[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

All of these are "ripoffs" sanctioned and promoted by the EHEE (Evil
High-End Establishment, pronounced "Eeee-Heee"). These all represent
'solved' issues. There's no sense even discussing them! Discussing
them here simply wrecks this forum!

This leaves speakers and home-made room treatments. I move that this
forum be renamed "rec.audio.opinions-on-speakers.and.cheap-home-
made.audio.solutions" forthwith. Do I have a second?

[Jenn]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

All of these are "ripoffs" sanctioned and promoted by the EHEE (Evil
High-End Establishment, pronounced "Eeee-Heee"). These all represent
'solved' issues. There's no sense even discussing them! Discussing
them here simply wrecks this forum!

This leaves speakers and home-made room treatments. I move that this
forum be renamed "rec.audio.opinions-on-speakers.and.cheap-home-
made.audio.solutions" forthwith. Do I have a second?

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet subscriptions will keep
some little girls safe tonight.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

All of these are "ripoffs" sanctioned and promoted by
the EHEE (Evil High-End Establishment, pronounced
"Eeee-Heee"). These all represent 'solved' issues.
There's no sense even discussing them! Discussing them
here simply wrecks this forum!

This leaves speakers and home-made room treatments. I
move that this forum be renamed
"rec.audio.opinions-on-speakers.and.cheap-home-
made.audio.solutions" forthwith. Do I have a second?

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

All of these are "ripoffs" sanctioned and promoted by
the EHEE (Evil High-End Establishment, pronounced
"Eeee-Heee"). These all represent 'solved' issues.
There's no sense even discussing them! Discussing them
here simply wrecks this forum!

This leaves speakers and home-made room treatments. I
move that this forum be renamed
"rec.audio.opinions-on-speakers.and.cheap-home-
made.audio.solutions" forthwith. Do I have a second?

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

"Pity party"

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 10:46*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in






In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.
All of these are "ripoffs" sanctioned and promoted by
the EHEE (Evil High-End Establishment, pronounced
"Eeee-Heee"). These all represent 'solved' issues.
There's no sense even discussing them! Discussing them
here simply wrecks this forum!

This leaves speakers and home-made room treatments. I
move that this forum be renamed
"rec.audio.opinions-on-speakers.and.cheap-home-
made.audio.solutions" forthwith. Do I have a second?
"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

What lies, GOIA? In the past week I've asked you:

What kind of music do you enjoy listening to?
What type of speakers do you like best (e.g. box, dipole, etc.)?
What vinyl you kept after claiming you'd sold it all?
What cartridges do you think sound best?
What are good turntables IYO?

The silence was deafening. I think you were probably too busy thinking
about little girls.

[Arny Krueger]

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of
such snot.

Your own, Jenn's, or both?

I will follow Jenn's example and simply deny my fault related to anything.
;-)

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
net
In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of
such snot.

Your own, Jenn's, or both?

I will follow Jenn's example and simply deny my fault related to anything.
;-)

Yet another in a long line of false accusations.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg scolds itself.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.
I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

See, Jenn? Arnii is against his own snottiness after all.

[George M. Middius]

Soundhaspriority said:

My sympathies are with you, and Art, and George, and Jenn. But the guys
you're trying to get are like steam engines. They don't have any spark; they
will just ride their rails till the ends of their lives.

Why do you assume the game has an ending? It's just fun to play.

[Arny Krueger]

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message


"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

...
The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.

I think that realistic factual discussions about vinyl are good fun.

Turntables? No.

Why not?

Cartridges or stylii? No.

What's wrong with that?

Wire and cables? No.

Again, does anybody have anything interesting to say about them?

Amplifiers? No.

Been there, done that and just lately.

Preamplifiers? No.

???????????

Tubes? No.

I'm still having fun over in RAT.

CD/DVD players? No.

Huh?

Ready-made room treatments? No.

What's wrong with Real Traps?

SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.

They were fun while they lasted.

Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.

How does one get a decent one for less than that?

Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

Note that I recently cited an amplifier review that was DBT-less.

