failing to address the basic fact that he leveled a personal attack against a joke I posted which never referred to him at all. There is no evidence provided to substantiate Krueger's probable false claim that he has many stable and lengthy personal relationships. Are we to take this proven liar's word for it? I think not. OTOH, there is a 7 year history of Krueger's "stable and length" interpersonal relationships on RAO that he has formed. Yes, indeed. They are many. They are stable. They are lengthy. And has pointed out over by many people over a 7 year period, most of them involve relationships in which the other party has quickly developed an intense feeling of revulsion, disgust and dislike because of Krueger's well-documented history of engaging in unprovoked personal attacks against them. OTOH, in this post Richman seems to be very unhappy and in fact we know nothing about Richman's real-world relationships. So who's more pathological, Richman or Krueger? Not even a rational or logical try to change the subject under investigation. Since Krueger's claims about psychopatholgoy and interpersonal relationships have been shown to be illogical and unsupported by any empirical evidence, who cares about what questions he now tries, unsuccessfully to raise, to change the focus - namely, his latest unprovoked personal attack against me - as exemplified by his comments about a joke that I posted. Note that he has still not given any defense for this incontrovertible fact. And of course, he never will, given his basic dishonesty. Just another predictable example of why this sociopath is hated by most of RAO's posters. Most of RAO's regular posters are sociopaths or borderline sociopaths, like Phillips, Richman, Weil, Middius, Devil, Maggie, etc. Given Kruegerr's basic lack of knowledge about psychopatholgy, the above comments arre ludicrous and as is typical of Krueger, lies. Unlike myself, Krueger has no quialifications that would even remotely enable him to comment meaningfully about psychpathology. His stupidity was very well demonstrated above when he made the idiotic claim that those with "a symptom of psychopathology" would be unhappy. This is not necessarily true, as Krueger himself demonstrates. After all he claims to "enjoy" himself when he makes his usual; delusional and paranoid (2 symptoms) accuations about Middius, Atkinson and others having "cliques" or "networks" of sockpuppets that attack him. So the fact that they would have problems with a person who is reasonably sane and well-adjusted should be no surprise. ROFLMAO!!!!!! Let's let all the posters of RAO decide whether Krueger meets this criteria. Krueger's pathological psotings are a matter of Google record. As as pointed out many times in the past by numerous psoters, his behavior on RAO easily meets the criteria for several diagnostic criteria, most notably that of Paranoid Personality Disorder. Note that this is not a diagnosis, just an observation based on his online postings. This current post is just the latest example of that. For further documentation, see the following historical account. The comments there are as valid today as when they were first made. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.worldnet.a tt.net&output=gplain Just another unhappy sociopath (who seems to have almost completely disappeared off the face of Usenet) venting his frustrations. There is no evidence that Mr. Shain had any socipathic tendencies whatsoever. Neither is there any evidence that he was "frustrated". But as usual, Krueger likes to lie about people without presenting any evidence to support his delusional claims. What Mr. Shain's post illustrates, however, is that a significantly large number of different RAO posters have been attacked, defamed, slandered, lied about, and attacked without provocation by Krueger. It's also worth pointing out that no other RAO poster, AFAIK, has *ever* been described in this way - only Krueger. The reaons for this are quite obvious. BTW, it appears that one of Ed's current ventures (after the collapse of Vergence) can be examined by visiting www.metropolisdvd.com Bruce J. Richman |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Snip previous proof of Richman's lying and intellectual dishonesty Just more obfuscation and blather from RAO's most detested poster. Can't read very well, can you Richman? This isn't a Middius post. Note that Krueger once again fails to take responsibility for leveling an provoked attack against me after I posted a joke on RAO which had no reference to him whatsoever. Which joke might that be, and what was the thread name? All that has followed since from his lying responses has been a pathetic attempt to avoid dealing with this basic fact. Which basic fact is that Richman? You didn't identify a specific post so I just don't know what you are talking about. BTW, do YOU know what you are talking about? Richman, are you a class act or what? A typical response from RAO's most despised and hated purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters. So what are you claiming Richman - that you're not hated or that you're not a leading purveyor of personal attacks