Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Eeyore wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Eeyore wrote: Trevor Wilson wrote: "Eeyore" wrote "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: "Brian Leyland, MSc , FIEE, FIMechE, FIPENZ, an Electrical and Mechanical Engineer specialising in power generation and power systems, now a power industry consultant." Why the hell shouldn't they have an energy expert on their panel ? **Because it's about CLIMATE SCIENCE, not power generation. The two are unrelated. You would disenfranchise certain scientists because of their area of specialisation ? Answer me this: if this group is sincere in its effort to propogate the "truth" and challenge the "nutters", how does a nuclear engineer, a power generation and distribution specialist, or the like, enhance that effort? Why would he detract from it ? Um, bias? You're automatically assuming anti-AGW bias because the guy's an energy expert ? I'm sorry but that's a ridiculous assertion. Um, not wanting to bite the hand that feeds him? Who is paying them ? You're just making things up. Clealry you're both seriously deluded and have a closed mind. Graham |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kyoto Hypocracy - The Real Issue | Audio Opinions | |||
Piss on Kyoto | Audio Opinions | |||
Piss on Kyoto | Audio Opinions | |||
The Piss Boy | Car Audio |