I say, if it's audio, I want to hear it. ****y fits that
result are completely acceptable, at least in comparison
to the political/racists/adhominem rants that have made
this a parody of a newsgroup.

OK, the OT was lame, but it was the lack of intelligence shown in the
actual discussions that were the nails in RAO's coffin.


Let's face it: discussions about audio just don't have
the drama and color of sticking it to a maniac.

Speak for yourself. I'd rather have no maniacs.

By comparison, audio is a dainty pleasure.

Done right, audio is anything but dainty. Too bad we have people around
here who don't want to get their hands dirty, or even do much work.

My sympathies are with you, and Art, and George, and
Jenn.

???????????

But the guys you're trying to get are like steam
engines. They don't have any spark; they will just ride
their rails till the ends of their lives. You can't get
any juice out of them. Taunting them is like daring the
old 4x6x4 to leave the tracks. It ain't gonna happen. And
it's boring. I think everyone else has tuned out.

The reason for the mass exodus was the sort of bilge that Art, the Middiot
and ****R still grind out. There might be hope for Jenn, if you can get her
mad enough so that she actually starts to think.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

The reason for the mass exodus was the sort of bilge that Art, the Middiot
and ****R still grind out. There might be hope for Jenn, if you can get her
mad enough so that she actually starts to think.

lol

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

GOIA questions his own existence:

On Feb 7, 11:57*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

Speak for yourself. I'd rather have no maniacs.

No wonder you're such an asshole. You can't get away from yourself.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 11:57*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

Tubes? No.

I'm still having fun over in RAT.

Do the regulars on RAT there have "fun" when you're around, GOIA? Do
you add to the discussions there or do you detract from them like you
do here? Or do people just generally ignore you?

What is your definition of "fun"?

(BTW, since I crossposted to RAT, does anybody have any pro/con
opinions or experience for homebrews using PP or PPP EL38, 6384, or
KT8C/CV1079 tubes? And also, any currently-available transformer
recommendations for them?)

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

What lies, GOIA? In the past week I've asked you:

What kind of music do you enjoy listening to?
What type of speakers do you like best (e.g. box, dipole, etc.)?
What vinyl you kept after claiming you'd sold it all?
What cartridges do you think sound best?
What are good turntables IYO?

The silence was deafening. I think you were probably too busy thinking
about little girls.

I have it on good authority that Krooger spends a fair amount of time
trying to defeat the alarm in his ankle bracelet.

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

;-)

Does the winkie mean that you know it's not really Jenn's example but
you're saying so anyway? Is that a joke? Irony?

Actually, it means Arnii scored some turds that he's especially proud to
add to his collection.

[George M. Middius]

Yapper yapped:

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

Is this an audio discussion or an Arny discussion?

You're an Arnii discussion. The available issues are whether you're in
love with the Krooborg, whether you voluntarily became its creature, and
whether you think Krooger is a good christian. Let me know which of those
issues you want and your choice of pro or con, and I'll pencil you in.

I think all topics on your list are open.

I think your trap is open again.

Lets[sic] start with this.
What is your TT of preference and why?

My preference is a new line from the UK called "Dead Dogs Turntables".
Have you had a chance to audition one yet?

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" wrote in message


I can only say I want to be on record as truly saddenned
that your audio interest has been diminished to this
scope.

The Middiot's audio interest is not diminished, because it has never been
any larger than just about zero. Go into google and read his posts from the
first one - he has always been about redicule.

[George M. Middius]

If an idiot yaps in the privacy of his work-kennel, does his religious
instructor hear the yapping?

Is this an audio discussion or an Arny discussion?

You're an Arnii discussion. The available issues are whether you're in
love with the Krooborg, whether you voluntarily became its creature, and
whether you think Krooger is a good christian. Let me know which of those
issues you want and your choice of pro or con, and I'll pencil you in.

I can only say[snip]

Sadly, there's no "only" about it. Whatever you say, Witless, you say over
and over and over, regardless of how many times it's rebutted by regular
people.

