Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
. com.) I
promised you that there would be no restrictions on what
subjects you wished to talk about, although I felt it fair
to include a section where you and I answered questions from
the audience.

Mr. McKelvy strongly felt that I was not owed a fee if I
were to accept a similar invitation -- "Stop mucking about
with all the bull**** about fees..." he wrote -- so I made
it clear that no fee would be offered you, Mr. Krueger, for
your appearance in New York, just "reasonable expenses." I
subsequently defined these expenses as a round trip,
coach-class air fare and accommodation for 2 nights. I also
subsequently clarified that this invitation was to you
personally, not to someone else that you might wish to
attend in your place.

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.

Thanks in advance for letting me know what you decision is
by the time and date specified above.
Sincerely
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com
Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
. com.) I

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his crowd.
I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not going
to agree with your invitation.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com
Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
. com.) I

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his
crowd.
I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed
my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not
going
to agree with your invitation.



Remember the Scott Wheeler lawsuit? Remember how "George M. Middius"
said you would apologize to avoid the threat of legal action? Then he
shifted gears and predicted that Wheeler would prevail in court (as did
Sad-sackman). Then, when Wheeler's "case" collapsed, "George" fell
silent. Sort of like Ed Shain disappearing from RAO when Vergance went
bust. ;-)

So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson.....

George M. Middius wrote:
Fran=E7ois Yves Le Gal said:

John you have my answer now, "Yes"

Wow. Will the revolution be webcasted?

They already showed it on broadcast TV, on New Year's Day. You know
-- the
hours-long video feed of nothing (except a fireplace). Krooger will
not
show up in NYC, and if he does show up, it will be too late, or he'll
be
"unable" to find the location of the event, or he'll give some other
excuse. Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not
ever.



here we go....... ;-)

George M. Middius wrote:


François Yves Le Gal said:


John you have my answer now, "Yes"


Wow. Will the revolution be webcasted?
Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not ever.


Why not? He'll just be the same dirt he's here, also there.

wrote in message
oups.com

Remember the Scott Wheeler lawsuit?

It's Scott, not me that is trying to forget his loss. ;-)

Remember how "George M. Middius" said you would apologize to avoid the
threat of legal action?

I seem to recall that. I'm quite sure that Middius did everythng he could to
impress Scott of this *fact*.

Then he shifted gears and predicted that Wheeler would prevail in court
(as did Sad-sackman).

I seem to recall that. I'm quite sure that Middius and Sackman did everythng
they could to impress Scott of this *fact*. Didn't Sackman even visit the
west coast in or about that time?

Then, when Wheeler's "case" collapsed, "George" fell silent.

Will any person who is surprised, please raise their hand! ;-) I mean,
besides George, Scott, and Sack_of_whatever_man.

Sort of like Ed Shain disappearing from RAO when Vergance went bust. ;-)

Well, everything you're talking about now is pretty small potatoes compared
to THAT! I hear that serious money (totalling maybe in the 7 figure range)
was involved.

So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson...

His mouth, his personal reputation...

What am I thinking? George has no personal reputation. You have to be a
person to have a personal repuation, right? ;-)

wrote in message
oups.com

George M. Middius wrote:

Krooger will not show up in NYC, and if he does show up, it will be too
late, or he'll be
"unable" to find the location of the event, or he'll give some other
excuse. Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not
ever.

here we go....... ;-)

Agreed.

BTW, who is Krooger? ;-)

I can see it now:

Interviewer - George, were you wrong about Scatt Wheeler's lawsuit against
Krueger?

Middius - No, who is Krueger? I wrote about Krooger!

Interviewer - George, were you wrong about Atkinson's New York debate with
Krueger?

Middius - No, who is Krueger? I wrote about Krooger!

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:06:41 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

wrote in message
roups.com

George M. Middius wrote:

Krooger will not show up in NYC, and if he does show up, it will be too
late, or he'll be
"unable" to find the location of the event, or he'll give some other
excuse. Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not
ever.

here we go....... ;-)

Agreed.

