[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 14, 11:34 am, Eeyore
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Do you automatically assume they must be tainted in some way ? If so, then you need
to look very seriously at your prejudices.

I automatically assume that power generation or power distribution in
no way "changes the science". I question why it is necessary for EVERY
SINGLE GROUP trying to discredit the science to have an "energy
expert" on staff. Don't you find that at all curious? I sure do.

Any more odd than they might have an audio engoineer too ?

What would the audio engineer bring to the table? Should we consider
that audio engineer's opinion with the same weight as a
climatologist's opinion? Should I go to an audio engineer when I have
an ear ache, rather than an ear, nose, and throat specialist? After
all, both have something to do with hearing! (Although I cannot figure
out how power generation is correlated to climate. At least the audio
engineer has something to do with hearing, no matter how loosely...)

Are you suggesting a conspiracy ?

No need to suggest it. It's an already proven fact. Or haven't you
seen the Exxon memo?

http://www.environmentaldefense.org/...ContentID=4870

Or any of this?

http://www.greenpeace.org/internatio...-exxon-front-g

http://www.nrdc.org/media/pressreleases/020403.asp

But let me guess: the power engineer on your site disagrees. LOL!