Upon learning that Wheeler's lawsuit is in the amount of $5,000, I have
reevaluated my position regarding Arny's defense.

Arny's costs to secure professional representation would be far greater
the $5,000 potential award.

Arny's costs to present a competent self-defense would probably aproach
or even exceed $5,000, considering travel expense, plus some minimal legal
advise in preparing briefs and motions.

Wheeler has a tremendous home field advantage in this enterprise.

As far as the $5,000, Arny has no intention of paying it, and
Wheeler has no intentioin of collecting it. Colletion costs would approach
or
exceed the amount of award.

I would consider this to be a nuisance suit on the part of Wheeler.
However, Arny brought this fiasco upon himself by the nature of his
history of horrific behavior.

No matter how much I despise Arny, I have to stand back and give a
fair appraisal of this matter.

Wheeler should not have filed suit in such a small amount. Either he should
have
asked for "at least" $30,000, or not have bothered with it at all. That
amount
would assure a fair fight. now, if Arny lived in LA, then the $5,000 suit
would be fair game.

Also to note, it would seem to me that libel of one's reputation
would be such an egregious act that it would warrant
a claim far in excess of $5,000.

If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles away,
I would probably issue also, though after I would have "at least" filed a
motion to dismiss.

Arny, you got screwed, but it couldn't have happened to
a nicer guy! Way to go, big guy! Just desserts!





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message


Also to note, it would seem to me that libel of one's reputation
would be such an egregious act that it would warrant
a claim far in excess of $5,000.

Of course there wasn't any libel of the reputation of anything but an
anonymous email address.

If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles away,
I would probably issue also, though after I would have "at least"
filed a motion to dismiss.

OK, so you got money to burn. BTW, it's easy to say what you'd do when
you're not the one that has to do it.

Arny, you got screwed, but it couldn't have happened to
a nicer guy! Way to go, big guy! Just desserts!

I got screwed? In the final analysis I got a keepsake.

OTOH, *somebody* paid a filing fee to get nothing but a bad reputation on
Usenet, based solely on their own fouled-up behavior.

Upon learning that Wheeler's lawsuit is in the amount of $5,000, I have
reevaluated my position regarding Arny's defense.

Arny's costs to secure professional representation would be far greater
the $5,000 potential award.

Arny's costs to present a competent self-defense would probably aproach
or even exceed $5,000, considering travel expense, plus some minimal legal
advise in preparing briefs and motions.

Wheeler has a tremendous home field advantage in this enterprise.

As far as the $5,000, Arny has no intention of paying it, and
Wheeler has no intentioin of collecting it. Colletion costs would approach
or
exceed the amount of award.

I would consider this to be a nuisance suit on the part of Wheeler.
However, Arny brought this fiasco upon himself by the nature of his
history of horrific behavior.

No matter how much I despise Arny, I have to stand back and give a
fair appraisal of this matter.

Wheeler should not have filed suit in such a small amount. Either he should
have
asked for "at least" $30,000, or not have bothered with it at all. That
amount
would assure a fair fight. now, if Arny lived in LA, then the $5,000 suit
would be fair game.

Also to note, it would seem to me that libel of one's reputation
would be such an egregious act that it would warrant
a claim far in excess of $5,000.

If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles away,
I would probably issue also, though after I would have "at least" filed a
motion to dismiss.

Arny, you got screwed, but it couldn't have happened to
a nicer guy! Way to go, big guy! Just desserts!




Just as a matter of clarification I filed a limmited lawsuit. that limmits
total damages to 25,000 dollars. The law clearly states that the amount awarded
in libel cases is based on the evidence. The amount asked for is meaningless.
At the end of the complaint The amount prayed for is general damages according
to proof, for punitive damages , for the cost of the suit encured here in and
for any other and further relief as the court may deem proper. The bottom line
is you are required to put a dollar amount on the face of the lawsuit and that
amount has no bearing on what the judgement may be. If I had put 25,000 dollars
it would make no difference.

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles
away, I would probably issue also, though after
I would have "at least" filed a motion to dismiss.

OK, so you got money to burn. BTW, it's easy to
say what you'd do when you're not the one that has
to do it.

