Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi everybody!
I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? fp. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:44:11 -0700, fp wrote
(in article ): Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? fp. These are nowhere near the best speakers in the world. The best are made by companies like MBL, Wilson Audio, Kharma, Magnepan (MG-20), Revel, YG Acoustics and Martin Logan. My vote for the world's most accurate and musical loudspeaker system goes to Martin-Logan for their CLX. Of course, you'll need a good pair of subs to get you below about 50 Hz, but that can be done quite nicely for under US$30,000. You can spend a lot more of course, but I doubt if you'll get a better sounding speaker system. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Mar 2009 21:44:11 GMT, fp wrote:
Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. First, there is no answer because there are too many situations and no one speaker is ideal/best for every one. You have to tell us about the room, the rest of the system, the program material and what your listening preferences are. Second, I wonder if you, like many others who say that money is no problem realize that speaker prices can run easily into six-figure$. Not that one generally needs to spend that much but real number limits would be helpful. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? I have only heard one B&O speaker that I like but several B&W speakers (I own several). There are, however, many, many other options depending on your needs. OTOH, mebbe you are only trolling for controversy. We'll see. Kal |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If by "best" you mean "most accurate", then Klein+Hummel's O500C/O900
is certainly a main contender: http://www.klein-hummel.com/klein-hummel/globals.nsf/resources/kleinundhummel_o900_o500_hq.jpg/$File/kleinundhummel_o900_o500_hq.jpg Flat (± 1.5 dB) from 17 Hz to 20 kHz. A 10-band parametric equalizer is included so they can be "voiced" by the user. Another contender is the Geithain 800K: http://www.me-geithain.de/download/me800k.pdf Klaus On 26 mrt, 22:44, fp wrote: Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? fp. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello fp,
fp wrote in news:732b9bFrq1b3U1 @mid.individual.net: What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are in my opinion K+H 0500C, possibly with their dedicated O900 sub, if you want the highest dynamic range and bass extension: http://www.klein-hummel.com/klein-hu...nsf/root/prof- monitoring_studio-monitors_main-monitors_O500C http://www.klein-hummel.com/klein-hu...nsf/root/prof- monitoring_studio-monitors_subwoofer_O900 Aesthetically wise they are not as pleasant as some other home speakers, but when it comes to performances they are difficult to beat. Bye, -- Denis Sbragion InfoTecna Tel: +39 0362 805396, Fax: +39 0362 805404 URL: http://www.infotecna.it |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fp writes:
I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? This posting is remarkably similar to one that arrived a few days ago titled "Best sounding speakers you have ever heard", also sent via Individual.NET. I recommend that you read the replies to that question. Andrew. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Haley wrote:
This posting is remarkably similar to one that arrived a few days ago titled "Best sounding speakers you have ever heard", also sent via Individual.NET. I recommend that you read the replies to that question. Hmmmm. And I thought that this ng had developed a slap-back echo and was about to propose that we apply some acoustic treatment to it. //Walt |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"fp" wrote in message
... Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? fp. Look into the Legacy Audio speaker series. State of the art! They are indeed expen$ive, but I have a pair and they are the best speakers I've ever owned. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Mar 2009 19:44:12 GMT, "Howard Davis"
wrote: "fp" wrote in message ... Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? fp. Look into the Legacy Audio speaker series. State of the art! They are indeed expen$ive, but I have a pair and they are the best speakers I've ever owned. I do not wish to demean Legacy Audiio speakers but this sort of response is not particularly useful. No doubt many of us could post similarly indicating our enthusiasm for what we have chosen. Doesn't really answer anything. Kal |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The speakers I'm looking for will be used in the living room. I listen
to artists like John Mayer and bands like Coldplay. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Mar 2009 01:25:36 GMT, fp wrote:
The speakers I'm looking for will be used in the living room. I listen to artists like John Mayer and bands like Coldplay. How big is the living room? How is it decorated? Is it in a separate house or in an apartment? Can you give us a diagram of the room layout? What else is in the system? What levels do you require? What size constraints are there? .. .. .. .. .. .. .. and .. .. .. .. .. .. .. What is your budget? Kal |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fp wrote:
The speakers I'm looking for will be used in the living room. I listen to artists like John Mayer and bands like Coldplay. Have you paid any attention to acoustic treatment of your listening room ? What is its current construction ? This is one of the first things that's considered important in studio siyuations. This can make cheese from chalk without even changing speakers. Graham |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 9:25*am, fp wrote:
The speakers I'm looking for will be used in the living room. I listen to artists like John Mayer and bands like Coldplay. In my humble opinion no matter how hard you try the room tend to distort whatever accuracy you may have with your loudspeakers. Try with lower end such as PSB, Axiom, Wharfadale, Mission and there like and then audition on trial an expensive speakers and see if it worth the price and whether your rest of the system match the loudspeakers. On average listening volume you would settle with reasonable speakers after a couple of weeks listening even if it is inaccurate. Just two days ago, an so called audiophile said my system lacks bass because his SPL meter says so at A-weighting measurement. So you can find a group who prefers system setup at A-weighting level or C- weighting. Enjoy music and stop chasing equipments as there is no definitive answer. Regards, ST |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Of course your sources and your driving electronics will have to be of the same caliber(Audio Research suggested for the Beveridges and spectron for the Von Schweikerts suggested). Hope this helps great listening |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fp wrote:
Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? It depends if you want 'monitor class' or 'hi-fi' ! Monitor class speakers will reproduce the sound very accurately including every flaw so may not be to everyone's taste. 'Hi-fi' speaker are designed to 'flatter the ear' regardless of the source quality. Trust me - it's a long story. 2 companies that come to mind are ATC and PMC, both in England. ATC are almost 'the reference standard' in studio monitor speakers and they'll cost you more than you can imagine. They do some 'home speakers' too. PMC address both the hi-fi and pro monitor markets broadly and those I've heard sounded lovely. http://www.atc.gb.net/ http://www.pmc-speakers.com/ At the end of the day, you'll need to HEAR them to see if they suit you. Select a few tracks you know well as a reference source and listen to them. Graham |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"fp" wrote in message
What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? You might find these test results interesting: http://www.soundstageav.com/speakermeasurements.html The paradigm monitor 100s caught my eye. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger wrote:
You might find these test results interesting: http://www.soundstageav.com/speakermeasurements.html Whoa! Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, plus or minus 25 db. I guess this is what one would expect from a company that sells "magic cables". //Walt |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Walt" wrote in message
... Arny Krueger wrote: You might find these test results interesting: http://www.soundstageav.com/speakermeasurements.html Whoa! Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, plus or minus 25 db. I guess this is what one would expect from a company that sells "magic cables". //Walt Sadly this is what has been happening to the "high-end" these days. It's insufficient for loudspeakers to be accurate, as that's boring. If you want high-end credibility you have to make the sound jump out at you. That means highly coloured horns, direct "full-range" drivers and other abominations that were rightly consigned to the rubbish bin as far back as 1968. And all this driven by horribly distorting SET amplifiers with flea-power output and high output impedance so that even if you did actually have a loudspeaker with a sensibly flat response, its impedance variations would ensure the resulting response was anything but flat. I do rather despair at the gullibility of high-end buyers who only buy with their ears, with no understanding of, or interest in, measured specifications and who are so easily impressed by a high level of coloration. S. -- http://audiopages.googlepages.com |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Walt" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: You might find these test results interesting: http://www.soundstageav.com/speakermeasurements.html Whoa! Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, plus or minus 25 db. I guess this is what one would expect from a company that sells "magic cables". So you noticed those, too? I was wondering if there was some SET someplace whose crazy output impedance curve would yield a reasonably flat overall response. |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everybody!
