Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The subject of Stereophile's circulation arose on r.a.o. and r.a.t. today, the
context being how a mainly 2-channel audio magazine can survive in today's complicated media market. Rusty Boudreaux had said (in message ) that he had "noticed the drop on [Stereophile]'s gov't filing page for circulation," while Arny Krueger had stated (in message ) that he thought "there is plenty of evidence that Stereophile's magazine sales are shrinking at a rate that should and probably does greatly concern [John] Atkinson." However, it is fair to point out that Mr. Krueger offered _no_ such "evidence," nor does he have any. Mr. Krueger also wrote that he'd "heard that Atkinson admits it [ie, that "Stereophile's magazine sales are shrinking"] privately." However, I don't know Mr. Krueger personally, I have not had _any_ conversations with him, nor have I discussed changes in Stereophile's circulation statistics with anyone who knows Mr. Krueger. His statement that he has "heard that..." etc. is thus at best a figment of Mr. Krueger's imagination and at worst a deliberate dissemination of a falsehood to damage a magazine edited by someone Mr. Krueger regards as a personal enemy. I did promise Mr. Goudreaux that I would supply Stereophile's circulation statistics. Here, then, are the paid circulation figures for Stereophile during the past 10 years. These are the figures submitted each year by the magazine's publisher with its second-class mailing statement to the Post Office, and are the average of the 12 issues preceding the month of filing (which is generally November): 1994: 71,040 1995: 79,332 1996: 85,808 1997: 87,219 1998: 83,921 1999: 85,224 2000: 91,384 2001: 84,987 2002: 82,932 2003: 81,668 Please note that there are many factors which contribute to a magazine's paid circulation, and that to draw any general conclusion concerning any specific factor will almost certainly be incorrect. For example, if you wish, as Mr. Boudreaux did, to correlate the magzine's circulation with the health of the high-end audio industry, our circulation in 2000, when the industry was having a hard time, was higher than in 1996 and 1997 when the audio industry was at its peak. Regardless, I hope that this puts the matter of Stereophile's purported circulation problems to rest. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Magazine Statitistics | Audio Opinions | |||
Saddam/Time Magazine | Pro Audio | |||
Remove magazine from Sony CDX-656 changer | Car Audio | |||
- TAS magazine Website Updated - | Audio Opinions | |||
FA: Matrix sound design magazine (this might interest some of you) | Pro Audio |