Marc Phillips a écrit :
What satisfaction can you possibly get from spending so much time here? At
least people like Arny and Howard operate under the assumption that they are
despised and hated for their views. We have no idea what your views are, since
no one can understand what you're talking about. Aren't there any French audio
groups where you can troll?

You must be the loneliest person on Usenet. How sad it must be to be you.

Boon


This is a boomerang question, let us have your answer,
and please save your pity for your Mother in law.

Lionel

On 19/9/03 11:27 AM, in article
, "Marc Phillips"
wrote:

What satisfaction can you possibly get from spending so much time here? At
least people like Arny and Howard operate under the assumption that they are
despised and hated for their views. We have no idea what your views are,
since
no one can understand what you're talking about. Aren't there any French
audio
groups where you can troll?

You must be the loneliest person on Usenet. How sad it must be to be you.

I would suggest that my poor sick son Bob is the loneliest person the the
Usenet, perhaps the planet. He can't find another person to sue!


Sylvan Morein
--

http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/l...ws/4853918.htm

Doctoral student takes intellectual property case to Supreme Court
By L. STUART DITZEN
Philadelphia Inquirer

PHILADELPHIA -Even the professors who dismissed him from a doctoral program
at Drexel University agreed that Robert Morein was uncommonly smart.

They apparently didn't realize that he was uncommonly stubborn too - so much
so that he would mount a court fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court
to challenge his dismissal.

The Supremes have already rejected this appeal, btw.

"It's a personality trait I have - I'm a tenacious guy," said Morein, a
pleasantly eccentric man regarded by friends as an inventive genius. "And we
do come to a larger issue here."

An "inventive genius" that has never invented anything. And hardly
"pleasantly" eccentric.

A five-year legal battle between this unusual ex-student and one of
Philadelphia's premier educational institutions has gone largely unnoticed
by the media and the public.

Because no one gives a **** about a 50 year old loser.

But it has been the subject of much attention in academia.

Drexel says it dismissed Morein in 1995 because he failed, after eight
years, to complete a thesis required for a doctorate in electrical and
computer engineering.

Not to mention the 12 years it took him to get thru high school!
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Morein, 50, of Dresher, Pa., contends that he was dismissed only after his
thesis adviser "appropriated" an innovative idea Morein had developed in a
rarefied area of thought called "estimation theory" and arranged to have it
patented.

A contention rejected by three courts. From a 50 YEAR OLD that has
done NOTHING PRODUCTIVE with his life.


In February 2000, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Esther R. Sylvester
ruled that Morein's adviser indeed had taken his idea.

An idea that was worth nothing, because it didn't work. Just like
Robert Morein, who has never worked a day in his life.


Sylvester held that Morein had been unjustly dismissed and she ordered
Drexel to reinstate him or refund his tuition.

Funnily enough, Drexel AGREED to reinstate Morein, who rejected the
offer because he knew he was and IS a failed loser. Spending daddy's
money to cover up his lack of productivity.

That brought roars of protest from the lions of academia. There is a long
tradition in America of noninterference by the courts in academic decisions.

Backed by every major university in Pennsylvania and organizations
representing thousands of others around the country, Drexel appealed to the
state Superior Court.

The appellate court, by a 2-1 vote, reversed Sylvester in June 2001 and
restored the status quo. Morein was, once again, out at Drexel. And the
time-honored axiom that courts ought to keep their noses out of academic
affairs was reasserted.

The state Supreme Court declined to review the case and, in an ordinary
litigation, that would have been the end of it.

But Morein, in a quixotic gesture that goes steeply against the odds, has
asked the highest court in the land to give him a hearing.

Daddy throws more money down the crapper.

His attorney, Faye Riva Cohen, said the Supreme Court appeal is important
even if it fails because it raises the issue of whether a university has a
right to lay claim to a student's ideas - or intellectual property - without
compensation.

"Any time you are in a Ph.D. program, you are a serf, you are a slave," said
Cohen. Morein "is concerned not only for himself. He feels that what
happened to him is pretty common."

It's called HIGHER EDUCATION, honey. The students aren't in charge,
the UNIVERSITY and PROFESSORS are.


Drexel's attorney, Neil J. Hamburg, called Morein's appeal - and his claim
that his idea was stolen - "preposterous."

