Please discuss the following with the class:

Marriage, you say (more or less) is a scared, time-honored institutionalizing
of a committed relationship between a man and a woman. You imply, I think, that
gay marriage would somehow damage that institution. I assume, as well, that you
support the Holy Emperor Bush in his call for a constitutional amendment to
protect marriage. Whether you do or don't, here's the question: Which is the
bigger threat to marriages and families? Loving gay couples who make the
difficult decision to commit for life, or the MILLIONS of men and women who
commit adultery and thereby shatter their families and often cripple their
children emotionally? If it's in the state's interest to preserve marriage as
being between a man and a woman for the sake of families, why not propose an
amendment to make adultery a capital crime?

What do you think?

Professor Midnite

Professor Midnite wrote:

Please discuss the following with the class:

Marriage, you say (more or less) is a scared, time-honored institutionalizing
of a committed relationship between a man and a woman. You imply, I think, that
gay marriage would somehow damage that institution. I assume, as well, that you
support the Holy Emperor Bush in his call for a constitutional amendment to
protect marriage. Whether you do or don't, here's the question: Which is the
bigger threat to marriages and families? Loving gay couples who make the
difficult decision to commit for life, or the MILLIONS of men and women who
commit adultery and thereby shatter their families and often cripple their
children emotionally? If it's in the state's interest to preserve marriage as
being between a man and a woman for the sake of families, why not propose an
amendment to make adultery a capital crime?

Adultery is fine, as long as it's between a man and a woman. Or
two women. That's kinda hot.

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Glenn Z

Good heavens! I wrote:

Marriage, you say (more or less) is a *scared*, time-honored
institutionalizing

I meant to write a *sacred*. Apologies to all. But could this be a Freudian
slip?

Professor Midnite

Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when "The
Wedding March" began!

Boon

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message

Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many
sacred moments that day, including filling out my marriage license
with a golf pencil, and the hefty click sound the play button of the
tape recorder made when "The Wedding March" began!

Plastic does as plastic is.

Plastic does as plastic is.



O.K. Forrest.

"Professor Midnite" wrote in message
...
Please discuss the following with the class:

Marriage, you say (more or less) is a scared, time-honored
institutionalizing
of a committed relationship between a man and a woman. You imply, I think,
that
gay marriage would somehow damage that institution. I assume, as well,
that you
support the Holy Emperor Bush in his call for a constitutional amendment
to
protect marriage. Whether you do or don't, here's the question: Which is
the
bigger threat to marriages and families? Loving gay couples who make the
difficult decision to commit for life, or the MILLIONS of men and women
who
commit adultery and thereby shatter their families and often cripple their
children emotionally? If it's in the state's interest to preserve marriage
as
being between a man and a woman for the sake of families, why not propose
an
amendment to make adultery a capital crime?

What do you think?


How would you score a blow job?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf
pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when
"The
Wedding March" began!


You didn't insist on vinyl?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe"

How would you score a blow job?



It depends from whom.

But a question, class:

Q: What word do men use to describe the worst blow job they ever had?


A: Fabulous!


Now then, getting back to the question at hand, since you presume to be the
grand protector of the traditional marriage and traditional family, and since
Scott fashions himself a veritable Catcher In The Rye protecting children,
which is more problematic to children and traditional families: Gay marriage or
adultery. And should we have a constitutional amendment suspending the *cruel
and unusual* concept, thus permitting castration of male adulterers and stoning
of females, in the same manner Holy Roller Rapture Boy George wants a
constitutional amendment to deny Gays civil rights and equal treatment under
the law?

We eagerly await your response.

Professor Midnite

"Professor Midnite" wrote in message
...
From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe"

How would you score a blow job?



It depends from whom.

But a question, class:

Q: What word do men use to describe the worst blow job they ever had?


A: Fabulous!


Now then, getting back to the question at hand, since you presume to be
the
grand protector of the traditional marriage and traditional family, and
since
Scott fashions himself a veritable Catcher In The Rye protecting children,
which is more problematic to children and traditional families: Gay
marriage or
adultery. And should we have a constitutional amendment suspending the
*cruel
and unusual* concept, thus permitting castration of male adulterers and
stoning
of females, in the same manner Holy Roller Rapture Boy George wants a
constitutional amendment to deny Gays civil rights and equal treatment
under
the law?

We eagerly await your response.

We?

Is the status of capital crime offered as deterrent?
I don't see how incarcerating a parent is going to
benefit the family.

