Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did this, you included
a few of your own words, although the meaning was inscrutable. Just now,
you forwarded my own posts to me without a single word of your own.
Apparently you want me to guess what you're feeling.

If I hurt your feelings, I don't care. If you feel insulted or aggrieved,
you deserve it. If your tongue is tied because you're apoplectic with
anger and frustration, too bad.

As a gratuitous fillip to your poor, pathetic, beleaguered self, you
getting bitch-slapped by Bobo doesn't cause me the slightest little
twinge. Neither does the fact that everybody is ignoring you. (It's
obvious to everybody that you're the world's most desperately needy
attention whore, you know.)

You could could off both your thumbs in a lawnmower accident and nobody
would care. Are you getting the message yet, Shovels?





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message news



Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did this, you included
a few of your own words, although the meaning was inscrutable. Just now,
you forwarded my own posts to me without a single word of your own.
Apparently you want me to guess what you're feeling.

If I hurt your feelings, I don't care. If you feel insulted or aggrieved,
you deserve it. If your tongue is tied because you're apoplectic with
anger and frustration, too bad.

As a gratuitous fillip to your poor, pathetic, beleaguered self, you
getting bitch-slapped by Bobo doesn't cause me the slightest little
twinge. Neither does the fact that everybody is ignoring you. (It's
obvious to everybody that you're the world's most desperately needy
attention whore, you know.)

You could could off both your thumbs in a lawnmower accident and nobody
would care. Are you getting the message yet, Shovels?

Strangely, I don't get much email from Richard Graham lately, even though
I've stolen his soul and put it in a canning jar with a tight lid. I'll let
you look at it for a quarter.

On Thu, 4 May 2006 23:23:15 -0400, "soundhaspriority"
wrote:


"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message news



Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did this, you included
a few of your own words, although the meaning was inscrutable. Just now,
you forwarded my own posts to me without a single word of your own.
Apparently you want me to guess what you're feeling.

If I hurt your feelings, I don't care. If you feel insulted or aggrieved,
you deserve it. If your tongue is tied because you're apoplectic with
anger and frustration, too bad.

As a gratuitous fillip to your poor, pathetic, beleaguered self, you
getting bitch-slapped by Bobo doesn't cause me the slightest little
twinge. Neither does the fact that everybody is ignoring you. (It's
obvious to everybody that you're the world's most desperately needy
attention whore, you know.)

You could could off both your thumbs in a lawnmower accident and nobody
would care. Are you getting the message yet, Shovels?

Strangely, I don't get much email from Richard Graham lately, even though
I've stolen his soul and put it in a canning jar with a tight lid. I'll let
you look at it for a quarter.

Well, I hope you checked the identity tag before you sealed the jar,
Robert. I'd like to be certain of this one.

paul packer wrote:

On Thu, 4 May 2006 23:23:15 -0400, "soundhaspriority"
wrote:

Strangely, I don't get much email from Richard Graham lately, even though
I've stolen his soul and put it in a canning jar with a tight lid. I'll let
you look at it for a quarter.

Well, I hope you checked the identity tag before you sealed the jar,
Robert.

You should already know by now that Crazy Bob is a self-aggrandizing
egomaniacal fool. That's why he just realized he only has his own
finger in his little jar.

I'd like to be certain of this one.

Are you sure about that? Psycho Bob Morein has -never- received email
from Richard Graham. But since you're foolish enough to believe him
when he tells you I'm "Richard Graham", you're foolish enough to
believe anything, Packer. Ergo, you'll never be "certain" of anything,
except the fact that you're a naive, easily swayed fool.

I can't lay claim that I've "stolen Psycho Bob's soul", since he's pure
evil. Pure evil doesn't have a "soul". I do however have his cahones on
my desk. I play "knick knack" with them when I get bored....

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.


George is George.
"At least" he's not a self pitying hypocrite, like you



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news

George is George.

"At least" he's not a self pitying hypocrite, like you

Says who? YOU? Google begs to differ, buddy. You want to see self pity
from Shovels? You're looking at it. He's starting a new thread vying
for attention from the world, in which he's whining about some email he
"claims" to have received from me, but never did. That's Shovels little
"pity play". He does that a lot. Take a good look. Here he is whining
for pity because I "munged" his post (which is one of the few true
things he's ever said about me), calling me "lowbrow" for doing so, and
even complaining about me having somehow stolen my own post from
Google's archives because the imbecile couldn't figure out how to
search for it:

referenced in the header but it's not available on my news server (Newsguy).
Shovie did his typical lowbrow copycat routine by munging my post, but what
is the "goombah" thing supposed to mean? Christ, what a loony tune....