I wouldn’t sweat-it, Arny. You haven’t been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn’t spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

Yustabe said


Also to note, it would seem to me that libel of one's reputation
would be such an egregious act that it would warrant
a claim far in excess of $5,000.


Arny said


Of course there wasn't any libel of the reputation of anything but an
anonymous email address.


This bull**** has already been explained. The rules regarding the
identifiablity of the plaintiff are clear in the civil codes.

Yustabe said


If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles away,
I would probably issue also, though after I would have "at least"
filed a motion to dismiss.

Arny said


OK, so you got money to burn. BTW, it's easy to say what you'd do when
you're not the one that has to do it.

Weren't you the one saying you were going to hire a lawyer to write a thousand
dollar demur and put a lein on my house?

Yustabe said


Arny, you got screwed, but it couldn't have happened to
a nicer guy! Way to go, big guy! Just desserts!

Arny said


I got screwed? In the final analysis I got a keepsake.

No, Arny did not get screwed. I gave him 30 days to retract his libel. It would
have cost him nothing. I told him in no uncertain terms exactly what I was
going to do if he didn't post a retraction. He chose to reafirm his libel
instead of retracting it.This lawsuit was not a blindside cheap shot. Arny
could have easily avoided it at no cost. He didn't get screwed, he screwed
himself.

Arny said


OTOH, *somebody* paid a filing fee to get nothing but a bad reputation on
Usenet, based solely on their own fouled-up behavior.

A bad reputation with whom? You , Lionel and a couple other loosers that matter
as little as the two of you? I am concerned about what normal people who may
sometime in the future check on me think about my reputation. I'm sure that
idea is beyond you.

"Langis" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote:

OTOH, *somebody* paid a filing fee to get nothing but a bad
reputation on Usenet, based solely on their own fouled-up behavior.

I suspect Krueger is capable of modulating his chemicular imbalance
such that he shall mentally accommodate the following concepts: being
judged a pathetic libelous cowardly pervert in a court of law is a
positive and desirable attribute; being found guilty casts a dim light
on the successful plaintiff.

It's not a matter of modulation, it's a matter of having a sensible
perspective on life.

For example, cowardliness in and of itself is not against the law. Indeed,
the law fosters it. The law does not judge the human condition some call
"pathetic" at all.

Libel and perversion are separate crimes. One is civil and one is criminal.
They can't possibly be tried in the same court at the same time.

So, in Dormer's world, a person could be judged a "pathetic libelous
cowardly pervert in a court of law". In the real world that can't possibly
happen. So Dormer, which chemicals are you modulating these days and when
are you going to get that sanity thing going again?

Powell said


I wouldnt sweat-it, Arny. You havent been served,
right?

Yes he has. good job on keeping up on the facts.

Powell said

Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous.

Thanks for showing your ignorance on the California Codes regarding libel.

Powell said

Scott probably hasnt spent a dime on
legal.

I have spent the money on a filing fee and the cost of a letter with delivery
confirmation.

Powell said

Let his spend a grand on legal discovery

Powell you are out of the loop aren't you. Arny isn't going to answer the
lawsuit. he is going to take a default judgement. There will be no discovery.
As if it would cost me any money other than postage. But feel free to show us
your ignorance on the California Codes regarding default judgements.

Powell said

(he has no money).

So you have joined Arny in fantasizing about my personal life. Go figure.

Powell said

any need to cave-in is
ridiculous.

He already did.

Powell said

If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses.

Arny, Powell is quite the legal expert. Take his advise.

"Powell" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles
away, I would probably issue also, though after
I would have "at least" filed a motion to dismiss.

OK, so you got money to burn. BTW, it's easy to
say what you'd do when you're not the one that has
to do it.

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Langis" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote:

OTOH, *somebody* paid a filing fee to get nothing but a bad
reputation on Usenet, based solely on their own fouled-up behavior.

I suspect Krueger is capable of modulating his chemicular imbalance
such that he shall mentally accommodate the following concepts: being
judged a pathetic libelous cowardly pervert in a court of law is a
positive and desirable attribute; being found guilty casts a dim light
on the successful plaintiff.

It's not a matter of modulation, it's a matter of having a sensible
perspective on life.

