NYOB on Nov 15 in "It is amazing..." thread
".Look at how Ludo
is trying to deny what he said about Olive's work. I used a direct
quote
from one of his posts and a slightly paraphrased version of things he's

said repeatedly and now he's denying like crazy..

His "slight paraphrase" as emailed by him to Sean Olive
"The preson making the above statement also concludes that your
tests on speakers revealed that people were not able to distinguish
better quality speakers from lesser ones when doing so blind .

Sean Olive responded angrily to this "slight paraphrase" of the
nonexistent "preson's" views.
Next NYOB publishes Olive's response under this heading: "Guess
what Sean Olive had to say about Ludovic's remarks"
Sean Olive never dreamt that anyone in a theoretical discussion
would resort to blatant forgery. He knowa better now I hope..

The forger.NYOB had a different take on my views just 30 days ago, He
started then a new thread headlined:" Since Quaaludeovic is SO FOND
of Sean Olive"

I said there on Oct. 9:
"Sean Olive sounds clear enough to me without your pompous
pseudo-scientific parody of his clear statement.: He found and reported
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE COMPARING LOUDSPEAKERS. Twist
and turn that is what he says."

And on Oct. 19:
"I see nothing wrong with using a common sense precaution of
*double-blinding*. I see a lot wrong with trumpeting certainties about

a never researched, never validated ABX protocol APPLIED TO COMPARING
MUSICAL REPRODUCTION OF AUDIO COMPONENTS."

And in the current thread;
"And now Sean Olive did exactly that using DBT. Lo and behold- the
majority of panelists had problems with recognizing difference but when
not bothered with that knew what they liked.".

Some "slight paraphrase". A forger of $100
bills said in court: "I was only making a slight paraphrase"