It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is totally against
you. I drew this inference by applying your Kroological klaim that if a
poster does not attack moi on every occasion, that means they are
completely down with everything I say. Especially what I say about you.

Since duh-Mikey is the only RAO regular who tries to fight your battles
for you, that means all the rest of us are Arnii-haters. Every last one of
us. We all hate you and want you to make an ass of yourself.



--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is
totally against you.

George, given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is composed of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group of people who are so
easily influenced by a lowbrow like you, is an affirmation not a
condemnation.

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is
totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is composed of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group of people who are so
easily influenced by a lowbrow like you, is an affirmation not a
condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted. Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for you? Also, why do you
need Jenn to fight your battles for you?




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is
totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

Thanks for finally admitting that George is not your correct name. But
you'll have to help me here - exactly what is your correct name?

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is composed
of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group of
people who are so easily influenced by a lowbrow like
you, is an affirmation not a condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted.

Bad logic. Just because I have something that is the more prefereable of
several poor options, does not mean that I have what I want.

Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for you?

Asked and answered. But to help you with your failing mental facilities
Middiot, I'll give you the answer again.

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles - I'm doing a fine job of helping you
humiliate yourself in public.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is about giving her some
much-needed moral guidance.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is
totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

Thanks for finally admitting that George is not your correct name. But
you'll have to help me here - exactly what is your correct name?

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is composed
of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group of
people who are so easily influenced by a lowbrow like
you, is an affirmation not a condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted.

Bad logic. Just because I have something that is the more prefereable of
several poor options, does not mean that I have what I want.

Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for you?

Asked and answered. But to help you with your failing mental facilities
Middiot, I'll give you the answer again.

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles - I'm doing a fine job of helping you
humiliate yourself in public.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is about giving her some
much-needed moral guidance.

LOL Believe me, when I feel like I need some moral guidance, I consult
those whose moral guidance I respect. Your paranoia, which is
displayed by you wishing that I were more critical of George, has
nothing to do with "moral guidance".

"Jenn" wrote in message
ps.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is
totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

Thanks for finally admitting that George is not your
correct name. But you'll have to help me here - exactly
what is your correct name?

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is composed
of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group of
people who are so easily influenced by a lowbrow like
you, is an affirmation not a condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted.

Bad logic. Just because I have something that is the
more prefereable of several poor options, does not mean
that I have what I want.

Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for
you?

Asked and answered. But to help you with your failing
mental facilities Middiot, I'll give you the answer
again.

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles - I'm doing a
fine job of helping you humiliate yourself in public.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for
you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is about
giving her some much-needed moral guidance.

LOL Believe me, when I feel like I need some moral
guidance, I consult those whose moral guidance I respect.

Is Jeffry Dahmer still on your list of consultants, Jenn?

Your paranoia, which is displayed by you wishing that I
were more critical of George, has nothing to do with
"moral guidance".

In order to be paranoid about George, I'd have to fear him. Now use your
little pea brain just once Jenn, and try to come up with the correct answer
to the question: "Does Arny Fear the George Middius persona?" Here's a hint:
The answer is no!

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ps.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater) is
totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

Thanks for finally admitting that George is not your
correct name. But you'll have to help me here - exactly
what is your correct name?

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is composed
of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group of
people who are so easily influenced by a lowbrow like
you, is an affirmation not a condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted.

Bad logic. Just because I have something that is the
more prefereable of several poor options, does not mean
that I have what I want.

Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for
you?

Asked and answered. But to help you with your failing
mental facilities Middiot, I'll give you the answer
again.

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles - I'm doing a
fine job of helping you humiliate yourself in public.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for
you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is about
giving her some much-needed moral guidance.

LOL Believe me, when I feel like I need some moral
guidance, I consult those whose moral guidance I respect.

Is Jeffry Dahmer still on your list of consultants, Jenn?

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted. Are you proud of how low
you have sunk?


Your paranoia, which is displayed by you wishing that I
were more critical of George, has nothing to do with
"moral guidance".

In order to be paranoid about George, I'd have to fear him. Now use your
little pea brain just once Jenn,

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted.

to the question: "Does Arny Fear the George Middius persona?" Here's a hint:
The answer is no!

I don't claim that you're paranoid about George. You're paranoid about
me not posting what you somehow believe is the proper number of
objections to George.

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:26:42 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Your paranoia, which is displayed by you wishing that I
were more critical of George, has nothing to do with
"moral guidance".