I just heard Kerry offer his support of the amendment.
I also saw a poll showing a slim majority of democrats
are in favor. I don't think a constiitutional amendment
is needed. Particularly when it won't change
anything including individual states left to decide the issue
(no matter what you call it, civil union or whatever).

ScottW

Art Sackman wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf
pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when
"The
Wedding March" began!


You didn't insist on vinyl?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption
=---








Well, "at least" it was an analogue tape recorder. And probably a recording
made from an LP.



Bruce J. Richman

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

What do you think?



How would you score a blow job?

Special Dispensation?

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

Wedding March" began!



You didn't insist on vinyl?

AHAHAHAH.

OMG I can't believe I didn't think of that one first.

ScottW wrote:

"Professor Midnite" wrote in message
...

From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe"

How would you score a blow job?



It depends from whom.

But a question, class:

Q: What word do men use to describe the worst blow job they ever had?


A: Fabulous!


Now then, getting back to the question at hand, since you presume to be

the

grand protector of the traditional marriage and traditional family, and

since

Scott fashions himself a veritable Catcher In The Rye protecting children,
which is more problematic to children and traditional families: Gay

marriage or

adultery. And should we have a constitutional amendment suspending the

*cruel

and unusual* concept, thus permitting castration of male adulterers and

stoning

of females, in the same manner Holy Roller Rapture Boy George wants a
constitutional amendment to deny Gays civil rights and equal treatment

under

the law?

We eagerly await your response.


We?

Is the status of capital crime offered as deterrent?
I don't see how incarcerating a parent is going to
benefit the family.

I just heard Kerry offer his support of the amendment.
I also saw a poll showing a slim majority of democrats
are in favor.

See? Told you he was a lip-service bum.

I'd not voting for Kerry in this primary I can tell you.
(why NOT register for it - it's not like you can kick
Bush out of the Republican nominee position)

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
ink.net...


ScottW wrote:

I just heard Kerry offer his support of the amendment.
I also saw a poll showing a slim majority of democrats
are in favor.

See? Told you he was a lip-service bum.

I'd not voting for Kerry in this primary I can tell you.
(why NOT register for it - it's not like you can kick
Bush out of the Republican nominee position)

Scott heard wrong. Kerry said he's not in favor of gay marriage, but is
opposed to this amendment.

A CNN poll today showed 56% are opposed to Bush's propsed amendment.

From: "ScottW"

Is the status of capital crime offered as deterrent?

Obviously. So? Which is the bigger threat to marriage, families and children:
Gay marriage or adultery? And if it's adultery, why haven't you been vigorously
railing against it, oh purported and pusillanimous protector of our precious
progeny?

I just heard Kerry offer his support of the amendment.

"A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest... Lai la lai..."


Kerry Wins Three Contests Out West
By DAVID ESPO, AP

(Feb. 25) - Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry scored solid

(snip)

Both Kerry and Edwards accused the president of playing politics with the
Constitution - a charge the White House denied. The two Democrats said they
oppose gay marriage, but would vote against the amendment if it is brought
before the Senate.



Professor Midnite

in article , Sandman at
wrote on 2/25/04 1:31 AM:


"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
ink.net...


ScottW wrote:

I just heard Kerry offer his support of the amendment.
I also saw a poll showing a slim majority of democrats
are in favor.

See? Told you he was a lip-service bum.

I'd not voting for Kerry in this primary I can tell you.
(why NOT register for it - it's not like you can kick
Bush out of the Republican nominee position)

Scott heard wrong. Kerry said he's not in favor of gay marriage, but is
opposed to this amendment.

A CNN poll today showed 56% are opposed to Bush's propsed amendment.


He must have attended the Ann Coulter School for Political Studies:
1. Make **** up.
2. Express horror and outrage over the **** you just made up.

(Marc Phillips) wrote
Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when "The
Wedding March" began!

Boon

Spastic woes as apopalectic is.

lete (Professor Midnite) wrote
Good heavens! I wrote:

Marriage, you say (more or less) is a *scared*, time-honored
institutionalizing

I meant to write a *sacred*. Apologies to all. But could this be a Freudian
slip?

Professor Midnite

Thanks professor midneit for admitting your so full of it its just
like, Atkinson doesnt' know his "look over here, cake" was apopalectic
in the first place!

GMAB ;-)

Acne Krooker wrote:



(Marc Phillips) wrote
Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf
pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when
"The
Wedding March" began!

Boon

Spastic woes as apopalectic is.









You shure got that wright! Phillips is nuthing more than a filthy lyre.

