In article , "Gary Sokolich"
wrote:
"Daniel Fox" wrote in
oups.com:


Gary Sokolich wrote:
Bob Cain wrote in
:

Gary Sokolich wrote:

I do not claim here to have done anything.

"I have" obviously means something to Sokolich different from what
is commonly meant by it. He will provide a link to what he has
done to show what assumption I have made and how it violates
anything.

The analysis of Frequency Modulation Distortion (aka Doppler
distortion) in loudspeakers was done by Beers & Belar in 1943.
The analysis of Doppler distortion produced by a piston in a tube
was done by Art Ludwig and is published on his website.

It is a hash job with no merit. From the quality of it I believe
Gary Sokolich wrote it as well as the crap he quoted. Sokolich has
a history of impersonation that is well known.

Unlike you, I have no interest in either
reinventing the wheel or challenging reputable authorities on the
subject matter.

Dokolich does not have the ability or he would have used it counter
or refute the technical result I arrived at. To prove otherwise he
will post his own analysis to show that he understands the problem
and its solution.

That is why I was right and why you were wrong on every aspect of
the Doppler distortion debate.

Sokolich said nothing that he could be objectively right or wrong
about. He is very careful about that in everything he writes.

(He seems to have slipped and tripped himself up recently, however,
by stating unequivocally that tube amps with transformer outputs
have no problems with open circuit loads.)

It is not necessary to provide any solutions to any partial
differential equations to analyze this problem other than the
standard solution to the acoustic plane wave. That Sokolich claims
otherwise demonstrates either obfuscation or ignorance.

This is all I have to say on the subject (this time 'round) until
and unless he puts some meat on the bones of his contentions.
Bob

You obviously have nothing substantive to say on the subject.
Perhaps you should put some meat on the bones of your contentions.
All you have ever put forth is a litany of unsubstantiated,
ever-changing ignorant opinion. You began the Doppler distortion
debate by denying the existence of Doppler distortion. Somewhat
later you took the position that Doppler distortion existed in the
free field but not in a tube. Then Art Ludwig did an analysis and
sent you his MatLab program for calculating the distortion levels.
In light of the exchanges between you and Art Ludwig in
alt.sci.physics.acoustics, it could not be more obvious that Art
Ludwig's analysis was over your head and that you were clueless about
the approach that he took in analyzing the problem. Because you were
incapable of understanding Art's analysis, you went to sci.physics
begging for help. There, Zigoteau led you by the hand through some of
the preliminary aspects of an alternative analysis, but eventually
gave up on you out and stated that you obviously didn't know what you
were doing. In the end, you acknowledged that Doppler distortion
exists both in a free field and in a tube, which is what I said from
the very beginning. The Doppler distortion debate took place over a
period of several months and in several newsgroups. Accordingly,
asking me to provide links to my position on the matter is absurd,
and serves only to further demonstrate that you are still ignorant
about the physics involved and that you have nothing substantive to
say on the subject.

Please keep this S**t out of here. For good. No one cares. really.
Thank You.

And exactly who the f..k do you think you are to dictate to me what I
should or should not post.

I agree. There are serious professionals here discussing important topics,
including what headphones I should buy to record winos on the subway in New
York. Like all professionals these decisions can be life-changing and they
deserve to be read and considered by everyone here.

Bob

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
.. .

Forgery

Robert Morein wrote:
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
.. .

Forgery

Jesus Christ... rec.audio.pro is rapidly becoming sociopath central.
Don't you people have anything better to do? Never mind - dont answer
that.

Daniel Fox wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:
"Robert Morein" wrote in message
.. .

Forgery

Jesus Christ... rec.audio.pro is rapidly becoming sociopath central.
Don't you people have anything better to do? Never mind - dont answer
that.

Sorry Mr. Fox. The forgery probably comes from Brian L. McCarty, or
Paul Sappler, or Bob Weinberg or Jerry Esterman, who are sociopathic
net trolls who have been psychostalking me everywhere I go. They are
part of a conspiracy against me, that I have been working with the FBI
to uncover, along with K1 Ventures ( a company out of Singapore), Jerry
Wexler, Steve Stevenson (of Arc Recording Studios in Bhurma), the
diplomatic council of North Korea, and the offices of the presidents of
both England and India. As you may understand, I can not let them
tarnish my good name, so I must fight the good fight, so that Usenet
can be free of "scum" like this.