BTW, who is Krooger? ;-)

I can see it now:

Interviewer - George, were you wrong about Scatt Wheeler's lawsuit against
Krueger?

Who is Scatt Wheeler, a jazz singer? A jazz singer with a "repuation"
perhaps?

Middius - No, who is Krueger? I wrote about Krooger!

Interviewer - George, were you wrong about Atkinson's New York debate with
Krueger?

Middius - No, who is Krueger? I wrote about Krooger!

BTW, it's so cute when you guys kiss. It would be cuter if it weren't
your butts though.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.

John you have my answer now, "Yes"

Thank you, Mr. Krueger. Following next Tuesday's meeting, I will get
back to you with the exact date. We can then discuss travel
arrangements
so we can purchase your ticket.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:59:30 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"John Atkinson" wrote in message
roups.com
Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
. com.) I

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his crowd.
I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not going
to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message


But Krooger's connection to the real world, though tenuous, is just
tenacious enough. He realizes there's a chasm between his private
fantasy world and that "other world" he's trying to escape. And so he
won't let the worlds collide, because if he did, the viability of the
Kroo-dimension would be compromised even in Krooger's tortured mind.
He'll stay where it's safe -- inside his hovel, connected to the
world only through his computer.

George, who is Krooger?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message

****-for-Brains said:

But Krooger's connection to the real world, though tenuous, is just
tenacious enough. He realizes there's a chasm between his private
fantasy world and that "other world" he's trying to escape. And so
he won't let the worlds collide, because if he did, the viability
of the Kroo-dimension would be compromised even in Krooger's
tortured mind. He'll stay where it's safe -- inside his hovel,
connected to the world only through his computer.

George, who is Krooger?

snip non-answer

"George M. Middius" wrote in message

dave weil said to Fecesborg:

I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I
delayed my answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about
how I was not going to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Krooger is a "master of the debating trade".

Who is Krooger, and who are you quoting besides yourself, George?

George M. Middius wrote:


François Yves Le Gal said:


John you have my answer now, "Yes"


Wow. Will the revolution be webcasted?


They already showed it on broadcast TV, on New Year's Day. You know -- the
hours-long video feed of nothing (except a fireplace). Krooger will not
show up in NYC, and if he does show up, it will be too late, or he'll be
"unable" to find the location of the event, or he'll give some other
excuse. Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not ever.


"So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson....."

Right on cue, George. Are you sure you weren't some
behavioral modification subject at one time or another?
You sure seem to salivate and whine whenever Kreuger
posts anything.

dave weil wrote:

BTW, it's so cute when you guys kiss. It would be cuter if it weren't
your butts though.

Best laugh I've had all week. Thanks, I needed that.

George M. Middius wrote:


Fella said:


Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not ever.



Why not? He'll just be the same dirt he's here, also there.


Why not, you ask? Heh heh heh....

Krooger has given us several glimpses into his private world of delusions
and psychoses. In his imaginary reality, he is the all-knowing Great Audio
Expert who "has never lost an audio debate". That is the imagined
dimension where his "debating trade" garbage takes the place of both
genuine intellectual discourse and the true business of producing and
selling audio equipment.

Or Kreuger could be enjoying poking you with a stick to see
how you react. MY guess, based upon what a search online
turned up, as well as a search at the local library, is that
Kreuger has more audio knowledge than you might believe.

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
ink.net

Or Kreuger could be enjoying poking you with a stick to see
how you react.

According to Wheeler, that would be a sociopathic think to do. ;-)

MY guess, based upon what a search online
turned up, as well as a search at the local library, is that
Kreuger has more audio knowledge than you might believe.

BTW, who is Kreuger? ;-)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:25:12 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



dave weil said to Fecesborg:

I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not going
to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Krooger is a "master of the debating trade".

Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

I tried to find out if there's a line on whether Krooger shows up, but
oddly, none of the bookies in Vegas seems to have heard of him. ;-)

Oh, I'm sure he'll be there. Why wouldn't he? He's seemingly
impervious to embarassment. Besides, THAT VOICE. Who wouldn't want to
see it immortalized once more, and this time in a format that can be
shared with the world-at-large.

dave weil a écrit :
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:59:30 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"John Atkinson" wrote in message
groups.com

Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
ps.com.) I

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
ups.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his crowd.
I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not going
to agree with your invitation.


Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

For my part I have always a lot of fun seing that all Middius's
predictions fail grotesquely.
If like me you was here for the fun you would also appreciate such
attention from Arnold Krueger.
RAO is for fun isn't it Dave ?

Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

Fair Dave.
Only Middius & Co don't understand that it is possible.

a écrit :
Arny Krueger wrote:

"John Atkinson" wrote in message
groups.com

Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
ps.com.) I

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
ups.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his

crowd.

I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed

my

answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not

going

to agree with your invitation.




Remember the Scott Wheeler lawsuit? Remember how "George M. Middius"
said you would apologize to avoid the threat of legal action? Then he
shifted gears and predicted that Wheeler would prevail in court (as did
Sad-sackman). Then, when Wheeler's "case" collapsed, "George" fell
silent. Sort of like Ed Shain disappearing from RAO when Vergance went
bust. ;-)

So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson.....


"George" cannot resist to the temptation to make an ass of himself.

Don't laugh, George is my prefered one.
While other like Sackman, Richman... do that on a petty and miserable
daily basis, George always takes care to do the things in large.
His narcissistic person always requests an hollywoodian humiliation !

a écrit :
George M. Middius wrote:

François Yves Le Gal said:


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

Wow. Will the revolution be webcasted?

They already showed it on broadcast TV, on New Year's Day. You know

-- the

hours-long video feed of nothing (except a fireplace). Krooger will

not

show up in NYC, and if he does show up, it will be too late, or he'll

be

"unable" to find the location of the event, or he'll give some other
excuse. Krooger will not take the stage and address JA. Not now, not

ever.



here we go....... ;-)

Even Richman isn't so *predictable* ! )

dave weil a écrit :
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:25:12 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



dave weil said to Fecesborg:


I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not going
to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Krooger is a "master of the debating trade".


Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

I tried to find out if there's a line on whether Krooger shows up, but
oddly, none of the bookies in Vegas seems to have heard of him. ;-)


Oh, I'm sure he'll be there. Why wouldn't he?

You don't understand Dave.
George is a *coward*, the above proves that he simply thinks that
everybody would react as cowardly as him. Nothing complicate.

George M. Middius wrote:



dave weil said:

I tried to find out if there's a line on whether Krooger shows up, but
oddly, none of the bookies in Vegas seems to have heard of him. ;-)

Oh, I'm sure he'll be there. Why wouldn't he? He's seemingly
impervious to embarassment. Besides, THAT VOICE. Who wouldn't want to
see it immortalized once more, and this time in a format that can be
shared with the world-at-large.

Would you like to make a bet on it? I'll bet he won't open his mouth at
the event. I'll put up two bottles of red wine. Not that it wouldn't be
delightful to see Krooger get eviscerated in person.

Anybody want to bet?

Yes I'm ready to bet with you.
But not red wine, please, since you have already proved that you don't know anything on the subject. ;-)




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

George M. Middius wrote:







----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

George M. Middius wrote:



****-for-Brains said:

But Krooger's connection to the real world, though tenuous, is just
tenacious enough. He realizes there's a chasm between his private
fantasy world and that "other world" he's trying to escape. And so he
won't let the worlds collide, because if he did, the viability of the
Kroo-dimension would be compromised even in Krooger's tortured mind.
He'll stay where it's safe -- inside his hovel, connected to the
world only through his computer.