(DuhMikeyMcSmelvy) wrote

Acne Krooker wrote:



(Marc Phillips) wrote
Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf
pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when
"The
Wedding March" began!

Boon

Spastic woes as apopalectic is.









You shure got that wright! Phillips is nuthing more than a filthy lyre.

Eggsacktlye.

Arny said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message

Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many
sacred moments that day, including filling out my marriage license
with a golf pencil, and the hefty click sound the play button of the
tape recorder made when "The Wedding March" began!

Plastic does as plastic is.

That doesn't make any sense. Would you care to try again, idiot?

Boon

Yustabe said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Dr. Z said:

I think marriage is a sacrosanct rite and that nothing glorifies
the blessed union of a man and a woman more than a
spur-of-the-moment three-AM ceremony by a unicycle-riding
Malaysian Elvis impersonator at the 24-hour drive-through Chapel
of the Immaculate Pink Eldorado.

Hey, don't knock Vegas weddings...I had one! And there were many sacred
moments that day, including filling out my marriage license with a golf
pencil,
and the hefty click sound the play button of the tape recorder made when
"The
Wedding March" began!


You didn't insist on vinyl?

At least it wasn't digital.

Boon

George M. Middius wrote:


Sandman said:


Scott heard wrong. Kerry said he's not in favor of gay marriage, but is
opposed to this amendment.


Politicians are such tools. I wish a candidate could just smile
and call the idiots what they are.


A CNN poll today showed 56% are opposed to Bush's propsed amendment.


Unfortunately, a greater percentage are "against gay marriage".
And I'll bet most of them have "reasons" that are even shallower
than Socky's.

Is that even possible?

Seriously. Is it? I really want to know.

"DuhMikeyMcSmelvy" wrote in message
...
Acne Krooker wrote:



(Marc Phillips) wrote
Dr. Z said:



You shure got that wright! Phillips is nuthing more than a filthy lyre.



And you can play him just like a harp.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

George M. Middius wrote:


Joseph Oberlander said:


Unfortunately, a greater percentage are "against gay marriage".
And I'll bet most of them have "reasons" that are even shallower
than Socky's.

Is that even possible?

Seriously. Is it? I really want to know.



Socky's calls to tradition are at least recognizable in our shared
experiences. Some of our less erudite fellow citizens say things like
"Faggots can't get married! Yuck!"

Dang. You're right. I completely forgot about the Jerry Springer Show.

All marriages are same-sex marriages - once you're married, it's the same
sex every night. :-)

"Sandman" wrote in message


All marriages are same-sex marriages - once you're married, it's the
same sex every night. :-)

This autobiographical comment comes from someone who obviously lacks any
personal creativity. I feel sorry for your current wife, Sanders. Not only
did she catch a little fish, and an impotent fish, she got a dumb fish.

Arny said:

"Sandman" wrote in message


All marriages are same-sex marriages - once you're married, it's the
same sex every night. :-)

This autobiographical comment comes from someone who obviously lacks any
personal creativity. I feel sorry for your current wife, Sanders. Not only
did she catch a little fish, and an impotent fish, she got a dumb fish.

So tell us, Arny...what kind of kinky sex do you enjoy? Or is that too loaded
of a question to ask a known pedophile such as yourself?

Boon

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sandman" wrote in message


All marriages are same-sex marriages - once you're married, it's the
same sex every night. :-)

This autobiographical comment comes from someone who obviously lacks any
personal creativity. I feel sorry for your current wife, Sanders. Not only
did she catch a little fish, and an impotent fish, she got a dumb fish.


"At least" it was a rich fish with a really nice house that doesn't
have a crumbing foundation.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

(Marc Phillips) wrote
Arny said:

"Sandman" wrote in message


All marriages are same-sex marriages - once you're married, it's the
same sex every night. :-)

This autobiographical comment comes from someone who obviously lacks any
personal creativity. I feel sorry for your current wife, Sanders. Not only
did she catch a little fish, and an impotent fish, she got a dumb fish.

So tell us, Arny...what kind of kinky sex do you enjoy? Or is that too loaded
of a question to ask a known pedophile such as yourself?

Boon

The stains on my harddisk Phillips are not the least annoying while
recording a boys' choir at the church Phillips whenever I'm horny
without subwoofers rolling around in droves just as much as Atkinson
would like to have but can't afford due to an apoplectic disturbance
of the "usual suspects" if ever they could darken the doors of a
church, Phillips.

At least not in this millenniluim, which would be obsolete as a dumb
fish Phillips ;-)