Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those of us who have remained skeptical after reading glowing reports of
tremendously improved sound quality due to the wider bandwidth of SACD and DVD-A can find quite a bit of vindication in this report: http://world.std.com/~griesngr/intermod.ppt Basically it shows that SACDs come in two flavors - those with absolutely no music above 22 KHz (your typical remastered recording) or those with negligible music above 22 KHz (your typical new recording). The author of this report is a well-known expert who has been studying the requirements for more lifelike reproduction of music for decades, and has a number of successful products to his credit. I see just another indication of how unreliable the high end establishment is as a source of information about what actually sounds better. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Any SACD Experience to Report? | High End Audio | |||
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps | High End Audio | |||
Is the war over yet? DVD-audio vs SACD | High End Audio | |||
WORLDJAZZ SCAM REVEALED; BRIAN L. MCCARTY | Audio Opinions | |||
SACD Remastering Scam Revealed! | Audio Opinions |