Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


Arny would never vote for Kerry. BTW, I know people who used to work the
resorts in Vail and if you think Kerry didn't do drugs, you are crazier
than you appear.

You know people.

To the point: Can you prove this accusation?

Kerry had a reputation for being absurdly strait-laced.


Reputation? That's really nothing more than hearsay isn't it. If you don't
get caught it never gets to be part of your reputation, particularly if ones
friends and acquaintances, and employees don't blab.

Then your tripe about "knowing people" is less than hearsay.

There's evidence that Bush drank some, there's nothing but anecdotes on drug
use, yet the loony left takes that as proof.

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by
self-admission. The drug use anecdotes are no less relevant
than "knowing people who work Vail."


--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


Arny would never vote for Kerry. BTW, I know people who used to work
the resorts in Vail and if you think Kerry didn't do drugs, you are
crazier than you appear.

You know people.

To the point: Can you prove this accusation?

Kerry had a reputation for being absurdly strait-laced.


Reputation? That's really nothing more than hearsay isn't it. If you
don't get caught it never gets to be part of your reputation,
particularly if ones friends and acquaintances, and employees don't blab.

Then your tripe about "knowing people" is less than hearsay.

There's evidence that Bush drank some, there's nothing but anecdotes on
drug use, yet the loony left takes that as proof.

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission. The
drug use anecdotes are no less relevant than "knowing people who work
Vail."


Thanks for the honesty and making my point.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
. ..


Michael McKelvy wrote:



Arny would never vote for Kerry. BTW, I know people who used to work
the resorts in Vail and if you think Kerry didn't do drugs, you are
crazier than you appear.

You know people.

To the point: Can you prove this accusation?

Kerry had a reputation for being absurdly strait-laced.


Reputation? That's really nothing more than hearsay isn't it. If you
don't get caught it never gets to be part of your reputation,
particularly if ones friends and acquaintances, and employees don't blab.

Then your tripe about "knowing people" is less than hearsay.

There's evidence that Bush drank some, there's nothing but anecdotes on
drug use, yet the loony left takes that as proof.

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission. The
drug use anecdotes are no less relevant than "knowing people who work
Vail."



Thanks for the honesty and making my point.

I didn't make your point. You say the talk of Shrub's
cocaine habit is just vapor, but you toss in what you claim
is certain knowledge that Kerry used drugs at Vail.

That does not compute.

--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
.. .


Michael McKelvy wrote:



Arny would never vote for Kerry. BTW, I know people who used to work
the resorts in Vail and if you think Kerry didn't do drugs, you are
crazier than you appear.

You know people.

To the point: Can you prove this accusation?

Kerry had a reputation for being absurdly strait-laced.


Reputation? That's really nothing more than hearsay isn't it. If you
don't get caught it never gets to be part of your reputation,
particularly if ones friends and acquaintances, and employees don't
blab.

Then your tripe about "knowing people" is less than hearsay.

There's evidence that Bush drank some, there's nothing but anecdotes on
drug use, yet the loony left takes that as proof.

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission.

But we don't know what his subjective estimation of quite a lot is.

The
drug use anecdotes are no less relevant than "knowing people who work
Vail."



Thanks for the honesty and making my point.

I didn't make your point.

Yes you did. It just wasn't aimed at you.

You say the talk of Shrub's
cocaine habit is just vapor, but you toss in what you claim is certain
knowledge that Kerry used drugs at Vail.

That does not compute.

Trevor thinks we should by into his firmly enshrined belief that Bush is
addled from drugs and alcohol. I simply offered up some information I have
from eyewitnesses to Kerry's drug use when he was hanging out in Vail. It
worth every bit as much as Trevor's conviction. Nothing.

I was using absurdity to demosntrate his absurdity.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission.


But we don't know what his subjective estimation of quite a lot is.

Not really relevant. When a man says he drinks too much and
has to make a life changing decision to stop, you can bet it
wasn't a martini after dinner then home to bed.


You say the talk of Shrub's

cocaine habit is just vapor, but you toss in what you claim is certain
knowledge that Kerry used drugs at Vail.

That does not compute.


Trevor thinks we should by into his firmly enshrined belief that Bush is
addled from drugs and alcohol. I simply offered up some information I have
from eyewitnesses to Kerry's drug use when he was hanging out in Vail. It
worth every bit as much as Trevor's conviction. Nothing.

I affirm that Bush is quite addled, but haven't a clue to
its origin. Excessive alcohol consumption alone can lead to
considerable nerve and brain damage and dysfunction.