against numerous RAO posters? Note Krueger's attempt to change the subject. There's this problem with the vagueness of your statements, Richman. His comment above about class acts in reesponse (sic) to a joke I posted on RAO was just one of a 7 year history of unprovoked personal attacks made against me - as well as many other posters - by this obnoxious liar and hatemonger. Could you be more vague, Richman? There is no evidene (sic), as usual, to support any of his claims about hatred directed at me except by him , of course, and one or two parasitic clones such as McKelvey. Besides your overwhelming self-hatred Richman, there's the matter of your lying. Here's a negative post about you from someone who is most definitely not a clone of anybody, but is just his sweet self: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=3E...FC%40email.com trotsky wrote in "Bruce, I can't stand how weak you are intellectually. Somewhere in your pea brain you must realize that the Usenet phenomonon brings up peculiar psychological issues, mob mentality and mass hysteria being two of them. Do you even have a degree? This is an intelligent and, to me, somewhat obvious topic of conversation for a guy who supposedly has a PhD in psychology, but for some reason you are stuck in some kind of endless loop of only dealing with lowest common denominators. Regardless of how I slice it, I find both your level of intelligence and your mental health somewhat suspect. Come clean on what you've been professionally diagnosed with and we'll have a starting point." Clearly not a love letter. So Richman, that makes you a proven liar once again. delete lame attempt by Richman to change the subject |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
Don't you mean for those without the gut for anything more than name calling and ad-hominem attacks, eh Quackenbush? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
Arny Krueger decides to engage in more selective editing, snippage, and
obfuscation as follows: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Snip previous proof of Richman's lying and intellectual dishonesty An obvious attempt by the liar, Krueger, to prevent readers from reading factual information about Krueger's sociopathic behavior. As usual, he resorts to his usual tactic of deleting parts of posts that expose his pathology. Just more obfuscation and blather from RAO's most detested poster. Can't read very well, can you Richman? This isn't a Middius post. Typical Krueger attempt to shift blame. The Google record clearly indicates that Krueger has antagonized more separate posters and attacked more separate posters than any other poster on RAO over a 7 year period. In a thread entitled "A Bad Krueger Experience", Ed Shain noted the following ias follows: ""As far as I can observe, the following contributors to RAO have all had bitter or hostile exchanges with Arnold Krueger in which there was some distinguishing negative characteristic, whether contempt, lying, dishonest quoting, altered texts, attacks without provocation, intellectual dishonesty, refusal to admit error, manipulated context etc. I believe an accurate list of all who've had such an experience might be productive in developing a less hostile atmosphere here on RAO." (end quote from post of July 27, 1999 by Mr. Shain). Mr. Shain then went on to list the following RAO posters as among the many that Krueger has attacked as follows: "Jeff Adams, John Atkinson, Marc Blank, Roy Briggs, Jennifer Burton, Jason Cotton, Michael Clyne, Paul Dormer, Felix (Fear3000), Michael Gindi, Pete Goudreau, Brian Leupp, Gene Lyle, Paul Macca, Michael Mandwright, Stephen McEleroy, George Middius, Stewart Pinkerton, Photobug (Fred), Bruce Richman,Chuck Ross, Barry Rothman, Jim Sanders, Jonathan Scull, Jim Seymour, Greg Singh, Ed Shain, Andrew Thibault, Leslie Vreeland, Dave Weil, Glenn Zelniker, and Steve Zipser". (end quote from Mr. Shain). The URL for the above is: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:...&lr=&ie=UTF-8& as_drrb=b&as_mind=29&as_minm=3&as_miny=1995&as_max d=28&as_maxm=7&as_maxy=1 999&selm=379edb90.8997399%40netnews.worldnet.att.n et Quite a list Despiite Krueger's delusional claims that most of these people are sockpuppets (a claim for which he offers no proof), the number of "enemies" he has targeted is significantly higher than that of any other RAO poster. Of course, since Mr. Shain began that thread (which had over 900 responses - which tells you something about Krueger's terrible reputation on RAO), many others have been attacked by him. The latest "attackee' was a poster named "Schizoid Man".Of course, we could also add Paul Bamborough, "Phil" (whose last name is known by some of uis but not posted here at his request), Marc Phillips (who posts here as "Boon"), and no doubt many others as well. So once again, Krueger, in trying to shift blame to another poster (Middius, in this case) is proven to be lieing as is his daily habit when confronted with damaging and supported information about his behavior. Note that Krueger once again fails to take responsibility for leveling an provoked attack against me after I posted a joke