Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Everyone,
Recently I use a 2.0 home theatre setup due to space limitations. My Toshiba SD9000 has been set to output PCM, which is conditioned by a Meridian 518 (de-jittering, adding pre-emphasis, noise-shaping and digital gain when necessary) feeding an Audio Alchemy DDE v1.1. Though the surround channels are missing I enjoy an exceptional clarity in the two channels I have, far better than I ever heard through a middle-class HT receiver. I am just through with viewing 'Prince of Egypt'. I adjusted digital gain +4 (the straight 2-channel PCM mix-down does not use the 16 bit output as efficiently as it could be), with noise-shaping type C and pre-emphasis the result is simply overwhelmingly realistic front (but of course without any rear information). I could imagine that feeding a receiver with AC-3 mix could result less defined front. My question is: can I expect better D/A performance from a higher-end HT receiver's (let's say Rotel, NAD, Denon, H-K) more modern, 24/192 internal DACs than the DDE's oldish 18/48 resolution Crystal 4303 chips with passive output stage (which is again quite staggeringly good even now)? Although I enjoy surround movies, my prefences go to classical music. So how good are these receivers, when feeding them with simple PCM 16/44 music, and using their front DACs without any processing (I mean artificial ambiences) if I can do this at all? Thanks in advance. Gyula |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gyula Hunyor" wrote in message om... Hello Everyone, [snip] My question is: can I expect better D/A performance from a higher-end HT receiver's (let's say Rotel, NAD, Denon, H-K) more modern, 24/192 internal DACs than the DDE's oldish 18/48 resolution Crystal 4303 chips with passive output stage (which is again quite staggeringly good even now)? Although I enjoy surround movies, my prefences go to classical music. So how good are these receivers, when feeding them with simple PCM 16/44 music, and using their front DACs without any processing (I mean artificial ambiences) if I can do this at all? They sure sound different. I still prefer the 18 bit ladder DAC in my Sony TA-E1000ESD to the 24/48 decoders in my Yamaha DSP-A1 On the other hand, the Perpetual Tech P3A, which is actually made by the reconstituted principals of AA, seems better than either. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Home Theater "Junkyard Wars" | Audio Opinions | |||
Denon AVR-1803 Home Audio Receivers | Audio Opinions |