Within these hallowed halls, Frank Pittel of
added the following to the collective
conscience:
In alt.politics.usa.republican Schizoid Man
wrote:

"Frank Pittel" wrote in message

WoW, you were wrong on everyone of them. How long did it take you
to make up this pack of lies??

Ummm... care to repudiate any of these points with, er, facts? It
might be more illuminating than simply calling them 'lies' and
dismissing them.

I'll argue any and all of the points with facts when there is a
single fact given to support them. Until then they're nothing more
then the delusions of a looney tune loser brain washed by the dnc lib
dem.

I'd have to agree, it's easier to prove then to disprove.

in article , Mikermckelvy at
wrote on 3/26/04 11:13 AM:

From: "clamnebula"

Things you have to believe to be a Republican today:

1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers
for your recovery.

You are of course referring to Rush Limbaugh. The fact is Rush never once
said
that persons who become accidentally addicted to pain medication should be in
jail.

Where does he make any distinction at all about the kind of illegal drugs
someone should go to jail over?

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws
against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the
laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and
neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating
the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

"John Stone" wrote in message
...
in article , Mikermckelvy at
wrote on 3/26/04 11:13 AM:

From: "clamnebula"

Things you have to believe to be a Republican today:

1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers
for your recovery.

You are of course referring to Rush Limbaugh. The fact is Rush never
once
said
that persons who become accidentally addicted to pain medication should
be in
jail.

Where does he make any distinction at all about the kind of illegal drugs
someone should go to jail over?

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws
against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And
the
laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and
neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are
violating
the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity
is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others
in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones
who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

Yup. So when is Pig Boy gonna start doin his hard time?

And wtf is he still doing on the air spouting his lies and hate (and
interviewing Dick Cheney on the air to allow Dick to spout absurd lies about
Richard Clarke)?

From: "Sandman"

Yup. So when is Pig Boy gonna start doin his hard time?


For what? There's no case. The DA is fishing or they would have charged him
with something. He's being persecuted for the same thing a Florida state pol
did and was let off. In his case they want to violate Florida law and sieze
his medical records to see IF they can find a crime. That's why the ACLU has
intervened with their Friend of the Court action.



And wtf is he still doing on the air spouting his lies and hate (and
interviewing Dick Cheney on the air to allow Dick to spout absurd lies about
Richard Clarke)?

Never happened.

Cheney was refuting Clarke's lies.

As usual you have it bass ackwards.

"Sandman" wrote in message
news
And wtf is he still doing on the air spouting his lies and hate (and
interviewing Dick Cheney on the air to allow Dick to spout absurd lies
about
Richard Clarke)?

Sanders, you can't recognize lies when they come streaming out of your
own mouth, let alone anyone elses.

ScottW

"Sandman" wrote in message
news

"John Stone" wrote in message
...
in article , Mikermckelvy at
wrote on 3/26/04 11:13 AM:

From: "clamnebula"

Things you have to believe to be a Republican today:

1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're
a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our
prayers
for your recovery.

You are of course referring to Rush Limbaugh. The fact is Rush never
once
said
that persons who become accidentally addicted to pain medication
should
be in
jail.

Where does he make any distinction at all about the kind of illegal
drugs
someone should go to jail over?

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws
against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And
the
laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and
neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are
violating
the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites
are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this
disparity
is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others
in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones
who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

Yup. So when is Pig Boy gonna start doin his hard time?

When he gets convicted in a court of law, not when you think he should
because you don't like him. He has all the protections that you would want
for yourself, so why do you try to withhold from him. Could it be that you
disagree with his politics that you feel he should have no rights and if
this is so would you feel the same way if someone who agees with you was so
treated?

And wtf is he still doing on the air spouting his lies and hate (and
interviewing Dick Cheney on the air to allow Dick to spout absurd lies
about
Richard Clarke)?


Let's see if I understand this: Cheney's comments are lies because you
disagree with them and they are not verified. Clarke's comments are truth
because you agree and they are not verified. But wait, in other interviews
and testimony Clarke contradicted what he has said in his book. This would
verify Cheney's comments but not Clarke's. It would seem the only reason
that you assume that Cheney is lying is that you don't like what he says and
the only reason you believe Clarke, this time, is that you do like what he
is saying.
It seems that the comments by Clarke and Cheney are immaterial your just
stating your own opinion and they're just props.

Phil

From: John Stone

in article , Mikermckelvy at
wrote on 3/26/04 11:13 AM:

From: "clamnebula"

Things you have to believe to be a Republican today:

1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers
for your recovery.

You are of course referring to Rush Limbaugh. The fact is Rush never once
said
that persons who become accidentally addicted to pain medication should be
in
jail.

Where does he make any distinction at all about the kind of illegal drugs
someone should go to jail over?

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws
against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the
laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and
neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating
the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

He's referring to recreational drug use.

"Mikermckelvy" wrote in message
...
From: John Stone

in article , Mikermckelvy at
wrote on 3/26/04 11:13 AM:

From: "clamnebula"

Things you have to believe to be a Republican today:

1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers
for your recovery.

You are of course referring to Rush Limbaugh. The fact is Rush never once
said
that persons who become accidentally addicted to pain medication should be
in
jail.

Where does he make any distinction at all about the kind of illegal drugs
someone should go to jail over?

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws
against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the
laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and
neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating
the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

He's referring to recreational drug use.

Some people consider Xanax and Valium recreational drugs... especiallly those
who take too many of them.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.619 / Virus Database: 398 - Release Date: 3/10/2004

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:01:36 -0500, "clamnebula"
wrote:

-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

He's referring to recreational drug use.

