"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
As far back (and probably before) as 2000, the compulsive libeler
and
liar
McKelvy was engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me. In a
thread
that eventually included more than 400 posts, including many from
the
compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, he used his *very first post*
to
engage in
his usual form of libel. Note his use of the same libelous term he
continues
to use to this day. It should be pointed out since his post was one
of
the
first in this thread, no mention of his name was made by me prior to
his
unprovoked personal attack. The post is reprinted below:

From: Mikeylikst )
Subject: Second Thoughts
View: Complete Thread (459 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2000/01/22


From:

Calling Dr. Quackenbush!

Mix equal portions of hatred, bigotry and ignorance - and you often
end
up
with

The Resistance.


Mike McKelvy

"The aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series
of
hobgoblins,all imagnary."


The above is a quote from H.L. Menken, you idiot.


You didn't read the post, scumbag and libeler.

Of course I did. You do se the " marksdon't you? The quote from Menken
is
a well known one.

Like recent forgeries of my posts and deliberate text modifications, you
deliberately omitted text from the original post to make it convey your
bull****. I don't care about your quotes of Menken. You used the term
"Dr.
Quackenbush" to libel me as you have done many times before and since.

I can't libel you. You don't exist.

Your
failure to acknowleege this proven fact confirms your cowardice and
seriously
psychopathic mindset.


I stand by my comments on the "Resistance." It's no more
than a collection of idiots who have nothing better to do than slander
and
libel others they don't like. The only thing they are resisting is
decent
behavior, while criticising others behavior.


Since I haven't seen any posts from The Resistance, as you call it in a
long
time, perhaps you and Krueger can adopt this name to describe your "folie
a
deux" in which the 2 of you try and smear many regular RAO posters because
they
don't happen to endorse your psychotic and delusional postings.


You've got it all wrong. I don't smear you because I disagree with you, I
smear you because you act like an unprofessional, uncivilized, asshole

Or are you going to lie again,
and claim that Menken used the name, "r. Quackenbush", you retarded
piece of
****?

Of course not, nobody would demean Menken by trying to claim he would
bother
with you.


As usual, you're making no sense whatsoever. But given your severe
cognitive
deficiencies, that is to be expected. The fact remains that you libeled
me
without provocation.

No, it doesn't, asshole.

Your reading comprehension problems are once again exposed - as are your
lies.


http://members.aol.com/rlspeakers/TH...SOUNDPAGE.html


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-----------------------------------------

If one cares to check the Google record, one will also find a few
other
interesting things about this post. I freely admit that on the post
of
mine
which lead to McKelvy's unprovoked personal attack, I had made some
humorous
comments about a person who used to post here.

You mean you made a personal attack.


Wrong, liar. You deleted part of the post as part of your usual
practice
of
forgery and deceptive post modification. You deleted a smiley emoticon
generally cocsiderd by most infelligent life forms on RAO (which
eliminates
you) to mean trhe comment preceding it was made in jest.

How about all the times you don't include an emoticon? You make plenty
of
disgusting comments without using one. To most intelligent life forms,
that
shows you are a disgusting pig.


This post is about your unprovoked personal attack behavior against me,
scumbag, not your delusional perceptions of my behavior.

I don't have any delusional perceptions of your behavior. You are an
unprofessional asshole.

When I respond to
you, compulsive liar McKelvy, it is simply to correct and refute your
maniacal
ravings. It is not meant to be humorous.

Yet you come across as a silly sounding boob.

Your lame attempt to invoke an
IKYABWAI is as predictable as your lies and incoherent gibberish. The
fact
remains that you engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me.

If it's incoherent, how come you keep understanding it enough to respond
with incoherent gibberish of your own?



Of course, you would never know
that from McKelvy's deliberately modified distortion of what I
actually
wrote.

You could if you had half a brain, simply by going to the original, or are
now claiming I rewrote the original as well?

(1) As you can seen he deleted the end of one of my sentences.

Just like you're doing here and now.

A lie. Care to discuss your recent forgeries of posts I've made by
transparent
attempts to change pronouns and other silly and obvious deceptive
editing
bull****?



McKelvy fails to admit forging rercent posts of mine because he has no
valid
respoinse. He's been caught lying again - by use of forgery and
deliberate
text modification of what another person wrote).



Sure, I make
typographical errors and don't use a spell checker. But I don't
usually
leave
sentences that dangle like the one he screwed around with. (2) The
probable
reason he deliberately modified what I wrote was because at the end
of
my
comments, I inserted an emoticon smiley - clearly indicating that my
comments
were meant to be humorous.


McKelvy's silence is deafening at this point. Apparently, he couldn't
"think"
of a decent bull**** defense or rationalization to counter this factual
claim)

Or else I thought you were doing a good job of making yourself look like
an
idiot.

Nobody believes you.

If I see nobody I'll ask him. Everybody else cansee for themselves you're
an idiot.

You're in denial and/or attempting to weasel out of being
exposed as a forger and deliberate modifier of what other people write.

How can I do all that when I've already admitted I I did it. Anybody
following this thread can see it by looking at the originals.

Have
you considered trying to make counterfeit bills? Maybe you'll have more
luck
there than you've had on RAO.

Have you considered being something other than an irrational asshole?

What does this all prove? The following points;

(1) McKelvy has been proven to have lied when he claims that he only
attacks
those who attack him first.


I never specified that it had to be ME who was attacked first. I
don't
like
to see anybody attacked for no reason. Not even you.


Prove it. Attack those that attack me or others that you frequently
attack.
To the best of my knowledge, you've never done so.

One of the keys is it has to be an unprovoked attack. I've never seen
anyone attack you without provocation. Of course I don't read every post
and usually avoid yours.


2 lies in the same sentence - how predictabe. More self-serving false
claims
designed to deny reality from McKelvy.

Now you claim youknow what I read and that you never attack anybody. You're
seriously ****ed in the head.

If you think you have the
right to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against anybody on RAO
who
attacks your friend, Krueger, than, of course, you are as guilty as he
is
of
wanting a lifetime free pass to attack almost everybody on RAO.

I don't bother with most people on RAO. Some I like, and some like you I
don't.


And your right to attack people unprovoked comes from where exactly?

Sorry, scumbag

Don't be sorry, be decent.

Another IKYABWAI - a sure sign that you've lost, ****head. I don't attack
people without prior provocation.

Liar. I already proved you did in the Julian Hirsch thread.

Ed Shain, in a post you tried to smear,
identified numerous individuals that have had serious conflicts with your
puppetmaster, Krueger.

Ed Shain was another asshole.

Of course, even more "enemies" of his (and yours, by
extension) have been added to the list since then.

They have? It seems like the same gang if idiots to me.

No attacks made by me have
occurred without prior provocation.

Liar, I proved you attacke Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. Why did you do
it?

That is true of most of us on RAO - except
for you and Krueger, of course.

You can;t speak for most people, you seem to having trouble speaking for
yourself.

and libeler, but that type of self-serving rationalization for your
despicable
unprovoked personal attacks is duly noted.

As are yours.


Except that they don''t exist except in your paranoid delusional system.

No, you don't exist. You're a fraud and a sockpuppet.

Apparently the cretin, McKelvy, has no other defense but to copy hero
Krueger
by mindlessly repeating a series of infantile lies the equivalent of
"nyaaah,
nyaaah, nyaah!"

LOL !!!


Nyaaah, nyaaah makes you laugh out loud? How old are you, 4?

You wanted some evidence of your unprovoked personal attacks and I
provided it.

No, you only provided your usual lies and half truths.


Tell it to all the people that can read Google and see the evidence.
You're
full of **** as usual.


Try posting whole in context quotes like I did from the Julian Hirsch
thread.

I'm sure I could have gone back much further on RAO and provided much
more,
but exposing you for the compulsive liar you are even in this small
example is
sufficient proof for all objective readers.

Objective readers? You and the guy in your pocket?


No, cretin. The significant majority of readers on RAO that have not ever
been
critical of anybody other than you or Krueger.

Your pocket must be very crowded with little voices. A significant majority
of readers on RAO probably never say anything.

Now why do you suppose that is?
Hint - it has to do with your documented lengthy history of lies, libel,
and
unprovoked personal attacks.



(2) McKelvy has been shown to have lied when he denies making
unprovoked
personal attacks against me in which his name was never mentioned.

See above.




(3) McKelvy has a lengthy history of making libelous comments about
my
professional activities without any factual evidence to support
them.

And you never do anything like that. Riiiigghhht.


For once in your miserable libelous "life", you are correct.

Failure to recognize sarcasm noted.


Inability to comprehend plainly written English noted. Attempt to engage
in
obfuscation noted and found lacking.

You're right, you suck at obfuscation.

Of course, you
don't engage in any professional activities, have no credentials, and
no
title
(other than resident compulsive liar and libeler) AFAIK. Unlike you, I
have
not claimed that the degrees, licenses, etc. of professionals posting
on
RAO
don't exist or were made up.

Neither have I. I said yours are. You are not a professional. If you were
you'd most likely have your license revoked for the way you behave here.


So? What has that to with you being an asshole?

Another delusional perception you get to have.

No, you really are an asshole.

IOW, you are now admitting that
you make up libelous bull**** about the credentials of others such as
myself
without any evidence.

Show me where I said that. I said you, whoever the **** you are a fake.

Thanks, libeler, for admitting your guilt by failure to
respond in a rational manner.


You're welcome **** for brains.


(4) As he has proven today in his deliberate attempt to forge a post
made
by me
by obviously transparent modifications of the text, he has a lengthy
history,
just like his role model, Krueger, of engaging in selective editing
and
deletions of content from posts written by others.

Usually because they are long and boring.


A blatant lie. The sole purpose for your deliberate deletions is to
hide
evidence of your compulsive lying, libel and ignorance.

How do you know what I find boring? If I'm a compulsive liar, it should
be
easy enough for others to see. So far it's only you.

Others on RAO have frequently commented on your overt demonstrations of
ignorance, stupidity, lying, and libel.

Others on RAO have claimed that vinyl is objectively superior to CD as a
format, they're crazy too.



The sole purpose of this
fraudulent behavior is obviously to try and distort what others
have
actually
said. Misquotes and lies are how he exists on RAO.

Prove it. If I alter something you wrote, the original is always
available
for comparison.


I already have, in another post, very recentely. I reprinted the original
post
that you tried to forge and modify. Of course, you can always claim that
Google is lying to us.

LOL !

No just you.

I don't really need to distort what you say, you make an ass of
yourself
with nearly every post.


A delusional, paranoid, psychotic poercerption you get to have. Most
of
RAO
disagrees with you - not that there's anything wrong with that.

And it doesn't make them right either.


They are all wrong. You alone know the true story. And you have also
studied
phrenology and find it inspirational.

No, just studied you and seen you for the unprofessional asshole you are.

Are you denying that you have recently engaged in forgeries of posts
that
I
have made? Feel free to lie again as is your custom.

No, I don't deny it, but I clearly indicated the whole thing was a
satire.


But of course, you were just lying again, since your proven itnent in
every
post you make involving my name is to engagein character assassination and
libel.

How is that possible, you don't exist.


Now, I have no doubt that compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, will
try
to
rationalilze his despicable unprovoked personal attacks upon by me
by
some
old,
tired, irrational argument. He will also try and apply either
evasive
comments, forgery, spindoctoring, and/or other transparent attempts
to
deny his
obvious guilt. However, he can't change the Google record, which is
there
for
all to examine and draw their own conclusions.


Unlike you I prefer the truth.




ROFLMAO !!!! SCORE !!!!

This cretin has just uttered one of his biggest lies of all time.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

P.S. Stay tuned for tales from McKelvy entitled "Google Lies to Me"

LOL !!!!



Bruce J. Richman


I'm sure everybody will be waiting for your next batch of lies. :-(



McKelvy now refers to himself and Krueger as "everyone". More evidence of
his
megalomania, egocentricity, and above all psychotic thought processes.

Actually I was refrring to anybody else that might be following your
dementia in this thread.

The idiot McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
As far back (and probably before) as 2000, the compulsive libeler
and
liar
McKelvy was engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me. In a
thread
that eventually included more than 400 posts, including many from
the
compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, he used his *very first post*
to
engage in
his usual form of libel. Note his use of the same libelous term he
continues
to use to this day. It should be pointed out since his post was one
of
the
first in this thread, no mention of his name was made by me prior to
his
unprovoked personal attack. The post is reprinted below:

From: Mikeylikst )
Subject: Second Thoughts
View: Complete Thread (459 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2000/01/22


From:

Calling Dr. Quackenbush!

Mix equal portions of hatred, bigotry and ignorance - and you often
end
up
with

The Resistance.


Mike McKelvy

"The aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series
of
hobgoblins,all imagnary."


The above is a quote from H.L. Menken, you idiot.


You didn't read the post, scumbag and libeler.

Of course I did. You do se the " marksdon't you? The quote from Menken
is
a well known one.

Like recent forgeries of my posts and deliberate text modifications, you
deliberately omitted text from the original post to make it convey your
bull****. I don't care about your quotes of Menken. You used the term
"Dr.
Quackenbush" to libel me as you have done many times before and since.

I can't libel you. You don't exist.


Is that what the puppetmaster pulling your strings told you to say, lunatic?
You're so crazy that you now have deteriorated to the point where you can't
even tell what is real and what is not.

L:OL !!! I love it. Keep saying it. It just highlight your psychotic
thinking.
What a complete fool you are.

Tell your puppeteer, Krueger to try that with the judge - lol. I'm just
waiting to see what the results are and then we'll consider further action. In
the meantime, I'm sure all of RAO (except Krueger) can count on you, like the
highly conditioned, mad dog that you are to keep spouting your gibberish and
psychotic rantings every time you see my name. If you ever get tired of RAO,
perhaps you can join the circus - they always can put you in a trained animal
act.

Your
failure to acknowleege this proven fact confirms your cowardice and
seriously
psychopathic mindset.


