Hello Mikey! Look out for the desk! Oops, too late. I hope your medical is
paid up.

Anyway.... You recently said you believe your IQ is over 130. We all
laughed. But then, upon sober reflection, I thought, maybe they have special
IQ tests for special persons. If so, and that was the kind of test you took,
it's quite possible you scored significantly higher than average. For
retards, that is. Jolly good show.

My point today lies elsewhere, however. I have some sobering news for you:
By normal standards, your IQ is, unfortunately, quite a ways under 130. Yes,
Mickey, I have subjected you to an IQ analysis using your Usenet posts. I
grabbed about a hundred of them(*) and gave them to a psychologist for
analysis. He, or his students, parsed them for instances of "logic
violations" and "logic affirmations". (In case you're wondering, this work
wasn't a charitable endeavor. It's part of a research project.) They also
searched for a bunch of other psych-lingo stuff. It was pretty arcane to me,
but of course it's not my field.

Bottom line: Your IQ was estimated to be around 95 to 100. Barely average,
in other words. The analysis confirmed my expections, I'm sure you'll be
pleased to learn.

So please, Mickey, stop trying to pass yourself off as exceptionally bright.
We've always had your self-immolations on Usenet to discredit your fatuous
claims, and now we have some scientific, objective, fact-based evidence.
You're an idiot, Mickey -- it's a proven fact.



(*) I only copied posts in which you attempted to assert an argument that
could be subjected to logical deconstruction or verification of facts. I
didn't include any of those throwaway IKYABWAI posts that you emit instead
of wit. I also excluded any of your Kroopologism posts on the grounds that
they make you look like a nutjob.