Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"In the final analysis, I want The Clever Little Clock. Machina Dynamica
promises that with the Clock there will be less distortion, and that was genuinely the case. My curse is that usually my favorite music is so poorly recorded that it does sound distorted on our system. The Clock can not make up for a bad recording, but the distortion was lessened to such a degree that the bad recordings actually sounded good." http://www.positive-feedback.com/Iss...lock_nespa.htm |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() WVK wrote: "In the final analysis, I want The Clever Little Clock. Machina Dynamica promises that with the Clock there will be less distortion, and that was genuinely the case. My curse is that usually my favorite music is so poorly recorded that it does sound distorted on our system. The Clock can not make up for a bad recording, but the distortion was lessened to such a degree that the bad recordings actually sounded good." http://www.positive-feedback.com/Iss...lock_nespa.htm I heard some really good things about this super-tweaked clock from owners, but I never heard the clock. Did you purchase one? If so, could you elaborate on its relative merits on sound quality? How does it compare, for example, to other upgrades of similar cost? |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WVK" wrote in message news ![]() "In the final analysis, I want The Clever Little Clock. Machina Dynamica promises that with the Clock there will be less distortion, and that was genuinely the case. My curse is that usually my favorite music is so poorly recorded that it does sound distorted on our system. The Clock can not make up for a bad recording, but the distortion was lessened to such a degree that the bad recordings actually sounded good." http://www.positive-feedback.com/Iss...lock_nespa.htm The basic clock mechanism has to sell for less than $20. The Machina Dynamica is $199. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Arny Krueger wrote: "WVK" wrote in message news ![]() "In the final analysis, I want The Clever Little Clock. Machina Dynamica promises that with the Clock there will be less distortion, and that was genuinely the case. My curse is that usually my favorite music is so poorly recorded that it does sound distorted on our system. The Clock can not make up for a bad recording, but the distortion was lessened to such a degree that the bad recordings actually sounded good." http://www.positive-feedback.com/Iss...lock_nespa.htm The basic clock mechanism has to sell for less than $20. The Machina Dynamica is $199. Wow! clap! clap! Little Arny can calculate! We're so PROUD of you, little Arny! First of all you pompous withered old fool, "Machina Dynamica" is not the name of the product, it's the name of the company. Second of all you pompous withered old fool, the CLC is not simply a rebadged Timex clock, you moron. Thirdly, Kait has forgotten more about audio than you ever knew, you engineering wanna-be pc sound card peddler. No one is stupid enough to sell or buy a clock for $200 that they could buy for $9.99; no, not even YOU. What's obvious to everyone else buy you, is that the clock has been treated. The treated clock sounds like you've upgraded your system by significantly more than $200, so it is in fact, a BARGAIN. Had you actually read the review I posted, you'd have known that, and maybe had a clue as to what you're blabbing about. But you never do, do you? That's why you'll always be an ignorant old fart Arny; stuck back in a time when "high fidelity" meant putting a quarter on the tonearm of your monophonic record player. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article .com, wrote: No one is stupid enough to sell or buy a clock for $200 that they could buy for $9.99; no, not even YOU. What's obvious to everyone else buy you, is that the clock has been treated. The treated clock sounds like you've upgraded your system by significantly more than $200, so it is in fact, a BARGAIN. No doubt this sonic advantage is noticable only in sighted evaluations. Long-time proponents of sighted evaluations such as Sackman and Middius should find this product very much to their liking. Do you know how the clock is "treated"? Soaked in Snake Oil, no doubt. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jenn wrote:
Do you know how the clock is "treated"? It's treated with derision, of course. Were you suspecting something else? //Walt |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Walt wrote: Jenn wrote: Do you know how the clock is "treated"? It's treated with derision, of course. Were you suspecting something else? //Walt LOL |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walt" wrote in message ... Jenn wrote: Do you know how the clock is "treated"? It's treated with derision, of course. LOL! Were you suspecting something else? No, he was just trolling for people to flame. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article .com, wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "WVK" wrote in message news ![]() Dynamica promises that with the Clock there will be less distortion, and that was genuinely the case. My curse is that usually my favorite music is so poorly recorded that it does sound distorted on our system. The Clock can not make up for a bad recording, but the distortion was lessened to such a degree that the bad recordings actually sounded good." http://www.positive-feedback.com/Iss...lock_nespa.htm The basic clock mechanism has to sell for less than $20. The Machina Dynamica is $199. Wow! clap! clap! Little Arny can calculate! We're so PROUD of you, little Arny! First of all you pompous withered old fool, "Machina Dynamica" is not the name of the product, it's the name of the company. Second of all you pompous withered old fool, the CLC is not simply a rebadged Timex clock, you moron. Thirdly, Kait has forgotten more about audio than you ever knew, you engineering wanna-be pc sound card peddler. No one is stupid enough to sell or buy a clock for $200 that they could buy for $9.99; no, not even YOU. What's obvious to everyone else buy you, is that the clock has been treated. The treated clock sounds like you've upgraded your system by significantly more than $200, so it is in fact, a BARGAIN. Had you actually read the review I posted, you'd have known that, and maybe had a clue as to what you're blabbing about. But you never do, do you? That's why you'll always be an ignorant old fart Arny; stuck back in a time when "high fidelity" meant putting a quarter on the tonearm of your monophonic record player. Do you know how the clock is "treated"? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jenn" wrote in message ... In article .com, wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: "WVK" wrote in message news ![]() Dynamica promises that with the Clock there will be less distortion, and that was genuinely the case. My curse is that usually my favorite music is so poorly recorded that it does sound distorted on our system. The Clock can not make up for a bad recording, but the distortion was lessened to such a degree that the bad recordings actually sounded good." http://www.positive-feedback.com/Iss...lock_nespa.htm The basic clock mechanism has to sell for less than $20. The Machina Dynamica is $199. Wow! clap! clap! Little Arny can calculate! We're so PROUD of you, little Arny! First of all you pompous withered old fool, "Machina Dynamica" is not the name of the product, it's the name of the company. Second of all you pompous withered old fool, the CLC is not simply a rebadged Timex clock, you moron. Thirdly, Kait has forgotten more about audio than you ever knew, you engineering wanna-be pc sound card peddler. No one is stupid enough to sell or buy a clock for $200 that they could buy for $9.99; no, not even YOU. What's obvious to everyone else buy you, is that the clock has been treated. The treated clock sounds like you've upgraded your system by significantly more than $200, so it is in fact, a BARGAIN. Had you actually read the review I posted, you'd have known that, and maybe had a clue as to what you're blabbing about. But you never do, do you? That's why you'll always be an ignorant old fart Arny; stuck back in a time when "high fidelity" meant putting a quarter on the tonearm of your monophonic record player. Do you know how the clock is "treated"? It seems to be treated with disrespect. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zone 2 "Presenence Speakers" Not Working Yamaha RXV657 | Audio Opinions | |||
avr3805 zone 2 source | High End Audio | |||
Onkyo 602 zone 2 question | Tech | |||
Laser in CD player "in the red zone" | High End Audio | |||
PRESSURE ZONE Subwoofer direction | Car Audio |