I stand by my comments on the "Resistance." It's no more
than a collection of idiots who have nothing better to do than slander
and
libel others they don't like. The only thing they are resisting is
decent
behavior, while criticising others behavior.


Since I haven't seen any posts from The Resistance, as you call it in a
long
time, perhaps you and Krueger can adopt this name to describe your "folie
a
deux" in which the 2 of you try and smear many regular RAO posters because
they
don't happen to endorse your psychotic and delusional postings.


You've got it all wrong. I don't smear you because I disagree with you, I
smear you because you act like an unprofessional, uncivilized, asshole


You're insane. You are nothing more than a sociopathic, hatefilled, bitter
scumbag who stoops to blatant lies, character assassination & libel because you
don't know how to do anything else due to your mental illness. You've proven
by your actions on RAO to be consumed with hatred and unable to act in a
socially acceptable way. You make totally irrational statements and then try
and lie about "professional behavior" because you realize you've been exposed
as a lying con man and hate merchant. You don't fool anybody except yourself.




Or are you going to lie again,
and claim that Menken used the name, "r. Quackenbush", you retarded
piece of
****?

Of course not, nobody would demean Menken by trying to claim he would
bother
with you.


As usual, you're making no sense whatsoever. But given your severe
cognitive
deficiencies, that is to be expected. The fact remains that you libeled
me
without provocation.

No, it doesn't, asshole.


Your psychotic disconnect from reality is manifesting itself again. Keep
repeating "Richman doesn't exist" to RAO. It helps convince everybody that
you're insane. That is the few that have not been amazed at how twisted and
distorted your posts appear to any rational person


problems are once again exposed - as are your
lies.


http://members.aol.com/rlspeakers/TH...SOUNDPAGE.html


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-----------------------------------------

If one cares to check the Google record, one will also find a few
other
interesting things about this post. I freely admit that on the post
of
mine
which lead to McKelvy's unprovoked personal attack, I had made some
humorous
comments about a person who used to post here.

You mean you made a personal attack.


Wrong, liar. You deleted part of the post as part of your usual
practice
of
forgery and deceptive post modification. You deleted a smiley emoticon
generally cocsiderd by most infelligent life forms on RAO (which
eliminates
you) to mean trhe comment preceding it was made in jest.

How about all the times you don't include an emoticon? You make plenty
of
disgusting comments without using one. To most intelligent life forms,
that
shows you are a disgusting pig.


This post is about your unprovoked personal attack behavior against me,
scumbag, not your delusional perceptions of my behavior.

I don't have any delusional perceptions of your behavior. You are an
unprofessional asshole.



You're lying again. You're a complete fraud, a sociopathic liar and
hatemonger. You don't even know the meaning of the word professional, yet
you've demonstrated your total disregard for facts by continually spreading
lies about me over a 7 year period. Since you don't admit that you've made up
numerous false claims without any evidence to support them, there is only one
reasonable conclusion to draw - you're either consciously lying and just trying
to deny it....... or - you so delusional that you actually believe the nonsense
you spew.

As for professional behavior, you dunce, this is not a place for the practice
of any profession. It is a NG forum, for pete's sake. The fact that a
licensed psychologist has pointed out that you are delusional; - based on your
crazy claims (such as that I don't exist) - is an opinion made on a newsgroup
by a person who happens to be qualified to evaluate your abnormal behavior.
Others have reached the same conclusion about your delusions by simply
observing your juvenile, sociopathic, assinine antics on RAO.

When I respond to
you, compulsive liar McKelvy, it is simply to correct and refute your
maniacal
ravings. It is not meant to be humorous.

Yet you come across as a silly sounding boob.


More evidence of your delusional problems. You've been exposed and proven to
be a liar, quite delusional, and comsumed with hatred. There is nothing silly
at all about the reasonable practice of calling somebody who makes glaringly
false statements about a person's identity, vocational background, credentials,
etc. - a delusional individual. There are 2 possibilities: (1) You're either
consciously and voluntarily lying - a distinct possibility, given your
hatred-driven desire to smear me, or (2) you really believe the stuff you say
in the same manner that those suffering from both paranoid ideation and
delusional thinking.


Your lame attempt to invoke an
IKYABWAI is as predictable as your lies and incoherent gibberish. The
fact
remains that you engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me.

If it's incoherent, how come you keep understanding it enough to respond
with incoherent gibberish of your own?



Another IKYABWAI. In the course of my professional career, through clinical
experience, I've learned that even the most seriously disturbed, such as
yourself, have transient moments of lucidity. Do you what the term echolalia
means? Look it up. Your mindless parroting of IKYABWAI's is just another
indication that you are suffering from a thought disorder.

Here's a proposal for you. Try telling your stories, face-to-face to any
licensed mental health professional in your area. Allow them to ask you a few
reasonable questions about your reasons for the saying the things you do.
Further, let them explore with you whether or if you have any logical or
rational reason to believe that a person doesn't exist, that he doesn't possess
all the professioinal and experiential qualifications that he has previously
mentioned. Try also to explain to that professional the basis of your many
beliefs about myself and others on others that you have defamed and smeared.
While legitimate clinicians may disagree as to what diagnosis you would then
obtain, I would be very surprised if delusional thinking, paranoid ideation,
and/or irrational hatred toward selected others were not part of their clinical
impressions reported.



Of course, you would never know
that from McKelvy's deliberately modified distortion of what I
actually
wrote.

You could if you had half a brain, simply by going to the original, or are
now claiming I rewrote the original as well?

(1) As you can seen he deleted the end of one of my sentences.

Just like you're doing here and now.

A lie. Care to discuss your recent forgeries of posts I've made by
transparent
attempts to change pronouns and other silly and obvious deceptive
editing
bull****?



McKelvy fails to admit forging rercent posts of mine because he has no
valid
respoinse. He's been caught lying again - by use of forgery and
deliberate
text modification of what another person wrote).



Sure, I make
typographical errors and don't use a spell checker. But I don't
usually
leave
sentences that dangle like the one he screwed around with. (2) The
probable
reason he deliberately modified what I wrote was because at the end
of
my
comments, I inserted an emoticon smiley - clearly indicating that my
comments
were meant to be humorous.


McKelvy's silence is deafening at this point. Apparently, he couldn't
"think"
of a decent bull**** defense or rationalization to counter this factual
claim)

Or else I thought you were doing a good job of making yourself look like
an
idiot.

Nobody believes you.

If I see nobody I'll ask him. Everybody else cansee for themselves you're
an idiot.


Prove it. Prove that you are not delusional when you make false statements
about me and claim they are factual.


You're in denial and/or attempting to weasel out of being
exposed as a forger and deliberate modifier of what other people write.

How can I do all that when I've already admitted I I did it. Anybody
following this thread can see it by looking at the originals.


You only admitted after failing to get away with it. Your intent was to
hopefully fool a few people tha might not have read the original post.



Have
you considered trying to make counterfeit bills? Maybe you'll have more
luck
there than you've had on RAO.

Have you considered being something other than an irrational asshole?

Since that has never applied to me, there has been no need to consider it. You
do have a continued tendency to engage in a form of partial echolalia in which
you partially parrot what people say and just end the sentence differently. It
is very reminiscent of the Dustin Hoffman character, Rainman. Of course, he was
just acting the part of an autistic patient. With you, thought disorder does
not appear to be an act.





What does this all prove? The following points;

(1) McKelvy has been proven to have lied when he claims that he only
attacks
those who attack him first.


I never specified that it had to be ME who was attacked first. I
don't
like
to see anybody attacked for no reason. Not even you.


Prove it. Attack those that attack me or others that you frequently
attack.
To the best of my knowledge, you've never done so.

One of the keys is it has to be an unprovoked attack. I've never seen
anyone attack you without provocation. Of course I don't read every post
and usually avoid yours.


2 lies in the same sentence - how predictabe. More self-serving false
claims
designed to deny reality from McKelvy.

Now you claim youknow what I read and that you never attack anybody. You're
seriously ****ed in the head.

If you think you have the
right to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against anybody on RAO
who
attacks your friend, Krueger, than, of course, you are as guilty as he
is
of
wanting a lifetime free pass to attack almost everybody on RAO.

I don't bother with most people on RAO. Some I like, and some like you I
don't.


And your right to attack people unprovoked comes from where exactly?

Sorry, scumbag

Don't be sorry, be decent.


I treat all RAO posters with the level of respect they deserve. Civilized
conversations have been carried on with many here who can easily be named.
Since you have demonstrated an inability to engage in civilized rational
conversation with me, and have further demonstrated an eagerness to engage in
slander and defamation concerning many of my professional activities and
background - you are not entitled to either respect or decent behavior from me.


Another IKYABWAI - a sure sign that you've lost, ****head. I don't attack
people without prior provocation.

Liar. I already proved you did in the Julian Hirsch thread.


Liar. You've proved nothing. However, the reason for the title of this thread
is contained in Google. Besides you have advanced the notion that provocation
can be whatever you define it to be - how convenient. Why don't you ask
Krueger to do a Google search for you. As I';ve shown in other thread, this
fool listed a thread in which I discussed Daniel Lanois (record producer for
Emmylou Harris and others) as an example of an unprovoked personal attack
against him. The thread had nothing to do with him and his name was never
mentioned. I reprinted it so all could be witness to his stupidity. Your
stupidity lies in trying to rationalize your unprovoked personal attacks by
claiming "you did it first" - and then trying to extend it to include not only
yourself but anybody else you select - over an indeterminant time frame. How
scientific! No wonder your speaker business never got off the ground.


Ed Shain, in a post you tried to smear,
identified numerous individuals that have had serious conflicts with your
puppetmaster, Krueger.

Ed Shain was another asshole.


As are all who disagree with you and Krueger? As are all who provide factual
evidence of your hero's long history of interpersonal conflict on RAO? Has it
ever occurred to you that you might be wrong and a significant majority of
those voicing opinions about you and Krueger are right/ Let me retract my
suggestion that you see a licensed mental health professioinal for a
face-to-face evaluation. Clearly, you are quite lacking in self-awareness,
have minimal insight into the reasons for your behavior, and have demonstrated
neither the motivation nor the capacity to change in any way. Your rigidity
suggests that when 2 licensed psychologists independently (and without
consultation) posted the clinical definition (with symptoms) of Paranoid
Personality Disorder (as listed in the APA's Diagnostic & Statistical Manual -
IV) in reference to Krueger, they might have easily been applied to your online
behavior as well.



Of course, even more "enemies" of his (and yours, by
extension) have been added to the list since then.

They have? It seems like the same gang if idiots to me.

No attacks made by me have
occurred without prior provocation.

Liar, I proved you attacke Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. Why did you do
it?

That is true of most of us on RAO - except
for you and Krueger, of course.

You can;t speak for most people, you seem to having trouble speaking for
yourself.

and libeler, but that type of self-serving rationalization for your
despicable
unprovoked personal attacks is duly noted.

As are yours.


Except that they don''t exist except in your paranoid delusional system.

No, you don't exist. You're a fraud and a sockpuppet.


Prove it. See above. You're either consciously and voluntarily lying and are
aware of it, or you convinced that you are telling the truth and are
delusional. Which is it?


Apparently the cretin, McKelvy, has no other defense but to copy hero
Krueger
by mindlessly repeating a series of infantile lies the equivalent of
"nyaaah,
nyaaah, nyaah!"

LOL !!!


Nyaaah, nyaaah makes you laugh out loud? How old are you, 4?


Acftually, I'm laughing to myself at you. If you think I am laughing out loud,
then we can add auditory hallucinations to your symptom list. You now have
admitted to hearing voices from the act of reading a NG post. Does your
computer and/or Google also talk to you?


You wanted some evidence of your unprovoked personal attacks and I
provided it.

No, you only provided your usual lies and half truths.


Tell it to all the people that can read Google and see the evidence.
You're
full of **** as usual.


Try posting whole in context quotes like I did from the Julian Hirsch
thread.

I'm sure I could have gone back much further on RAO and provided much
more,
but exposing you for the compulsive liar you are even in this small
example is
sufficient proof for all objective readers.

Objective readers? You and the guy in your pocket?


No, cretin. The significant majority of readers on RAO that have not ever
been
critical of anybody other than you or Krueger.

Your pocket must be very crowded with little voices. A significant majority
of readers on RAO probably never say anything.


Prove it.


Now why do you suppose that is?
Hint - it has to do with your documented lengthy history of lies, libel,
and
unprovoked personal attacks.



(2) McKelvy has been shown to have lied when he denies making
unprovoked
personal attacks against me in which his name was never mentioned.

See above.




(3) McKelvy has a lengthy history of making libelous comments about
my
professional activities without any factual evidence to support
them.

And you never do anything like that. Riiiigghhht.


For once in your miserable libelous "life", you are correct.

Failure to recognize sarcasm noted.


Inability to comprehend plainly written English noted. Attempt to engage
in
obfuscation noted and found lacking.

You're right, you suck at obfuscation.


IKYABWAI and lame parroting/echolalia observed. Further clinical evidence of
thought disorder.

Of course, you
don't engage in any professional activities, have no credentials, and
no
title
(other than resident compulsive liar and libeler) AFAIK. Unlike you, I
have
not claimed that the degrees, licenses, etc. of professionals posting
on
RAO
don't exist or were made up.

Neither have I. I said yours are. You are not a professional. If you were
you'd most likely have your license revoked for the way you behave here.



More evidence of libel and delusional thinking.


So? What has that to with you being an asshole?

Another delusional perception you get to have.

No, you really are an asshole.

IOW, you are now admitting that
you make up libelous bull**** about the credentials of others such as
myself
without any evidence.

Show me where I said that. I said you, whoever the **** you are a fake.


Which imeets all criteria for libel. You're clearly delusiional.


Thanks, libeler, for admitting your guilt by failure to
respond in a rational manner.


You're welcome **** for brains.


So no you think you are talking to Krueger. As your thought processes continue
to deteriorate, you continue to lose the ability to make even gross
identifications of people with whom you are attempting to communicate. Not
surprising at all.