Shovels is one of the greatest hypocrites I've ever seen around here.
You want to see hypocrisy from him? Start with the quote above. He
bitches about how "lowbrow" it is for me to "munge his quotes" when he
was the one who started doing that with me. I figured if the little
career troll of RAO wants to play those lowbrow dirty tricks like that,
then that's what I'll do with him. There's no end to the trolls
hypocrisy, and he's guilty of absolutely every single accusation he's
ever made against me or anybody else.

But perhaps the most revealing flaw in Shovie's character is the
hypocrisy of being the official "spokesperson" of the so-called
"subjectivists" on this group, and bashing Arny for 8 years straight
for denouncing the idea that people should listen under normal
conditions to audio products to determine whether they are valid or
not, instead of adhering to theoretical ideologies to determine this. I
showed numerous times that Shovels entire raison d'etre for being here,
the "subjectivist spokesperson", is itself a hypocritical farce.
Because he abandoned his firm belief that he kept bashing Arny with
when it came to my tweaks. He dismissed them without trying them, even
though some of his mates have tried them and found that they work. Thus
he can no longer criticize Arny for doing the same thing that he
himself does - invalidating audio concepts by theory alone.

Here's one supporting source of Middius' hypocrisy:

Shovels The Lie-Telling, Post Forging, Quote Mangling, Unethical
RAO-Addicted Troll

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...7?dmode=source

wrote in message
oups.com...

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news

George is George.

"At least" he's not a self pitying hypocrite, like you

Says who? YOU? Google begs to differ, buddy. You want to see self pity
from Shovels? You're looking at it. He's starting a new thread vying
for attention from the world, in which he's whining about some email he
"claims" to have received from me, but never did. That's Shovels little
"pity play". He does that a lot. Take a good look. Here he is whining
for pity because I "munged" his post (which is one of the few true
things he's ever said about me), calling me "lowbrow" for doing so, and
even complaining about me having somehow stolen my own post from
Google's archives because the imbecile couldn't figure out how to
search for it:

referenced in the header but it's not available on my news server
(Newsguy).
Shovie did his typical lowbrow copycat routine by munging my post, but
what
is the "goombah" thing supposed to mean? Christ, what a loony tune....

Shovels is one of the

Then you're talking about yourself, because that is the name Middius gave
you and it sticks.

Crazy Bob Morein holds off on making more death threats against me for
the time being:

Shovels is one of the

Oh there you are, little Psycho Bobby. When you weren't replying to all
of my posts yesterday seconds after I was making them, I thought maybe
you were dead? Perhaps killed by the very bullet you threatened me with
the day before yesterday? Wouldn't that be "ironic". Do you realize
that you are making a liar out of your trolling partner, Shovels? After
all, he just finished saying at the beginning of this thread that I am
being completely ignored. Yet neither you nor him seem mentally or
physically capable of such a feat of intense will on your behalf.
Neither of you clowns ever stopped hanging on my every word since I've
been here. You really ought to email each other more often to get your
stories straight. Since you both teamed up with the foolish notion that
either of you were good enough to take me on (a move I know darn well
you have since regretted), I'll give you a tip: you really shouldn't
undermine your teammate. Work together, because as it already stands,
the both of you boobs combined doesn't even equal a quarter of me and
what I'm capable of doing to you.

Then you're talking about yourself, because that is the name Middius gave
you and it sticks.

No, sorry, "Shovels" is the name I gave Middius. And all of your
petulant whining doesn't change that fact. Shovels being as lame and
unoriginal as you are, couldn't think of anything better and copied my
name. Just as you have done, "coincidentally". And I don't think you
understand the concept of what "sticking" means. No one but Shovie
addresses me by that name. Even YOU don't call me "Shovels", which
means you don't recognize that as my legitimate name, because you
realize yourself that it's Middius' moniker, that I gave him. So no, it
most certainly ain't "sticking", Moreon. As a matter of fact, -nothing-
is, because it seems that everyone came up with their own name for me.
Arny's got his "Mr. SHP". You've got your "Richard Graham". Shovels has
got his "Shovels" (after stealing the name from me). Westface has his
"Skippy". ScottW (or was it Sullivan? I always get the two confused)
came up with "Shippy", Paul Packer's got his "Mr. Sound", and so on and
so forth.

