"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?

So, you are now saying that a response to the suit would not
have resulted in a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.

It doesn't take an expert to see what an utter idiot you are.

When you find an expert sockpuppet Yustabe, be sure to post on this topic
again.

If you had filed a written response, you may have gotten
a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.

The only cost would be the fee. You could have written it yourself.

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed that
there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted himself on
this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming unglued and so are its
individual members.

If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal jurisdiction.
The other would be an answer to the claims along with a clarification of the
information that the filer would ordinarily include, but that this filer
fraudulently left out. Little things like the name of the newsgroup and name
of the entity that was purportedly libeled.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?

So, you are now saying that a response to the suit would not
have resulted in a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.


Good one!
You should have been an attorney!




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If you had filed a written response, you may have
gotten a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result
in its dismissal.

How were you served... mail or process server?

"Powell" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If you had filed a written response, you may have
gotten a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result
in its dismissal.

How were you served... mail or process server?

Asked and answered. Do try to keep up, Powell.

"Arny Krueger" wrote

If you had filed a written response, you may have
gotten a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result
in its dismissal.

How were you served... mail or process server?

Asked and answered. Do try to keep up, Powell.

Hehehe... you're not on trial, Arny. You can
answer the question without fear of legal
reprisal. Please suppress your paranoia and
posturing if only for a moment.

How were you served... mail or process server?


Mail.

"S888Wheel" wrote

How were you served... mail or process server?


Mail.

Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal". If Arny refused the
mail you’re back to square one (using process
server). Have you received confirmation that Arny
signed for your letter?

"Powell" wrote in message

"S888Wheel" wrote

How were you served... mail or process server?


Mail.

Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal".

Updated to: "If suit goes to court, I'll lose"

If Arny refused the
mail you're back to square one (using process
server). Have you received confirmation that Arny
signed for your letter?

Do try to keep up. Or, try to make logical extrapolations from what people
who do know are saying. Old news.

"Arny Krueger" wrote

How were you served... mail or process server?

Mail.

Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal".

Updated to: "If suit goes to court, I'll lose"

Really? How do you loose in a frivolous case?

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:38:49 -0400, "Powell"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote

How were you served... mail or process server?

Mail.

Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal".

Updated to: "If suit goes to court, I'll lose"

Really? How do you loose in a frivolous case?

Why are you sticking up for this piece of ****?

--
td

"Powell" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote

How were you served... mail or process server?

Mail.

Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal".

Updated to: "If suit goes to court, I'll lose"

Really? How do you loose in a frivolous case?

Whether a case is frivolous is up to the court. I can't predict exactly what
the judge will do.

The court has other means at its disposal than the relatively controversial
action of declaring the case frivolous. The classic "You win, your damages
are $1" is one such approach that avoids a great deal of such controversy.

In this case the filing does not include such relevant facts as the name of
the newsgroup where the alleged libel was posted, and the fact that the
purported libel was targeted at an anonymous alias, not a specific
individual. In California absence of any relevant facts can lead to
dismissal via a judge granting a "demur". Will the judge or anybody on his
staff notice sockpuppet wheel's intentional errors? Hard to predict.

So what's going to happen?

I'm willing to wait and see.

Really? How do you loose in a frivolous case?

You don't. Arny likes to call the case frivolous despite the fact that he knows
the complaint represents a legitimate cause of action. His rationale is to
claim that the complaint is fraudulant. Of course he hasn't got the balls to
get into court and try to prove that claim.

Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal". If Arny refused the
mail youre back to square one (using process
server). Have you received confirmation that Arny
signed for your letter?

You are wrong. I sent the letter using the delivery confirmation service. There
is no signiture involved.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal". If Arny refused the
mail you're back to square one (using process
server). Have you received confirmation that Arny
signed for your letter?

You are wrong. I sent the letter using the delivery confirmation
service. There is no signiture involved.

Notice that sockpuppet wheel delusially rants about signatures, when the
issue was not raised.

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:39:27 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

delusially

Paging Gerg! Paging Gerg!

Give this guy a lesson on effeminance, will you?

--
td

Powell said


Arny wrote "My position is that no response to the
suit will result in its dismissal". If Arny refused the
mail you're back to square one (using process
server). Have you received confirmation that Arny
signed for your letter?

I said


You are wrong. I sent the letter using the delivery confirmation
service. There is no signiture involved.

Arny said


Notice that sockpuppet wheel delusially rants about signatures, when the
issue was not raised.


Arny, are you that stupid or is this another lame attempt at humor?

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.


Make up your mind. yesterday you were acknowledging you would loose the default
judgement. If the case is dismissed you win. Of course anyone who has read the
california Codes on default judgements would know that the only way Arny could
get a dismissal is if the allegations in the complaint don't add up to a cause
of action. Given the fact that I used the Bender book of forms for pleadings
there is very little chance of that.

Arny said

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed that
there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted himself on
this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming unglued and so are its
individual members.

Thanks for showing you have limmited reading comprehension. Cite any claim I
have made that there is any fee for filing an answer to a lawsuit in California
Superior Court.


If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal jurisdiction.
The other would be an answer to the claims along with a clarification of the
information that the filer would ordinarily include, but that this filer
fraudulently left out. Little things like the name of the newsgroup and name
of the entity that was purportedly libeled.






And if arny had ever looked at the actual Codes on the issue he would have
figured out that he can challenge my identifability during the trial only.He
would also know that he has already lost that point. If arny had read the codes
and understood them he would know that he would be dead in the water on the
jurisdiction issue as well. Ignorance is bliss. Ignorance makes for an easy
victory in the court of Arny's mind. Obviously it is the fear of loosing in a
real court that keeps him from answering.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its
dismissal.


Make up your mind. yesterday you were acknowledging you would loose
the default judgement.

Your senile dimentia is showing. I said that with a contingency. If you
weren't so brain-dead you'd remember what it was and why it is relevant
here.

If the case is dismissed you win.

Dooohhhhhhh.

Of course
anyone who has read the california Codes on default judgements would
know that the only way Arny could get a dismissal is if the
allegations in the complaint don't add up to a cause of action.


Doooooooooohhhhhhhhhh.

Given
the fact that I used the Bender book of forms for pleadings there is
very little chance of that.

LOL!

Arny said

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed
that there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted
himself on this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming
unglued and so are its individual members.

Thanks for showing you have limmited reading comprehension. Cite any
claim I have made that there is any fee for filing an answer to a
lawsuit in California Superior Court..

Since you don't respond to challenges like this when I make them I won't
waste my time.

If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal
jurisdiction. The other would be an answer to the claims along with
a clarification of the information that the filer would ordinarily
include, but that this filer fraudulently left out. Little things
like the name of the newsgroup and name of the entity that was
purportedly libeled.

And if arny had ever looked at the actual Codes on the issue he would
have figured out that he can challenge my identifability during the
trial only.

It's like there's a California Law Library on every street corner in
Michigan.

He would also know that he has already lost that point. If
arny had read the codes and understood them he would know that he
would be dead in the water on the jurisdiction issue as well.

Wrong. I do have some California-based legal opinions on that matter at my
disposal.

Ignorance is bliss. Ignorance makes for an easy victory in the court
of Arny's mind. Obviously it is the fear of loosing in a real court
that keeps him from answering.

Obviously sockpuppet wheel is persisting in his memory lapses and delusions.