(4) As he has proven today in his deliberate attempt to forge a post
made
by me
by obviously transparent modifications of the text, he has a lengthy
history,
just like his role model, Krueger, of engaging in selective editing
and
deletions of content from posts written by others.

Usually because they are long and boring.


A blatant lie. The sole purpose for your deliberate deletions is to
hide
evidence of your compulsive lying, libel and ignorance.

How do you know what I find boring? If I'm a compulsive liar, it should
be
easy enough for others to see. So far it's only you.

Others on RAO have frequently commented on your overt demonstrations of
ignorance, stupidity, lying, and libel.

Others on RAO have claimed that vinyl is objectively superior to CD as a
format, they're crazy too.


So anybody who makes an unscientific claim is crazy? In that case your
unscientific statements about my identity, my credentials, etc. defines you as
crazy.

Why don';t you list the people you think have made that claim, and provide some
Google references so that the rest of us can evaluate whether they are crazy.




The sole purpose of this
fraudulent behavior is obviously to try and distort what others
have
actually
said. Misquotes and lies are how he exists on RAO.

Prove it. If I alter something you wrote, the original is always
available
for comparison.


I already have, in another post, very recentely. I reprinted the original
post
that you tried to forge and modify. Of course, you can always claim that
Google is lying to us.

LOL !

No just you.

I don't really need to distort what you say, you make an ass of
yourself
with nearly every post.


A delusional, paranoid, psychotic poercerption you get to have. Most
of
RAO
disagrees with you - not that there's anything wrong with that.

And it doesn't make them right either.


They are all wrong. You alone know the true story. And you have also
studied
phrenology and find it inspirational.

No, just studied you and seen you for the unprofessional asshole you are.


So now you are studying a person that you claim doesn't exist? Most would
consider that further evidence of your psychosis. You continue to fail to
comprehend that RAO is not a forum for the professional practice of anything in
particular. Its a place for the exchange of subjective opinions. Some happen
to be given by people qualified to make them an d ohers are given by people
like you who claim to have magical powers to determine who exists and who
doesn't, or who is or is not a fraud. How did you develop these "gifts"? Were
tarot cards, runes. or tea leaves involved? Perhaps a Ouija Board? I'm sure
we can entertain any theory you might advance that corresponds to your obvious
lack of scientific evidence.

Are you denying that you have recently engaged in forgeries of posts
that
I
have made? Feel free to lie again as is your custom.

No, I don't deny it, but I clearly indicated the whole thing was a
satire.



Only after it was exposed by me. (I'm not referring to your attempts to
describe previously made posts in which you made silly comment about vinyl
copulation, etc. as satire. Given your 7 year history of unprovoked personal
attacks against me, no rational person would believe your defense that you were
just being satirical. Your goals have nothing to do with humor, they have
everything to do with hatred and slander).



But of course, you were just lying again, since your proven itnent in
every
post you make involving my name is to engagein character assassination and
libel.

How is that possible, you don't exist.


Further evidence of your psychosis. Prove it to a licensed mental health
professional. Even better, try and use that statement after you've been
involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility and see if they release you.
Ask them if you can have visitors during your lengthy stay.



Now, I have no doubt that compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, will
try
to
rationalilze his despicable unprovoked personal attacks upon by me
by
some
old,
tired, irrational argument. He will also try and apply either
evasive
comments, forgery, spindoctoring, and/or other transparent attempts
to
deny his
obvious guilt. However, he can't change the Google record, which is
there
for
all to examine and draw their own conclusions.


Unlike you I prefer the truth.




ROFLMAO !!!! SCORE !!!!

This cretin has just uttered one of his biggest lies of all time.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

P.S. Stay tuned for tales from McKelvy entitled "Google Lies to Me"

LOL !!!!



Bruce J. Richman


I'm sure everybody will be waiting for your next batch of lies. :-(



McKelvy now refers to himself and Krueger as "everyone". More evidence of
his
megalomania, egocentricity, and above all psychotic thought processes.

Actually I was refrring to anybody else that might be following your
dementia in this thread.


Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia. Prove that you can even
define the term. Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
The idiot McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
As far back (and probably before) as 2000, the compulsive libeler
and
liar
McKelvy was engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me.
In a
thread
that eventually included more than 400 posts, including many from
the
compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, he used his *very first
post*
to
engage in
his usual form of libel. Note his use of the same libelous term
he
continues
to use to this day. It should be pointed out since his post was
one
of
the
first in this thread, no mention of his name was made by me prior
to
his
unprovoked personal attack. The post is reprinted below:

From: Mikeylikst )
Subject: Second Thoughts
View: Complete Thread (459 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2000/01/22


From:

Calling Dr. Quackenbush!

Mix equal portions of hatred, bigotry and ignorance - and you
often
end
up
with

The Resistance.


Mike McKelvy

"The aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and
hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless
series
of
hobgoblins,all imagnary."


The above is a quote from H.L. Menken, you idiot.


You didn't read the post, scumbag and libeler.

Of course I did. You do se the " marksdon't you? The quote from
Menken
is
a well known one.

Like recent forgeries of my posts and deliberate text modifications,
you
deliberately omitted text from the original post to make it convey your
bull****. I don't care about your quotes of Menken. You used the term
"Dr.
Quackenbush" to libel me as you have done many times before and since.

I can't libel you. You don't exist.


Is that what the puppetmaster pulling your strings told you to say,
lunatic?
You're so crazy that you now have deteriorated to the point where you
can't
even tell what is real and what is not.

L:OL !!! I love it. Keep saying it. It just highlight your psychotic
thinking.
What a complete fool you are.

Tell your puppeteer, Krueger to try that with the judge - lol. I'm just
waiting to see what the results are and then we'll consider further
action. In
the meantime, I'm sure all of RAO (except Krueger) can count on you, like
the
highly conditioned, mad dog that you are to keep spouting your gibberish
and
psychotic rantings every time you see my name. If you ever get tired of
RAO,
perhaps you can join the circus - they always can put you in a trained
animal
act.

Your
failure to acknowleege this proven fact confirms your cowardice and
seriously
psychopathic mindset.


I stand by my comments on the "Resistance." It's no more
than a collection of idiots who have nothing better to do than slander
and
libel others they don't like. The only thing they are resisting is
decent
behavior, while criticising others behavior.


Since I haven't seen any posts from The Resistance, as you call it in a
long
time, perhaps you and Krueger can adopt this name to describe your
"folie
a
deux" in which the 2 of you try and smear many regular RAO posters
because
they
don't happen to endorse your psychotic and delusional postings.


You've got it all wrong. I don't smear you because I disagree with you,
I
smear you because you act like an unprofessional, uncivilized, asshole


You're insane. You are nothing more than a sociopathic, hatefilled,
bitter
scumbag who stoops to blatant lies, character assassination & libel
because you
don't know how to do anything else due to your mental illness. You've
proven
by your actions on RAO to be consumed with hatred and unable to act in a
socially acceptable way. You make totally irrational statements and then
try
and lie about "professional behavior" because you realize you've been
exposed
as a lying con man and hate merchant. You don't fool anybody except
yourself.




Or are you going to lie again,
and claim that Menken used the name, "r. Quackenbush", you
retarded
piece of
****?

Of course not, nobody would demean Menken by trying to claim he would
bother
with you.


As usual, you're making no sense whatsoever. But given your severe
cognitive
deficiencies, that is to be expected. The fact remains that you
libeled
me
without provocation.

No, it doesn't, asshole.


Your psychotic disconnect from reality is manifesting itself again. Keep
repeating "Richman doesn't exist" to RAO. It helps convince everybody
that
you're insane. That is the few that have not been amazed at how twisted
and
distorted your posts appear to any rational person


problems are once again exposed - as are your
lies.


http://members.aol.com/rlspeakers/TH...SOUNDPAGE.html



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-----------------------------------------

If one cares to check the Google record, one will also find a few
other
interesting things about this post. I freely admit that on the
post
of
mine
which lead to McKelvy's unprovoked personal attack, I had made
some
humorous
comments about a person who used to post here.

You mean you made a personal attack.


Wrong, liar. You deleted part of the post as part of your usual
practice
of
forgery and deceptive post modification. You deleted a smiley
emoticon
generally cocsiderd by most infelligent life forms on RAO (which
eliminates
you) to mean trhe comment preceding it was made in jest.

How about all the times you don't include an emoticon? You make
plenty
of
disgusting comments without using one. To most intelligent life
forms,
that
shows you are a disgusting pig.


This post is about your unprovoked personal attack behavior against me,
scumbag, not your delusional perceptions of my behavior.

I don't have any delusional perceptions of your behavior. You are an
unprofessional asshole.



You're lying again. You're a complete fraud, a sociopathic liar and
hatemonger. You don't even know the meaning of the word professional,
yet
you've demonstrated your total disregard for facts by continually
spreading
lies about me over a 7 year period. Since you don't admit that you've
made up
numerous false claims without any evidence to support them, there is only
one
reasonable conclusion to draw - you're either consciously lying and just
trying
to deny it....... or - you so delusional that you actually believe the
nonsense
you spew.

As for professional behavior, you dunce, this is not a place for the
practice
of any profession. It is a NG forum, for pete's sake. The fact that a
licensed psychologist has pointed out that you are delusional; - based on
your
crazy claims (such as that I don't exist) - is an opinion made on a
newsgroup
by a person who happens to be qualified to evaluate your abnormal
behavior.
Others have reached the same conclusion about your delusions by simply
observing your juvenile, sociopathic, assinine antics on RAO.

When I respond to
you, compulsive liar McKelvy, it is simply to correct and refute your
maniacal
ravings. It is not meant to be humorous.

Yet you come across as a silly sounding boob.


More evidence of your delusional problems. You've been exposed and proven
to
be a liar, quite delusional, and comsumed with hatred. There is nothing
silly
at all about the reasonable practice of calling somebody who makes
glaringly
false statements about a person's identity, vocational background,
credentials,
etc. - a delusional individual. There are 2 possibilities: (1) You're
either
consciously and voluntarily lying - a distinct possibility, given your
hatred-driven desire to smear me, or (2) you really believe the stuff you
say
in the same manner that those suffering from both paranoid ideation and
delusional thinking.


Your lame attempt to invoke an
IKYABWAI is as predictable as your lies and incoherent gibberish. The
fact
remains that you engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me.

If it's incoherent, how come you keep understanding it enough to respond
with incoherent gibberish of your own?



Another IKYABWAI. In the course of my professional career, through
clinical
experience, I've learned that even the most seriously disturbed, such as
yourself, have transient moments of lucidity. Do you what the term
echolalia
means? Look it up. Your mindless parroting of IKYABWAI's is just another
indication that you are suffering from a thought disorder.

Here's a proposal for you. Try telling your stories, face-to-face to any
licensed mental health professional in your area. Allow them to ask you a
few
reasonable questions about your reasons for the saying the things you do.
Further, let them explore with you whether or if you have any logical or
rational reason to believe that a person doesn't exist, that he doesn't
possess
all the professioinal and experiential qualifications that he has
previously
mentioned. Try also to explain to that professional the basis of your
many
beliefs about myself and others on others that you have defamed and
smeared.
While legitimate clinicians may disagree as to what diagnosis you would
then
obtain, I would be very surprised if delusional thinking, paranoid
ideation,
and/or irrational hatred toward selected others were not part of their
clinical
impressions reported.



Of course, you would never know
that from McKelvy's deliberately modified distortion of what I
actually
wrote.

You could if you had half a brain, simply by going to the original, or
are
now claiming I rewrote the original as well?

(1) As you can seen he deleted the end of one of my sentences.

Just like you're doing here and now.

A lie. Care to discuss your recent forgeries of posts I've made by
transparent
attempts to change pronouns and other silly and obvious deceptive
editing
bull****?



McKelvy fails to admit forging rercent posts of mine because he has no
valid
respoinse. He's been caught lying again - by use of forgery and
deliberate
text modification of what another person wrote).



Sure, I make
typographical errors and don't use a spell checker. But I don't
usually
leave
sentences that dangle like the one he screwed around with. (2)
The
probable
reason he deliberately modified what I wrote was because at the
end
of
my
comments, I inserted an emoticon smiley - clearly indicating that
my
comments
were meant to be humorous.


McKelvy's silence is deafening at this point. Apparently, he
couldn't
"think"
of a decent bull**** defense or rationalization to counter this
factual
claim)

Or else I thought you were doing a good job of making yourself look
like
an
idiot.

Nobody believes you.

If I see nobody I'll ask him. Everybody else cansee for themselves
you're
an idiot.


Prove it. Prove that you are not delusional when you make false statements
about me and claim they are factual.


You're in denial and/or attempting to weasel out of being
exposed as a forger and deliberate modifier of what other people write.

How can I do all that when I've already admitted I I did it. Anybody
following this thread can see it by looking at the originals.


You only admitted after failing to get away with it. Your intent was to
hopefully fool a few people tha might not have read the original post.



Have
you considered trying to make counterfeit bills? Maybe you'll have more
luck
there than you've had on RAO.

Have you considered being something other than an irrational asshole?

Since that has never applied to me, there has been no need to consider it.
You
do have a continued tendency to engage in a form of partial echolalia in
which
you partially parrot what people say and just end the sentence
differently. It
is very reminiscent of the Dustin Hoffman character, Rainman. Of course,
he was
just acting the part of an autistic patient. With you, thought disorder
does
not appear to be an act.





What does this all prove? The following points;

(1) McKelvy has been proven to have lied when he claims that he
only
attacks
those who attack him first.


I never specified that it had to be ME who was attacked first. I
don't
like
to see anybody attacked for no reason. Not even you.


Prove it. Attack those that attack me or others that you frequently
attack.
To the best of my knowledge, you've never done so.

One of the keys is it has to be an unprovoked attack. I've never seen
anyone attack you without provocation. Of course I don't read every
post
and usually avoid yours.