However, it looks like I do need to point out another ironic lie of
yours: every time you say -anything- against me, you're talking about
-yourself-, because you've also copied my name. Check your headers if
you don't believe me. No one knows who the hell you're talking about,
since you appear to be talking about yourself. This is why I have
always laughed at your attack posts against me, and goaded you on to
create more. The more you talk against me, the more you speak against
yourself. I use your name so that when Google searches are made on it
by members of the IEEE and SAG (some of whom I've been contacting you
know....), people know just who "soundhaspriority" really is. That's
the beauty of the impotence of you. Every time you attack "Richard
Graham" you're two degrees removed from attacking me. One degree
because I'm not Graham, and no one but you believes I am, a second
degree because as everyone can see, YOU are "soundhaspriority" now. And
you're the one claiming "soundhaspriority's identity is "Richard
Graham"", which means you're Richard Graham. Which means everything you
say against Graham is being said by yourself against yourself.
Comprends-tu, mon p'tit con?

Well, keep ignoring me like Shovels says you are, you're doing a
bang-up job of that.
But if you're back in a few minutes as I predict, I'll have a shiny new
carrot for you to munch on.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name,

Meaning that I mentioned it once; far less than Arny.

she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Note that George has never whined about having his name in the title of
an "attack thread" like you have, then turned around and did that
himself.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own.
Apparently you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack
threads titled with someone's name,

Meaning that I mentioned it once; far less than Arny.

she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Note that George has never whined about having his name
in the title of an "attack thread" like you have, then
turned around and did that himself.

I never said that George whined about it. He's so desperate for attention
that he probably loves it. Think of him as Paul Packer with arthritus or
something like it, waiting for some underpaid care giver to change his
Depends.

However thanks again Jenn for showing that you are RAO's mistress of the red
herring argument.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message
news Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own.
Apparently you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack
threads titled with someone's name,

Meaning that I mentioned it once; far less than Arny.

she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Note that George has never whined about having his name
in the title of an "attack thread" like you have, then
turned around and did that himself.

I never said that George whined about it.

And I never said that you said that George whined about it. That's
totally beside the point. Red herring argument.

He's so desperate for attention
that he probably loves it. Think of him as Paul Packer with arthritus or
something like it, waiting for some underpaid care giver to change his
Depends.

However thanks again Jenn for showing that you are RAO's mistress of the red
herring argument.

Thanks for showing that you don't know what a red herring argument is.
Did YOU make a point of being critical of those who use someone's name
(yours) in the title of an attack thread? Yes, you did. Did you then
do that yourself? Yes, you did. Did you then criticize me for not
being critical of George for doing it? Yes, you did. Has George ever
whined about it and then acted hypocritical by doing it himself? No, he
didn't. Did you? Yes, you did.

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at]
comcast [dot] net wrote in message
news Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you
did this, you included a few of your own words,
although the meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you
forwarded my own posts to me without a single word of
your own. Apparently you want me to guess what you're
feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack
threads titled with someone's name,

Meaning that I mentioned it once; far less than Arny.

she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Note that George has never whined about having his name
in the title of an "attack thread" like you have, then
turned around and did that himself.

I never said that George whined about it.

And I never said that you said that George whined about
it. That's totally beside the point. Red herring
argument.

He's so desperate for attention
that he probably loves it. Think of him as Paul Packer
with arthritus or something like it, waiting for some
underpaid care giver to change his Depends.

However thanks again Jenn for showing that you are RAO's
mistress of the red herring argument.

Thanks for showing that you don't know what a red herring
argument is.

As a service to the google-impaired:

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-herring.html

Did YOU make a point of being critical of
those who use someone's name (yours) in the title of an
attack thread? Yes, you did.

Of course. They did it gratuitously.

Did you then do that yourself? Yes, you did.

The difference being that I generally only do it in self-defense.

For example, I let Paul's gratuitous re-gurigitation of that old news steep
for a few days before responding the first time. This gave the Middius
clique plenty of time to be criticized for the obvious fact that they are a
bunch of lemmings who pile onto some really lame crap and wallow in it like
the pigs they are.

Did you then criticize me for
not being critical of George for doing it? Yes, you did.

Of course Jenn- making the point that you are very selective in your
whining. Your idea of justice is not based on fairness - its based on your
likes and dislikes.

Has George ever whined about it and then acted
hypocritical by doing it himself? No, he didn't.

Actually George has done this many times in the past, if memory serves.
Given that its so hard to admit you're wrong even when presented with
irrefuatable facts, its not worth the trouble to do the searching for you.

Did you? Yes, you did.

So what, Jenn?

Jenn wrote:

Has George ever whined about it and then acted hypocritical by doing it himself?
No, he didn't.