Some people consider Xanax and Valium recreational drugs... especiallly those
who take too many of them.

Agreed. First of all, *any* drug use outside of a legitimate
prescription could reasonably be called "recreational". In fact, one
might resonably argue that a person who deliberatly circumvents legal
constraints on prescription drugs by obtaining thousands of pills from
multiple doctors are just as guilty of "getting away with drug use"
and "trafficking in this stuff".

Of course, since Mr. McKelvy is in favor of legalization of drugs,
he's not being inconsistant in *his* view of the stituation, only his
assesment of Mr. Limbaugh's view of the situation.

clamnebula wrote:


"Mikermckelvy" wrote in message
...
From: John Stone

in article , Mikermckelvy at
wrote on 3/26/04 11:13 AM:

From: "clamnebula"

Things you have to believe to be a Republican today:

1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers
for your recovery.

You are of course referring to Rush Limbaugh. The fact is Rush never
once
said
that persons who become accidentally addicted to pain medication should
be
in
jail.

Where does he make any distinction at all about the kind of illegal drugs
someone should go to jail over?

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws
against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And
the
laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and
neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are
violating
the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be
convicted and they ought to be sent up."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug
use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are
getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity
is
not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others
in
jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones
who
are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
-- Rush Limbaugh. October 5, 1995 show transcript.

Looks pretty all-inclusive to me.

He's referring to recreational drug use.

Some people consider Xanax and Valium recreational drugs... especiallly those
who take too many of them.


---

Very true. I've evaluated and/or treated numerous drug addicts over the years,
and I can assure you that in addition to Xanax and Valium, Ativan, Tylenol #3
with Codeine, Percoset, Fiorial, Oxycontin and many other legally prescribed
antianxiety drugs and pain medications (most of which are narcotics) are very
frequently used by them. "Doctor shopping" and "pharmacy shopping" for
multiple prescriptions is very common, as is making purchases on the street.
There have also been numerous examples of doctors being arrested for illegal
overprescription of many of these drugs.





Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.619 / Virus Database: 398 - Release Date: 3/10/2004










Bruce J. Richman

From: (Bruce J. Richman)

Doctor shopping" and "pharmacy shopping" for
multiple prescriptions is very common, as is making purchases on the street.
There have also been numerous examples of doctors being arrested for illegal
overprescription of many of these drugs.





In the case of Rush Limbaugh, there is no evidence of doctor shopping.

In alt.politics.usa.republican 21C BBS wrote:
: Within these hallowed halls, Frank Pittel of
: added the following to the collective
: conscience:
: In alt.politics.usa.republican Schizoid Man
: wrote:
:
: "Frank Pittel" wrote in message
:
: WoW, you were wrong on everyone of them. How long did it take you
: to make up this pack of lies??
:
: Ummm... care to repudiate any of these points with, er, facts? It
: might be more illuminating than simply calling them 'lies' and
: dismissing them.
:
: I'll argue any and all of the points with facts when there is a
: single fact given to support them. Until then they're nothing more
: then the delusions of a looney tune loser brain washed by the dnc lib
: dem.
:
: I'd have to agree, it's easier to prove then to disprove.


There's still no proof and I'll bet there never will be.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

"E.E.Bud Keith" wrote in message
...

13. Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but
creationism should be taught in schools.

Here we are right back where we started liberals making claims about
global
warming and they are right and anyone who disagrees is wrong. Actually the
fact of the matter is, everybody agrees that there is global warming.
The disagreement is what is causing it, and the true answer is no one
really
knows positively.

Well friend were back to my way or the highway. One theory is as good as
the
next. so in order to be fair(that nice liberal word) both should be
taught.

**Nonsense. Creationism is not a theory. It is a fairy tale. Evolution is
not a theory. Evolution is a fact. NATURAL SELECTION is the theory proposed
by Darwin, to explain the fact of Evolution. Only the terminally stupid
would allow equal time to a fairy tale to be taught to children.

Liberals need to read there Bibles;
There is no fact for evolving but The Bible clearly tells us how we all
got here and it should be taught in every school every day.
Grams

**Nonsense. Creationism is not a theory. It is a fairy tale. Evolution is
not a theory. Evolution is a fact. NATURAL SELECTION is the theory proposed
by Darwin, to explain the fact of Evolution. Only the terminally stupid
would allow equal time to a fairy tale to be taught to children.

Uh...the use of the words "their" and "there" are indeed
different....or don't they "teach 'ya 'dat in 'dem dare Hick schools"?!

Yet another fine product of Voucher Driven Education.

ROFLMAO!

"Grams" wrote in message
nk.net...
Liberals need to read there Bibles;
There is no fact for evolving but The Bible clearly tells us how we all
got here and it should be taught in every school every day.
Grams

**Nonsense. Creationism is not a theory. It is a fairy tale. Evolution
is
not a theory. Evolution is a fact. NATURAL SELECTION is the theory
proposed
by Darwin, to explain the fact of Evolution. Only the terminally stupid
would allow equal time to a fairy tale to be taught to children.

"Grams" wrote in message
nk.net...
Liberals need to read there Bibles;

**Heheh. I'll betcha Liberals know how to spell.

There is no fact for evolving but The Bible clearly tells us how we all
got here and it should be taught in every school every day.

**Yeah, right.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Grams said:

Liberals need to read there Bibles;
There is no fact for evolving but The Bible clearly tells us how we all
got here and it should be taught in every school every day.
Grams

Since when are Amish connected to the Internet?
Do your "elderly" know about this?

--
Sander deWaal
Vacuum Audio Consultancy

Grams said:

Liberals need to read there Bibles;

Republiwhores need to read their grammar textbooks.