In order to be paranoid about George, I'd have to fear him. Now use your
little pea brain just once Jenn, and try to come up with the correct answer
to the question: "Does Arny Fear the George Middius persona?" Here's a hint:
The answer is no!

However, Arnold fears ME.

Which is great...

I knew I shouldn't have done it, but I went and asked Mr. Slime a direct
question. Finally, on the fourth iteration, the Beast coughs up an answer.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for you?

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles

A lie. Clearly Mikey is acting on your instructions when he runs
interference for you.

You say you don't need him, but obviously you do. Else you would certainly
tell him to **** off and let you "win" all your debates on your own. Your
silence on this question reveals all.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is about giving her some
much-needed moral guidance.

Your alienation from the human race grows wider and deeper with every
passing week. You poor, pathetic, paranoid piece of crap. I really can't
understand why you don't end your pain once and for all.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:34:47 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Is Jeffry Dahmer still on your list of consultants, Jenn?

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted. Are you proud of how low
you have sunk?

Oh, he's been proud for years now.

George M. Middius wrote:
I knew I shouldn't have done it, but I went and asked Mr. Slime a direct
question. Finally, on the fourth iteration, the Beast coughs up an answer.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for you?

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles

A lie. Clearly Mikey is acting on your instructions when he runs
interference for you.

You say you don't need him, but obviously you do. Else you would certainly
tell him to **** off and let you "win" all your debates on your own. Your
silence on this question reveals all.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is about giving her some
much-needed moral guidance.

Your alienation from the human race

Aren't you over emphasizing usenet just a bit? Oh sorry...I
forget...usenet is your only
interface to the human race. Carry on.

ScottW

On 20 Jun 2006 11:37:19 -0700, "ScottW" wrote:

Aren't you over emphasizing usenet just a bit?

No, he's not over it.

Drat - that darn English language somes back to bite ScottW again and
again and again...

Witlessmongrel barked:

Aren't you over emphasizing usenet just a bit?

No, he's not over it.

Duck Dave....oops no need. Everything is over your head anyway.

Are you aware of the irony in this exchange?

Drat - that darn English language somes back to bite ScottW again and
again and again...

Yeah.. it sucks... I switched to American when I was young and never
looked back.

Apparently, Scooter believes that using standard English when trying to
communicate is "elitist".




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

On 20 Jun 2006 11:44:32 -0700, "ScottW" wrote:

Drat - that darn English language somes back to bite ScottW again and
again and again...

Yeah.. it sucks...

That's OK, perhaps you could stick to the telephone.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


I knew I shouldn't have done it, but I went and asked Mr. Slime a direct
question. Finally, on the fourth iteration, the Beast coughs up an answer.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for you?

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles

A lie. Clearly Mikey is acting on your instructions when he runs
interference for you.

You say you don't need him, but obviously you do. Else you would certainly
tell him to **** off and let you "win" all your debates on your own. Your
silence on this question reveals all.


Arny's silence obviously constitutes a personal attack aganst you.
That is a valid application of Kroologic.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On 20 Jun 2006 11:44:32 -0700, "ScottW" wrote:

Drat - that darn English language somes back to bite ScottW again and
again and again...

Yeah.. it sucks...

That's OK, perhaps you could stick to the telephone.

with Velcro?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...

We all hate you and want you to make an ass of yourself.


he will do that whether we hate him or not.
some things just 'are'.




--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:28:24 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On 20 Jun 2006 11:44:32 -0700, "ScottW" wrote:

Drat - that darn English language somes back to bite ScottW again and
again and again...

Yeah.. it sucks...

That's OK, perhaps you could stick to the telephone.

with Velcro?

Nah, as much as he's been beating off here on RAO, he won't need it.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Witlessmongrel barked:

Aren't you over emphasizing usenet just a bit?

No, he's not over it.

Duck Dave....oops no need. Everything is over your head anyway.

Are you aware of the irony in this exchange?

Drat - that darn English language somes back to bite ScottW again and
again and again...

Yeah.. it sucks... I switched to American when I was young and never
looked back.

Apparently, Scooter believes that using standard English when trying to
communicate is "elitist".

No, it's the pompous arrogance of insisting on it while tossing
things like "sute" out there that I find snobbish.
Everybody knows that invoking spelling/grammar is
surrender in the cogent realm anyway.
A realm you rarely visit.

ScottW

Witlessmongrel yappeid:

Apparently, Scooter believes that using standard English when trying to
communicate is "elitist".

No, it's the pompous arrogance of insisting on it while tossing
things like "sute" out there that I find snobbish.