2 lies in the same sentence - how predictable. More self-serving false
claims
designed to deny reality from McKelvy.

Now yo claim youknow what I read and that you never attack anybody.
You're
seriously ****ed in the head.

If you think you have the
right to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against anybody on
RAO
who
attacks your friend, Krueger, than, of course, you are as guilty as
he
is
of
wanting a lifetime free pass to attack almost everybody on RAO.

I don't bother with most people on RAO. Some I like, and some like you I
don't.


And your right to attack people unprovoked comes from where exactly?

Sorry, scumbag

Don't be sorry, be decent.


I treat all RAO posters with the level of respect they deserve. Civilized
conversations have been carried on with many here who can easily be named.
Since you have demonstrated an inability to engage in civilized rational
conversation with me, and have further demonstrated an eagerness to engage
in
slander and defamation concerning many of my professional activities and
background - you are not entitled to either respect or decent behavior
from me.


Another IKYABWAI - a sure sign that you've lost, ****head. I don't
attack
people without prior provocation.

Liar. I already proved you did in the Julian Hirsch thread.


Liar. You've proved nothing. However, the reason for the title of this
thread
is contained in Google. Besides you have advanced the notion that
provocation
can be whatever you define it to be - how convenient. Why don't you ask
Krueger to do a Google search for you. As I';ve shown in other thread,
this
fool listed a thread in which I discussed Daniel Lanois (record producer
for
Emmylou Harris and others) as an example of an unprovoked personal attack
against him. The thread had nothing to do with him and his name was never
mentioned. I reprinted it so all could be witness to his stupidity. Your
stupidity lies in trying to rationalize your unprovoked personal attacks
by
claiming "you did it first" - and then trying to extend it to include not
only
yourself but anybody else you select - over an indeterminant time frame.
How
scientific! No wonder your speaker business never got off the ground.


Ed Shain, in a post you tried to smear,
identified numerous individuals that have had serious conflicts with
your
puppetmaster, Krueger.

Ed Shain was another asshole.


As are all who disagree with you and Krueger? As are all who provide
factual
evidence of your hero's long history of interpersonal conflict on RAO?
Has it
ever occurred to you that you might be wrong and a significant majority of
those voicing opinions about you and Krueger are right/ Let me retract my
suggestion that you see a licensed mental health professioinal for a
face-to-face evaluation. Clearly, you are quite lacking in
self-awareness,
have minimal insight into the reasons for your behavior, and have
demonstrated
neither the motivation nor the capacity to change in any way. Your
rigidity
suggests that when 2 licensed psychologists independently (and without
consultation) posted the clinical definition (with symptoms) of Paranoid
Personality Disorder (as listed in the APA's Diagnostic & Statistical
Manual -
IV) in reference to Krueger, they might have easily been applied to your
online
behavior as well.



Of course, even more "enemies" of his (and yours, by
extension) have been added to the list since then.

They have? It seems like the same gang if idiots to me.

No attacks made by me have
occurred without prior provocation.

Liar, I proved you attacke Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. Why did you
do
it?

That is true of most of us on RAO - except
for you and Krueger, of course.

You can;t speak for most people, you seem to having trouble speaking for
yourself.

and libeler, but that type of self-serving rationalization for your
despicable
unprovoked personal attacks is duly noted.

As are yours.


Except that they don''t exist except in your paranoid delusional
system.

No, you don't exist. You're a fraud and a sockpuppet.


Prove it. See above. You're either consciously and voluntarily lying and
are
aware of it, or you convinced that you are telling the truth and are
delusional. Which is it?


Apparently the cretin, McKelvy, has no other defense but to copy hero
Krueger
by mindlessly repeating a series of infantile lies the equivalent of
"nyaaah,
nyaaah, nyaah!"

LOL !!!


Nyaaah, nyaaah makes you laugh out loud? How old are you, 4?


Acftually, I'm laughing to myself at you. If you think I am laughing out
loud,
then we can add auditory hallucinations to your symptom list. You now
have
admitted to hearing voices from the act of reading a NG post. Does your
computer and/or Google also talk to you?


You wanted some evidence of your unprovoked personal attacks and I
provided it.

No, you only provided your usual lies and half truths.


Tell it to all the people that can read Google and see the evidence.
You're
full of **** as usual.


Try posting whole in context quotes like I did from the Julian Hirsch
thread.

I'm sure I could have gone back much further on RAO and provided
much
more,
but exposing you for the compulsive liar you are even in this small
example is
sufficient proof for all objective readers.

Objective readers? You and the guy in your pocket?


No, cretin. The significant majority of readers on RAO that have not
ever
been
critical of anybody other than you or Krueger.

Your pocket must be very crowded with little voices. A significant
majority
of readers on RAO probably never say anything.


Prove it.


Now why do you suppose that is?
Hint - it has to do with your documented lengthy history of lies,
libel,
and
unprovoked personal attacks.



(2) McKelvy has been shown to have lied when he denies making
unprovoked
personal attacks against me in which his name was never
mentioned.

See above.




(3) McKelvy has a lengthy history of making libelous comments
about
my
professional activities without any factual evidence to support
them.

And you never do anything like that. Riiiigghhht.


For once in your miserable libelous "life", you are correct.

Failure to recognize sarcasm noted.


Inability to comprehend plainly written English noted. Attempt to
engage
in
obfuscation noted and found lacking.

You're right, you suck at obfuscation.


IKYABWAI and lame parroting/echolalia observed. Further clinical evidence
of
thought disorder.

Of course, you
don't engage in any professional activities, have no credentials,
and
no
title
(other than resident compulsive liar and libeler) AFAIK. Unlike
you, I
have
not claimed that the degrees, licenses, etc. of professionals
posting
on
RAO
don't exist or were made up.

Neither have I. I said yours are. You are not a professional. If you
were
you'd most likely have your license revoked for the way you behave here.



More evidence of libel and delusional thinking.


So? What has that to with you being an asshole?

Another delusional perception you get to have.

No, you really are an asshole.

IOW, you are now admitting that
you make up libelous bull**** about the credentials of others such as
myself
without any evidence.

Show me where I said that. I said you, whoever the **** you are a fake.


Which imeets all criteria for libel. You're clearly delusiional.


Thanks, libeler, for admitting your guilt by failure to
respond in a rational manner.


You're welcome **** for brains.


So no you think you are talking to Krueger. As your thought processes
continue
to deteriorate, you continue to lose the ability to make even gross
identifications of people with whom you are attempting to communicate.
Not
surprising at all.



(4) As he has proven today in his deliberate attempt to forge a
post
made
by me
by obviously transparent modifications of the text, he has a
lengthy
history,
just like his role model, Krueger, of engaging in selective
editing
and
deletions of content from posts written by others.

Usually because they are long and boring.


A blatant lie. The sole purpose for your deliberate deletions is to
hide
evidence of your compulsive lying, libel and ignorance.

How do you know what I find boring? If I'm a compulsive liar, it
should
be
easy enough for others to see. So far it's only you.

Others on RAO have frequently commented on your overt demonstrations of
ignorance, stupidity, lying, and libel.

Others on RAO have claimed that vinyl is objectively superior to CD as a
format, they're crazy too.


So anybody who makes an unscientific claim is crazy? In that case your
unscientific statements about my identity, my credentials, etc. defines
you as
crazy.

Why don';t you list the people you think have made that claim, and provide
some
Google references so that the rest of us can evaluate whether they are
crazy.




The sole purpose of this
fraudulent behavior is obviously to try and distort what others
have
actually
said. Misquotes and lies are how he exists on RAO.

Prove it. If I alter something you wrote, the original is always
available
for comparison.


I already have, in another post, very recentely. I reprinted the
original
post
that you tried to forge and modify. Of course, you can always claim
that
Google is lying to us.

LOL !

No just you.

I don't really need to distort what you say, you make an ass of
yourself
with nearly every post.


A delusional, paranoid, psychotic poercerption you get to have.
Most
of
RAO
disagrees with you - not that there's anything wrong with that.

And it doesn't make them right either.


They are all wrong. You alone know the true story. And you have also
studied
phrenology and find it inspirational.

No, just studied you and seen you for the unprofessional asshole you are.


So now you are studying a person that you claim doesn't exist? Most would
consider that further evidence of your psychosis. You continue to fail to
comprehend that RAO is not a forum for the professional practice of
anything in
particular. Its a place for the exchange of subjective opinions. Some
happen
to be given by people qualified to make them an d ohers are given by
people
like you who claim to have magical powers to determine who exists and who
doesn't, or who is or is not a fraud. How did you develop these "gifts"?
Were
tarot cards, runes. or tea leaves involved? Perhaps a Ouija Board? I'm
sure
we can entertain any theory you might advance that corresponds to your
obvious
lack of scientific evidence.

Are you denying that you have recently engaged in forgeries of posts
that
I
have made? Feel free to lie again as is your custom.

No, I don't deny it, but I clearly indicated the whole thing was a
satire.



Only after it was exposed by me. (I'm not referring to your attempts to
describe previously made posts in which you made silly comment about vinyl
copulation, etc. as satire. Given your 7 year history of unprovoked
personal
attacks against me, no rational person would believe your defense that you
were
just being satirical. Your goals have nothing to do with humor, they have
everything to do with hatred and slander).



But of course, you were just lying again, since your proven itnent in
every
post you make involving my name is to engagein character assassination
and
libel.

How is that possible, you don't exist.


Further evidence of your psychosis. Prove it to a licensed mental health
professional. Even better, try and use that statement after you've been
involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility and see if they release
you.
Ask them if you can have visitors during your lengthy stay.



Now, I have no doubt that compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy,
will
try
to
rationalilze his despicable unprovoked personal attacks upon by
me
by
some
old,
tired, irrational argument. He will also try and apply either
evasive
comments, forgery, spindoctoring, and/or other transparent
attempts
to
deny his
obvious guilt. However, he can't change the Google record, which
is
there
for
all to examine and draw their own conclusions.


Unlike you I prefer the truth.




ROFLMAO !!!! SCORE !!!!

This cretin has just uttered one of his biggest lies of all time.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

P.S. Stay tuned for tales from McKelvy entitled "Google Lies to Me"

LOL !!!!



Bruce J. Richman


I'm sure everybody will be waiting for your next batch of lies. :-(



McKelvy now refers to himself and Krueger as "everyone". More evidence
of
his
megalomania, egocentricity, and above all psychotic thought processes.

Actually I was refrring to anybody else that might be following your
dementia in this thread.


Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.

Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


You keep confusing me with you, further proof that you're a whack job.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Michael McKelvy wrote:

most of post deleted since it contains old material already psted and read by
all interested parties

Dr. Richman said:

Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Actually, the only person that has ever made any such false claim about my
posting has been a pathological liar such as yourself, who is apparently
threatened by the evluations of a licensed psychologist - and one that you have
repeatedly libeled. You also obviously don't no what the term dementia means.
IYour stupidity concerning the use of fairly common psychological terms is
therefore confirmed.


Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.


You've just proven that your use of common psycholgical terms is, as predicted,
stupidly mistaken. You've also provided more evidence that you suffer from a
thought disorder, since psychotic individuals such as yourself, frequently
invent meanings that only they believe are true.

I believe I have a doctorate in psychology because it is a proven fact and a
matter of public record.

I believe that you have a 7 year history of engaging in libel on RAO because
that is also a proven fact and a matter of Google record.

Since you have proven yourself unable to define "dementiaa" in a way that
conforms to any valid dictionary definition, perhaps you should stick to more
simple words with which you are familiar and that descrdibe you like - liar,
sockpuppet, fool, etc.

Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


Just more evidence of your lack of contact with reality.



You keep confusing me with a piece of ****, further proof that you're a wise
and perceptive person.

]
Thank you for the kind words, I'm flattered.

(Note: the above is satire done just to illustrate how easy it is to adopt
juvenile tactics such as those used by McKelvy when engaging iin forgery. But
unlike him, I'm admitting I modified his latest psychotic statement - and I'm
doing it before being expsed - because unlike the pathologial liar, McKelvy, I
don't have anything to try and cover up like he does).
Nobody confuses your daily exhibition of psychotic thinking with anybody other
than yourself. You're almost compleetely out of touch with reality. and your
posts continue to demonstrate that fact.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist














Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

most of post deleted since it contains old material already psted and
read by
all interested parties

Dr. Richman said:

Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Actually, the only person that has ever made any such false claim about my
posting has been a pathological liar such as yourself, who is apparently
threatened by the evluations of a licensed psychologist - and one that you
have
repeatedly libeled.

I'm not threatened. I find it unprofessional that you would claim to be
able to make such judgements on someone you've never met. Plus you don't
exist.

You also obviously don't no what the term dementia means.
IYour stupidity concerning the use of fairly common psychological terms is
therefore confirmed.


And people think I don't "no" how to spell!

Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.


You've just proven that your use of common psycholgical terms is, as
predicted,
stupidly mistaken.

It still fits.

You've also provided more evidence that you suffer from a
thought disorder, since psychotic individuals such as yourself, frequently
invent meanings that only they believe are true.

The only thing I've proven is that you're an asshole.

I believe I have a doctorate in psychology because it is a proven fact
and a
matter of public record.

Maybe BJ Richman does but you don't.

I believe that you have a 7 year history of engaging in libel on RAO
because
that is also a proven fact and a matter of Google record.

Then I guess we're even, you have a similar history.

Since you have proven yourself unable to define "dementiaa" in a way that
conforms to any valid dictionary definition, perhaps you should stick to
more
simple words with which you are familiar and that descrdibe you like -
liar,
sockpuppet, fool, etc.

Now who's engaging in libel?

Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


Just more evidence of your lack of contact with reality.
I have lots of contact with reality, that's how I know you are a ****.


You keep confusing me with a piece of ****, further proof that you're a
wise
and perceptive person.

Thank you for admitting you are a piece of ****.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
Lost his grip on reality .

