[Powell]

"Arny Krueger" wrote

I understand the meanign of a 192/24 samples recording..

24/192 is the highest resolution used in commercial recordings. It
represents vast overkill. Think of it as having a car that will go 155
mph.

Hehehe... right, you said that about ISA vs PCI sound cards,
too.

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.
Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings. Not a member
of any professional recording/engineering society or even
subscribed to any recording magazines. How is it that you
are so intimately familiar with commercial recording
going-ons (24/192) to form such an uninformed opinion?

[George M. Middius]

Powell said to Mr. ****:

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.
Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings. Not a member
of any professional recording/engineering society or even
subscribed to any recording magazines. How is it that you
are so intimately familiar with commercial recording
going-ons (24/192) to form such an uninformed opinion?

Arnii has made over 500,000 Usenet posts. Does that answer your question?





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Arny Krueger]

"Powell" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote

I understand the meanign of a 192/24 samples recording..

24/192 is the highest resolution used in commercial
recordings. It represents vast overkill. Think of it as
having a car that will go 155 mph.

Hehehe... right, you said that about ISA vs PCI sound
cards, too.

Powell, you seem to be slipping into senility. I corrected you about that at
least once before.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...91302a32e711b9

I corrected you back in 2005, saying:

"This is all fine and good, but there is this bomb ticking under ISA, and
when it goes off, new PC's won't have ISA. The ISA bomb was originally set
for 1998, but has been set back a year. I don't know about you, but if I
have a $200+ audio card that still makes sense in terms of function, and
performance, I sure would not have to scrap it the next time I switch
PC's."

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Not a member of any professional recording/engineering society or even
subscribed to any recording magazines.

That would be untrue.

Indeed you're not reading RAO very well - Ludo just lately managed to find a
reference to a technical article that I wrote for a recording engineering
magazine some years ago.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Powell" wrote in message

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Pretty sad when you have to fake credentials, Arns.

Most people have lives. You have RAO.

That's kind of sad, in a pathetic and insane kind of way.;-)

________________________________________

Arns Krueger (n. Vulgar): an insane asshole who is addicted to
harassing Normal people's preferences on the Usenet

[Powell]

"George M. Middius" wrote

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.
Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings. Not a member
of any professional recording/engineering society or even
subscribed to any recording magazines. How is it that you
are so intimately familiar with commercial recording
going-ons (24/192) to form such an uninformed opinion?

Arnii has made over 500,000 Usenet posts. Does that
answer your question?

Arny wrote "That's about 10,000 a year, or 833 per
month or 27 per day. Most posts take me a minute
or two, so this represents maybe an hour or two,
more or less worth of effort per day."

Note: Arny is math challenged too. Even so, that's
about thirteen 40 hr. work weeks a year posting to
USEnet. That's more than a quarter of everyone
elses entire work year with nothing to show for it.
What a pitiful waste of a human life.

[Powell]

"Arny Krueger" wrote

I understand the meanign of a 192/24 samples recording..

24/192 is the highest resolution used in commercial
recordings. It represents vast overkill. Think of it as
having a car that will go 155 mph.

Hehehe... right, you said that about ISA vs PCI sound
cards, too.

Powell, you seem to be slipping into senility. I corrected you about that
at least once before.

You think. It goes back to 1998.

snip quacking


BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish.


Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish. I doubt you even know what a ISBN is
or could produce one.


Not a member of any professional recording/engineering society or even
subscribed to any recording magazines.

That would be untrue.

More rubbish. You lied to Atkinson and me about
your readily available library access to AES journals,
too.


Indeed you're not reading RAO very well - Ludo just lately managed to find
a reference to a technical article
that I wrote for a recording engineering magazine some years ago.

Zzzzz... Where are all your ABX articles you
claimed to have written? No guessing required,
just more rubbish.


How is it that you are so intimately familiar with commercial recording
going-ons (24/192) to form such an uninformed opinion?

Note: no response from Arny, just cowering.

[Arny Krueger]

"Powell" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote

I understand the meanign of a 192/24 samples
recording..

24/192 is the highest resolution used in commercial
recordings. It represents vast overkill. Think of it as
having a car that will go 155 mph.

Hehehe... right, you said that about ISA vs PCI sound
cards, too.

Powell, you seem to be slipping into senility. I
corrected you about that at least once before.



http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...91302a32e711b9

I corrected you back in 2005, saying:

"This is all fine and good, but there is this bomb ticking under ISA, and
when it goes off, new PC's won't have ISA. The ISA bomb was originally set
for 1998, but has been set back a year. I don't know about you, but if I
have a $200+ audio card that still makes sense in terms of function, and
performance, I sure would not have to scrap it the next time I switch
PC's."

You think. It goes back to 1998.

So Powell, you want people to think that a comment I made about computer
technology in 1998 supercedes a comment I made about computer technology in
2005?

LOL!

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish.

I see Powell that you have no proof, just a childish, dismissive comment.

Haven't produced_commercial_ recordings.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish. I doubt you even know what a ISBN is
or could produce one.

I see Powell that you have no proof, just a childish, dismissive comment.

Not a member of any professional recording/engineering
society or even subscribed to any recording magazines.

That would be untrue.

More rubbish. You lied to Atkinson and me about
your readily available library access to AES journals,
too.

Just goes to show that you can't distinguish between access to AES papers
and AES journals. For the benefit of other readers, they need to know that
the AES publishes CDs of AES papers, which are distinct from a library of
JAES issues.

http://www.aes.org/e-lib/

Indeed you're not reading RAO very well - Ludo just
lately managed to find a reference to a technical article
that I wrote for a recording engineering magazine some
years ago.

Zzzzz... Where are all your ABX articles you
claimed to have written?

Well, there is the article I wrote for The Audiophile Voice....

How is it that you are so intimately familiar with
commercial recording going-ons (24/192) to form such an
uninformed opinion?

Note: no response from Arny, just cowering.

Power, if hi rez formats make such an important difference, why is it so
hard to do a reliable listening test demonstrating them?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Powell" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote

BTW, you've never been employed as a recording engineer.

That would be untrue.
Delusions of omnisicence noted.

Rubbish.

I see Powell that you have no proof, just a childish, dismissive comment.

LOL!

________________________________________

Arns Krueger (n. Vulgar): an insane asshole who is addicted to
harassing Normal people's preferences on the Usenet