"Snobbish"? How doggish you are. dave's observation that you were unable
to understand a simple sentence could conceivably be labeled petty. The
garbled clump of words you vomited in reply, however, is a far cry from a
typo. Snobbish? It might be supportable to claim it's hypocritical, in
some small degree. You are *so* lame, Scooter.

Everybody knows that invoking spelling/grammar is
surrender in the cogent realm anyway.

"Everybody knows" that? The hubris of the marching morons never fails to
astonish. I don't "know" any such thing. Nor do I know what "the cogent
realm" is. To me, a user of standard English, a realm cannot be cogent. A
person or an argument can be cogent; a realm can be small or vast,
imaginary or real, strong or crumbling. But "cogent"? That's a flea-bitten
misusage of common words.



--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Witlessmongrel yappeid:

Apparently, Scooter believes that using standard English when trying to
communicate is "elitist".

No, it's the pompous arrogance of insisting on it while tossing
things like "sute" out there that I find snobbish.

"Snobbish"? How doggish you are. dave's observation that you were unable
to understand a simple sentence could conceivably be labeled petty.

Petty's good. Yes Dave can be petty....he can be very petty.

The
garbled clump of words you vomited in reply, however, is a far cry from a
typo.

Do you really want to rehash Dave's sentence? Let's decode the following
logic statement and you get to add 2 paretheses any where you legally can.

Not A And Not B Or C

How many possible outcomes are there? Can you figure it out? I doubt it.
Can Dave? Obviously not. He can't find two outcomes to his comparable
sentence.
I'm sure that won't stop him from playing along though.


Snobbish?

Dave proved the scope of his snobbish attitude on the
catered lunch.
You and he have much in common in that regard.
You have no true basis for the airs you put on.

It might be supportable to claim it's hypocritical, in
some small degree. You are *so* lame, Scooter.

Everybody knows that invoking spelling/grammar is
surrender in the cogent realm anyway.

"Everybody knows" that?

Everbody who is interested in staying on point rather than scoring points.
That leaves you out.

The hubris of the marching morons never fails to
astonish. I don't "know" any such thing.

Why am I not surprised?

Nor do I know what "the cogent
realm" is.

No fooling, you've never been there.

To me, an abuser of standard English, a realm cannot be cogent. A
person or an argument can be cogent;
a realm can be small or vast,
imaginary or real, strong or crumbling. But "cogent"? That's a flea-bitten
misusage of common words.

realm:
2 : SPHERE, DOMAIN within the realm of possibility

within the realm of cogent arguments is the cogent realm

Works for me George. But I think misusage as applied
above is really a very poor choice.

ScottW

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:17:05 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:


"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Witlessmongrel yappeid:

Apparently, Scooter believes that using standard English when trying to
communicate is "elitist".

No, it's the pompous arrogance of insisting on it while tossing
things like "sute" out there that I find snobbish.

"Snobbish"? How doggish you are. dave's observation that you were unable
to understand a simple sentence could conceivably be labeled petty.

Petty's good. Yes Dave can be petty....he can be very petty.

The
garbled clump of words you vomited in reply, however, is a far cry from a
typo.

Do you really want to rehash Dave's sentence? Let's decode the following
logic statement and you get to add 2 paretheses any where you legally can.

Not A And Not B Or C

How many possible outcomes are there? Can you figure it out? I doubt it.
Can Dave? Obviously not. He can't find two outcomes to his comparable
sentence.
I'm sure that won't stop him from playing along though.


Snobbish?

Dave proved the scope of his snobbish attitude on the
catered lunch.
You and he have much in common in that regard.
You have no true basis for the airs you put on.

It might be supportable to claim it's hypocritical, in
some small degree. You are *so* lame, Scooter.

Everybody knows that invoking spelling/grammar is
surrender in the cogent realm anyway.

"Everybody knows" that?

Everbody who is interested in staying on point rather than scoring points.
That leaves you out.

The hubris of the marching morons never fails to
astonish. I don't "know" any such thing.

Why am I not surprised?

Nor do I know what "the cogent
realm" is.

No fooling, you've never been there.

To me, an abuser of standard English, a realm cannot be cogent. A
person or an argument can be cogent;
a realm can be small or vast,
imaginary or real, strong or crumbling. But "cogent"? That's a flea-bitten
misusage of common words.

realm:
2 : SPHERE, DOMAIN within the realm of possibility

within the realm of cogent arguments is the cogent realm

Works for me George. But I think misusage as applied
above is really a very poor choice.

