Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:27:38 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: If digital doesn't as a rule sound better than vinyl, then it's obviously under-represented, at least in your perceptions Weil. This doesn't make any sense. Don't you *really* mean - "If digital doesn't as a rule sound better than vinyl, then it's obviously *over*-represented, at least in your perceptions Weil."? If not, maybe you could explain how your statement makes any sort of sense pertaining to a household that has almost virtual parity between the two formats. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC | General | |||
About Wheeler vs Krueger | Audio Opinions | |||
The Scull Factor... on-line quacking | Audio Opinions | |||
Question for Kroopologist "Powell" | Audio Opinions | |||
Scott quacking about Arny Krueger and Libel | Audio Opinions |