"I will eat my shoe if the Supreme Court hears this case," declared Hamburg.
"We're not even going to file a response. He is a brilliant guy, but his
intelligence should be used for the advancement of society rather than
pursuing self-destructive litigation."

No **** sherlock.

The litigation began in 1997, when Morein sued Drexel claiming that a
committee of professors had dumped him after he accused his faculty adviser,
Paul Kalata, of appropriating his idea.

His concept was considered to have potential value for businesses in
minutely measuring the internal functions of machines, industrial processes
and electronic systems.

The field of "estimation theory" is one in which scientists attempt to
calculate what they cannot plainly observe, such as the inside workings of a
nuclear plant or a computer.

My estimation theory? There is NO brain at work inside the head of
Robert Morein, only sawdust.


Prior to Morein's dismissal, Drexel looked into his complaint against Kalata
and concluded that the associate professor had done nothing wrong. Kalata,
through a university lawyer, declined to comment.

At a nonjury trial before Sylvester in 1999, Morein testified that Kalata in
1990 had posed a technical problem for him to study for his thesis. It
related to estimation theory.

Kalata, who did not appear at the trial, said in a 1998 deposition that a
Cherry Hill company for which he was a paid consultant, K-Tron
International, had asked him to develop an alternate estimation method for
it. The company manufactures bulk material feeders and conveyors used in
industrial processes.

Morein testified that, after much study, he experienced "a flash of
inspiration" and came up with a novel mathematical concept to address the
problem Kalata had presented.

Without his knowledge, Morein said, Kalata shared the idea with K-Tron.

K-Tron then applied for a patent, listing Kalata and Morein as co-inventors.

Morein said he agreed "under duress" to the arrangement, but felt "locked
into a highly disadvantageous situation." As a result, he testified, he
became alienated from Kalata.

As events unfolded, Kalata signed over his interest in the patent to K-Tron.
The company never capitalized on the technology and eventually allowed the
patent to lapse. No one made any money from it.

Because it was bogus. Even Kalata was mortified that he was a victim
of this SCAMSTER, Robert Morein.

In 1991, Morein went to the head of Drexel's electrical engineering
department, accused Kalata of appropriating his intellectual property, and
asked for a new faculty adviser.

The staff at Drexel laughed wildly at the ignorance of Robert Morein.

He didn't get one. Instead, a committee of four professors, including
Kalata, was formed to oversee Morein's thesis work.

Four years later, the committee dismissed him, saying he had failed to
complete his thesis.

So Morein ****s up his first couple years, gets new faculty advisers
(a TEAM), and then ****s up again! Brilliant!


Morein claimed that the committee intentionally had undermined him.

Morein makes LOTS of claims that are nonsense. One look thru the
usenet proves it.


Judge Sylvester agreed. In her ruling, Sylvester wrote: "It is this court's
opinion that the defendants were motivated by bad faith and ill will."

So much for political machine judges.

The U.S. Supreme Court receives 7,000 appeals a year and agrees to hear only
about 100 of them.

Hamburg, Drexel's attorney, is betting the high court will reject Morein's
appeal out of hand because its focal point - concerning a student's right to
intellectual property - was not central to the litigation in the
Pennsylvania courts.

Morein said he understands it's a long shot, but he feels he must pursue it.

Just like all the failed "causes" Morein pursues. Heck, he's been
chasing another "Brian McCarty" for years and yet has ZERO impact on
anything.

Failure. Look it up in Websters. You'll see a picture of Robert
Morein. The poster boy for SCAMMING LOSERS.


"I had to seek closure," he said.

Without a doctorate, he said, he has been unable to pursue a career he had
hoped would lead him into research on artificial intelligence.

Who better to tell us about "artificial intelligence".
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


As it is, Morein lives at home with his father and makes a modest income
from stock investments. He has written a film script that he is trying to
make into a movie. And in the basement of his father's home he is working on
an invention, an industrial pump so powerful it could cut steel with a
bulletlike stream of water.


FAILED STUDENT
FAILED MOVIE MAKER
FAILED SCREENWRITER
FAILED INVESTOR
FAILED DRIVER
FAILED SON
FAILED PARENTS
FAILED INVENTOR
FAILED PLAINTIFF
FAILED HOMOSEXUAL
FAILED HUMAN
FAILED
FAILED

But none of it is what he had imagined for himself.

"I don't really have a replacement career," Morein said. "It's a very
gnawing thing."

