Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"I. Care" wrote in message
.net There is an interesting discussion which might relate to one of the threads that was/has been going on here. It is on rec.audio.high-end and titled "The long term listening myth" It's only interesting to people who don't already know the punch line. Long term listening is a great way to find musical passages and circumstances where there is audible distortion. In some sense, its the only way. But long term listening is a very poor methodolgy if you goal is the most sensitive possible results. The orgional ABX Comparator had a standard battery backup feature that supported long term listening tests. 4 AA cells on the back panel would maintain the storage of unknowns and test results for days, even when there was an interruption of power. Frankly, it was one of the least important features of the product and was almost never used. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Objectivist vs Subjectivist and Listening Tests | Tech | |||
Olive and Toole | Audio Opinions | |||
Just for Ludovic | Audio Opinions | |||
dB vs. Apparent Loudness | Pro Audio | |||
Subjectivist and Objectivist -- Are these misnomers? | High End Audio |