George, who is Krooger?

Failure to attempt to refute the obvious noted. Full and complete
acceptance of my description noted. Total and utter failure as a human
being noted.

One or two days ago you were writing that you have killfiled Krueger.
You are really a *pityful* liar George... ;-)




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

Arny Krueger" wrote




John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his crowd. I
hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my answer was
to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not going to agree with
your invitation.


Unbelievable!! Of course that doesn't really mean that you are going to be
there personally until you, umm ah, I mean you know, ........ showed up.

"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com...
Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
. com.) I
promised you that there would be no restrictions on what
subjects you wished to talk about, although I felt it fair
to include a section where you and I answered questions from
the audience.

Mr. McKelvy strongly felt that I was not owed a fee if I
were to accept a similar invitation -- "Stop mucking about
with all the bull**** about fees..." he wrote -- so I made
it clear that no fee would be offered you, Mr. Krueger, for
your appearance in New York, just "reasonable expenses." I
subsequently defined these expenses as a round trip,
coach-class air fare and accommodation for 2 nights. I also
subsequently clarified that this invitation was to you
personally, not to someone else that you might wish to
attend in your place.


Dear John,

It would be well worth the extra expense to schedule Mr. Krueger's arrival
at least 24 hours ahead of the "performance". Otherwise you run the
considerable risk of him getting lost in the traffic, airport or his own
basement. There is also the considerable potential for minor traffic
accidents, canceled flights due to a tsunami and hijacking of his flight to
Cuba. Of course even the best laid out travel plans will not prevent family
tragedies or sudden illnesses like a stroke, diarrhea and ingrown toenails
(in a combination of your choice).

Additionally, there is also the real danger of Mr. Krueger becoming a victim
of kidnapping and conspiracy in which an impostor will try to take his place
in the debate. To prevent this from happening, I recommend that you conduct
a DNA test prior to the debate to verify that the person attending really is
Mr. Krueger. I would particularly keep an eye on suspicious characters
wearing a Jeffrey Dahmer Halloween mask, a Corvette t-shirt and displaying a
name tag of "Arny Kreuger".

Best of luck. This should be very interesting.

Cheers,

Margaret

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his
crowd. I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I
delayed my answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I
was not going to agree with your invitation.


Well, for the most part, we were silent. You had till the 31st, and
AFAIAC, you should be given until the 31st.
I am glad you reached the decision to attend.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Arny Krueger wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com
Mr. Krueger, on December 7, 2004, at the instigation of
Michael McKelvy, I invited you to debate me in person at the
forthcoming Home Entertainment 2005 Show, scheduled to take
place in New York at the end of April. (See r.a.o. message
. com.) I

You responded that while you were interested in taking part
in this debate, you needed some time to come to a decision.
Your specific words were "Of course that's a long way from
home, but let's see if I can put something together..." and
"I will give you my *final answer* by the end of January,
if that's all right with you."

In response, I told you on December 12 that I needed to know
your decision by February 1, 2005 (see r.a.o. message
.com).

Back then, February 1 was more than 6 weeks in the future,
so I didn't felt it necessary to remind you of the
invitation. However, as that deadline is now next Tuesday,
I really do need a Yes or No answer by 10am that morning,
as I am meeting with the magazine and Show management later
that day to make the final decisions over the Show's events
program.


John you have my answer now, "Yes"

I only delayed answering because of the posturing by Middius and his
crowd.
I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed
my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not
going
to agree with your invitation.



Remember the Scott Wheeler lawsuit? Remember how "George M. Middius"
said you would apologize to avoid the threat of legal action? Then he
shifted gears and predicted that Wheeler would prevail in court (as did
Sad-sackman). Then, when Wheeler's "case" collapsed, "George" fell
silent. Sort of like Ed Shain disappearing from RAO when Vergance went
bust. ;-)

So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson.....

wrote in message
oups.com...