Do us all (including your flea-bitten self) a big favor and go bury a
bone.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 2:29*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

The Middiot's audio interest is not diminished, because it has never been
any larger than just about zero. *Go into google and read his posts from the
first one - he has always been about redicule.

Speakers? Lies? Turntable/cartridge/tonearm combinations? Music?

I'm resorting to shorthand, GOIA, as I've asked you all of these
questions several times now. ;-)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 1:50*pm, ScottW wrote:

Is this an audio discussion or an Arny discussion?

Don't distract him. I've been asking GOIA some audio questions for a
few days now. He doesn't seem to be understanding them.

I'd really like to know what vinyl he's kept (and why), or if he
didn't keep any and sold it all like he said he did, why he said just
said he had some. Isn't that strange?

Say, does GOIA have 'integrity' IYO? I've never lied here, you see,
and I apparently don't have any 'integrity'. GOIA just got caught in a
bald-faced lie. Color me curious.

I think all topics on your list are open.
Lets start with this.

What is your TT of preference and why?

Not until you nag GOIA like you have been nagging Jenn. It's only
fair. You need to say, "I'd like to go on record that GOIA reminds me
of snot when I have a really bad cold".

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 4:25*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

Say, does GOIA have 'integrity' IYO?

* Not generally. *Though in a serious audio discussion
I don't think he overtly lies until someone shows him
to have less expertise than he wished he had.

I've never lied here, you see,

Not even regarding things I've said?

Nope.

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

I've never lied here, you see,

Not even regarding things I've said?

Nope.

Do you think Scottie will ever say "I misspoke"?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 5:16*pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

I've never lied here, you see,

Not even regarding things I've said?

Nope.

Do you think Scottie will ever say "I misspoke"?

Nope.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 12:22*pm, Bret Ludwig wrote:
Do the regulars on RAT there have "fun" when you're around, GOIA? Do
you add to the discussions there or do you detract from them like you
do here? Or do people just generally ignore you?

What is your definition of "fun"?

*Not what anyone else would consider fun.

I have noticed a rather underwhelming outpouring of support for GOIA.
I suspect his name in the subject line was enough to keep all of his
"friends" on RAT away.

(BTW, since I crossposted to RAT, does anybody have any pro/con
opinions or experience for homebrews using PP or PPP EL38, 6384, or
KT8C/CV1079 tubes? And also, any currently-available transformer
recommendations for them?)

*Yes, avoid them.

For technical reasons? I'm pretty sure they'll be just fine for audio.

*The 1625 is probably the best off-type value now. 807s are fairly
economic also.

I have at least three dozen of each type on hand, so even if the 1625
(a 12v 807, isn't it?) was only .10 each it isn't a better value. I
even have some old Philips brown-base EL34s and some NOS Mullards.

I just want to make a couple of nice tube monoblocks.

Who's making the best trannies these days? I have a pair of military
UTC 6v 10a power trannies, so specifically I'm curious about currently-
made outputs.

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 11:57 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

Tubes? No.

I'm still having fun over in RAT.

Do the regulars on RAT there have "fun" when you're around, GOIA?

To quote a very knowledgeable retired BBC
engineer of my acquaintance: "I would rather have
cranial surgery than be involved in discussion
of any kind with Mr Krueger"

That will tell you how much fun Arny is.

Iain

[Clyde Slick]

On 8 Feb, 09:17, "Iain Churches" wrote:



To quote a very knowledgeable retired BBC
engineer of my acquaintance: "I would rather have
cranial surgery than be involved in discussion
of any kind with Mr Krueger"

That will tell you how much fun Arny is.

Iain

Not that there is anythig worng with cranial surgery.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

The question is, what topics are "OK" to discuss?

Vinyl? No.
Turntables? No.
Cartridges or stylii? No.
Wire and cables? No.
Amplifiers? No.
Preamplifiers? No.
Tubes? No.
CD/DVD players? No.
Ready-made room treatments? No.
SACD/Blu-Ray, etc.? No.
Stereos costing more than a few hundred bucks? No.
Any audio review that does not include DBT? No.

