Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anybody a comment on how come nobody noticed, by listening (it was
found, apparently accidentally, by someone who was looking at the frequency distribution of some of the files he'd downloaded), that HDTracks and other web-based music selling services were (inadvertently?) selling up-sampled 16-bit/44.1 KHz material as "hi-rez" *downloads and charging $20-$30 an album for them? Could it be that there is no AUDIBLE difference between 16-bit/44.KHz material and so called hi-rez as was found by Meyer and Moran in their notorius ABX study of DSD, and that's why the fraud supposedly went unnoticed even by the people selling the music files? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The AES Repudiates SACD, DVD-A, and the high resolution audio myth | Audio Opinions | |||
High resolution digital recorders | Pro Audio | |||
High resolution Recording available on line? | High End Audio | |||
Nesa one high resolution audio ologram | High End Audio | |||
Q: Very High Resolution Microphones | Pro Audio |