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

most of post deleted since it contains old material already psted and
read by
all interested parties

Dr. Richman said:

Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Actually, the only person that has ever made any such false claim about my
posting has been a pathological liar such as yourself, who is apparently
threatened by the evluations of a licensed psychologist - and one that you
have
repeatedly libeled.

I'm not threatened.

Your compulsive need to engage in delusional babel about my nonexistence
certrainly suggests that you are threatened by the opinion of a person
qualified to comment on your absurd statements. Many others have also done so.

I find it unprofessional that you would claim to be
able to make such judgements on someone you've never met.

All judgments and comments that I have made refer to your online behavior as
demonstrated on RAO. They do not refer to your non-online behavior.



Plus you don't
exist.

Another statement indicating that you are psychotic while on RAO.


You also obviously don't no what the term dementia means.
IYour stupidity concerning the use of fairly common psychological terms is
therefore confirmed.


And people think I don't "no" how to spell!


When dealing with delusional individuals such as yourself, it helps to dumb
down occasionally to your level. Besides, you need a certain amount of
typographical errors to quibble about so that you can feel like a rational
human being despite many RAO utterances suggessting otherwise.



Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.


You've just proven that your use of common psycholgical terms is, as
predicted,
stupidly mistaken.

It still fits.


Another false statement nad further proof that you are delusional.


You've also provided more evidence that you suffer from a
thought disorder, since psychotic individuals such as yourself, frequently
invent meanings that only they believe are true.

The only thing I've proven is that you're an asshole.


You've proven nothing of the kind. However, your desperate try to invent
idiosyncratic meanings for words proves that you are suffering from a thought
disorder.


I believe I have a doctorate in psychology because it is a proven fact
and a
matter of public record.

Maybe BJ Richman does but you don't.


Your ignorance and willingness to commit libel are proven despite your
continuing to invent a fictional character borne of your delusions called BJ
Richman. However, Bruce J. Richman does possess a doctorate, I am Bruce J.
Richman, and each and every time you claim I am not you simply add to the
evidence of your stupidity and psychotic inability to recognize reality.



I believe that you have a 7 year history of engaging in libel on RAO
because
that is also a proven fact and a matter of Google record.

Then I guess we're even, you have a similar history.


That is false. Libel generrally consists of attacks against a person' s
professional credentials and or occupational activities. You have none
desribed or in evidence. Your need to use IKYABWAI's also indicate that you
have run out of lies and other delusional material to use in your compulsive
need to engage in libel.



Since you have proven yourself unable to define "dementiaa" in a way that
conforms to any valid dictionary definition, perhaps you should stick to
more
simple words with which you are familiar and that descrdibe you like -
liar,
sockpuppet, fool, etc.

Now who's engaging in libel?


Only you. The above statement meets no legal definition of libel. Your use of
yet another IKYBWAI, however indicates your increasing desperation as described
above.


Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


Just more evidence of your lack of contact with reality.
I have lots of contact with reality, that's how I know you are a ****.

Psychotic individuals such as yourself often believe their own delusions. You
have proven that here over and over again.




\\\ You keep confusing me with a piece of ****, further proof that you're a
wise
and perceptive person.







Thank you for admitting you are a piece of ****.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist


As is habit borne of his delusional despearation, the psychotic fool McKelvy
has deliberately deleted comments I made about satirical change of his
irrational drivel and modified text as is childish custom.

His idiocy and insanity on RAO remain confirmed.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist






























Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

most of post deleted since it contains old material already psted and
read by
all interested parties

Dr. Richman said:

Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Actually, the only person that has ever made any such false claim about
my
posting has been a pathological liar such as yourself, who is
apparently
threatened by the evluations of a licensed psychologist - and one that
you
have
repeatedly libeled.

I'm not threatened.

Your compulsive need to engage in delusional babel about my nonexistence
certrainly suggests that you are threatened by the opinion of a person
qualified to comment on your absurd statements. Many others have also
done so.

I find it unprofessional that you would claim to be
able to make such judgements on someone you've never met.

All judgments and comments that I have made refer to your online behavior
as
demonstrated on RAO. They do not refer to your non-online behavior.



Plus you don't
exist.

Another statement indicating that you are psychotic while on RAO.


You also obviously don't no what the term dementia means.
IYour stupidity concerning the use of fairly common psychological terms
is
therefore confirmed.


And people think I don't "no" how to spell!


When dealing with delusional individuals such as yourself, it helps to
dumb
down occasionally to your level. Besides, you need a certain amount of
typographical errors to quibble about so that you can feel like a rational
human being despite many RAO utterances suggessting otherwise.



Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.


You've just proven that your use of common psycholgical terms is, as
predicted,
stupidly mistaken.

It still fits.


Another false statement nad further proof that you are delusional.


You've also provided more evidence that you suffer from a
thought disorder, since psychotic individuals such as yourself,
frequently
invent meanings that only they believe are true.

The only thing I've proven is that you're an asshole.


You've proven nothing of the kind. However, your desperate try to invent
idiosyncratic meanings for words proves that you are suffering from a
thought
disorder.


I believe I have a doctorate in psychology because it is a proven fact
and a
matter of public record.

Maybe BJ Richman does but you don't.


Your ignorance and willingness to commit libel are proven despite your
continuing to invent a fictional character borne of your delusions called
BJ
Richman. However, Bruce J. Richman does possess a doctorate, I am Bruce
J.
Richman, and each and every time you claim I am not you simply add to the
evidence of your stupidity and psychotic inability to recognize reality.



I believe that you have a 7 year history of engaging in libel on RAO
because
that is also a proven fact and a matter of Google record.

Then I guess we're even, you have a similar history.


That is false. Libel generrally consists of attacks against a person' s
professional credentials and or occupational activities. You have none
desribed or in evidence. Your need to use IKYABWAI's also indicate that
you
have run out of lies and other delusional material to use in your
compulsive
need to engage in libel.



Since you have proven yourself unable to define "dementiaa" in a way
that
conforms to any valid dictionary definition, perhaps you should stick
to
more
simple words with which you are familiar and that descrdibe you like -
liar,
sockpuppet, fool, etc.

Now who's engaging in libel?


Only you. The above statement meets no legal definition of libel. Your
use of
yet another IKYBWAI, however indicates your increasing desperation as
described
above.


Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


Just more evidence of your lack of contact with reality.
I have lots of contact with reality, that's how I know you are a ****.

Psychotic individuals such as yourself often believe their own delusions.
You
have proven that here over and over again.




\\\ You keep confusing me with a piece of ****, further proof that
you're a
wise
and perceptive person.







Thank you for admitting you are a piece of ****.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist


As is habit borne of his delusional despearation, the psychotic fool
McKelvy
has deliberately deleted comments I made about satirical change of his
irrational drivel and modified text as is childish custom.

His idiocy and insanity on RAO remain confirmed.


ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Blah, blah, blah.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

most of post deleted since it contains old material already psted and
read by
all interested parties

Dr. Richman said:

Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Actually, the only person that has ever made any such false claim about
my
posting has been a pathological liar such as yourself, who is
apparently
threatened by the evluations of a licensed psychologist - and one that
you
have
repeatedly libeled.

I'm not threatened.

Your compulsive need to engage in delusional babel about my nonexistence
certrainly suggests that you are threatened by the opinion of a person
qualified to comment on your absurd statements. Many others have also
done so.

I find it unprofessional that you would claim to be
able to make such judgements on someone you've never met.

All judgments and comments that I have made refer to your online behavior
as
demonstrated on RAO. They do not refer to your non-online behavior.



Plus you don't
exist.

Another statement indicating that you are psychotic while on RAO.


You also obviously don't no what the term dementia means.
IYour stupidity concerning the use of fairly common psychological terms
is
therefore confirmed.


And people think I don't "no" how to spell!


When dealing with delusional individuals such as yourself, it helps to
dumb
down occasionally to your level. Besides, you need a certain amount of
typographical errors to quibble about so that you can feel like a rational
human being despite many RAO utterances suggessting otherwise.



Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.


You've just proven that your use of common psycholgical terms is, as
predicted,
stupidly mistaken.

It still fits.


Another false statement nad further proof that you are delusional.


You've also provided more evidence that you suffer from a
thought disorder, since psychotic individuals such as yourself,
frequently
invent meanings that only they believe are true.

The only thing I've proven is that you're an asshole.


You've proven nothing of the kind. However, your desperate try to invent
idiosyncratic meanings for words proves that you are suffering from a
thought
disorder.


I believe I have a doctorate in psychology because it is a proven fact
and a
matter of public record.

Maybe BJ Richman does but you don't.


Your ignorance and willingness to commit libel are proven despite your
continuing to invent a fictional character borne of your delusions called
BJ
Richman. However, Bruce J. Richman does possess a doctorate, I am Bruce
J.
Richman, and each and every time you claim I am not you simply add to the
evidence of your stupidity and psychotic inability to recognize reality.



I believe that you have a 7 year history of engaging in libel on RAO
because
that is also a proven fact and a matter of Google record.

Then I guess we're even, you have a similar history.


That is false. Libel generrally consists of attacks against a person' s
professional credentials and or occupational activities. You have none
desribed or in evidence. Your need to use IKYABWAI's also indicate that
you
have run out of lies and other delusional material to use in your
compulsive
need to engage in libel.



Since you have proven yourself unable to define "dementiaa" in a way
that
conforms to any valid dictionary definition, perhaps you should stick
to
more
simple words with which you are familiar and that descrdibe you like -
liar,
sockpuppet, fool, etc.

Now who's engaging in libel?


Only you. The above statement meets no legal definition of libel. Your
use of
yet another IKYBWAI, however indicates your increasing desperation as
described
above.


Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


Just more evidence of your lack of contact with reality.
I have lots of contact with reality, that's how I know you are a ****.

Psychotic individuals such as yourself often believe their own delusions.
You
have proven that here over and over again.


I can only judge you on the basis of other real medical professionals and
normal people that I know and have known. You suffer by comparison.



\\\ You keep confusing me with a piece of ****, further proof that
you're a
wise
and perceptive person.







Thank you for admitting you are a piece of ****.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist


As is habit borne of his delusional despearation, the psychotic fool
McKelvy
has deliberately deleted comments I made about satirical change of his
irrational drivel and modified text as is childish custom.

His idiocy and insanity on RAO remain confirmed.


Einstein said insanity was doing the same thing over and over expecting a
differnt result. Fits you perfectly.

































Bruce J. Richman

I'm not threatened. I find it unprofessional that you would claim to be
able to make such judgements on someone you've never met. Plus you don't
exist.
BRBR

If he doesn't exist then why are you talkng to him?

"S888Wheel" wrote in message
...

I'm not threatened. I find it unprofessional that you would claim to be
able to make such judgements on someone you've never met. Plus you don't
exist.
BRBR

If he doesn't exist then why are you talkng to him?


The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be
obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons. It amuses me sometimes
to pull his chain, especially after a major breach of decency like his
unprovoked attack in the Julian Hirsch thread.

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
The idiot McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
As far back (and probably before) as 2000, the compulsive
libeler
and
liar
McKelvy was engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me.
In a
thread
that eventually included more than 400 posts, including many
from
the
compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy, he used his *very first
post*
to
engage in
his usual form of libel. Note his use of the same libelous
term
he
continues
to use to this day. It should be pointed out since his post
was
one
of
the
first in this thread, no mention of his name was made by me
prior
to
his
unprovoked personal attack. The post is reprinted below:

From: Mikeylikst )
Subject: Second Thoughts
View: Complete Thread (459 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2000/01/22


From:

Calling Dr. Quackenbush!

Mix equal portions of hatred, bigotry and ignorance - and you
often
end
up
with

The Resistance.


Mike McKelvy

"The aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and
hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless
series
of
hobgoblins,all imagnary."


The above is a quote from H.L. Menken, you idiot.


You didn't read the post, scumbag and libeler.

Of course I did. You do se the " marksdon't you? The quote from
Menken
is
a well known one.

Like recent forgeries of my posts and deliberate text modifications,
you
deliberately omitted text from the original post to make it convey
your
bull****. I don't care about your quotes of Menken. You used the
term
"Dr.
Quackenbush" to libel me as you have done many times before and
since.

I can't libel you. You don't exist.


Is that what the puppetmaster pulling your strings told you to say,
lunatic?
You're so crazy that you now have deteriorated to the point where you
can't
even tell what is real and what is not.

L:OL !!! I love it. Keep saying it. It just highlight your
psychotic
thinking.
What a complete fool you are.

Tell your puppeteer, Krueger to try that with the judge - lol. I'm just
waiting to see what the results are and then we'll consider further
action. In
the meantime, I'm sure all of RAO (except Krueger) can count on you,
like
the
highly conditioned, mad dog that you are to keep spouting your gibberish
and
psychotic rantings every time you see my name. If you ever get tired of
RAO,
perhaps you can join the circus - they always can put you in a trained
animal
act.

Your
failure to acknowleege this proven fact confirms your cowardice and
seriously
psychopathic mindset.


I stand by my comments on the "Resistance." It's no more
than a collection of idiots who have nothing better to do than
slander
and
libel others they don't like. The only thing they are resisting is
decent
behavior, while criticising others behavior.


Since I haven't seen any posts from The Resistance, as you call it in
a
long
time, perhaps you and Krueger can adopt this name to describe your
"folie
a
deux" in which the 2 of you try and smear many regular RAO posters
because
they
don't happen to endorse your psychotic and delusional postings.


You've got it all wrong. I don't smear you because I disagree with
you,
I
smear you because you act like an unprofessional, uncivilized, asshole


You're insane. You are nothing more than a sociopathic, hatefilled,
bitter
scumbag who stoops to blatant lies, character assassination & libel
because you
don't know how to do anything else due to your mental illness. You've
proven
by your actions on RAO to be consumed with hatred and unable to act in a
socially acceptable way. You make totally irrational statements and
then
try
and lie about "professional behavior" because you realize you've been
exposed
as a lying con man and hate merchant. You don't fool anybody except
yourself.

I'm not trying to fool anybody. You're fool enough for both of us.