ScottW


Scott, I see your point but you're reaching. "Cogent realm" should be
"realm of cogency"--the other is really outside the realm of English.
Personally I would argue with George about everything BUT spelling and
grammar. You're simply not on firm ground there.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ps.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater)
is totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

Thanks for finally admitting that George is not your
correct name. But you'll have to help me here - exactly
what is your correct name?

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is
composed of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group
of people who are so easily influenced by a lowbrow
like you, is an affirmation not a condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted.

Bad logic. Just because I have something that is the
more prefereable of several poor options, does not mean
that I have what I want.

Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for
you?

Asked and answered. But to help you with your failing
mental facilities Middiot, I'll give you the answer
again.

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles - I'm doing a
fine job of helping you humiliate yourself in public.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for
you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is
about giving her some much-needed moral guidance.

LOL Believe me, when I feel like I need some moral
guidance, I consult those whose moral guidance I
respect.

Is Jeffry Dahmer still on your list of consultants, Jenn?

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted. Are you
proud of how low you have sunk?

I'm not as low as you, Jenn. You're the one who is blind to George's
sociopathic behavior. I presume that's because you have similar problems in
your own life.

Your paranoia, which is displayed by you wishing that I
were more critical of George, has nothing to do with
"moral guidance".

In order to be paranoid about George, I'd have to fear
him. Now use your little pea brain just once Jenn,

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted.

Inablity to answer the serious issue raised, noted.

to the question: "Does Arny Fear the George Middius
persona?" Here's a hint: The answer is no!

Here's comes the patented Jenn dissembling act:

I don't claim that you're paranoid about George.

I'm sure you had a lot of people fooled, Jenn.

You're
paranoid about me not posting what you somehow believe is
the proper number of objections to George.

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet. This is
about a pattern of behavior what you established long ago. Do try to study
the meaning of common words before you use them, Jenn.

In article 7e0mg.22003$8q.21286@dukeread08,
"ScottW" wrote:

Do you really want to rehash Dave's sentence? Let's decode the following
logic statement and you get to add 2 paretheses any where you legally can.

Not A And Not B Or C

According to this, the sentence goes thusly:

You don't think; drug abuse isn't a disease or a choice.

Stephen

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet. This is
about a pattern of behavior what you established long ago. Do try to study
the meaning of common words before you use them, Jenn.

Paranoia is a delusional belief, especially one that harm will occur
because a persecutor intends it.

Then there's this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoi...ality_disorder

* 301.00 Paranoid Personality Disorder

A. A pervasive distrust and suspiciousness of others such that their
motives are interpreted as malevolent, beginning by early adulthood and
present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by four (or more) of the
following:

1. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are
exploiting, harming, or deceiving him or her
2. is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or
trustworthiness of friends or associates
3. is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear
that the information will be used maliciously against him or her
4. reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign
remarks or events
5. persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults,
injuries, or slights
6. perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that
are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to
counterattack
7. has recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding
fidelity of spouse or sexual partner

End quote.

Stephen

paul packer said:

Scott, I see your point but you're reaching. "Cogent realm" should be
"realm of cogency"--the other is really outside the realm of English.
Personally I would argue with George about everything BUT spelling and
grammar. You're simply not on firm ground there.

The subject of comparative quality and value of ganja varieties has not
yet arisen on RAO. We shall see!




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

MINe 109 said:

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet.

Paranoia is a delusional belief, especially one that harm will occur
because a persecutor intends it.

Then there's this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoi...ality_disorder

* 301.00 Paranoid Personality Disorder

A. A pervasive distrust and suspiciousness of others such that their
motives are interpreted as malevolent, beginning by early adulthood and
present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by four (or more) of the
following:

1. suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are
exploiting, harming, or deceiving him or her
2. is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or
trustworthiness of friends or associates
3. is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear
that the information will be used maliciously against him or her
4. reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign
remarks or events
5. persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults,
injuries, or slights
6. perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that
are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to
counterattack
7. has recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding
fidelity of spouse or sexual partner

End quote.

Is it a coincidence you posted this in a thread about Arnii Slimeborg?




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet. This is
about a pattern of behavior what you established long ago. Do try to study
the meaning of common words before you use them, Jenn.



We respect your expertise in the area of paranoia.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet.

That definiton comes from a PROVEN paranoid.
Notice the implication that these things WILL happen in the future.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

MINe 109 said:

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet.

Paranoia is a delusional belief, especially one that harm will occur
because a persecutor intends it.

