Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Possibly a stupid question, but I'm an amateur, so forgive me. I've noticed when extracting audio from a CD, older discs seem to retain the peaks and valleys of their dynamic range, while newer discs seem to be severely clipped. I'm guessing the problem is "bit depth", in that newer CDs are commonly mastered in 24-bit, and I'm extracting using a 16-bit sound card. Can anyone tell me if upgrading to a 24-bit card will correct this? Thanks.... JK |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JayKay65 wrote:
Hi, Possibly a stupid question, but I'm an amateur, so forgive me. I've noticed when extracting audio from a CD, older discs seem to retain the peaks and valleys of their dynamic range, while newer discs seem to be severely clipped. I'm guessing the problem is "bit depth", in that newer CDs are commonly mastered in 24-bit, and I'm extracting using a 16-bit sound card. Can anyone tell me if upgrading to a 24-bit card will correct this? Thanks.... JK Use something like EAC and it won't be an issue. www.exactaudiocopy.de |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
htmlinput type crash/html
begin On 18 Jul 2003 09:07:29 -0700, JayKay65 wrote: Hi, Possibly a stupid question, but I'm an amateur, so forgive me. I've noticed when extracting audio from a CD, older discs seem to retain the peaks and valleys of their dynamic range, while newer discs seem to be severely clipped. I'm guessing the problem is "bit depth", in that newer CDs are commonly mastered in 24-bit, and I'm extracting using a 16-bit sound card. No CDs are mastered at 24 bits. CD is a 16 bit medium. They may be recorded and mixed at 24 bits, but all CDs are mastered at 16 bits. For extracting the data, the bitness of your soundcard is usually irrelevent as the data is read off the sound card without every being converted to analog and back. Check that whatever program you're using to rip the CD data is doing a digital extraction. As far as newer discs seeming to be severely clipped, it is probably due to excessive compression where quieter passages are boosted and louder passages are attenuated. This is more a sign of music catering to mediocre sound systems or radio. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
htmlinput type crash/html
begin On 18 Jul 2003 18:58:02 GMT, TCS wrote: htmlinput type crash/html begin On 18 Jul 2003 09:07:29 -0700, JayKay65 wrote: Hi, Possibly a stupid question, but I'm an amateur, so forgive me. I've noticed when extracting audio from a CD, older discs seem to retain the peaks and valleys of their dynamic range, while newer discs seem to be severely clipped. I'm guessing the problem is "bit depth", in that newer CDs are commonly mastered in 24-bit, and I'm extracting using a 16-bit sound card. No CDs are mastered at 24 bits. CD is a 16 bit medium. They may be recorded and mixed at 24 bits, but all CDs are mastered at 16 bits. For extracting the data, the bitness of your soundcard is usually irrelevent as the data is read off the sound card without every being ooops: data is read off the CD without the soundcard ... converted to analog and back. Check that whatever program you're using to rip the CD data is doing a digital extraction. As far as newer discs seeming to be severely clipped, it is probably due to excessive compression where quieter passages are boosted and louder passages are attenuated. This is more a sign of music catering to mediocre sound systems or radio. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhh yes, that makes sense. Muchas gracias for the info!
Homer Simpson voice Stupid music industry /Homer Simpson voice So... any advice on where to find commonly used industry compression ratios, so I can at least pump the loudness of the older tracks up to match the newer ones? (in case that suggested app doesn't work)? TCS wrote in message news:slrnbhggpp.1pt0.The.Central.Scrutinizer@turi ng.kaosol.net... As far as newer discs seeming to be severely clipped, it is probably due to excessive compression where quieter passages are boosted and louder passages are attenuated. This is more a sign of music catering to mediocre sound systems or radio. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JayKay65" wrote in message
om Possibly a stupid question, but I'm an amateur, so forgive me. There are no stupid questions if asked with honest intent. Your intent is obviously honest. I've noticed when extracting audio from a CD, older discs seem to retain the peaks and valleys of their dynamic range, while newer discs seem to be severely clipped. That's because that is how those CDs were intended to be made. The clipping, etc is called "Supercompression" among other things. It is done intentionally to make the music appear to be loud and have a in-your-face type sound. What you are seeing are the result of artistic decisions made by the producers of the recordings. Technological limits or bit depth have nothing at all to do with it. I'm guessing the problem is "bit depth", in that newer CDs are commonly mastered in 24-bit, and I'm extracting using a 16-bit sound card. Nope, its because that's what the producers of the recordings wanted to deliver to their listeners. Can anyone tell me if upgrading to a 24-bit card will correct this? Nope. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JayKay65" wrote in message
m I appreciate all your help, but there's still one thing that confuses me: If the audio is "supercompressed" in the production phase before being written to the CD, then why isn't it clipped when I extract it using an analog method instead of digital? The quality of an analog extraction is pretty low-fi, but there are intact peaks. The low quality of the analog extraction might be concealing the clipping. Is it that the frequency response of an analog extraction isn't as good as that of digital, and the missing data is creating the illusion of peaks? That's probably it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fix audio files | General | |||
Audio extraction speed | General | |||
Newbie question: Any good resources on audio production? | General | |||
New Notebook external audio option | General |