[Jenn]

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

[Trevor Wilson[_2_]]

Jenn wrote:
Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

**I can (barely) tell the difference between 320k MP3 files and CDs on
my (crappy) car stereo. On my home stereo, the difference is readily
apparent. Of course, it will be material dependent. I'm happy to use
320k MP3 files, as long as they are free. I sure wouldn't pay money for
them though.

Trevor Wilson

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[George M. Middius]

Bratzi shouted:

.mp3 is a VERY flawed format and I'd never pay for anything of that
filetype. ONLY a lossless coded like FLAC is worth any money.

Yet another failing of the non-Nazi technology we're stuck with. No doubt
the Nazis would have created a far superior set of standards if only the
vicious, persecuting Americans had let them continue their purges of
inferior races.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know why
you are asking...

[George M. Middius]

Kroo**** is being chased by yet another pack of dogs.

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know why
you are asking...

Another rough day at "church", Arnii? Maybe you should stop taking offense
at the pastor's preaching. After all, he probably doesn't know about half
of your sins.

[Arny Krueger]

"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know
why
you are asking...

Thanks for resurrecting this thread. I was curious about the Berg
Quartet 'box' on sale at iTunes. The original cds were notoriously
trying IRT sound quality.

If the CDs sound bad, then there's a really good chance that the MP3 will
sound bad. Only a claim of serious remastering or remixing could give the
situation hope.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know why
you are asking...

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know
why
you are asking...

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 15, 3:51 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message

...





In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com
Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know
why
you are asking...
You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

Nothing, as long as you realize that you've just "sunk" to Jenn's
level, good old Arns. So I presume we won't be hearing from you about
how horrible Jenn is any more, unless (of course) Jenn is forcing you
to behave that way...

Now that you've proven yourself to be horrible, where will you go from
here?

[George M. Middius]

Mr. **** has a close encounter with the Brown Meanies.

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

Humans take naps for the salubrious effect. For you, apparently, napping
is a way to get snottier and snottier and snottier with no effort.

Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

Even if Jenn did troll, she wouldn't end up smeared all over with feces
like you do.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know
why
you are asking...

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

lol


Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

An interesting view into your sense of morality.

Anyway, I don't recall ever trolling you. Would you provide an example?

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

An interesting view into your sense of morality.

Arnii is dead-set on getting into "heaven" and "sitting next to Abraham".
All he has to do to wash away his sins is repeat his catechism of
self-abnegation once a week: "I am a liar and a hypocrite. I am a vile,
disgusting piece of crap. I am a liar and a hypocrite. Thank you,
JEE-zus!"

Anyway, I don't recall ever trolling you. Would you provide an example?

We've already covered this. You're a woman. Next! ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have
an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know
why
you are asking...

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

lol


Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

An interesting view into your sense of morality.

No Jenn, this is about you.


Anyway, I don't recall ever trolling you.

Of course not, that would be admitting that you had what you considered to
be a fault.

Would you provide an example?

I can see that there is no point in pursuing this matter with you Jenn,
because of your inability to consider the possibility that you ever did
something that you felt might be wrong.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
net
...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and have
an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't know
why
you are asking...

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

lol


Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

An interesting view into your sense of morality.

No Jenn, this is about you.

I won't bother explaining to you. More "debate trade" would surely
follow.



Anyway, I don't recall ever trolling you.

Of course not, that would be admitting that you had what you considered to
be a fault.

I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you. But of
course, for some strange reason, you need to trot out this old, bogus
argument.


Would you provide an example?

I can see that there is no point in pursuing this matter with you Jenn,
because of your inability to consider the possibility that you ever did
something that you felt might be wrong.

LOL So you can't offer an example. Figures.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you. But of
course, for some strange reason, you need to trot out this old, bogus
argument.

Not a chance.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you. But of
course, for some strange reason, you need to trot out this old, bogus
argument.

Not a chance.

lol Care to take a poll?

[George M. Middius]

Witlessmongrel snarled:

I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you.

Somehow I find that goal a bit uninspiring.

I have just the solution to "inspire" you, Scottie:

http://student.bmj.com/issues/03/06/...ges/life13.jpg

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 4:50 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:53 pm, Jenn wrote:

I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you.

Somehow I find that goal a bit uninspiring.

Why don't you show us how it's done, 2pid? Here, let's start. You
finish the sentence:

"I, 2pid, have not been right once when it comes to military strategy
or tactics at the strategic, operational or tactical level because..."