Or are you going to lie again,
and claim that Menken used the name, "r. Quackenbush", you
retarded
piece of
****?

Of course not, nobody would demean Menken by trying to claim he
would
bother
with you.


As usual, you're making no sense whatsoever. But given your severe
cognitive
deficiencies, that is to be expected. The fact remains that you
libeled
me
without provocation.

No, it doesn't, asshole.


Your psychotic disconnect from reality is manifesting itself again.
Keep
repeating "Richman doesn't exist" to RAO. It helps convince everybody
that
you're insane. That is the few that have not been amazed at how twisted
and
distorted your posts appear to any rational person


problems are once again exposed - as are your
lies.


http://members.aol.com/rlspeakers/TH...SOUNDPAGE.html




-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-----------------------------------------

If one cares to check the Google record, one will also find a
few
other
interesting things about this post. I freely admit that on the
post
of
mine
which lead to McKelvy's unprovoked personal attack, I had made
some
humorous
comments about a person who used to post here.

You mean you made a personal attack.


Wrong, liar. You deleted part of the post as part of your usual
practice
of
forgery and deceptive post modification. You deleted a smiley
emoticon
generally cocsiderd by most infelligent life forms on RAO (which
eliminates
you) to mean trhe comment preceding it was made in jest.

How about all the times you don't include an emoticon? You make
plenty
of
disgusting comments without using one. To most intelligent life
forms,
that
shows you are a disgusting pig.


This post is about your unprovoked personal attack behavior against
me,
scumbag, not your delusional perceptions of my behavior.

I don't have any delusional perceptions of your behavior. You are an
unprofessional asshole.



You're lying again. You're a complete fraud, a sociopathic liar and
hatemonger. You don't even know the meaning of the word professional,
yet
you've demonstrated your total disregard for facts by continually
spreading
lies about me over a 7 year period. Since you don't admit that you've
made up
numerous false claims without any evidence to support them, there is
only
one
reasonable conclusion to draw - you're either consciously lying and just
trying
to deny it....... or - you so delusional that you actually believe the
nonsense
you spew.

As for professional behavior, you dunce, this is not a place for the
practice
of any profession. It is a NG forum, for pete's sake. The fact that a
licensed psychologist has pointed out that you are delusional; - based
on
your
crazy claims (such as that I don't exist) - is an opinion made on a
newsgroup
by a person who happens to be qualified to evaluate your abnormal
behavior.


Sure it is. Fraud.

Others have reached the same conclusion about your delusions by simply
observing your juvenile, sociopathic, assinine antics on RAO.

When I respond to
you, compulsive liar McKelvy, it is simply to correct and refute your
maniacal
ravings. It is not meant to be humorous.

Yet you come across as a silly sounding boob.


More evidence of your delusional problems. You've been exposed and
proven
to
be a liar, quite delusional, and comsumed with hatred. There is
nothing
silly
at all about the reasonable practice of calling somebody who makes
glaringly
false statements about a person's identity, vocational background,
credentials,
etc. - a delusional individual. There are 2 possibilities: (1) You're
either
consciously and voluntarily lying - a distinct possibility, given your
hatred-driven desire to smear me, or (2) you really believe the stuff
you
say
in the same manner that those suffering from both paranoid ideation and
delusional thinking.


Your lame attempt to invoke an
IKYABWAI is as predictable as your lies and incoherent gibberish.
The
fact
remains that you engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me.

If it's incoherent, how come you keep understanding it enough to
respond
with incoherent gibberish of your own?



Another IKYABWAI. In the course of my professional career, through
clinical
experience, I've learned that even the most seriously disturbed, such as
yourself, have transient moments of lucidity. Do you what the term
echolalia
means? Look it up. Your mindless parroting of IKYABWAI's is just
another
indication that you are suffering from a thought disorder.

Here's a proposal for you. Try telling your stories, face-to-face to
any
licensed mental health professional in your area. Allow them to ask you
a
few
reasonable questions about your reasons for the saying the things you
do.
Further, let them explore with you whether or if you have any logical or
rational reason to believe that a person doesn't exist, that he doesn't
possess
all the professioinal and experiential qualifications that he has
previously
mentioned. Try also to explain to that professional the basis of your
many
beliefs about myself and others on others that you have defamed and
smeared.
While legitimate clinicians may disagree as to what diagnosis you would
then
obtain, I would be very surprised if delusional thinking, paranoid
ideation,
and/or irrational hatred toward selected others were not part of their
clinical
impressions reported.



Of course, you would never know
that from McKelvy's deliberately modified distortion of what I
actually
wrote.

You could if you had half a brain, simply by going to the original, or
are
now claiming I rewrote the original as well?

(1) As you can seen he deleted the end of one of my sentences.

Just like you're doing here and now.

A lie. Care to discuss your recent forgeries of posts I've made
by
transparent
attempts to change pronouns and other silly and obvious deceptive
editing
bull****?



McKelvy fails to admit forging rercent posts of mine because he has
no
valid
respoinse. He's been caught lying again - by use of forgery and
deliberate
text modification of what another person wrote).



Sure, I make
typographical errors and don't use a spell checker. But I
don't
usually
leave
sentences that dangle like the one he screwed around with. (2)
The
probable
reason he deliberately modified what I wrote was because at the
end
of
my
comments, I inserted an emoticon smiley - clearly indicating
that
my
comments
were meant to be humorous.


McKelvy's silence is deafening at this point. Apparently, he
couldn't
"think"
of a decent bull**** defense or rationalization to counter this
factual
claim)

Or else I thought you were doing a good job of making yourself look
like
an
idiot.

Nobody believes you.

If I see nobody I'll ask him. Everybody else can see for themselves
you're
an idiot.


Prove it. Prove that you are not delusional when you make false
statements
about me and claim they are factual.


You're in denial and/or attempting to weasel out of being
exposed as a forger and deliberate modifier of what other people
write.

How can I do all that when I've already admitted I I did it. Anybody
following this thread can see it by looking at the originals.


You only admitted after failing to get away with it.

I wasn't trying to get away with it. It would be impossible since the
original is just a click away.

Your intent was to
hopefully fool a few people tha might not have read the original post.

My intent was to **** with you and see what sort of gibberish you would come
up with.

Have
you considered trying to make counterfeit bills? Maybe you'll have
more
luck
there than you've had on RAO.

Have you considered being something other than an irrational asshole?

Since that has never applied to me, there has been no need to consider
it.
You
do have a continued tendency to engage in a form of partial echolalia in
which
you partially parrot what people say and just end the sentence
differently. It
is very reminiscent of the Dustin Hoffman character, Rainman. Of course,
he was
just acting the part of an autistic patient. With you, thought disorder
does
not appear to be an act.

More libel.



What does this all prove? The following points;

(1) McKelvy has been proven to have lied when he claims that he
only
attacks
those who attack him first.


I never specified that it had to be ME who was attacked first. I
don't
like
to see anybody attacked for no reason. Not even you.


Prove it. Attack those that attack me or others that you
frequently
attack.
To the best of my knowledge, you've never done so.

One of the keys is it has to be an unprovoked attack. I've never
seen
anyone attack you without provocation. Of course I don't read every
post
and usually avoid yours.


2 lies in the same sentence - how predictable. More self-serving
false
claims
designed to deny reality from McKelvy.

Now you claim youknow what I read and that you never attack anybody.
You're
seriously ****ed in the head.

If you think you have the
right to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against anybody on
RAO
who
attacks your friend, Krueger, than, of course, you are as guilty
as
he
is
of
wanting a lifetime free pass to attack almost everybody on RAO.

I don't bother with most people on RAO. Some I like, and some like you
I
don't.


And your right to attack people unprovoked comes from where exactly?

Sorry, scumbag

Don't be sorry, be decent.


I treat all RAO posters with the level of respect they deserve.

So when somebody pays respects to Julian Hirsch, that means that you have
carte blanche to attack them, even though YOU were never mentioned? I think
we can tell who has lost touch with reality.

Civilized
conversations have been carried on with many here who can easily be
named.
Since you have demonstrated an inability to engage in civilized rational
conversation with me, and have further demonstrated an eagerness to
engage
in
slander and defamation concerning many of my professional activities and
background - you are not entitled to either respect or decent behavior
from me.

You have no professional activities.


Another IKYABWAI - a sure sign that you've lost, ****head. I don't
attack
people without prior provocation.

Liar. I already proved you did in the Julian Hirsch thread.


Liar. You've proved nothing.

I proved you attacked Arny for no ****ing reason.

However, the reason for the title of this
thread
is contained in Google. Besides you have advanced the notion that
provocation
can be whatever you define it to be - how convenient.

No, I advanced the notion that whn someone makes unprovoked persoanl
attacks, I feel it's OK for me to tell them they are an asshole for doing
it.

Why don't you ask
Krueger to do a Google search for you. As I';ve shown in other thread,
this
fool listed a thread in which I discussed Daniel Lanois (record producer
for
Emmylou Harris and others) as an example of an unprovoked personal
attack
against him. The thread had nothing to do with him and his name was
never
mentioned. I reprinted it so all could be witness to his stupidity.
Your
stupidity lies in trying to rationalize your unprovoked personal attacks
by
claiming "you did it first" - and then trying to extend it to include
not
only
yourself but anybody else you select - over an indeterminant time frame.
How
scientific! No wonder your speaker business never got off the ground.

It did better that your "practice" ever will.


Ed Shain, in a post you tried to smear,
identified numerous individuals that have had serious conflicts with
your
puppetmaster, Krueger.

Ed Shain was another asshole.


As are all who disagree with you and Krueger?

No, as are people who launch ad hominem attacks instead of behaving in a
mature fashion. Consider the fact that in my discussion with Art in the
Bush in 30 seconds thread I let 2 or 3 such attacks go by before I responded
in kind. It is not my habit to make them out of hand when I disagree with
someone.

As are all who provide
factual
evidence of your hero's long history of interpersonal conflict on RAO?

Have you ever noticed that when you get a group of people together, not all
of them agree? Some can discuss their differences without name calling of
any kind. Others can't. You appear to be in the second group.

Has it
ever occurred to you that you might be wrong and a significant majority
of
those voicing opinions about you and Krueger are right/

Nope. I've been participating in this group for most of 9 years IIRC. I've
seen Arny have perfectly reasonable discussions with people and nver attack.
I've seen other people who go "nucking futs" when he points out to them they
are using non-science to make a scientific point. I also know that even
people who disagree with him on a personal level still concede he uses
scientific methods.

The subjectivst contingent in audio are a bizarre bunch IMO. I've seen and
read of plenty of people who just lose it when you tell them things that are
known but contradict their beliefs.



Let me retract my
suggestion that you see a licensed mental health professioinal for a
face-to-face evaluation. Clearly, you are quite lacking in
self-awareness,
have minimal insight into the reasons for your behavior, and have
demonstrated
neither the motivation nor the capacity to change in any way. Your
rigidity
suggests that when 2 licensed psychologists independently (and without
consultation) posted the clinical definition (with symptoms) of Paranoid
Personality Disorder (as listed in the APA's Diagnostic & Statistical
Manual -
IV) in reference to Krueger, they might have easily been applied to your
online
behavior as well.

Such a practice is totally unprofessional and worthless, given that what
somebody on line is not necessarily representative of how they are in the
real world.

Just as I'm sure you are a different person (lterally and figuratively) when
not on RAO. If you weren't it's likely you'd be beaten to a pulp, or at the
very least have your "license" revoked.


Of course, even more "enemies" of his (and yours, by
extension) have been added to the list since then.

They have? It seems like the same gang if idiots to me.

No attacks made by me have
occurred without prior provocation.

Liar, I proved you attacked Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. Why did
you
do
it?


Why did you atack Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread?

That is true of most of us on RAO - except
for you and Krueger, of course.

You can;t speak for most people, you seem to having trouble speaking
for
yourself.

and libeler, but that type of self-serving rationalization for
your
despicable
unprovoked personal attacks is duly noted.

As are yours.


Except that they don''t exist except in your paranoid delusional
system.

No, you don't exist. You're a fraud and a sockpuppet.


Prove it. See above. You're either consciously and voluntarily lying
and
are
aware of it, or you convinced that you are telling the truth and are
delusional. Which is it?

I'm not delusional, I am telling the truth. You are an asshole and a
sockpuppet.


Apparently the cretin, McKelvy, has no other defense but to copy hero
Krueger
by mindlessly repeating a series of infantile lies the equivalent of
"nyaaah,
nyaaah, nyaah!"

LOL !!!


Nyaaah, nyaaah makes you laugh out loud? How old are you, 4?


Acftually, I'm laughing to myself at you. If you think I am laughing
out
loud,
then we can add auditory hallucinations to your symptom list. You now
have
admitted to hearing voices from the act of reading a NG post. Does your
computer and/or Google also talk to you?

You really are nuts you know?


You wanted some evidence of your unprovoked personal attacks and I
provided it.

No, you only provided your usual lies and half truths.


Tell it to all the people that can read Google and see the evidence.
You're
full of **** as usual.


Try posting whole in context quotes like I did from the Julian Hirsch
thread.

I'm sure I could have gone back much further on RAO and provided
much
more,
but exposing you for the compulsive liar you are even in this
small
example is
sufficient proof for all objective readers.

Objective readers? You and the guy in your pocket?


No, cretin. The significant majority of readers on RAO that have not
ever
been
critical of anybody other than you or Krueger.

Your pocket must be very crowded with little voices. A significant
majority
of readers on RAO probably never say anything.


Prove it.


Prove a negative? Prove you're not a cannibal?

Now why do you suppose that is?
Hint - it has to do with your documented lengthy history of lies,
libel,
and
unprovoked personal attacks.



(2) McKelvy has been shown to have lied when he denies making
unprovoked
personal attacks against me in which his name was never
mentioned.

See above.




(3) McKelvy has a lengthy history of making libelous comments
about
my
professional activities without any factual evidence to support
them.

And you never do anything like that. Riiiigghhht.