on RAO which had no reference to him whatsoever. Which joke might that be, and what was the thread name? Well, now, Krueger, there are only 2 possible reasons for your question above: (1) You are too stupid to realize that this very thread entitled "For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post" is the one that started with the joke that you attacked, or (2) you are once again attempting to lie your way out of accepting responsibility for the personal attack as described in Reason #1. In your case both reasons apply. So let us proceed to demonstrate your (1) stupidity in trying to sell this bull**** above, and (2) your dishonesty in failing to acknowledge that you attacked the joke I posted with no provocation from me and no mention of your name. The original post which you attacked read as follows: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0721223911.069 26.00000382%40mb-m06.aol.com "In the dead of summer a fly was resting on a leaf beside a lake. The hot, dry fly who said to no one in particular, "Gosh....if I go down three inches, I will feel the mist from the water and I will be refreshed." There was a fish in the water thinking, "Gosh...if that fly goes down three inches I can jump up and eat him." There was also a bear resting on the shore thinking "Gosh...if that fly goes down three inches...that fish will jump for the fly....and I will eat him." It also happened that there was a hunter was further up the bank of the lake preparing to eat a cheese sandwich. "Gosh" he thought "if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish leaps for it....that bear will expose himself and grab fo! r the fish. I'll shoot the bear and then have a proper lunch." You probably think this is enough activity for one bank of a lake, but I can tell you there was more. A wee mouse by the hunter's foot was thinking "Gosh....if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish jumps for that fly....and that bear grabs for that fish....the dumb hunter will shoot the bear and drop his cheese sandwich, which I c! an then eat." Finally, there was a cat lurking in the bushes took in this scene and thought "Gosh....if that fly goes down three inches....and that fish jumps for that fly....and that bear grabs for that fish...and that hunters shoots that bear... and that mouse makes off with the cheese sandwich....then I can have mouse for lunch while he's distracted." The poor fly, who is oblivious to all this activity around him, is finally so hot and so dry that he heads down for the cooling mist of the water. The fish then swallows the fly....the bear grabs the fish....the hunter shoots the bear....the mouse grabs the cheese sandwich....the cat jumps for the mouse....the mouse ducks....the cat falls into the water and drowns. The moral of the story is.....whenever a fly goes down three inches some pussy is probably in danger?" (end of post) Now when Krueger, chose to attack this post - which as can be seen, contains no reference to him - he deliberately deleted over 90% of the post as follows in the following "response" (post # 2 in this thread): http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...20030721223911. 06926.00000382%40mb-m06.aol.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie %3DUTF-8%26selm%3D20030721223911.06926.00000382%2540mb-m06.aol.com snip lots of boring stuff The moral of the story is.....whenever a fly goes down three inches some pussy is probably in danger Bruce J. Richman "Richman, are you a class act or what?" Note that the pathological liar Krueger now pretends to be ignoratnt of this response. He also pretends to be ignorant of the fact that he deliberately deleted most of the thread to try and hide the fact that it was an obvious joke. This type of delilberate elimination of data from threads is just one of many ways in which thet pseudoscientist, Krueger, tries to distort the posts of others so that he can then attack them. LOL! Since Krueger has chosen, once again, to try and change the subject and deny knowledge or responsibility for the above data taken directly from Google, there is no point in reproducing the rest of his pathetic, dishonest and lame attempts to change the subject in the drivel he then proceeds to post in this thread. No doubt, Krueger will delete part of this thread too, if he responds at all. Even his loyal and perhaps only supporter, McKelvey, who quite predictably tried to support his role model in this thread via unprovoked personal attack on me (what else is new?) - usually posts what other people in their entirety when he attacks them. Perhaps a few more years under Krueger's "tutelage" will turn him in to as frequent a deliberate deleter of relevant information as his role model. Time will tell. Bruce J. Richman |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