Remember the Scott Wheeler lawsuit? Remember how "George M. Middius"
said you would apologize to avoid the threat of legal action? Then he
shifted gears and predicted that Wheeler would prevail in court (as did
Sad-sackman). Then, when Wheeler's "case" collapsed, "George" fell
silent. Sort of like Ed Shain disappearing from RAO when Vergance went
bust. ;-)

So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson.....


Maybe next year you can show up.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
oups.com

I seem to recall that. I'm quite sure that Middius and Sackman did
everythng they could to impress Scott of this *fact*. Didn't Sackman even
visit the west coast in or about that time?


No, I was in Detroit scouting the opposition. I wanted to see the cracks in
your basement foundation for myself.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"George M. Middius" wrote in message


But Krooger's connection to the real world, though tenuous, is just
tenacious enough. He realizes there's a chasm between his private
fantasy world and that "other world" he's trying to escape. And so he
won't let the worlds collide, because if he did, the viability of the
Kroo-dimension would be compromised even in Krooger's tortured mind.
He'll stay where it's safe -- inside his hovel, connected to the
world only through his computer.

George, who is Krooger?


The Beast.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


dave weil said to Fecesborg:

I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not
going
to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Krooger is a "master of the debating trade".

Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

I tried to find out if there's a line on whether Krooger shows up, but
oddly, none of the bookies in Vegas seems to have heard of him. ;-)

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


dave weil said to Fecesborg:

I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not
going
to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Krooger is a "master of the debating trade".

Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

I tried to find out if there's a line on whether Krooger shows up, but
oddly, none of the bookies in Vegas seems to have heard of him. ;-)

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


dave weil said to Fecesborg:

I hope that you picked up on the fact that the only reason I delayed my
answer was to give them plenty of time to posture about how I was not
going
to agree with your invitation.

Yeah, that's such a good reason all right. Just shows what kind of
person you are to do business with.

Krooger is a "master of the debating trade".

Have fun in NYC though. You should have a good time.

I tried to find out if there's a line on whether Krooger shows up, but
oddly, none of the bookies in Vegas seems to have heard of him. ;-)

I thought he was famous.

Clyde Slick wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Remember the Scott Wheeler lawsuit? Remember how "George M.
Middius"
said you would apologize to avoid the threat of legal action? Then
he
shifted gears and predicted that Wheeler would prevail in court (as
did
Sad-sackman). Then, when Wheeler's "case" collapsed, "George" fell
silent. Sort of like Ed Shain disappearing from RAO when Vergance
went
bust. ;-)

So, now we can expect "George" to post endlessly about how you will
"back out" at the last minute because you fear "Lord Atkinson.....


Maybe next year you can show up.




Maybe next year you'll be witty.

George M. Middius wrote:


Doofy Krooberlander said:


You sure seem to salivate and whine whenever Kreuger
posts anything.


Who is "Kreuger"? I assume you're deliberately misspelling Mr. ****'s name
in order to avoid a "libel suit". Or maybe you'd like some yak butter with
your stack of Kroopologism pancakes.....

I write for content, and not for exact spelling, so get over it.
He types. You jump and salivate. Sounds like good entertainment
to me.

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
ink.net


Or Kreuger could be enjoying poking you with a stick to see
how you react.


According to Wheeler, that would be a sociopathic think to do. ;-)

It's human nature to poke the cages at the zoo, though.

Joseph Oberlander wrote:
George M. Middius wrote:


Doofy Krooberlander said:


You sure seem to salivate and whine whenever Kreuger
posts anything.


Who is "Kreuger"? I assume you're deliberately misspelling Mr.
****'s name
in order to avoid a "libel suit". Or maybe you'd like some yak
butter with
your stack of Kroopologism pancakes.....

I write for content, and not for exact spelling, so get over it.
He types. You jump and salivate. Sounds like good entertainment
to me.




Watching "George" drool keeps me here. :-)