Georgette,
You are one ****ed up whore. Please choke on your partners
**** covered black cock. If you were a real man you would go and meet
the great Kroo face to face. Are you afraid of the Kroobitch kicking
you in the ass you homo woodworking cumguzzler? You and the Kroofreak
must meet up or all these years of you sad ****s arguing online is a
waste. Lets all get together and watch ou grudge **** like you know
you want to. Scott Wheeler IS a child rapist and a sick ****.

"RAO et al" wrote in message
om...
Georgette,
You are one ****ed up whore. Please choke on your partners
**** covered black cock. If you were a real man you would go and meet
the great Kroo face to face. Are you afraid of the Kroobitch kicking
you in the ass you homo woodworking cumguzzler? You and the Kroofreak
must meet up or all these years of you sad ****s arguing online is a
waste. Lets all get together and watch ou grudge **** like you know
you want to. Scott Wheeler IS a child rapist and a sick ****.



woodworking??




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On 29 Oct 2003 01:10:30 -0800, RAO et al wrote:
Georgette,
You are one ****ed up whore. Please choke on your partners
**** covered black cock. If you were a real man you would go and meet

Middius is a computer program, a badly written eliza clone in great need
for it's genital humor section to be updated with something fresh.

You can easily verify this by repeating the same thing over and over until
middius repeats it's canned responses. Arnni, one of the few people on this
newsgroup pathetic and stupid enough to find it fulfilling, has month long
correspondences with the middius 'bot. Maybe arnni is also non-sentient.

Killfile middius and it's cluster (trotsky etc.) and arnni and watch the s/n
of the newsgroup improve 100db.

Scott Wheeler IS a child rapist and a sick ****.


Of course this is a lie. But the evidence is stacking up against Arny for the
libel suit.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Scott Wheeler IS a child rapist and a sick ****.

Of course this is a lie. But the evidence is stacking up against Arny
for the libel suit.

Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place where
people take advantage of the fact that everything is pre-labeled "opinion"
and therefore nobody with a brain takes it seriously. Therefore, no harm can
be done to anybody's or anything's reputation. That was the original plan.

Of course I did suggest that it takes a minimal brain to perceive RAO
properly. Sorry to leave you out, sockpuppet wheel.

Finally, Mr. Middius was kind enough to print the California law about libel
and you were as I recall kind enough to confirm the accuracy of his post.
California law doesn't say that there are certain magic words or specific
means of expression that makes an utterance into libel, now does it? That
means that the various carefully-worded insults that you've addressed to me
are no more or less libel than anything I've addressed to you.

So if I've got this right your father is a lawyer. Is he supporting you in
this case to win, or to teach you a lesson? Or is he supporting you at all?

Arny said


Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place where
people take advantage of the fact that everything is pre-labeled "opinion"
and therefore nobody with a brain takes it seriously. Therefore, no harm can
be done to anybody's or anything's reputation. That was the original plan.

Sorry to see you still haven't figured out the difference between an opinion
and a libelous false accustaion as the law sees it.

Arny said


Of course I did suggest that it takes a minimal brain to perceive RAO
properly. Sorry to leave you out, sockpuppet wheel.

You have suggested a lot of crazy things Arny.

Arny said


Finally, Mr. Middius was kind enough to print the California law about libel
and you were as I recall kind enough to confirm the accuracy of his post.

Yes he did and I did.


Arny said

California law doesn't say that there are certain magic words or specific
means of expression that makes an utterance into libel, now does it?

Yes it does. He posted the code on libel and I confirmed it. He did not post
code which follows it called Libel per se. You might want to check it out. Have
you found the link to the California Codes or do i need to post that code for
you as well?

Arny said

That
means that the various carefully-worded insults that you've addressed to me
are no more or less libel than anything I've addressed to you.

Nope.

Arny said


So if I've got this right your father is a lawyer. Is he supporting you in
this case to win, or to teach you a lesson? Or is he supporting you at all?


Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions are
premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the relevant facts
including the full content of the California Codes regarding libel.

S888Wheel said to ****-for-Brains:

Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions are
premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the relevant facts
including the full content of the California Codes regarding libel.

At least™ you persuaded Turdy to stop claiming you had "defrauded
the court" by not arguing his defense to the libel complaint in your
filing.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message

S888Wheel said to ****-for-Brains:

Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions
are premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the
relevant facts including the full content of the California Codes
regarding libel.

At leastT you persuaded Turdy to stop claiming you had "defrauded
the court" by not arguing his defense to the libel complaint in your
filing.

You're really running your fiction generator overtime, eh Middius?

S888Wheel said to ****-for-Brains:

Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions are
premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the relevant facts
including the full content of the California Codes regarding libel.

At least™ you persuaded Turdy to stop claiming you had "defrauded
the court" by not arguing his defense to the libel complaint in your
filing.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Arny said


Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place
where people take advantage of the fact that everything is
pre-labeled "opinion" and therefore nobody with a brain takes it
seriously. Therefore, no harm can be done to anybody's or anything's
reputation. That was the original plan.

Sorry to see you still haven't figured out the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accustaion as the law sees it.

Cite a legal opinion that contradicts what I just said or admit that you're
making it up as you go along. This legal opinion must apply specifically to
the Usenet newsgroup rec.audio.opinion.


Arny said


Of course I did suggest that it takes a minimal brain to perceive RAO
properly. Sorry to leave you out, sockpuppet wheel.

You have suggested a lot of crazy things Arny.