Then there's this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoi...ality_disorder

Is it a coincidence you posted this in a thread about Arnii Slimeborg?

Synchronicity. I think Arny's more of a narcissist.

Stephen

MINe 109 said:

Is it a coincidence you posted this in a thread about Arnii Slimeborg?

Synchronicity. I think Arny's more of a narcissist.

Krooger hits a bull's-eye on the first six. The seventh might be a hit as
well, although Mrs. Krooborg is so heavily medicated that maybe even
Krazyborg doesn't have to worry.

You will note, note, that all of the symptoms listed focus on the
patient's view of himself. Maybe a paranoid personality automatically
qualifies as a narcissist.






--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

MINe 109 said:

Is it a coincidence you posted this in a thread about Arnii Slimeborg?

Synchronicity. I think Arny's more of a narcissist.

Krooger hits a bull's-eye on the first six. The seventh might be a hit as
well, although Mrs. Krooborg is so heavily medicated that maybe even
Krazyborg doesn't have to worry.

You will note, note, that all of the symptoms listed focus on the
patient's view of himself. Maybe a paranoid personality automatically
qualifies as a narcissist.

In the everyday world sense, sure.

Of course, a formal diagnosis requires a face-to-face evaluation by a
qualified person.

Stephen

MINe 109 said:

You will note, note, that all of the symptoms listed focus on the
patient's view of himself. Maybe a paranoid personality automatically
qualifies as a narcissist.

In the everyday world sense, sure.

Of course, a formal diagnosis requires a face-to-face evaluation by a
qualified person.

Jeez. I thought we come to RAO to have fun.




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ps.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message

SlimeBorg molds his expectations to fit reality.

It appears that all of RAO (except Mikey Bug Eater)
is totally against you.

George,

Who's "George"? Address me by my correct name, Slimey.

Thanks for finally admitting that George is not your
correct name. But you'll have to help me here - exactly
what is your correct name?

given your limited view of who "all of RAO" is
composed of, that
would be very good news. Being disliked by a group
of people who are so easily influenced by a lowbrow
like you, is an affirmation not a condemnation.

Then you have what you've always wanted.

Bad logic. Just because I have something that is the
more prefereable of several poor options, does not mean
that I have what I want.

Isn't that special.

P.S. Why do you need Mikey to fight your battles for
you?

Asked and answered. But to help you with your failing
mental facilities Middiot, I'll give you the answer
again.

I don't need Mikey to fight my battles - I'm doing a
fine job of helping you humiliate yourself in public.

Also, why do you need Jenn to fight your battles for
you?

This isn't about Jenn fighting my battles, this is
about giving her some much-needed moral guidance.

LOL Believe me, when I feel like I need some moral
guidance, I consult those whose moral guidance I
respect.

Is Jeffry Dahmer still on your list of consultants, Jenn?

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted. Are you
proud of how low you have sunk?

I'm not as low as you, Jenn. You're the one who is blind to George's
sociopathic behavior. I presume that's because you have similar problems in
your own life.

Your paranoia, which is displayed by you wishing that I
were more critical of George, has nothing to do with
"moral guidance".

In order to be paranoid about George, I'd have to fear
him. Now use your little pea brain just once Jenn,

Gratuitous and lame attempt at insult noted.

Inablity to answer the serious issue raised, noted.

to the question: "Does Arny Fear the George Middius
persona?" Here's a hint: The answer is no!

Here's comes the patented Jenn dissembling act:

I don't claim that you're paranoid about George.

I'm sure you had a lot of people fooled, Jenn.

You're
paranoid about me not posting what you somehow believe is
the proper number of objections to George.

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet. This is
about a pattern of behavior what you established long ago. Do try to study
the meaning of common words before you use them, Jenn.

I see... well, thank you for your opinion, Arny. I disagree, but it's
noted.

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:17:05 -0700, "ScottW"
wrote:


"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Witlessmongrel yappeid:

Apparently, Scooter believes that using standard English when trying to
communicate is "elitist".

No, it's the pompous arrogance of insisting on it while tossing
things like "sute" out there that I find snobbish.

"Snobbish"? How doggish you are. dave's observation that you were unable
to understand a simple sentence could conceivably be labeled petty.

Petty's good. Yes Dave can be petty....he can be very petty.

The
garbled clump of words you vomited in reply, however, is a far cry from a
typo.

Do you really want to rehash Dave's sentence? Let's decode the following
logic statement and you get to add 2 paretheses any where you legally can.

Not A And Not B Or C

How many possible outcomes are there? Can you figure it out? I doubt it.
Can Dave? Obviously not. He can't find two outcomes to his comparable
sentence.
I'm sure that won't stop him from playing along though.