For once in your miserable libelous "life", you are correct.

Failure to recognize sarcasm noted.


Inability to comprehend plainly written English noted. Attempt to
engage
in
obfuscation noted and found lacking.

You're right, you suck at obfuscation.


IKYABWAI and lame parroting/echolalia observed. Further clinical
evidence
of
thought disorder.

Of course, you
don't engage in any professional activities, have no credentials,
and
no
title
(other than resident compulsive liar and libeler) AFAIK. Unlike
you, I
have
not claimed that the degrees, licenses, etc. of professionals
posting
on
RAO
don't exist or were made up.

Neither have I. I said yours are. You are not a professional. If you
were
you'd most likely have your license revoked for the way you behave
here.



More evidence of libel and delusional thinking.


So? What has that to with you being an asshole?

Another delusional perception you get to have.

No, you really are an asshole.

IOW, you are now admitting that
you make up libelous bull**** about the credentials of others such as
myself
without any evidence.

Show me where I said that. I said you, whoever the **** you are a
fake.


Which imeets all criteria for libel. You're clearly delusiional.


Thanks, libeler, for admitting your guilt by failure to
respond in a rational manner.


You're welcome **** for brains.


So no you think you are talking to Krueger. As your thought processes
continue
to deteriorate, you continue to lose the ability to make even gross
identifications of people with whom you are attempting to communicate.
Not
surprising at all.



(4) As he has proven today in his deliberate attempt to forge a
post
made
by me
by obviously transparent modifications of the text, he has a
lengthy
history,
just like his role model, Krueger, of engaging in selective
editing
and
deletions of content from posts written by others.

Usually because they are long and boring.


A blatant lie. The sole purpose for your deliberate deletions is
to
hide
evidence of your compulsive lying, libel and ignorance.

How do you know what I find boring? If I'm a compulsive liar, it
should
be
easy enough for others to see. So far it's only you.

Others on RAO have frequently commented on your overt demonstrations
of
ignorance, stupidity, lying, and libel.

Others on RAO have claimed that vinyl is objectively superior to CD as
a
format, they're crazy too.


So anybody who makes an unscientific claim is crazy? In that case your
unscientific statements about my identity, my credentials, etc. defines
you as
crazy.


Then I guess you can't sue me. :-(

Why don';t you list the people you think have made that claim, and
provide
some
Google references so that the rest of us can evaluate whether they are
crazy.

Why don't you get a life?

The sole purpose of this
fraudulent behavior is obviously to try and distort what
others
have
actually
said. Misquotes and lies are how he exists on RAO.

Prove it. If I alter something you wrote, the original is always
available
for comparison.


I already have, in another post, very recentely. I reprinted the
original
post
that you tried to forge and modify.

And how hard was it to find? If you can find it so can anybody else who
wants to.

Of course, you can always claim
that
Google is lying to us.

LOL !

No just you.

I don't really need to distort what you say, you make an ass of
yourself
with nearly every post.


A delusional, paranoid, psychotic poercerption you get to have.
Most
of
RAO
disagrees with you - not that there's anything wrong with that.

And it doesn't make them right either.


They are all wrong. You alone know the true story. And you have
also
studied
phrenology and find it inspirational.

No, just studied you and seen you for the unprofessional asshole you
are.


So now you are studying a person that you claim doesn't exist? Most
would
consider that further evidence of your psychosis.

The smarter ones would know that I was talking about the persona diplayed
here as BJ Richman. That you can't make that you can't make such
distinctions speaks volumes.

You continue to fail to
comprehend that RAO is not a forum for the professional practice of
anything in
particular. Its a place for the exchange of subjective opinions.

And mine is your an asshole.

Reality is that you make unprovoked attacks and then lie about it.

Some
happen
to be given by people qualified to make them an d ohers are given by
people
like you who claim to have magical powers to determine who exists and
who
doesn't, or who is or is not a fraud.

Nothing magical about it, you act like an ass so I assume you aren't a real
psychologist.

How did you develop these "gifts"?
Were
tarot cards, runes. or tea leaves involved? Perhaps a Ouija Board? I'm
sure
we can entertain any theory you might advance that corresponds to your
obvious
lack of scientific evidence.

Observing your behavior here and comparing it to real world people who
actually are psychologists. To be fair I've known some MD's who were the
****heads too.

You know the joke about the Dr. who dies and is waiting in line to get
through the pearly gates.

The line is long and he gets tired of waiting, so he go up to St, Peter and
says, "Excuse me, I'm a doctor, I don't wait in line."

St Peter tells him he msut wait his turn like everybody else. The doc get
back in line and waits, and waits, and waits, and waits.

Eventually a huge white stretch limo pulls up. A guy gets out all dressed
in white, stethescope around his neck and walks right through the gates.

The Doctor goes balistic. He goes back to St. Peter and asks what's going
on. "You told me everybody had to wait in line, what gives.

St. Peter replies, "You don't understand. That was God. He just thinks
he's a doctor."



I don't think you're a doctor of any kind.

Are you denying that you have recently engaged in forgeries of
posts
that
I
have made? Feel free to lie again as is your custom.

No, I don't deny it, but I clearly indicated the whole thing was a
satire.



Only after it was exposed by me. (I'm not referring to your attempts to
describe previously made posts in which you made silly comment about
vinyl
copulation, etc. as satire. Given your 7 year history of unprovoked
personal
attacks against me, no rational person would believe your defense that
you
were
just being satirical. Your goals have nothing to do with humor, they
have
everything to do with hatred and slander).

Mind reading again? How could you know what my goals are? My goal is to
cause you to engage in these long winded diatribes where YOU keep slandering
ME.
As an added bonus I get to see you act like the fool you are.



But of course, you were just lying again, since your proven itnent in
every
post you make involving my name is to engagein character
assassination
and
libel.

How is that possible, you don't exist.


Further evidence of your psychosis. Prove it to a licensed mental
health
professional. Even better, try and use that statement after you've been
involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility and see if they
release
you.
Ask them if you can have visitors during your lengthy stay.

Should such an unlkely event occur, I wouldn't be telling a real person they
don't exist. I can say it to you because it's true you don't exist.

Now, I have no doubt that compulsive liar and libeler McKelvy,
will
try
to
rationalilze his despicable unprovoked personal attacks upon by
me
by
some
old,
tired, irrational argument. He will also try and apply either
evasive
comments, forgery, spindoctoring, and/or other transparent
attempts
to
deny his
obvious guilt. However, he can't change the Google record,
which
is
there
for
all to examine and draw their own conclusions.


I love how you build self fulfilling prophecies.


Unlike you I prefer the truth.




ROFLMAO !!!! SCORE !!!!

This cretin has just uttered one of his biggest lies of all time.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

P.S. Stay tuned for tales from McKelvy entitled "Google Lies to
Me"

LOL !!!!



Bruce J. Richman


I'm sure everybody will be waiting for your next batch of lies. :-(



McKelvy now refers to himself and Krueger as "everyone". More
evidence
of
his
megalomania, egocentricity, and above all psychotic thought
processes.

Once again you can't seem to interpret simple commonly used English. By
everyone, I obviously meant everyone reading this thread? Did you learn how
to read from Greg?

Actually I was refrring to anybody else that might be following your
dementia in this thread.


Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.

Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.


You keep confusing me with you, further proof that you're a whack job.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
and all around dickhead

Michael McKelvy wrote:From: "Michael Mckelvy"
Date: 12/7/2003 4:35 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:


"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...


(prior portions of both Richman and McKelvy's content deleted because it has
been seen and dealt with by both).

I don't have any delusional perceptions of your behavior. You are an
unprofessional asshole.



You're lying again. You're a complete fraud, a sociopathic liar and
hatemonger. You don't even know the meaning of the word professional,
yet
you've demonstrated your total disregard for facts by continually
spreading
lies about me over a 7 year period. Since you don't admit that you've
made up
numerous false claims without any evidence to support them, there is
only
one
reasonable conclusion to draw - you're either consciously lying and just
trying
to deny it....... or - you so delusional that you actually believe the
nonsense
you spew.

As for professional behavior, you dunce, this is not a place for the
practice
of any profession. It is a NG forum, for pete's sake. The fact that a
licensed psychologist has pointed out that you are delusional; - based
on
your
crazy claims (such as that I don't exist) - is an opinion made on a
newsgroup
by a person who happens to be qualified to evaluate your abnormal
behavior.


Sure it is.

For once you have told the truth. A rarity worth noting.

Fraud.

While you have repeated this libelous claim ad nauseum, you have yet to provide
any evidence to support it. Taken with your claims that I don't exist, it
simply indicates that you are psychotic.

Others have reached the same conclusion about your delusions by simply
observing your juvenile, sociopathic, assinine antics on RAO.

When I respond to
you, compulsive liar McKelvy, it is simply to correct and refute your
maniacal
ravings. It is not meant to be humorous.

Yet you come across as a silly sounding boob.


As for professional behavior, you dunce, this is not a place for the
practice
of any profession. It is a NG forum, for pete's sake. The fact that a
licensed psychologist has pointed out that you are delusional; - based
on
your
crazy claims (such as that I don't exist) - is an opinion made on a
newsgroup
by a person who happens to be qualified to evaluate your abnormal
behavior.


Sure it is. Fraud.

Others have reached the same conclusion about your delusions by simply
observing your juvenile, sociopathic, assinine antics on RAO.

When I respond to
you, compulsive liar McKelvy, it is simply to correct and refute your
maniacal
ravings. It is not meant to be humorous.

Yet you come across as a silly sounding boob.


More evidence of your delusional problems. You've been exposed and
proven
to
be a liar, quite delusional, and comsumed with hatred. There is
nothing
silly
at all about the reasonable practice of calling somebody who makes
glaringly
false statements about a person's identity, vocational background,
credentials,
etc. - a delusional individual. There are 2 possibilities: (1) You're
either
consciously and voluntarily lying - a distinct possibility, given your
hatred-driven desire to smear me, or (2) you really believe the stuff
you
say
in the same manner that those suffering from both paranoid ideation and
delusional thinking.


Your lame attempt to invoke an
IKYABWAI is as predictable as your lies and incoherent gibberish.
The
fact
remains that you engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me.

If it's incoherent, how come you keep understanding it enough to
respond
with incoherent gibberish of your own?

Another IKYABWAI. In the course of my professional career, through
clinical
experience, I've learned that even the most seriously disturbed, such as
yourself, have transient moments of lucidity. Do you what the term
echolalia
means? Look it up. Your mindless parroting of IKYABWAI's is just
another
indication that you are suffering from a thought disorder.

Here's a proposal for you. Try telling your stories, face-to-face to
any
licensed mental health professional in your area. Allow them to ask you
a
few
reasonable questions about your reasons for the saying the things you
do.
Further, let them explore with you whether or if you have any logical or
rational reason to believe that a person doesn't exist, that he doesn't
possess
all the professioinal and experiential qualifications that he has
previously
mentioned. Try also to explain to that professional the basis of your
many

beliefs about myself and others on others that you have defamed and
smeared.
While legitimate clinicians may disagree as to what diagnosis you would
then
obtain, I would be very surprised if delusional thinking, paranoid
ideation,
and/or irrational hatred toward selected others were not part of their
clinical
impressions reported.



Of course, you would never know
that from McKelvy's deliberately modified distortion of what I
actually
wrote.

You could if you had half a brain, simply by going to the original, or
are
now claiming I rewrote the original as well?

(1) As you can seen he deleted the end of one of my sentences.

Just like you're doing here and now.

A lie. Care to discuss your recent forgeries of posts I've made
by
transparent
attempts to change pronouns and other silly and obvious deceptive
editing
bull****?



McKelvy fails to admit forging rercent posts of mine because he has
no
valid
respoinse. He's been caught lying again - by use of forgery and
deliberate
text modification of what another person wrote).



Sure, I make
typographical errors and don't use a spell checker. But I
don't
usually
leave
sentences that dangle like the one he screwed around with. (2)
The
probable
reason he deliberately modified what I wrote was because at the
end
of
my
comments, I inserted an emoticon smiley - clearly indicating
that
my
comments
were meant to be humorous.


McKelvy's silence is deafening at this point. Apparently, he
couldn't
"think"
of a decent bull**** defense or rationalization to counter this
factual
claim)


Or else I thought you were doing a good job of making yourself look
like
an
idiot.

Nobody believes you.

If I see nobody I'll ask him. Everybody else can see for themselves
you're
an idiot.


Prove it. Prove that you are not delusional when you make false
statements
about me and claim they are factual.


You're in denial and/or attempting to weasel out of being
exposed as a forger and deliberate modifier of what other people
write.

How can I do all that when I've already admitted I I did it. Anybody
following this thread can see it by looking at the originals.


You only admitted after failing to get away with it.

I wasn't trying to get away with it. It would be impossible since the
original is just a click away.


Your intent was to
hopefully fool a few people tha might not have read the original post.

My intent was to **** with you and see what sort of gibberish you would come
up with.

Have
you considered trying to make counterfeit bills? Maybe you'll have
more
luck
there than you've had on RAO.

Have you considered being something other than an irrational asshole?

Since that has never applied to me, there has been no need to consider
it.
You
do have a continued tendency to engage in a form of partial echolalia in
which
you partially parrot what people say and just end the sentence

differently. It
is very reminiscent of the Dustin Hoffman character, Rainman. Of course,
he was
just acting the part of an autistic patient. With you, thought disorder
does
not appear to be an act.

More libel.


Actually, not the case. Just an observation of your repetititve IKYABWAI's and
perseveration when it comes to words like "fraud", "you don't exist", and other
phrases indicating you've lost touch with reality.

What does this all prove? The following points;

(1) McKelvy has been proven to have lied when he claims that he
only
attacks
those who attack him first.


I never specified that it had to be ME who was attacked first. I
don't
like
to see anybody attacked for no reason. Not even you.



Prove it. Attack those that attack me or others that you
frequently
attack.
To the best of my knowledge, you've never done so.

