| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Bose 802 with even less lows than normal
"GregS" wrote in message ... In article , "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote: "GregS" wrote in message ... There should be 8 separate enclosures within the cabnet, and each of 4 drivers share a common port, so its not a total air leak. Can you please explain how 4 drivers in isolated enclosures can share a common port? AFAIK none of the drivers are isolated. I never visited the insides of the 802, but thats the way the 901 is. There are three chambers in the 901 III up. You see only two ports in the 802 right? greg The 901 has 9 drive units, 8 at the back and 1 at the front. In other words, it is used the other way round to the 802 which has the 8 drive units facing the audience and two ports at the back. The 901 is a sealed box, with no ports, and is intended to provide most of its output reflected off the back walls, and only a small amount directed at the listener. The 802 is a PA 'speaker, and in my view, quite a good one for speech and individual instruments whilst the 901 was a so-called hi-fi 'speaker which singularly failed, given that stereo doesn't work if the sound is scattered as the 901 did. S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
|
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bose 802 with even less lows than normal
"Serge Auckland" wrote in message ... "GregS" wrote in message ... In article , "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote: "GregS" wrote in message .. . There should be 8 separate enclosures within the cabnet, and each of 4 drivers share a common port, so its not a total air leak. Can you please explain how 4 drivers in isolated enclosures can share a common port? AFAIK none of the drivers are isolated. I never visited the insides of the 802, but thats the way the 901 is. There are three chambers in the 901 III up. You see only two ports in the 802 right? greg The 901 has 9 drive units, 8 at the back and 1 at the front. In other words, it is used the other way round to the 802 which has the 8 drive units facing the audience and two ports at the back. The 901 is a sealed box, with no ports, and is intended to provide most of its output reflected off the back walls, and only a small amount directed at the listener. The 802 is a PA 'speaker, and in my view, quite a good one for speech and individual instruments whilst the 901 was a so-called hi-fi 'speaker which singularly failed, given that stereo doesn't work if the sound is scattered as the 901 did. S. Actually, I may be wrong on the sealed box aspect of the 901, as the current pictures do show a port. I don't remember there being one on older 901s, but again I could be wrong on this, memory not being what it was. S. http://audiopages.googlepages.com -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
|
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bose 802 with even less lows than normal
In article , "Serge Auckland" wrote:
"GregS" wrote in message ... In article , "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote: "GregS" wrote in message .. . There should be 8 separate enclosures within the cabnet, and each of 4 drivers share a common port, so its not a total air leak. Can you please explain how 4 drivers in isolated enclosures can share a common port? AFAIK none of the drivers are isolated. I never visited the insides of the 802, but thats the way the 901 is. There are three chambers in the 901 III up. You see only two ports in the 802 right? greg The 901 has 9 drive units, 8 at the back and 1 at the front. In other words, it is used the other way round to the 802 which has the 8 drive units facing the audience and two ports at the back. The 901 is a sealed box, with no ports, and is intended to provide most of its output reflected off the back walls, and only a small amount directed at the listener. The 802 is a PA 'speaker, and in my view, quite a good one for speech and individual instruments whilst the 901 was a so-called hi-fi 'speaker which singularly failed, given that stereo doesn't work if the sound is scattered as the 901 did. The 901 series I and II are sealed. Each used different drivers. The orginal used a CTS driver, which was also used in the pro audio "cubes" Series III moved to the ported enclosure. It has used the same low ohms aluminum coiled, higher QTS driver ever since, as far as I know. The 901 series I and II were filled tightly with fiberglass, and the newer editions use nothing, as do most cheap computer speakers. Series III started to have wiring split so the sound could be channeled either more to the left or more to the right. There was also a receiver that took comtrol.Later, the option was removed. To get decent bass from the 18 db amplified contour, a 300 watt amp was good to have, but the higher series models were slightly more efficient. greg |
|
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bose 802 with even less lows than normal
In article , (GregS) wrote:
In article , (GregS) wrote: In article , "Serge Auckland" wrote: "GregS" wrote in message .. . In article , "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote: "GregS" wrote in message .. . There should be 8 separate enclosures within the cabnet, and each of 4 drivers share a common port, so its not a total air leak. Can you please explain how 4 drivers in isolated enclosures can share a common port? AFAIK none of the drivers are isolated. I never visited the insides of the 802, but thats the way the 901 is. There are three chambers in the 901 III up. You see only two ports in the 802 right? greg The 901 has 9 drive units, 8 at the back and 1 at the front. In other words, it is used the other way round to the 802 which has the 8 drive units facing the audience and two ports at the back. The 901 is a sealed box, with no ports, and is intended to provide most of its output reflected off the back walls, and only a small amount directed at the listener. The 802 is a PA 'speaker, and in my view, quite a good one for speech and individual instruments whilst the 901 was a so-called hi-fi 'speaker which singularly failed, given that stereo doesn't work if the sound is scattered as the 901 did. The 901 series I and II are sealed. Each used different drivers. The orginal used a CTS driver, which was also used in the pro audio "cubes" Series III moved to the ported enclosure. It has used the same low ohms aluminum coiled, higher QTS driver ever since, as far as I know. The 901 series I and II were filled tightly with fiberglass, and the newer editions use nothing, as do most cheap computer speakers. Series III started to have wiring split so the sound could be channeled either more to the left or more to the right. There was also a receiver that took comtrol.Later, the option was removed. To get decent bass from the 18 db amplified contour, a 300 watt amp was good to have, but the higher series models were slightly more efficient. I think this was the orginal Bose speaker...... http://www.bose-pro.ru/901_007.jpg I goofed. Here it is... http://www.bose-export.com/philosophy/images/005.jpg I found this interesting page but I can't read it. The orginal driver is shown on the bottom, a bit overdriven. http://www.matthias-stark.de/html/restore.html The 802 was only equalized down to about 50 Hz vs the 30 Hz of the 901. greg |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| My Mic Level Is Too Low. Is This Normal? | Pro Audio | |||
| JBL ES300 is this normal? | Pro Audio | |||
| pod pro is this normal | Pro Audio | |||
| pod pro is this normal | Pro Audio | |||
Hybrid Mode