[Jenn]

In article . com,
ScottW wrote:

On Oct 15, 6:53 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:





"Jenn" wrote in message
.
net
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
net
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

odi
gy.
net
...

Anyone here have experience with downloading 192 kbps files and
have
an
opinion about the sonic differences between them and their
corresponding
redbook CDs? I'm asking due to looking at some things at
classicsonline.com

Given that you can tolerate how vinyl trashes music Jenn, I don't
know
why
you are asking...

You should take a nap instead of trolling.

Been there, done that.

lol

Why is it wrong for me to troll when you do it so often, Jenn?

An interesting view into your sense of morality.

No Jenn, this is about you.

I won't bother explaining to you. More "debate trade" would surely
follow.



Anyway, I don't recall ever trolling you.

Of course not, that would be admitting that you had what you considered
to
be a fault.

I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you.

Somehow I find that goal a bit uninspiring.

ScottW

Granted, but it's true.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 6:43 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 16, 3:59 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 16, 4:50 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 15, 6:53 pm, Jenn wrote:
I've admitted mistakes and faults here far more than have you.

Somehow I find that goal a bit uninspiring.

Why don't you show us how it's done, 2pid? Here, let's start. You
finish the sentence:

Now I have to finish your sentences too? You really desperately
need me.

Not really. You're the hemorrhoid of RAO.

"I, ssshhhead, have not been right once when it comes to military strategy
or tactics at the strategic, operational or tactical level because..."

But I have been right, exactly 100% of the time. (Unless Sanchez and
the others are lying, but for you to say that would be calling the
troops unreliable or worse. Uh-oh! another dilemma for 2pid!)

Remember, 2pid, that those of us who called your LGF and other
bloggers bull**** were not supporting the troops...

RIP'rs are clueless.

Hm. I wonder if Sanchez RIPed. I wonder if GEN Zinni did as well...

So in your overwhelming stupidity you cannot see the overwhelming
evidence agaisnt you. Feeling a bit overwhelmed, I see.

Why am I not surprised? (I am equally not surprised, BTW, at your
feeble IKYABWAI, as that's all you seem to have, little girl...)

Lol!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 6:43 pm, ScottW wrote:

"I, ssshhhead, have not been right once when it comes to military strategy
or tactics at the strategic, operational or tactical level because..."

BTW, 2pid, did you see how I put your name in there, forcing you to
change it to accomplish your lame IKYABWAI?

Lol! 2pid reacts as planned and on schedule. My little puppet can
dance, too!

Lol!

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance of the
relevant facts.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance of the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating. Does anyone else?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance of the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating.

Speaks to your poor memory and incomplete knowlege.

Does anyone else?

For sure, only those who read and remember the details of all of my posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million. I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and that is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance of the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating.

Speaks to your poor memory and incomplete knowlege.

What memory do YOU have about this during my time here?


Does anyone else?

For sure, only those who read and remember the details of all of my posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million. I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and that is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

As I noted, I'm speaking about just the time that I've been here. Do
you remember admitting mistakes during that time? Or are you simply
making yet another straw man argument?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance of
the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating.

Speaks to your poor memory and incomplete knowlege.

What memory do YOU have about this during my time here?


Does anyone else?

For sure, only those who read and remember the details of all of my
posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million. I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and that
is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and
remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

As I noted, I'm speaking about just the time that I've been here.

Ever hear of google?

Do you remember admitting mistakes during that time?

Yes.

Or are you simply making yet another straw man argument?

No need to Jenn, your ignorance of many things you try to speak
authoritatively about is a matter of the public record.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
com
...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance of
the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating.

Speaks to your poor memory and incomplete knowlege.

What memory do YOU have about this during my time here?


Does anyone else?

For sure, only those who read and remember the details of all of my
posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million. I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and that
is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and
remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

As I noted, I'm speaking about just the time that I've been here.

Ever hear of google?

Of course. Have you? You don't seem able to find any examples of you
admitting that you made a mistake in the time that I've been here.


Do you remember admitting mistakes during that time?

Yes.

For example?


Or are you simply making yet another straw man argument?

No need to Jenn, your ignorance of many things you try to speak
authoritatively about is a matter of the public record.

lol So just site an example or two of you admitting a mistake. It
should be easy for you if you are telling the truth. How's this for a
start: "I Arny admit that I made a mistake when I said that Jenn stated
she has never trolled."?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
com
...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance
of
the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating.

