Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Steven Sullivan Steven Sullivan is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,268
Default Speaker Break-In measurements


http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

scroll down to page 11.


hmmm......

can one expect these data to reflect real-world
audibility?


___
-S
"As human beings, we understand the world through simile, analogy,
metaphor, narrative and, sometimes, claymation." - B. Mason
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Eeyore Eeyore is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,474
Default Speaker Break-In measurements



Steven Sullivan wrote:

http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

scroll down to page 11.


Forbidden

Remote Host: [212.69.58.160]

You do not have permission to
access http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

Data files must be stored on
the same site they are linked from.

Graham

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Ron Ron is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default Speaker Break-In measurements


Eeyore wrote:
Steven Sullivan wrote:

http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

scroll down to page 11.


Forbidden

Remote Host: [212.69.58.160]

You do not have permission to
access http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

Data files must be stored on
the same site they are linked from.

Graham


I had the same problem go here http://www.affordableaudio.org then
click on December 2006 and it will open.

  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Steven Sullivan Steven Sullivan is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,268
Default Speaker Break-In measurements

Ron wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Steven Sullivan wrote:

http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

scroll down to page 11.


Forbidden

Remote Host: [212.69.58.160]

You do not have permission to
access http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

Data files must be stored on
the same site they are linked from.

Graham


I had the same problem go here http://www.affordableaudio.org then
click on December 2006 and it will open.



Sorry, yes, that's how I did it too. Go to the front page first,
then click Dec 2006.





___
-S
"As human beings, we understand the world through simile, analogy,
metaphor, narrative and, sometimes, claymation." - B. Mason
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Arny Krueger Arny Krueger is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,262
Default Speaker Break-In measurements

"Eeyore" wrote in
message
Steven Sullivan wrote:

http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

scroll down to page 11.


Forbidden

Remote
Host: [212.69.58.160]

You do
not have permission to access
http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

Data
files must be stored on the same site they are linked
from.



The provided link worked well with IE7. What browser(s) have problems?




  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tech
Old Fangled Old Fangled is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Speaker Break-In measurements

Steven Sullivan wrote in news:el26um$k1d$1
@reader2.panix.com:


http://www.affordableaudio.org/aa2006-12.pdf

scroll down to page 11.


hmmm......


That's a good phrase. Not very good testing methdology. Where's the
variance numbers for multiple tests? Where is the statistical analysis
of those variances? Where are the ambient temperature, pressure and
humidity readings? His blithe statement that "the measurements were very
consistent" means nothing.

can one expect these data to reflect real-world audibility?


With that data, who knows? The article references another such test
(http://www.vikash.info/audio/audax/break-in.asp) that gives slightly
better data. Notice that the before and after numbers aren't much higher
than the inter-test variance, and in some cases lower. The author of
that paper makes the error of believing that an average will somehow
eliminate testing variances. He needs to learn a bit more about
statistical analysis.

The entire conversation about burn-in seems so ridiculous to me. If
burn-in makes an audible difference, what happens if the burn-in period
makes the driver a poorer match to its enclosure? If the manufacturer
altered the enclosure to match a "burnt-in" driver, what happens if that
driver doesn't change enough? Yet, somehow, they all assert that burn-in
will always improve the sound. Sounds like some serious fakery (or
idiocy) to me.

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.audio.car FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (caution, this is HUGE) MOSFET Car Audio 0 June 18th 06 05:27 AM
Just for Ludovic Audio Opinions 64 November 19th 05 04:17 PM
Note to Trevor Audio Opinions 9 November 7th 05 08:45 AM
Bose 901 Review Mark Vacuum Tubes 2 February 6th 04 01:20 AM
Comments about Blind Testing watch king High End Audio 24 January 28th 04 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"