All of these are "ripoffs" sanctioned and promoted by
the EHEE (Evil High-End Establishment, pronounced
"Eeee-Heee"). These all represent 'solved' issues.
There's no sense even discussing them! Discussing them
here simply wrecks this forum!

This leaves speakers and home-made room treatments. I
move that this forum be renamed
"rec.audio.opinions-on-speakers.and.cheap-home-
made.audio.solutions" forthwith. Do I have a second?

"At least" Arny changing the title in his Usenet
subscriptions will keep some little girls safe tonight.

Thus Jenn puts her approval on ****R's lies.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of
such snot.

"Pity party"

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

[Arny Krueger]

"Iain Churches" wrote in message
.fi
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 11:57 am, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

Tubes? No.

I'm still having fun over in RAT.

Do the regulars on RAT there have "fun" when you're
around, GOIA?

To quote a very knowledgeable retired BBC
engineer of my acquaintance: "I would rather have
cranial surgery than be involved in discussion
of any kind with Mr Krueger"

That will tell you how much fun Arny is.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 8, 10:37*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

*I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

Your record on snot speaks for itself, GOIA.

Cure yourself first. ;-)

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

*I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.

Your record on snot speaks for itself, GOIA.
Cure yourself first. ;-)

Been there done, that. Properly cured turds are a staple of the outdoorsy
borg's diet.

http://files.blog-city.com/files/aa/21864/p/f/turds.jpg

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 6:09*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Feb 7, 2:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Feb 7, 4:25*pm, ScottW wrote:

On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
Say, does GOIA have 'integrity' IYO?

* Not generally. *Though in a serious audio discussion
I don't think he overtly lies until someone shows him
to have less expertise than he wished he had.

I've never lied here, you see,

Not even regarding things I've said?

Nope.

*A glimmer of hope.....dashed.

I've never had any hope that you'd ever learn English. If you did, my
advice would be not to dream impossible dreams.

Since learning English won't happen, another option is to learn to say
"Sorry, I misspoke."

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

Since [duh-Scottie] learning English won't happen, another option is to learn to say
"Sorry, I misspoke."

You were right before. Scottie only knows how to say "You misunderstood
me, you $(*!ing &#!*head!"

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 8, 4:56*pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Since [duh-Scottie] learning English won't happen, another option is to learn to say
"Sorry, I misspoke."

You were right before. Scottie only knows how to say "You misunderstood
me, you $(*!ing &#!*head!"

That's because, as we've seen magnified to the fifteenth power over
this past week, everything is always somebody else's fault to 2pid.

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! said:

Since [duh-Scottie] learning English won't happen, another option is to learn to say
"Sorry, I misspoke."

You were right before. Scottie only knows how to say "You misunderstood
me, you $(*!ing &#!*head!"

That's because, as we've seen magnified to the fifteenth power over
this past week, everything is always somebody else's fault to 2pid.

Yep, that's how it looks. I wonder if he learned to 'think' like that in
church? He swallowed the "miracles" crapola whole, so he's probably
gullible enough for any dogma they toss at him.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 8, 5:09*pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:
Shhhh! said:

Since [duh-Scottie] learning English won't happen, another option is to learn to say
"Sorry, I misspoke."

You were right before. Scottie only knows how to say "You misunderstood
me, you $(*!ing &#!*head!"

That's because, as we've seen magnified to the fifteenth power over
this past week, everything is always somebody else's fault to 2pid.

Yep, that's how it looks. I wonder if he learned to 'think' like that in
church? He swallowed the "miracles" crapola whole, so he's probably
gullible enough for any dogma they toss at him.

Well, he was 'smart' enough to see a trap used by small children since
the beginning of time. Anybody would know that either way you answer a
question like "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" is no-win.
Everybody except 2pid, that is. Drill sergeants use the same tactic on
basic trainees, of course. They'll make a statement about somebody.
When the person disagrees, they'll say "Are you calling me a liar?"
"No, drill sergeant!" "Then what I said is true." "No, drill
sergeant!" and so on. It inevitably ends with lots of push-ups. :-)

I wonder if 2pid will ever realize that by answering "no" to my
question he did indeed confess to having oral sex with stray mongrels.
Answering "Yes" would have been an admission that he had in the past
but had stopped. He should not have misused his ellipses...again,
which compounded his error. A comma even might have saved him.
Omitting the "No..." entirely was his best bet. "I have never engaged
in that type of activity." would have certainly ended the matter
there.