One of the keys is it has to be an unprovoked attack. I've never
seen
anyone attack you without provocation. Of course I don't read every
post
and usually avoid yours.


2 lies in the same sentence - how predictable. More self-serving
false
claims
designed to deny reality from McKelvy.

Now you claim youknow what I read and that you never attack anybody.
You're
seriously ****ed in the head.

If you think you have the
right to engage in unprovoked personal attacks against anybody on
RAO
who
attacks your friend, Krueger, than, of course, you are as guilty
as
he
is
of
wanting a lifetime free pass to attack almost everybody on RAO.

I don't bother with most people on RAO. Some I like, and some like you
I
don't.


And your right to attack people unprovoked comes from where exactly?

Sorry, scumbag

Don't be sorry, be decent.


I treat all RAO posters with the level of respect they deserve.

So when somebody pays respects to Julian Hirsch, that means that you have
carte blanche to attack them, even though YOU were never mentioned? I think
we can tell who has lost touch with reality.

Civilized
conversations have been carried on with many here who can easily be
named.
Since you have demonstrated an inability to engage in civilized rational

Since you have demonstrated an inability to engage in civilized rational
conversation with me, and have further demonstrated an eagerness to
engage
in
slander and defamation concerning many of my professional activities and
background - you are not entitled to either respect or decent behavior
from me.

You have no professional activities.


Another unsupporete false claim by a delusional purveyor of libel. No evidence
provided to support this bull****, of course.



Another IKYABWAI - a sure sign that you've lost, ****head. I don't
attack
people without prior provocation.

Liar. I already proved you did in the Julian Hirsch thread.


Liar. You've proved nothing.

I proved you attacked Arny for no ****ing reason.


A false statement. According to Krueger, all past statements ever made about
an indiviual constitute provocation. Given that line of specious reasoning,
your recent conversations with Krueger during your little "mutual mental
massage" sessions all constitute personal attacks against me since there was no
reason to do so - I was not part of those posts.

I've proven that you have engaged in unprovoked personal attacks against me and
continue to do so in your mutual lovefest posts with Krueger in which you try
and invent new delusional fantasies about the identities of Robert Morein and
myself.

However, the reason for the title of this
thread
is contained in Google. Besides you have advanced the notion that
provocation

can be whatever you define it to be - how convenient.

No, I advanced the notion that when someone makes unprovoked persoanl
attacks, I feel it's OK for me to tell them they are an asshole for doing
it.


Then you have just granted me permission to call you an asshole. Thanks.
And on behalf of the many people that have been targeted for unprovoked
personal attacks by you and Krueger, thanks again. Perhaps we should all
commend you on your generously giving permission to call you an asshole for
your documented past and recent behavior.


Why don't you ask
Krueger to do a Google search for you. As I';ve shown in other thread,
this
fool listed a thread in which I discussed Daniel Lanois (record producer
for
Emmylou Harris and others) as an example of an unprovoked personal
attack
against him. The thread had nothing to do with him and his name was
never
mentioned. I reprinted it so all could be witness to his stupidity.
Your
stupidity lies in trying to rationalize your unprovoked personal attacks
by
claiming "you did it first" - and then trying to extend it to include
not
only
yourself but anybody else you select - over an indeterminant time frame.
How
scientific! No wonder your speaker business never got off the ground.

It did better that your "practice" ever will.


Prove it, liar. I've seen numerous private patients over a lengthy career.
I've also held a variety of clinical positions, some privately funded and some
publically funded. Of course, since you deny I exist and have no redentials,
yet have failed to prove any of your libelous bull****, you've simply
demonstrated that you've lost touch with reality and are psychotic.

Ed Shain, in a post you tried to smear,
identified numerous individuals that have had serious conflicts with
your
puppetmaster, Krueger.

Ed Shain was another asshole.


As are all who disagree with you and Krueger?

No, as are people who launch ad hominem attacks instead of behaving in a

Consider the fact that in my discussion with Art in the
Bush in 30 seconds thread I let 2 or 3 such attacks go by before I responded
in kind. It is not my habit to make them out of hand when I disagree with
someone.


Of course it is. You disagree with my claim that I exist. You disagree and
have disagreed for many years with simple statements I have made about my
educaional and professional background. In response to those statements, you
have, for many years, engaged in name-calling, smear tactics and other forms of
ad hominem attacks.

As are all who provide
factual
evidence of your hero's long history of interpersonal conflict on RAO?

Have you ever noticed that when you get a group of people together, not all
of them agree? Some can discuss their differences without name calling of


Have you ever noticed that when you get a group of people together, not all
of them agree? Some can discuss their differences without name calling of
any kind. Others can't. You appear to be in the second group.

That is yet another false claim. I disagree with many people on this group
about certain audio issues and also political ones. I've managed to discuss
those issues without any name calling whatsoever. If you check the record on
RAHE, where I also post on occasion, you will find that while I don't post
there often, I've discussed issues on which we disagree with a number of
different posters - usually on the ongoing subjectivist/objectivist debate that
is endless, but usually civilized over there.

Has it
ever occurred to you that you might be wrong and a significant majority
of
those voicing opinions about you and Krueger are right/

Nope. I've been participating in this group for most of 9 years IIRC. I've
seen Arny have perfectly reasonable discussions with people and nver attack.
I've seen other people who go "nucking futs" when he points out to them they
are using non-science to make a scientific point. I also know that even
people who disagree with him on a personal level still concede he uses
scientific methods.

The subjectivst contingent in audio are a bizarre bunch IMO. I've seen and
read of plenty of people who just lose it when you tell them things that are
known but contradict their beliefs.

Let me retract my
suggestion that you see a licensed mental health professioinal for a
face-to-face evaluation. Clearly, you are quite lacking in
self-awareness,
have minimal insight into the reasons for your behavior, and have
demonstrated
neither the motivation nor the capacity to change in any way. Your
rigidity
suggests that when 2 licensed psychologists independently (and without
consultation) posted the clinical definition (with symptoms) of Paranoid
Personality Disorder (as listed in the APA's Diagnostic & Statistical
Manual -
IV) in reference to Krueger, they might have easily been applied to your
online
behavior as well.

Such a practice is totally unprofessional and worthless, given that what
somebody on line is not necessarily representative of how they are in the
real world.


Read what was written above. Psychologists certainly are qualified to comment
on the content of online behavior as long as they make it clear that this is
what they have done. Neither Dr. Gindi nor Dr. Richman has claimed that the
symptoms of Paranoid Personality Disorder do or do not apply to anything other
than online behavior.

Just as I'm sure you are a different person (lterally and figuratively) when
not on RAO. If you weren't it's likely you'd be beaten to a pulp, or at the
very least have your "license" revoked.


Since you don't think I exist, the above statement is meaningless. The fact
that you put license in quotes also means that you are attempting to make
statements about which you either (1) are deliberately lying, or (2)
delusionally believe them as part of a thought disorder. You have also claimed
I have no professional activities, am a bean counter, and work for an HMO - yet
you have never produced any evidence to indicate that any of the above is true.
In making those statements, *you* are acting unprofessionally by making claims
about my offline behavior. You have never met me, nor have you ever, as far as
I know, ever observed my offline activities in any way, shape, or form.
Therefore, applying your standards of professionalism, you have acted in a
nonprofessional way in making false claims about my offline behavior. Of
course, your bull**** about my lack of degrees, licenses, etc. is also evidence
false claims about my offline behavior.

Of course, even more "enemies" of his (and yours, by
extension) have been added to the list since then.

They have? It seems like the same gang if idiots to me.

No attacks made by me have
occurred without prior provocation.

Liar, I proved you attacked Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. Why did
you
do
it?


Why did you atack Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread?

That is true of most of us on RAO - except
for you and Krueger, of course.

You can;t speak for most people, you seem to having trouble speaking
for
yourself.

and libeler, but that type of self-serving rationalization for
your
despicable
unprovoked personal attacks is duly noted.

As are yours.


Except that they don''t exist except in your paranoid delusional
system.

No, you don't exist. You're a fraud and a sockpuppet.

Prove it. See above. You're either consciously and voluntarily lying
and
are
aware of it, or you convinced that you are telling the truth and are
delusional. Which is it?

I'm not delusional, I am telling the truth. You are an asshole and a
sockpuppet.


You are delusional since you believe that I am a sockpuppet. No doubt you will
expand on your delusional system in the future and invent further fabrications
designed to embellish this delusion. As for calling me an asshole, who cares?
I think you are an asshole also.

Delusions are defined as persistent, false, abnormal, usually psychotic
beliefs.
Since you have repeatedly failed to provide any evidence for your claims about
sockpuppets, nonexistence, etc. your beliefs about me fall obviously into that
category.


Apparently the cretin, McKelvy, has no other defense but to copy hero
Krueger
by mindlessly repeating a series of infantile lies the equivalent of
"nyaaah,
nyaaah, nyaah!"

LOL !!!


Nyaaah, nyaaah makes you laugh out loud? How old are you, 4?


Acftually, I'm laughing to myself at you. If you think I am laughing
out
loud,
then we can add auditory hallucinations to your symptom list. You now
have
admitted to hearing voices from the act of reading a NG post. Does your
computer and/or Google also talk to you?

You really are nuts you know?

Actually, I'm just ridiculing your absurd claim that by reading a RAO post you
can determine that somebody is laughing out loud. Most would call that sort of
claim - equating written words with laughing out loud - as yet another form of
psychotic behavior. Since you claim you can "tell' that by reading what I
wrote, I was simply asking you to give other examples of this magical power you
claim to have.


You wanted some evidence of your unprovoked personal attacks and I
provided it.

No, you only provided your usual lies and half truths.


Tell it to all the people that can read Google and see the evidence.
You're
full of **** as usual.


Try posting whole in context quotes like I did from the Julian Hirsch
thread.

I'm sure I could have gone back much further on RAO and provided
much
more,
but exposing you for the compulsive liar you are even in this
small
example is
sufficient proof for all objective readers.

Objective readers? You and the guy in your pocket?


No, cretin. The significant majority of readers on RAO that have not
ever
been
critical of anybody other than you or Krueger.

Your pocket must be very crowded with little voices. A significant
majority
of readers on RAO probably never say anything.


Prove it.


Prove a negative? Prove you're not a cannibal?

Now why do you suppose that is?
Hint - it has to do with your documented lengthy history of lies,
libel,
and
unprovoked personal attacks.



(2) McKelvy has been shown to have lied when he denies making
unprovoked
personal attacks against me in which his name was never
mentioned.

See above.




(3) McKelvy has a lengthy history of making libelous comments
about
my
professional activities without any factual evidence to support
them.

And you never do anything like that. Riiiigghhht.



For once in your miserable libelous "life", you are correct.

Failure to recognize sarcasm noted.


Inability to comprehend plainly written English noted. Attempt to
engage
in
obfuscation noted and found lacking.

You're right, you suck at obfuscation.


IKYABWAI and lame

And mine is your an asshole.

Reality is that you make unprovoked attacks and then lie about it.

Reality is that you have a 7+ year history of slander, character assassination,
and compulsive lying which you have attempted to rationalize, justify and/or
deny on many occasions by falsely claiming that you have been victimized by
others or were defending others whose pathological behavior you endorse.

Some
happen
to be given by people qualified to make them an d ohers are given by
people
like you who claim to have magical powers to determine who exists and
who
doesn't, or who is or is not a fraud.

Nothing magical about it, you act like an ass so I assume you aren't a real
psychologist.

An assumption is fallacious as most you have made. You claim that observations
of online behavior don't necessarily have any correspondence to real world
behavior, yet you deliberately ignore your own argument in trying to draw
assumptions from it. While I can't be certain, I have no knowledge that you
have repeatedly slandered, defamed and engaged in ad hominem attacks against
the "psychologist" or "MDs" you claim to know - on a public NG. It's fair to
say that if made the same irrational, delusional claims about them that you
have made about me, they would also conclude that you are delusional and
psychotic.

How did you develop these "gifts"?
Were
tarot cards, runes. or tea leaves involved? Perhaps a Ouija Board? I'm
sure
we can entertain any theory you might advance that corresponds to your
obvious
lack of scientific evidence.

Observing your behavior here and comparing it to real world people who
actually are psychologists. To be fair I've known some MD's who were the
****heads too.

I don't think you're a doctor of any kind.

'
You are mistaken. I have a PhD in Clinical Psychology. I have never claimed
to be a physician. People who have an earned doctorate in psychology are
usually referred to as "Dr.".

Are you denying that you have recently engaged in forgeries of
posts
that

Mind reading again? How could you know what my goals are? My goal is to
cause you to engage in these long winded diatribes where YOU keep slandering
ME.
As an added bonus I get to see you act like the fool you are.



Your goal, as it has always been, is to try and convice others of your
libelous, mindless, delusional propaganda. You think you can outshout people,
flood the NG with neverending drivel about others, and win a war of attrition.
You can't and you won't. All you have done is provide more and more evidence
that you are psychotic.

But of course, you were just lying again, since your proven itnent in
every
post you make involving my name is to engagein character
assassination
and
libel.

How is that possible, you don't exist.


Further evidence of your psychosis. Prove it to a licensed mental
health
professional. Even better, try and use that statement after you've been
involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital.

McKelvy now refers to himself and Krueger as "everyone". More
evidence
of
his
megalomania, egocentricity, and above all psychotic thought
processes.

Once again you can't seem to interpret simple commonly used English. By
everyone, I obviously meant everyone reading this thread? Did you learn how
to read from Greg?


You're an idiot. You pretend to know what everyone on RAO reads or believes.
More evidence of your thought disordered behavior on RAO is indicated.

Actually I was refrring to anybody else that might be following your
dementia in this thread.


Prove that I have any clinical evidence of dementia.

Isn't your posting ad nauseum about being a headshrinker enough?

Prove that you can even
define the term.

I'll give you my meaning of it. You can't tell what's real, you think
you're a doctor.

Otherwise, admit that you're a pathological liar and idiot.



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
Bruce J. Richman