Lionel said:

Marc Phillips a écrit :
What satisfaction can you possibly get from spending so much time here? At
least people like Arny and Howard operate under the assumption that they
are
despised and hated for their views. We have no idea what your views are,
since
no one can understand what you're talking about. Aren't there any French
audio
groups where you can troll?

You must be the loneliest person on Usenet. How sad it must be to be you.

Boon


This is a boomerang question, let us have your answer,
and please save your pity for your Mother in law.

Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here, unaware,
until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die from the ninety
degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels.

Boon

Marc Phillips a écrit :
Lionel said:


Marc Phillips a écrit :

What satisfaction can you possibly get from spending so much time here? At
least people like Arny and Howard operate under the assumption that they

are

despised and hated for their views. We have no idea what your views are,

since

no one can understand what you're talking about. Aren't there any French

audio

groups where you can troll?

You must be the loneliest person on Usenet. How sad it must be to be you.

Boon



This is a boomerang question, let us have your answer,
and please save your pity for your Mother in law.


Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here, unaware,
until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die from the ninety
degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels.

Boon



"Chassez le naturel il revient au galop !"

Lionel

--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

On 19 Sep 2003 11:49:13 GMT, (Marc Phillips) wrote:

Lionel said:

Marc Phillips a écrit :
What satisfaction can you possibly get from spending so much time here? At
least people like Arny and Howard operate under the assumption that they
are
despised and hated for their views. We have no idea what your views are,
since
no one can understand what you're talking about. Aren't there any French
audio
groups where you can troll?

You must be the loneliest person on Usenet. How sad it must be to be you.

Boon


This is a boomerang question, let us have your answer,
and please save your pity for your Mother in law.

Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here, unaware,
until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die from the ninety
degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels.

Boon


Alas, Marc reveals himself as a bigoted, racist, intolerant and
(perhaps) irredeemable ****. Marc, please could you try to adjust your
narrow perspective on people; try to exercise "tolerance" and to
remember the (even rudimentary) manners your parents taught you. And
if you are an American, (and you certainly sound like one on a line of
Latitude South of DC) you are a disgrace to your nation, along with
many of your redneck kindred spirits.

Lionel IMHO is honest; his heart is in the right place; his opinions
might not be palatable, nor even comprehensible sometimes, but he's
out there and not lurking around in the shadows. He's courageous too.
And, in case your sense of humour transplant didn't take, he's quite
witty I'm a fan.

Regards,

Anthony

A sockpuppets' conclave, so long before Hallowe'en?

Lionel IMHO is honest; his heart is in the right place

Oh yes -- Lionella think Kroo**** is just dandy. You've certainly
got the evidence on your side there.

May I politely request that you return to your stupid audio trolls?
This new tactic of defending the defenders of the Krooborg is quite
nauseating.

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:04:21 -0400, George M. Middius
wrote:



A sockpuppets' conclave, so long before Hallowe'en?

Lionel IMHO is honest; his heart is in the right place

Oh yes -- Lionella think Kroo**** is just dandy. You've certainly
got the evidence on your side there.

May I politely request that you return to your stupid audio trolls?
This new tactic of defending the defenders of the Krooborg is quite
nauseating.

Some folk never learn do they? Listen to me George (sorry, "Admiral")
Middius, if you raise your head again like this, I'm afraid I'll have
to slap you down like last time.

But, being an inherently kind and human person, I'll give you a chance
to redeem yourself by posing a few questions:

1. Why do you spend so much of your time on RAO? Why this pathological
hatred of Arnold Kruger? That he causes you to foam at the mouth in
public is your problem, rather than his, and of course it diminishes
your case to the objective observer;

2. Do you contribute to other Newsgroups of broader interest in any
constructive way? You obviously aren't a total nitwit in terms solely
of English sentence structure, but to an objective person your
currency and tone seems chronically rather poisonous and bitter. Why
should this be? Is there a particular reason for your unhappiness and
disillusionment? Would you care to share with us?

Regards,

Anthony


Try me.

Anthony PDC said:

May I politely request that you return to your stupid audio trolls?
This new tactic of defending the defenders of the Krooborg is quite
nauseating.

Some folk never learn do they? Listen to me George (sorry, "Admiral")
Middius, if you raise your head again like this, I'm afraid I'll have
to slap you down like last time.

Oh goody -- another sockpuppet with Kroogerian delusions of
grandeur.