Speaks to your poor memory and incomplete knowlege.

What memory do YOU have about this during my time here?


Does anyone else?

For sure, only those who read and remember the details of all of my
posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million.
I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and
that
is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and
remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

As I noted, I'm speaking about just the time that I've been here.

Ever hear of google?

Of course. Have you? You don't seem able to find any examples of you
admitting that you made a mistake in the time that I've been here.

Not worth the time.

Do you remember admitting mistakes during that time?

Yes.

For example?

I don't remember the details, I just remember admitting to some errors.

Or are you simply making yet another straw man argument?

No need to Jenn, your ignorance of many things you try to speak
authoritatively about is a matter of the public record.

lol So just site an example or two of you admitting a mistake.

The site with good records of my admitting to mistakes would be
www.google.com .

It should be easy for you if you are telling the truth.

Yet another example of Jenn trying to talk expertly about what she knows
little about. All I have to do is pull a few odd posts out of like 71,000!

How's this for a
start: "I Arny admit that I made a mistake when I said that Jenn stated
she has never trolled."?

I think that was at worst hyperbole, definitely not a mistake. But Jenn, why
don't you just make it easy for us and post a clear statement that you are a
habitual troller, and we'll keep that on your public record.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

gy.
com
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

odi
gy.
com
...

Granted, but it's true.

The only thing that keeps it from being a lie is Jenn's ignorance
of
the
relevant facts.

I don't recall you admitting any mistakes here in the time that I've
been participating.

Speaks to your poor memory and incomplete knowlege.

What memory do YOU have about this during my time here?


Does anyone else?

For sure, only those who read and remember the details of all of my
posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million.
I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and
that
is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and
remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

As I noted, I'm speaking about just the time that I've been here.

Ever hear of google?

Of course. Have you? You don't seem able to find any examples of you
admitting that you made a mistake in the time that I've been here.

Not worth the time.

Do you remember admitting mistakes during that time?

Yes.

For example?

I don't remember the details, I just remember admitting to some errors.

Or are you simply making yet another straw man argument?

No need to Jenn, your ignorance of many things you try to speak
authoritatively about is a matter of the public record.

lol So just site an example or two of you admitting a mistake.

The site with good records of my admitting to mistakes would be
www.google.com .

It should be easy for you if you are telling the truth.

Yet another example of Jenn trying to talk expertly about what she knows
little about. All I have to do is pull a few odd posts out of like 71,000!

All of the above is just fine, Arny, if you couple it with refraining
from making statements of "fact" that you can't back up, like when you
said that I troll and that you admit to mistakes and I don't. That
would be the honorable thing to do.


How's this for a
start: "I Arny admit that I made a mistake when I said that Jenn stated
she has never trolled."?

I think that was at worst hyperbole, definitely not a mistake. But Jenn, why
don't you just make it easy for us and post a clear statement that you are a
habitual troller, and we'll keep that on your public record.

Because that would be a lie.

[Clyde Slick]

On 17 Oct, 11:26, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

all of my posts,
which I believe now number at some significant fraction of a million.

I
just checked and Google estimates something like 71,000 posts, and that is
just under the nickname that I currently use.

For your claim to be factual Jenn, you would have had to read and remember
the contents of at least 71,000 of my posts. Wanna make that claim?

at ten minutes per post, you have wasted 710,000 minutes, or 11,800
some hours.
A typical full time year of work is 2080 hours, thus, by your own
admission, you have wasted enough time to have gainfully employed
for five full years. Just think of all the money you cou have made, by
selling even more of the overpriced, obsolete broken down computer
****
if you had only kept focused on your core business.

Congratulations on your fifth year anniversary of your
"productive" Usenet career!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 16, 9:57 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in glegroups.com...

On Oct 16, 6:43 pm, ScottW wrote:

"I, ssshhhead, have not been right once when it comes to military strategy
or tactics at the strategic, operational or tactical level because..."

BTW, 2pid, did you see how I put your name in there, forcing you to
change it to accomplish your lame IKYABWAI?

Yeah...that's so cool. Do it again.

So you actually seek out opportunities for lame IKYABWAIs.

That's so cool. Lol!

As I said, not an original 'thought' in 2pid's empty bean.