Arny said


Finally, Mr. Middius was kind enough to print the California law
about libel and you were as I recall kind enough to confirm the
accuracy of his post.

Yes he did and I did.


Arny said

California law doesn't say that there are certain magic words or
specific means of expression that makes an utterance into libel, now
does it?

Yes it does. He posted the code on libel and I confirmed it. He did
not post code which follows it called Libel per se. You might want to
check it out. Have you found the link to the California Codes or do i
need to post that code for you as well?

I didn't look.

Arny said

That
means that the various carefully-worded insults that you've
addressed to me are no more or less libel than anything I've
addressed to you.

Nope.

Prove it.

Arny said


So if I've got this right your father is a lawyer. Is he supporting
you in this case to win, or to teach you a lesson? Or is he
supporting you at all?

Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions
are premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the
relevant facts including the full content of the California Codes
regarding libel.

Prove it.

Arny said


Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place
where people take advantage of the fact that everything is
pre-labeled "opinion" and therefore nobody with a brain takes it
seriously. Therefore, no harm can be done to anybody's or anything's
reputation. That was the original plan.

I said


Sorry to see you still haven't figured out the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accustaion as the law sees it.

Arny said


Cite a legal opinion that contradicts what I just said or admit that you're
making it up as you go along. This legal opinion must apply specifically to
the Usenet newsgroup rec.audio.opinion.


Usenet newsgroup rec. audio opinion is a forum where people can freely publish
what ever they want to publish. It is not exempt from the laws of libel. If you
believe it is then feel free to cite any California Code that specifically
states Usenet newsgroup rec. audio. opinion is exempt from the California Codes
for libel.

The code reads as follows;
45. Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing,
printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye,
which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy,
or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

Usenet being a public forum allows people such as yourself to publish false,
unpriviliged writings. Usenet newsgroup rec. audio. opinion falls under the
general law of libel. Again, if you can cite any California code that would
cause Usenet newsgroup rec.audio .opinion to be exempt from the laws of libel
please cite it.

The code on libel per se reads as follows;
45a. A libel which is defamatory of the plaintiff without the
necessity of explanatory matter, such as an inducement, innuendo or
other extrinsic fact, is said to be a libel on its face. Defamatory
language not libelous on its face is not actionable unless the
plaintiff alleges and proves that he has suffered special damage as a
proximate result thereof. Special damage is defined in Section 48a
of this code.

Clearly accusing someone of being a pedophile is defamitory on it's face. If
you can find any lawsuits in which someone was plainly accused of being a
pedophile and the court found that such a plain and direct accusation of
pedophilia was not libel per se please cite the case.


Arny said


Of course I did suggest that it takes a minimal brain to perceive RAO
properly. Sorry to leave you out, sockpuppet wheel.

I said


You have suggested a lot of crazy things Arny.

No response noted. I guess you are conceding the point.


Arny said


Finally, Mr. Middius was kind enough to print the California law
about libel and you were as I recall kind enough to confirm the
accuracy of his post.

I said


Yes he did and I did.




Arny said

California law doesn't say that there are certain magic words or
specific means of expression that makes an utterance into libel, now
does it?

I said


Yes it does. He posted the code on libel and I confirmed it. He did
not post code which follows it called Libel per se. You might want to
check it out. Have you found the link to the California Codes or do i
need to post that code for you as well?


Arny said


I didn't look.

I figured as much. But you have it now for your reading pleasure.


Arny said

That
means that the various carefully-worded insults that you've
addressed to me are no more or less libel than anything I've
addressed to you.

I said


Nope.


Arny said


Prove it.


Read the code i just posted for you on libel per se.


Arny said


So if I've got this right your father is a lawyer. Is he supporting
you in this case to win, or to teach you a lesson? Or is he
supporting you at all?

I said


Naturally, you haven't got it right. And, naturally, your questions
are premised on your misunderstanding and/or ignorance of the
relevant facts including the full content of the California Codes
regarding libel.

Arny said


Prove it.



Asked and answered.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"S888Wheel" wrote in message

Scott Wheeler IS a child rapist and a sick ****.

Of course this is a lie. But the evidence is stacking up against Arny
for the libel suit.

Not at all. Plenty of evidence already exists that RAO is a place where
people take advantage of the fact that everything is pre-labeled "opinion"
and therefore nobody with a brain takes it seriously. Therefore, no harm
can
be done to anybody's or anything's reputation. That was the original plan.


Hence, nobody with a brain takes you seriously.
Actually, it is a very good defense for your case,
sort of like a version of the insanity defense that
would be allowable in a civil suit.





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

(RAO et al) wrote in message . com...
Georgette,
You are one ****ed up whore. Please choke on your partners
**** covered black cock. If you were a real man you would go and meet
the great Kroo face to face. Are you afraid of the Kroobitch kicking
you in the ass you homo woodworking cumguzzler? You and the Kroofreak
must meet up or all these years of you sad ****s arguing online is a
waste. Lets all get together and watch ou grudge **** like you know
you want to. Scott Wheeler IS a child rapist and a sick ****.


I wouldn't go that far. I'd just say that he is a fiercely
neoconservative individual with a rabidly racist and anti-Semitic
streak, probably as a result of his lack of girth.

He believes that dissent is tantamount to disloyalty and in the
suppression of free speech and honest opinion. A vile and despicable
human being.

If it weren't for his WASP, pro-Aryan views, he could could almost be
passed off a Stalinist.