Of course you've never posted on RAO under another name, right?
Possibly your real name.....

I notice you haven't made any excuses for your inane attachment to
Bitch Lionella, whose attachment in turn to the Beast drenches her
in turn with the vile stench of fetid feces. A real person would be
ashamed of such a connection, unless he were, of course, insane.

And so RAO has two new and imbecilic sockpuppets whose goal is to
attack me and Boon, the more mindlessly the better. Maybe you can
explain the devious purpose of your mild, ass-kissy contretemps with
****-for-Brains. Lionella, by contrast, didn't try to put any
distance between herself and Mr. ****. In fact, the last time
Lionella brought her crazoid act to RAO, she started out by
attacking Turdy with abandon, and only later revealed her true
agenda. We realized in time that she was completely whacko.

One thing we didn't imagine was some form of MPD.

George M. Middius a écrit :

A sockpuppets' conclave, so long before Hallowe'en?


Lionel IMHO is honest; his heart is in the right place


Oh yes -- Lionella think Kroo**** is just dandy. You've certainly
got the evidence on your side there.

May I politely request that you return to your stupid audio trolls?
This new tactic of defending the defenders of the Krooborg is quite
nauseating.

No ! *YOU* are the dandy.
A dandy who use to swim in muddy water with a big stone attached to his
neck.
The name of the stone ? LOL !

Georgetta, your hatred leads you to dangerous compromise
I hope this is something Anthony will never suffer.

PS : Black smoke, we're still looking for a pope !

--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

Anthony PDC said:

On 19 Sep 2003 11:49:13 GMT, (Marc Phillips) wrote:

Lionel said:

Marc Phillips a écrit :
What satisfaction can you possibly get from spending so much time here?
At
least people like Arny and Howard operate under the assumption that they
are
despised and hated for their views. We have no idea what your views are,
since
no one can understand what you're talking about. Aren't there any French
audio
groups where you can troll?

You must be the loneliest person on Usenet. How sad it must be to be
you.

Boon


This is a boomerang question, let us have your answer,
and please save your pity for your Mother in law.

Sorry, but that made no sense, either. I suppose you will stay here,
unaware,
until next summer, when you and other French shut-ins will die from the
ninety
degree temperatures inside your pathetic little hovels.

Boon


Alas, Marc reveals himself as a bigoted, racist, intolerant and
(perhaps) irredeemable ****. Marc, please could you try to adjust your
narrow perspective on people; try to exercise "tolerance" and to
remember the (even rudimentary) manners your parents taught you. And
if you are an American, (and you certainly sound like one on a line of
Latitude South of DC) you are a disgrace to your nation, along with
many of your redneck kindred spirits.

Lionel IMHO is honest; his heart is in the right place; his opinions
might not be palatable, nor even comprehensible sometimes, but he's
out there and not lurking around in the shadows. He's courageous too.
And, in case your sense of humour transplant didn't take, he's quite
witty I'm a fan.

What a load of crap.

Boon

Anthony PDC a écrit :

Lionel IMHO is honest; his heart is in the right place; his opinions
might not be palatable, nor even comprehensible sometimes, but he's
out there and not lurking around in the shadows. He's courageous too.
And, in case your sense of humour transplant didn't take, he's quite
witty I'm a fan.

Regards,

Anthony

Kind regards,
Lionel
--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus

Anthony PDC said:

Alas, Marc reveals himself as a bigoted, racist, intolerant and
(perhaps) irredeemable ****.

Then he said:

And
if you are an American, (and you certainly sound like one on a line of
Latitude South of DC)

Wow, Anthony. Sounds like you're a little intolerant toward Southerners. Care
to explain this gross generalization for everyone?

Boon

Marc Phillips a écrit :
Anthony PDC said:


Alas, Marc reveals himself as a bigoted, racist, intolerant and
(perhaps) irredeemable ****.


Then he said:


And
if you are an American, (and you certainly sound like one on a line of
Latitude South of DC)


Wow, Anthony. Sounds like you're a little intolerant toward Southerners. Care
to explain this gross generalization for everyone?

Boon


Boonie-boy,

You are like Trotsky, you have a lot of work to do and you're wasting
your time on RAO.
Take care of your family, wife, kids and mother-in-law they need more
and they are waiting more from you.

--
"Keep the bugs off your glass and the bears off your ass"
Bad Plus