Snobbish?

Dave proved the scope of his snobbish attitude on the
catered lunch.
You and he have much in common in that regard.
You have no true basis for the airs you put on.

It might be supportable to claim it's hypocritical, in
some small degree. You are *so* lame, Scooter.

Everybody knows that invoking spelling/grammar is
surrender in the cogent realm anyway.

"Everybody knows" that?

Everbody who is interested in staying on point rather than scoring points.
That leaves you out.

The hubris of the marching morons never fails to
astonish. I don't "know" any such thing.

Why am I not surprised?

Nor do I know what "the cogent
realm" is.

No fooling, you've never been there.

To me, an abuser of standard English, a realm cannot be cogent. A
person or an argument can be cogent;
a realm can be small or vast,
imaginary or real, strong or crumbling. But "cogent"? That's a flea-bitten
misusage of common words.

realm:
2 : SPHERE, DOMAIN within the realm of possibility

within the realm of cogent arguments is the cogent realm

Works for me George. But I think misusage as applied
above is really a very poor choice.

ScottW


Scott, I see your point but you're reaching. "Cogent realm" should be
"realm of cogency"--the other is really outside the realm of English.

BS. Prove it.

Personally I would argue with George about everything BUT spelling and
grammar. You're simply not on firm ground there.

Has he brought up anything else to discuss?
It's that or Arny with him.
He has a rather narrow scope of interest.

ScottW

In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

MINe 109 said:

You will note, note, that all of the symptoms listed focus on the
patient's view of himself. Maybe a paranoid personality automatically
qualifies as a narcissist.

In the everyday world sense, sure.

Of course, a formal diagnosis requires a face-to-face evaluation by a
qualified person.

Jeez. I thought we come to RAO to have fun.

I'm easily amused.

Anyone know what size screws connect the "Stand And Deliver" stands to
Quad 63s?

Stephen

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't
happened yet. This is about a pattern of behavior what
you established long ago. Do try to study the meaning of
common words before you use them, Jenn.

Paranoia is a delusional belief, especially one that harm
will occur because a persecutor intends it.

Thanks for your rewording of my comment, Stephen.

Scott, I see your point but you're reaching. "Cogent realm" should be
"realm of cogency"--the other is really outside the realm of English.

BS. Prove it.

How do you know it's BS until you've seen my answer? There's evidence
for the lack of an open mind for a start.

As for the other, how does one "prove" it? It's just not good English.
I didn't understand it and neither did George---therefore it's "wrong"
in the sense that it's confusing. Good English clearly conveys its
meaning. Both versions say the same thing but one is self-evident and
the other is confusing.

Personally I would argue with George about everything BUT spelling and
grammar. You're simply not on firm ground there.

Has he brought up anything else to discuss?
It's that or Arny with him.
He has a rather narrow scope of interest.

George likes US politics. Try that.

"paul packer" wrote in message
ups.com...

Scott, I see your point but you're reaching. "Cogent realm" should be
"realm of cogency"--the other is really outside the realm of English.

BS. Prove it.

How do you know it's BS until you've seen my answer?

Sorry... BS IM(nsh)O.

There's evidence
for the lack of an open mind for a start.

I thought open minds were banned around here.

As for the other, how does one "prove" it?

Aren't there rule for this kind of stuff?

It's just not good English.
I didn't understand it and neither did George---therefore it's "wrong"

ooooh.... an elitist. Do you really think you're understanding
defines the bounds of "good english".

in the sense that it's confusing. Good English clearly conveys its
meaning.

Hear this George, you're in deep trouble.

Both versions say the same thing but one is self-evident and
the other is confusing.

aaahh... the second is called a Weilism in good RAO parlance.

But would you really be confused if someone said the
possible realm instead of realm of possibility?


Personally I would argue with George about everything BUT spelling and
grammar. You're simply not on firm ground there.

Has he brought up anything else to discuss?
It's that or Arny with him.
He has a rather narrow scope of interest.

George likes US politics. Try that.

He can't make a substantive argument and thus is quite boring
on the topic.

ScottW

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:16:34 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:



Wrong Jenn - paranoia is fear of things that haven't happened yet. This is
about a pattern of behavior what you established long ago. Do try to study
the meaning of common words before you use them, Jenn.


Wow, the snot's flying today. Arny must have sold something, or
someone told him his soldering's very neat or something. He's like a
Puff Adder, inflating his ego to full stretch just before he strikes.