You claim to have eyewitnesses. Trevor does not.

The burden of proof is now upon you to cough up these
witnesses. After all, Kewrry still holds a seat as Senator,
and the people have a right to know.

You could be on Fox!

Maybe one of th ebleached blonde babes will interview you!



--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission.


But we don't know what his subjective estimation of quite a lot is.

Not really relevant. When a man says he drinks too much and has to make a
life changing decision to stop, you can bet it wasn't a martini after
dinner then home to bed.


I don't suspect it was, but there's no way to know what he meant by too
much. Coulda been a 6 pack a day, could been a case. One mans idea of too
much is not necessarily the same as another's. Just glad to see he got over
it.

You say the talk of Shrub's

cocaine habit is just vapor, but you toss in what you claim is certain
knowledge that Kerry used drugs at Vail.

That does not compute.


Trevor thinks we should by into his firmly enshrined belief that Bush is
addled from drugs and alcohol. I simply offered up some information I
have from eyewitnesses to Kerry's drug use when he was hanging out in
Vail. It worth every bit as much as Trevor's conviction. Nothing.

I affirm that Bush is quite addled, but haven't a clue to its origin.

More correctly, you beleive it.

Excessive alcohol consumption alone can lead to
considerable nerve and brain damage and dysfunction.

Look at Teddy Kennedy, I'd wager he had more booze and more time than Dubya
ever did. I remember a gag ad in National Lampoon. A take off on those old
VW bug commercials. It showed a VW floating in a lake with the caption: "If
Ted Kennedy had been driving a Volkswagon, he'd be President."

You claim to have eyewitnesses. Trevor does not.

Both claims are still meaningless at the end of the day.


The burden of proof is now upon you to cough up these witnesses. After
all, Kewrry still holds a seat as Senator, and the people have a right to
know.

If the people wanted to come forward tehy'd have done so.

You could be on Fox!

Bigh whoop!

Maybe one of th ebleached blonde babes will interview you!

I'll hold out for Paula Zahn.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission.


But we don't know what his subjective estimation of quite a lot is.

Not really relevant. When a man says he drinks too much and has to make a
life changing decision to stop, you can bet it wasn't a martini after
dinner then home to bed.



I don't suspect it was, but there's no way to know what he meant by too
much. Coulda been a 6 pack a day, could been a case. One mans idea of too
much is not necessarily the same as another's. Just glad to see he got over
it.

He didn't stop drinking because he caught the god bug. He
stopped because he was out of control.

That's a whole lot more than a six pack.





Trevor thinks we should by into his firmly enshrined belief that Bush is
addled from drugs and alcohol. I simply offered up some information I
have from eyewitnesses to Kerry's drug use when he was hanging out in
Vail. It worth every bit as much as Trevor's conviction. Nothing.

I affirm that Bush is quite addled, but haven't a clue to its origin.


More correctly, you beleive it.

I affirm it. Listen to him talk.


Excessive alcohol consumption alone can lead to

considerable nerve and brain damage and dysfunction.


Look at Teddy Kennedy, I'd wager he had more booze and more time than Dubya
ever did. I remember a gag ad in National Lampoon. A take off on those old
VW bug commercials. It showed a VW floating in a lake with the caption: "If
Ted Kennedy had been driving a Volkswagon, he'd be President."

Funny stuff.

Alcohol does not effect everyone the same in terms of nerve
and cell dgeneration.

Some have a much lower threshold for sustaining permanent
damage.



You claim to have eyewitnesses. Trevor does not.


Both claims are still meaningless at the end of the day.

No.

You claim to have knowledge of eyewitnesses. Trevor does not
claim such.




The burden of proof is now upon you to cough up these witnesses. After
all, Kewrry still holds a seat as Senator, and the people have a right to
know.


If the people wanted to come forward tehy'd have done so.

You could force the issue.

As an American, it might be said it is your duty to do so.

What if Kerry ran and won in 2008?



You could be on Fox!


Bigh whoop!

I thought you'd be overjoyed!



Maybe one of th ebleached blonde babes will interview you!


I'll hold out for Paula Zahn.

Eeewwgh!

--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:49:29 -0600, Law of Storms
wrote:

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by
self-admission.

He is a confessed alcoholic and was convicted of drunk driving--the
only U.S. president ever to be convicted of a crime.

jak163 wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:49:29 -0600, Law of Storms
wrote:


There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by
self-admission.


He is a confessed alcoholic and was convicted of drunk driving--the
only U.S. president ever to be convicted of a crime.

Thanks for putting it so succinctly.

--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."