For example, cowardliness in and of itself is not against the law. Indeed,
the law fosters it. The law does not judge the human condition some call
"pathetic" at all.

Libel and perversion are separate crimes. One is civil and one is
criminal.
They can't possibly be tried in the same court at the same time.

So, in Dormer's world, a person could be judged a "pathetic libelous
cowardly pervert in a court of law". In the real world that can't possibly
happen. So Dormer, which chemicals are you modulating these days and when
are you going to get that sanity thing going again?



However, you could be judged a pathetic libelous cowardly asshole.
Being an asshole is not a crime, so you're safe for now, Arny.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

S888Wheel wrote:

Powell said


I wouldnt sweat-it, Arny. You havent been served,
right?


Yes he has. good job on keeping up on the facts.

Powell said


Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous.


Thanks for showing your ignorance on the California Codes regarding libel.

Powell said


Scott probably hasnt spent a dime on
legal.


I have spent the money on a filing fee and the cost of a letter with delivery
confirmation.

Powell said


Let his spend a grand on legal discovery


Powell you are out of the loop aren't you. Arny isn't going to answer the
lawsuit. he is going to take a default judgement. There will be no discovery.
As if it would cost me any money other than postage. But feel free to show us
your ignorance on the California Codes regarding default judgements.

Powell said


(he has no money).


So you have joined Arny in fantasizing about my personal life. Go figure.

Powell said


any need to cave-in is
ridiculous.


He already did.

Powell said


If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses.


Arny, Powell is quite the legal expert. Take his advise.


It looks like your adventures on RAO become more and more grotesque Mr.
Scott Wheeler.
It looks like you are losing credit day after day.
Do you have a family's strategic meeting every day ?
How the others members of your family comment your today audience rating?

S888Wheel wrote:


No, Arny did not get screwed. I gave him 30 days to retract his libel. It would
have cost him nothing. I told him in no uncertain terms exactly what I was
going to do if he didn't post a retraction. He chose to reafirm his libel
instead of retracting it.This lawsuit was not a blindside cheap shot. Arny
could have easily avoided it at no cost. He didn't get screwed, he screwed
himself.


We know now that if he had made public excuses you would have sued him
anyway.
Perhaps you are a pedophile perhaps not but we know that you are a
vampire, Mr. Scott Wheeler.

"S888Wheel" wrote

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right?

Yes he has. good job on keeping up on the facts.

Not my job, I don't live here.


Powell said

Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous.

Thanks for showing your ignorance on the California
Codes regarding libel.

Quack, quack, quack...


Powell said

Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal.

I have spent the money on a filing fee and the
cost of a letter with delivery confirmation.

As I predicated.


Powell said

Let his spend a grand on legal discovery

Powell you are out of the loop aren't you. Arny
isn't going to answer the lawsuit. he is going to
take a default judgement.

Oh? The conveyance was in what written
form? ?Has there been an exchange of money?

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn’t ready for that level of
introspection.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message
...
Yustabe said


Also to note, it would seem to me that libel of one's reputation
would be such an egregious act that it would warrant
a claim far in excess of $5,000.


Arny said


Of course there wasn't any libel of the reputation of anything but an
anonymous email address.


This bull**** has already been explained. The rules regarding the
identifiablity of the plaintiff are clear in the civil codes.

Yustabe said


If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles away,
I would probably issue also, though after I would have "at least"
filed a motion to dismiss.

Arny said


OK, so you got money to burn. BTW, it's easy to say what you'd do when
you're not the one that has to do it.

Weren't you the one saying you were going to hire a lawyer to write a
thousand
dollar demur and put a lein on my house?

Yustabe said


Arny, you got screwed, but it couldn't have happened to
a nicer guy! Way to go, big guy! Just desserts!

Arny said


I got screwed? In the final analysis I got a keepsake.

No, Arny did not get screwed. I gave him 30 days to retract his libel. It
would
have cost him nothing. I told him in no uncertain terms exactly what I was
going to do if he didn't post a retraction. He chose to reafirm his libel
instead of retracting it.This lawsuit was not a blindside cheap shot. Arny
could have easily avoided it at no cost. He didn't get screwed, he screwed
himself.