****-for-Brains wrote in
: In message , Tim Brown wrote: 3. Richman reacts as if Krueger has comitted some federal crime. This is for you Richman: "One wants to be loved; failing this, to be admired; failing this, to be feared; failing even this, to be hated and despised. One wants to arouse some sort of feeling in people. The soul shrinks from the void and wants contact at any price." ~ Hjalmar Soderberg Couldn't have said it better, myself. I know where my soule will go when I die. Too bad ATkinsen's sockpuppets are gambling with their soles, big-time. I hope my response to your senseless noise makes you feel better. TB What, you think Richmend is going to start making sense, now? Hes been practising his act for years and, with Middidus to guide him its like he can expect the Noble prize any day now. NOT! ;-) How about that pathetic response he phoned in? He tried his best to push all my buttons. Claiming my post, which was really just a review of his recent rantings, was a personal attack. Looks like he used the full gamut of his limited vocabulary of insulting words. Parroted the unverifiable Goudreau hyperbole (where is he now?) Paranoically claiming I'm in kahoots with Krueger. As I told Middius, I'm not for Krueger, I'm against him. He doesn't have the smarts to see that I responded to him on Google BECAUSE he is killfiled on my regular newsreader. TB |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
The idiot, Dim Tim Brown, now finds himself ikn dialogue with Krueger
sockpuppets: snip of this loserHow about that pathetic response he phoned in? He tried his best to push all my buttons. ROFLMAO! It appears that despite claiming otherwise, the imbecilic Brown now finds himself responding to Krueger imitators. His anger and stupidity have conveniently combined to illustrate for all his inability to discriminate between fact and fiction. Who else but this obnoxious moron wouild enter into a dialogue with an obvious Krueger imitator? And as is this cretin's custom, he regularly reads Google posts to be sure that somebody has acknowledged his pitiful attempts to flame others and ingratiate h imself with Krueger. The fact that he only insults Krueger's enemies says it all. His so-called "kill filing", like the rest of this pathetic loser's uttering, is just another lie. Is it any wonder that he would find a natural bond with RAO's most compu\sive liar and hated poster. He and Krueger deserve each other. Bruce J. Richman |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
****-for-Brains wrote in message . ..
In message , Tim Brown wrote: How about that pathetic response he phoned in? He tried his best to push all my buttons. Claiming my post, which was really just a review of his recent rantings, was a personal attack. Looks like he used the full gamut of his limited vocabulary of insulting words. Parroted the unverifiable Goudreau hyperbole (where is he now?) Paranoically claiming I'm in kahoots with Krueger. As I told Middius, I'm not for Krueger, So "TB" you admit to being one of Aktinson's sockpuppets. How much does he pay you for your trouble "TB"? Its like I didn't pin back Goudreau's ears sixteenty times, on RAO and RAPRO. Lots! I'm nobody's sockpuppet. Aktinson is in my killfile, never read his rag mag. Go try to find a post where I've even talked to Atkinson. I'm against him. He doesn't have the smarts to see that I responded to him on Google BECAUSE he is killfiled on my regular newsreader. TB I'm suspect of anybody who claims to have expertiese in Goggle. "TB" if you aren't a paid assassin of my www.pcab****.com site "TB" perhaps you can tell us why you lie about killfiling myselves. Clearly you have an axle to grind "TB" but, its like Googol doesn't lie as much, to you as it should! I go to Google occasionally, out of boredom, to look in on the denizens of RAO, the ones I have killfiled on my regular newsreader, Xnews. If you check you will see that I also post under the moniker 'dcbrowntim'. Am I detecting some hostility from you too? Why would that be? TB |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
For Those Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - A New Non-Audio Post
****-for-Brains wrote in message . ..
In message , Tim Brown wrote: Paranoically claiming I'm in kahoots with Krueger. As I told Middius, I'm not for Krueger, So "TB" you admit to being one of Aktinson's sockpuppets. How much does he pay you for your trouble "TB"? Its like I didn't pin back Goudreau's ears sixteenty times, on RAO and RAPRO. Lots! I'm against him. I realize the above sentence of mine is ambiguous. I should have said: As I told Middius, I'm not for Krueger, I'm against Middius. The denizens are determined to put me on one side or the other. Well, I'm on neither. I'm not 'for' Krueger, Richman, Ferstler, Atkinson or any of the others. TB |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Krooger's Number One Fan
Timmy Brown-Nose is hurt from Arnii's rejection. Am I detecting some hostility from you too? Why would that be? Krooger is envious of your exalted employment as a repairborg for amplifiers, record players, toasters, etc. I'll bet you even get health insurance. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to Post to Usenet | Car Audio | |||
Where are those Wascally Weapons of Mass Destwuction??? | Audio Opinions | |||
Want an audio system but dont have the cash? get the cash find out how | General | |||
Want a new car audio system but dont have the cash? get cash now find out how | Car Audio |