Yes, he has. I thought I addressed this already? Shovels is one of the
greatest whining hypocrites I've ever seen around here. You want to see
whining hypocrisy from him? Start with the quote below. He bitches
about how "lowbrow" it is for me to "munge his quotes" when he was the
one who started doing that with me:

Shovels wrote:

Shovie did his typical lowbrow copycat routine by munging my post, but what


Here's where Shovels makes up quotes (and we're not talking about text
filtering here, but actually writing out words I never said and
attributing them to me):

"Shovels The Lie-Telling, Post Forging, Quote Mangling, Unethical
RAO-Addicted Troll":

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...10448a17caa217...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..

I never said that George whined about it. He's so desperate for attention
that he probably loves it. Think of him as Paul Packer with arthritus or
something like it, waiting for some underpaid care giver to change his
Depends.


maybe you can lend him a stack of $1,000 checks.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Wow. You're "defending my honour", Krueger. I'm touched. Are you
feeling okay today?

Oh wait a second... you're not saying that because you think it's
unfair that Shovels put up another whining, self-pitying attack thread
in my name are you? You're just playing social politics again, and
using Shovels attack thread to attack Jenn because she criticized you 6
months ago (rightly so) and that got under your skin. As it always does
whenever anyone criticizes you. Well I'm sorry but this attack thread
is about ME and in MY honour, Krueger. It's not about YOU. You'll just
have to start an attack thread against Jenn and have some respect for
Shovels, who did a lot of bawling, crying and whining to come up with
this attack thread against me. Don't you know that hijacking threads
shows poor "netiquette"?

Jenn's a hypocrite, we know that. I proved it recently when she joined
in the mockery attacks on me while I was out of earshot. (If I haven't
said it yet, Congratulations Jenn! You're an "official RAO member"
now).

But YOU are a hypocrite too, Arny. It would clog up my news server to
list all the examples of your hypocrisy, but it would include you being
a hypocrite for pointing out the hypocrisy of Jenn, since you are
already a proven hypocrite. You know who else is a hypocrite Arny? Paul
Packer. Robert Morein. Ludovic Mirabel. Steven Sullivan. ScottW.
Powell. Mike McKelvy. George "Shovels" Middius. etc. etc. Basically,
from all I've seen, everyone here on RAO is a HYPOCRITE.

So stop wasting your breath about how hypocritical someone is, since
you are too. But if you want to, then you should point out that Shovels
who started this thread, is the biggest hypocrite of all. Because he
attacks you for your audio beliefs, on the grounds that you dismiss
audio products you haven't heard. Yet that is exactly what HE does when
he dismisses all the fine, fine products at: http://belt.demon.co.uk
(don't forget to tell 'em "Shovie" sent you...).

In article om,
wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Wow. You're "defending my honour", Krueger. I'm touched. Are you
feeling okay today?

Oh wait a second... you're not saying that because you think it's
unfair that Shovels put up another whining, self-pitying attack thread
in my name are you? You're just playing social politics again, and
using Shovels attack thread to attack Jenn because she criticized you 6
months ago (rightly so) and that got under your skin. As it always does
whenever anyone criticizes you. Well I'm sorry but this attack thread
is about ME and in MY honour, Krueger. It's not about YOU. You'll just
have to start an attack thread against Jenn and have some respect for
Shovels, who did a lot of bawling, crying and whining to come up with
this attack thread against me. Don't you know that hijacking threads
shows poor "netiquette"?

Jenn's a hypocrite, we know that. I proved it recently when she joined
in the mockery attacks on me snip

I did? When?

Jenn said:

Jenn's a hypocrite, we know that. I proved it recently when she joined
in the mockery attacks on me snip

I did? When?

I wouldn't sweat Shovels' random accusations and proclamations. His standard
of "proof" is even more elastic than the Krooborg's.





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

Jenn wrote:
In article om,
wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Wow. You're "defending my honour", Krueger. I'm touched. Are you
feeling okay today?

Oh wait a second... you're not saying that because you think it's
unfair that Shovels put up another whining, self-pitying attack thread
in my name are you? You're just playing social politics again, and
using Shovels attack thread to attack Jenn because she criticized you 6
months ago (rightly so) and that got under your skin. As it always does
whenever anyone criticizes you. Well I'm sorry but this attack thread
is about ME and in MY honour, Krueger. It's not about YOU. You'll just
have to start an attack thread against Jenn and have some respect for
Shovels, who did a lot of bawling, crying and whining to come up with
this attack thread against me. Don't you know that hijacking threads
shows poor "netiquette"?