Arny said


OTOH, *somebody* paid a filing fee to get nothing but a bad reputation
on
Usenet, based solely on their own fouled-up behavior.

A bad reputation with whom? You , Lionel and a couple other loosers that
matter
as little as the two of you? I am concerned about what normal people who
may
sometime in the future check on me think about my reputation. I'm sure
that
idea is beyond you.

Calling someone a pedophile is not like calling someone a horse's ass.
Pedophilia is one of a small class of assertions which are considered prima
facie to be libelous.
The taint is very hard to wash off, and impossible for outsiders to
discount.
In this ONE CASE, I think Mr. Wheeler's action is justified.

Robert Morein said:

Pedophilia is one of a small class of assertions which are considered prima
facie to be libelous.
The taint is very hard to wash off, and impossible for outsiders to
discount.
In this ONE CASE, I think Mr. Wheeler's action is justified.

I hope Mister Wheeler is prepared for the eventuality that the shame
of losing a civil case will drive Mr. **** -- finally, finally -- to
do what has to be done.

"Langis" wrote in message
news
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

I suspect Krueger is capable of modulating his chemicular imbalance
such that he shall mentally accommodate the following concepts:
being judged a pathetic libelous cowardly pervert in a court of law
is a positive and desirable attribute; being found guilty casts a
dim light on the successful plaintiff.

It's not a matter of modulation, it's a matter of having a sensible
perspective on life.

****!

So frustrated by the truth that you're reduced to name-calling!

..Dormer, which chemicals are you modulating these days and when
are you going to get that sanity thing going again?

I don't know, how many times have you battered your wife this weekend?

Zero.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If I were sued for $5,000 in a court 2,000 miles
away, I would probably issue also, though after
I would have "at least" filed a motion to dismiss.

OK, so you got money to burn. BTW, it's easy to
say what you'd do when you're not the one that has
to do it.

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?

"Powell" wrote in message

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn't ready for that level of
introspection.

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by being an idiot about law,
doesn't mean that you have to attack me.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?



So, you are now saying that a response to the suit would not
have resulted in a dismissal.

It doesn't take an expert to see what an utter idiot you are.
If you had fileda written response, you may have gotten
a dismissal. The only cost would be the fee. You could have
written it yourself.





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Powell" wrote in message

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn't ready for that level of
introspection.

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by being an idiot about law,
doesn't mean that you have to attack me.



To Arny, every criticism is an attack, even from his friends.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Powell" wrote in message


"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .


A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.


Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn't ready for that level of
introspection.

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by being an idiot about law,
doesn't mean that you have to attack me.


To Arny, every criticism is an attack, even from his friends.



Yes you are right and Scott Wheeler is a moron and a coward who use
fallacious reasons to prove himself that he have some balls.
Mr. Innocent S888Wheel who is looking to the status of gentleman on RAO.
LOL !

He said Krueger has crossed "the" line but he doesn't mind if he has
crossed his *own* line the first time he has posted on RAO !
I hate guys like him they are only "troubles bringers" because above all
they are *cowards*.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news

"Powell" wrote in message

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn't ready for that level of
introspection.

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by being an idiot
about law, doesn't mean that you have to attack me.

To Arny, every criticism is an attack, even from his friends.

Powell my friend? Surely you jest!

Powell taking about introspection is like George Middius talking about the
truth.

BTW sockpuppet Yustabe. thanks for contradicting yourself when you
previously claimed that I have no friends.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?

So, you are now saying that a response to the suit would not
have resulted in a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.

It doesn't take an expert to see what an utter idiot you are.

When you find an expert sockpuppet Yustabe, be sure to post on this topic
again.

If you had filed a written response, you may have gotten
a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.

The only cost would be the fee. You could have written it yourself.

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed that
there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted himself on
this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming unglued and so are its
individual members.

If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal jurisdiction.
The other would be an answer to the claims along with a clarification of the
information that the filer would ordinarily include, but that this filer
fraudulently left out. Little things like the name of the newsgroup and name
of the entity that was purportedly libeled.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news

"Powell" wrote in message

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn't ready for that level of
introspection.

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by being an idiot
about law, doesn't mean that you have to attack me.