But 2pid, with his infamous poor English skills, has instead chosen to
call me a "liar" after his confessing to having oral sex with stray
mongrels. Do I actually think that 2pid has oral sex with stray
mongrels? I'd sure hope not. But since he's chosen to admit it, who am
I to disagree?

BTW, have you seen 2pid's latest foray into the "confusing" world of
English with JA? LOL!

Neither 2pid nor GOIA can ever admit that they were wrong. They're
birds of a feather.

[[email protected]]

On Feb 7, 12:29�pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message





�I can only say I want to be on record as truly saddenned
that your audio interest has been diminished to this
scope.

The Middiot's audio interest is not diminished, because it has never been
any larger than just about zero. �Go into google and read his posts from the
first one - he has always been about redicule.

I'd love to see George's first post here. It's probably more about
disbelief than ridicule, as in "How does a retard like Krueger know
how to work a keyboard?"

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

wrote in message

On Feb 7, 12:29?pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message





?I can only say I want to be on record as truly
saddenned that your audio interest has been diminished
to this scope.

The Middiot's audio interest is not diminished, because
it has never been any larger than just about zero. ?Go
into google and read his posts from the first one - he
has always been about redicule.

I'd love to see George's first post here. It's probably
more about disbelief than ridicule, as in "How does a
retard like Krueger know how to work a keyboard?"

Thanks Boon for admitting that you are so dense that you can't figure out
how to obtain the Middiot's first post here.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 8, 9:22*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
wrote in message







On Feb 7, 12:29?pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message



?I can only say I want to be on record as truly
saddenned that your audio interest has been diminished
to this scope.

The Middiot's audio interest is not diminished, because
it has never been any larger than just about zero. ?Go
into google and read his posts from the first one - he
has always been about redicule.

I'd love to see George's first post here. *It's probably
more about disbelief than ridicule, as in "How does a
retard like Krueger know how to work a keyboard?"

Thanks Boon for admitting that you are so dense that you can't figure out
how to obtain the Middiot's first post here.

I've looked for yours, GOIA. It seems that you've gone through several
iterations of spellings of your name, for example. Why don't you post
some of your early gems? I'd like to try to find the exact moment that
your sanity slipped away from you.

Or was that long before you appeared here?

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
. ..
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
.fi
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 11:57 am, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

Tubes? No.

I'm still having fun over in RAT.

Do the regulars on RAT there have "fun" when you're
around, GOIA?

To quote a very knowledgeable retired BBC
engineer of my acquaintance: "I would rather have
cranial surgery than be involved in discussion
of any kind with Mr Krueger"

That will tell you how much fun Arny is.

I want to go on record as being against the throwing of such snot.


The man, a BBC engineer with almost 40 years
experience and several papers published,
spoke in all sincerity, and, having realised what
a foul.mouthed, thoroughly unpleasant character
Mr K was, moved to a closed group to which
he (AK) is denied access.

The absence of this cultured and well-informed
man is a loss to any audio group. But, what does
that matter as long as Arny is "having fun" ?

Iain

[[email protected]]

On Feb 8, 7:22�pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
wrote in message







On Feb 7, 12:29?pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"ScottW" wrote in message



?I can only say I want to be on record as truly
saddenned that your audio interest has been diminished
to this scope.

The Middiot's audio interest is not diminished, because
it has never been any larger than just about zero. ?Go
into google and read his posts from the first one - he
has always been about redicule.

I'd love to see George's first post here. �It's probably
more about disbelief than ridicule, as in "How does a
retard like Krueger know how to work a keyboard?"

Thanks Boon for admitting that you are so dense that you can't figure out
how to obtain the Middiot's first post here.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, I'm just pulling an "Arny"...you know, feigning ignorance about
the Internet until someone does the work for me.

Boon