Jenn's a hypocrite, we know that. I proved it recently when she joined
in the mockery attacks on me snip

I did? When?

When you joined in a chorus of "shippy bashers" and thought I should go
back to Gary, Indiana. Unless you have an imposter as well?:

http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...e=source&hl=en

In article . com,
wrote:

Jenn wrote:
In article om,
wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Wow. You're "defending my honour", Krueger. I'm touched. Are you
feeling okay today?

Oh wait a second... you're not saying that because you think it's
unfair that Shovels put up another whining, self-pitying attack thread
in my name are you? You're just playing social politics again, and
using Shovels attack thread to attack Jenn because she criticized you 6
months ago (rightly so) and that got under your skin. As it always does
whenever anyone criticizes you. Well I'm sorry but this attack thread
is about ME and in MY honour, Krueger. It's not about YOU. You'll just
have to start an attack thread against Jenn and have some respect for
Shovels, who did a lot of bawling, crying and whining to come up with
this attack thread against me. Don't you know that hijacking threads
shows poor "netiquette"?

Jenn's a hypocrite, we know that. I proved it recently when she joined
in the mockery attacks on me snip

I did? When?

When you joined in a chorus of "shippy bashers" and thought I should go
back to Gary, Indiana. Unless you have an imposter as well?:

http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...201d?dmode=sou
rce&hl=en

A. I was making a "Music Man" joke, fool.
B. If I WAS "bashing" you (which I wasn't), how does that make me a
"hypocrite"?

You know who else is a hypocrite Arny? Paul
Packer. Robert Morein. Ludovic Mirabel. Steven Sullivan. ScottW.
Powell. Mike McKelvy. George "Shovels" Middius. etc. etc. Basically,
from all I've seen, everyone here on RAO is a HYPOCRITE

Don't leave us trembling in suspense, Master
Which one is a Sadducee and which one a Pharisee, Master?
Your respectful Ludovic M.

wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.


Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Wow. You're "defending my honour", Krueger. I'm touched. Are you
feeling okay today?

Oh wait a second... you're not saying that because you think it's
unfair that Shovels put up another whining, self-pitying attack thread
in my name are you? You're just playing social politics again, and
using Shovels attack thread to attack Jenn because she criticized you 6
months ago (rightly so) and that got under your skin. As it always does
whenever anyone criticizes you. Well I'm sorry but this attack thread
is about ME and in MY honour, Krueger. It's not about YOU. You'll just
have to start an attack thread against Jenn and have some respect for
Shovels, who did a lot of bawling, crying and whining to come up with
this attack thread against me. Don't you know that hijacking threads
shows poor "netiquette"?

Jenn's a hypocrite, we know that. I proved it recently when she joined
in the mockery attacks on me while I was out of earshot. (If I haven't
said it yet, Congratulations Jenn! You're an "official RAO member"
now).

But YOU are a hypocrite too, Arny. It would clog up my news server to
list all the examples of your hypocrisy, but it would include you being
a hypocrite for pointing out the hypocrisy of Jenn, since you are
already a proven hypocrite. You know who else is a hypocrite Arny? Paul
Packer. Robert Morein. Ludovic Mirabel. Steven Sullivan. ScottW.
Powell. Mike McKelvy. George "Shovels" Middius. etc. etc. Basically,
from all I've seen, everyone here on RAO is a HYPOCRITE.

So stop wasting your breath about how hypocritical someone is, since
you are too. But if you want to, then you should point out that Shovels
who started this thread, is the biggest hypocrite of all. Because he
attacks you for your audio beliefs, on the grounds that you dismiss
audio products you haven't heard. Yet that is exactly what HE does when
he dismisses all the fine, fine products at: http://belt.demon.co.uk
(don't forget to tell 'em "Shovie" sent you...).

The Krooborg is konfused again.

Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.

Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.


Thanks Mr. ****borg for agreeing with me that Shovels ia a pathetic, whining,
egomaniacal dirtbag.


--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

Shovels is konfused again. Let's see if we can't straighten tha lil'
feller out....:

Shovels, why do you keep emailing me? Last time you did
this, you included a few of your own words, although the
meaning was inscrutable. Just now, you forwarded my own
posts to me without a single word of your own. Apparently
you want me to guess what you're feeling.
Note that despite Jenn's loud whining about attack threads titled with
someone's name, she's has not said the slightest thing about this.

Thanks Mr. ****borg for agreeing with me that Shovels ia a pathetic, whining,
egomaniacal dirtbag.

Thanks Mr. Shovels, for agreeing that you're a pathetic, whining,
egomaniacal dirtbag.