To Arny, every criticism is an attack, even from his friends.

Powell my friend? Surely you jest!

Powell taking about introspection is like George Middius talking about the
truth.

BTW sockpuppet Yustabe. thanks for contradicting yourself when you
previously claimed that I have no friends.


Yeah, I forgot about Mikey and Lionel.
Keep up the good work.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?

So, you are now saying that a response to the suit would not
have resulted in a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.


Good one!
You should have been an attorney!




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If you had filed a written response, you may have
gotten a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result
in its dismissal.

How were you served... mail or process server?

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

Kudos, a simple response of civility would be
the norm. Arny isn't ready for that level of
introspection.

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by
being an idiot about law, doesn't mean that you
have to attack me.

To Arny, every criticism is an attack, even from his
friends.

Poor Arny, this really has spooked him .

"Powell" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If you had filed a written response, you may have
gotten a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result
in its dismissal.

How were you served... mail or process server?

Asked and answered. Do try to keep up, Powell.

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If you had filed a written response, you may have
gotten a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result
in its dismissal.

How were you served... mail or process server?

Asked and answered. Do try to keep up, Powell.

Hehehe... you're not on trial, Arny. You can
answer the question without fear of legal
reprisal. Please suppress your paranoia and
posturing if only for a moment.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote

To Arny, every criticism is an attack, even from
his friends.

Powell my friend? Surely you jest!

Yeah, I forgot about Mikey and Lionel.
Keep up the good work.

Arny is going to blame everyone else for a
problem he caused due to his incivility. What
do you call someone who won’t take personal
responsibility for their actions... an
Arny-blunder-ism ?

It looks like your adventures on RAO become more and more grotesque Mr.
Scott Wheeler.
It looks like you are losing credit day after day.
Do you have a family's strategic meeting every day ?
How the others members of your family comment your today audience rating?





Oh, yes Lionel. youa re on to something. everyone around here is deeply
concerned about Powell's opinions. Not.

Powell said


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right?


I said


Yes he has. good job on keeping up on the facts.


Powell said


Not my job, I don't live here.


What is yout job around here? Is it jumping into the middle of things with out
knowing jack?


Powell said

Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous.

I said


Thanks for showing your ignorance on the California
Codes regarding libel.

Powell said


Quack, quack, quack...



Powell at his purest. Pretty much everything you say translates into that.


Powell said

Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal.

I said



I have spent the money on a filing fee and the
cost of a letter with delivery confirmation.

Powell said


As I predicated.



God you are stupid. You predicted that I haven't spent a dime. In case you
didn't know the cost of filing is above 10 cents.



Powell said

Let his spend a grand on legal discovery


I said


Powell you are out of the loop aren't you. Arny
isn't going to answer the lawsuit. he is going to
take a default judgement.

Powell said


Oh? The conveyance was in what written
form? ?Has there been an exchange of money?

WTF are you babbling about now?

Just because you just made a fool of yourself by being an idiot about law,
doesn't mean that you have to attack me.

LOL. You were happy to have his support until now.

Lionel said


Yes you are right and Scott Wheeler is a moron and a coward who use
fallacious reasons to prove himself that he have some balls.
Mr. Innocent S888Wheel who is looking to the status of gentleman on RAO.
LOL !

LOL Lionel, are you that stupid? He said no such thing. You have become
obbsessed with me. you have become almost as creepy as Arny.

Lionel said


He said Krueger has crossed "the" line but he doesn't mind if he has
crossed his *own* line the first time he has posted on RAO !
I hate guys like him they are only "troubles bringers" because above all
they are *cowards*.


You are just enraged because I said I have no interest in anything your father
had to say since all I know of him is that he raised one looser, you. Time to
go pound the wall again and post more lies about me in your uncontrolable rage.
I would say I've been playing you like a piano (thanks for the extra evidence
you provided for my case) but I don't play the piano nearly so well.

It doesn't take an expert to see what an utter idiot you are.
If you had fileda written response, you may have gotten
a dismissal. The only cost would be the fee. You could have
written it yourself.

There is no fee. He can still do it. Bottom line is he fears the outcome. If he
defends himself and looses he looses. If he doesn't defend himself and looses
he declares victory in his imaginary court.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.


Make up your mind. yesterday you were acknowledging you would loose the default
judgement. If the case is dismissed you win. Of course anyone who has read the
california Codes on default judgements would know that the only way Arny could
get a dismissal is if the allegations in the complaint don't add up to a cause
of action. Given the fact that I used the Bender book of forms for pleadings
there is very little chance of that.

Arny said

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed that
there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted himself on
this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming unglued and so are its
individual members.

Thanks for showing you have limmited reading comprehension. Cite any claim I
have made that there is any fee for filing an answer to a lawsuit in California
Superior Court.


If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal jurisdiction.
The other would be an answer to the claims along with a clarification of the
information that the filer would ordinarily include, but that this filer
fraudulently left out. Little things like the name of the newsgroup and name
of the entity that was purportedly libeled.






And if arny had ever looked at the actual Codes on the issue he would have
figured out that he can challenge my identifability during the trial only.He
would also know that he has already lost that point. If arny had read the codes
and understood them he would know that he would be dead in the water on the
jurisdiction issue as well. Ignorance is bliss. Ignorance makes for an easy
victory in the court of Arny's mind. Obviously it is the fear of loosing in a
real court that keeps him from answering.

How were you served... mail or process server?


Mail.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its
dismissal.


Make up your mind. yesterday you were acknowledging you would loose
the default judgement.

Your senile dimentia is showing. I said that with a contingency. If you
weren't so brain-dead you'd remember what it was and why it is relevant
here.

If the case is dismissed you win.

Dooohhhhhhh.

Of course
anyone who has read the california Codes on default judgements would
know that the only way Arny could get a dismissal is if the
allegations in the complaint don't add up to a cause of action.


Doooooooooohhhhhhhhhh.

Given
the fact that I used the Bender book of forms for pleadings there is
very little chance of that.

LOL!

Arny said

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed
that there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted
himself on this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming
unglued and so are its individual members.

Thanks for showing you have limmited reading comprehension. Cite any
claim I have made that there is any fee for filing an answer to a
lawsuit in California Superior Court..

Since you don't respond to challenges like this when I make them I won't
waste my time.

If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal
jurisdiction. The other would be an answer to the claims along with
a clarification of the information that the filer would ordinarily
include, but that this filer fraudulently left out. Little things
like the name of the newsgroup and name of the entity that was
purportedly libeled.

And if arny had ever looked at the actual Codes on the issue he would
have figured out that he can challenge my identifability during the
trial only.

It's like there's a California Law Library on every street corner in
Michigan.

He would also know that he has already lost that point. If
arny had read the codes and understood them he would know that he
would be dead in the water on the jurisdiction issue as well.

Wrong. I do have some California-based legal opinions on that matter at my
disposal.

Ignorance is bliss. Ignorance makes for an easy victory in the court
of Arny's mind. Obviously it is the fear of loosing in a real court
that keeps him from answering.

Obviously sockpuppet wheel is persisting in his memory lapses and delusions.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

It doesn't take an expert to see what an utter idiot you are.
If you had fileda written response, you may have gotten
a dismissal. The only cost would be the fee. You could have
written it yourself.

There is no fee.

Prove it.

S888Wheel wrote:

Lionel said


Yes you are right and Scott Wheeler is a moron and a coward who use
fallacious reasons to prove himself that he have some balls.
Mr. Innocent S888Wheel who is looking to the status of gentleman on RAO.
LOL !


LOL Lionel, are you that stupid? He said no such thing. You have become
obbsessed with me. you have become almost as creepy as Arny.

Lionel said


He said Krueger has crossed "the" line but he doesn't mind if he has
crossed his *own* line the first time he has posted on RAO !
I hate guys like him they are only "troubles bringers" because above all
they are *cowards*.



You are just enraged because I said I have no interest in anything your father
had to say since all I know of him is that he raised one looser, you. Time to
go pound the wall again and post more lies about me in your uncontrolable rage.
I would say I've been playing you like a piano (thanks for the extra evidence
you provided for my case) but I don't play the piano nearly so well.

I'm sure that your wife would like that you make her a demonstration.
She's desperately waiting since too much years. ;-)