Lots of good suggestions here. I've listened to different speakers the last days, and I'm really impressed by Martin Logan's Summit Speakers. But I haven't bought anything yet. I will be using the new speakers in my living room. The roof height is 6 meters, and the room is 80 square meters big. Please come with more suggestions! Kalman Rubinson: the price is no issue. And I mean no issue. If it will cost me $200,000 , that's okay, as long as it will get me the best possible speakers. I've got some questions on why I'm rich, and the answer is internet marketing. If you want to earn a lot of money, and be able to buy the speakers you want, you can join www.mackthemillionaire.com, if it's not too late.. Hehe! Anyways, Howard Davis: I will check out Legacy Audio next week! Looking forward to it. Thanks everybody! |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Apr 2009 16:16:08 GMT, fp
wrote: Thanks everybody! Lots of good suggestions here. I've listened to different speakers the last days, and I'm really impressed by Martin Logan's Summit Speakers. But I haven't bought anything yet. I will be using the new speakers in my living room. The roof height is 6 meters, and the room is 80 square meters big. Please come with more suggestions! Kalman Rubinson: the price is no issue. And I mean no issue. If it will cost me $200,000 , that's okay, as long as it will get me the best possible speakers. I've got some questions on why I'm rich, and the answer is internet marketing. If you want to earn a lot of money, and be able to buy the speakers you want, you can join www.mackthemillionaire.com, if it's not too late.. Hehe! Good for you. Now, there are many speakers one might suggest but you need speakers that will be capable of filling that space and/or use multiple speakers. Assuming we are talking about 2 channels only, I would suggest looking at powered studio monitors from PMC and ATC, if you can tolerate their rather plain appearance. In addition to the ML's suggested above, look into B&W 801Ds or 800Ds, Cabasse La Sphere and the larger speakers from Wilson, Aerial, Avalon, Dali, EgglestonWorks, JMLab, Revel, mbl, Meridian (generally only with Meridian Electronics), SoundLabs, KEF Reference, etc. The list is long, even though I have kept it to speakers I know, because (1) once you get above $15K or so, the price is not directly correlated with performance quality and (2) personal taste becomes the over-riding issue (as it always should be). Thus, you need to get to hear these before choosing. Kal |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote: You might find these test results interesting: http://www.soundstageav.com/speakermeasurements.html Whoa! Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, plus or minus 25 db. I guess this is what one would expect from a company that sells "magic cables". //Walt the conclusion of the Druid review at high end flooby haven Positive Feedback: http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue11/zudruid.htm "I generally like to discuss certain recordings during my reviews, but it seems rather pointless here. Every CD I played sounded totally neutral, without either warmth or coldness, harshness, or brightness. The Druids render acoustic music very well, but will definitely rock when called upon to do so. Although I have some badly recorded CDs, the Druids made them all sound good, despite their ability to reproduce extreme detail. What are the downsides? If you are looking for warmth or room-thudding bass, look elsewhere. Bass is not emphasized in any way, so if you like tons of low end you may be disappointed. The bass is certainly there, but the Druids do not call attention to it. I did some tests with Stereophile's Test CD #1 and my Radio Shack sound meter, and found that in my room, the bass extended down to 40Hz, then fell off rapidly." -- -S We have it in our power to begin the world over again - Thomas Paine |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven Sullivan wrote:
Walt wrote: Whoa! Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, plus or minus 25 db. the conclusion of the Druid review at high end flooby haven Positive Feedback: http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue11/zudruid.htm The money quote: "Fifty-two inches tall, with 10-inch drivers and supertweeters mounted topside, and painted red with flames, they cut striking figures in my den. These tall beauties generated quite a few interesting comments from audio friends and family. Upon first seeing them, one nephew said that they looked like surfboards! Most other comments had the word "cool" at least once in each sentence. If the idea is that our beloved audio hobby should be fun, the Druids deliver by the boatload on looks alone. " As a wise person once said, "most people listen with their eyes, think with their dicks and f**k with their wallets." Now, about that 25 db hole at 160 hz ... //Walt |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 7:19*am, Walt wrote:
Steven Sullivan wrote: Walt wrote: Whoa! *Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, *plus or minus 25 db. the conclusion of the Druid review at high end flooby haven Positive Feedback: http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue11/zudruid.htm The money quote: * "Fifty-two inches tall, with 10-inch drivers and supertweeters mounted topside, and painted red with flames, they cut striking figures in my den. These tall beauties generated quite a few interesting comments from audio friends and family. Upon first seeing them, one nephew said that they looked like surfboards! Most other comments had the word "cool" at least once in each sentence. If the idea is that our beloved audio hobby should be fun, the Druids deliver by the boatload on looks alone. " As a wise person once said, "most people listen with their eyes, think with their dicks and f**k with their wallets." I see nothing worng with a subjective review of any piece of equipment including comentary on the visual appeal of the equipment. Some people actually care about these things. Now, about that 25 db hole at 160 hz ... I would expect that to be a big problem. But I haven't hear thse speakers so I reserve judgement. |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
Steven Sullivan wrote: Walt wrote: Whoa! Check out the plots for Druid speakers from Zu Cables: http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/me...zucable_druid/ 50 hz to 20 khz, plus or minus 25 db. the conclusion of the Druid review at high end flooby haven Positive Feedback: http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue11/zudruid.htm The money quote: "Fifty-two inches tall, with 10-inch drivers and supertweeters mounted topside, and painted red with flames, they cut striking figures in my den. These tall beauties generated quite a few interesting comments from audio friends and family. Upon first seeing them, one nephew said that they looked like surfboards! Most other comments had the word "cool" at least once in each sentence. If the idea is that our beloved audio hobby should be fun, the Druids deliver by the boatload on looks alone. " As a wise person once said, "most people listen with their eyes, think with their dicks and f**k with their wallets." Now, about that 25 db hole at 160 hz ... //Walt I dunno, but for me the equipment (speakerwise) produced in the late 1950's through the 1960's has little in the way of modern competition. I very much enjoy listening to my ol' rig, a Marrantz quad 4230 that drives Electro-Voice Regency/TRX 15s (front) and Aristocrat/TRX 12s (rear). I've listened to a good deal of new stuff but (to me) it just doesn't measure up. Oh, and despite being the ripe ol' age of 69, I still have a hearing range of 30-18KHz. But, maybe I'm just stuck in a time rut but then again, so are a number others considering the resurgence of vinyl and all... JT PS: When I was first introduced to HiFi in the 1950's, one of the best work out for speaker reproduction were George Wright theatre organ records. 16-20,000 CPS range in them thar' ol' days! |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"fp" wrote in message
... Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. Your goal should be better audio engineering, not "which speakers should I buy." The problem of reproduction is not one of designing a speaker that once and for all can reproduce the sound perfectly, but one of understanding what it is we are trying to do with the system. You may be on a fool's errand asking what are the "best" speakers in the world. Gary Eickmeier |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 10:33*am, "Gary Eickmeier" wrote:
"fp" wrote in message ... Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. Your goal should be better audio engineering, not "which speakers should I buy." That's an absurd assertion: he's not an audio engineer, he has no stake in the realm of audio engineering as a whole, he alledgedly wants to buy a speaker. (he may well have another agenda by the looks of his post, but it is far removed from audio engineering). The problem of reproduction is not one of designing a speaker that once and for all can reproduce the sound perfectly, but one of understanding what it is we are trying to do with the system. Is it JUST me or is this a load of gobbledygook? You may be on a fool's errand asking what are the "best" speakers in the world. Not if the question is EVER so slightly different: "What are the best speakers in the world ... for me." |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Apr 7, 10:33 am, "Gary Eickmeier" wrote: The problem of reproduction is not one of designing a speaker that once and for all can reproduce the sound perfectly, but one of understanding what it is we are trying to do with the system. Is it JUST me or is this a load of gobbledygook? It probably isn't just you, but it probably would be gobbledegook to you. You may be on a fool's errand asking what are the "best" speakers in the world. Not if the question is EVER so slightly different: "What are the best speakers in the world ... for me." Sounds like you just contradicted yourself. Gary Eickmeier |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"fp" wrote in message
... Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? These speakers are among the best there are http://www.teresonic.com/product_speakers.htm, especially the Ingenium Silver. -- Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards, Hans Kruse www.hanskrusephotography.com, www.hanskruse.com |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Hans Kruse" wrote in message
"fp" wrote in message ... Hi everybody! I'm new here, and was hoping to get som advice from you guys. I'm thinking about buying some really good audio speakers. And I mean the best there is! I know it will cost a lot of money, but that's no problem. What would you recommend? I've heard that Bowers & Wilkins are supposed to have the best speakers. But what about Bang & Olufsen? Are these speakers just design, or do they sound good to? These speakers are among the best there are http://www.teresonic.com/product_speakers.htm, especially the Ingenium Silver. Oh my goodness - someone actually believes the Lowther hype? IME they are among the most wretched-sounding expensive speakers ever foisted off on the world of audiophilia. Speaking as a past owner of Ohm Fs, it is nearly physically impossible or impossible to build a single driver that does everything right. The requirements conflict with themselves too much. |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
... Oh my goodness - someone actually believes the Lowther hype? IME they are among the most wretched-sounding expensive speakers ever foisted off on the world of audiophilia. Well, I have a pair of the Ingeniums and I can say for sure that they do sound pretty much as described in this review http://www.dagogo.com/TeresonicIngeniumSilver.html. I guess one can say they are not for all, but if you ever heard them driven by a very good amplifier then you will know how good they are. Speaking as a past owner of Ohm Fs, it is nearly physically impossible or impossible to build a single driver that does everything right. The requirements conflict with themselves too much. These are quite different speakers. -- Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards, Hans Kruse www.hanskrusephotography.com, www.hanskruse.com |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow,
This one is really all but impossible to answer. A hifi system is a package by which each component must work well with all the others. So, what speaker will sound best in a system has a lot to do with the amplifier that will drive it, the type of music you like, and your room acoustics. In general, I find that the most accurate sound seems to come from speakers with 5.25 - 6.5" woofers and a high quality tweeter. Although there is a law of diminishing returns, there is still a lot to be said for the old adage that you get what you pay for. Myself, I have had good luck with Sonus Faber, and Mirage (the stuff geared toward hifi and not home theater). I like the Paradigm Mini monitors as well (the bi ampable ones, not the cheap ones). None of these speakers are super expensive, but they do sound quite nice. I have heard some home made speakers that were amazing sounding as well. But, is there one 'perfect' speaker that is best? Probably not. I have never heard any speaker that sounds great with every amp and with every different type of music. Just listen to a few sets, preferably in your home with your other equipment, and let YOUR ears decide. We can suggest all the speakers in the world to you, but only you can say which sounds right to you. .. |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:07:19 -0700, WB wrote
(in article ): Wow, This one is really all but impossible to answer. A hifi system is a package by which each component must work well with all the others. So, what speaker will sound best in a system has a lot to do with the amplifier that will drive it, the type of music you like, and your room acoustics. In general, I find that the most accurate sound seems to come from speakers with 5.25 - 6.5" woofers and a high quality tweeter. Although there is a law of diminishing returns, there is still a lot to be said for the old adage that you get what you pay for. Myself, I have had good luck with Sonus Faber, and Mirage (the stuff geared toward hifi and not home theater). I like the Paradigm Mini monitors as well (the bi ampable ones, not the cheap ones). None of these speakers are super expensive, but they do sound quite nice. I have heard some home made speakers that were amazing sounding as well. But, is there one 'perfect' speaker that is best? Probably not. I have never heard any speaker that sounds great with every amp and with every different type of music. Just listen to a few sets, preferably in your home with your other equipment, and let YOUR ears decide. We can suggest all the speakers in the world to you, but only you can say which sounds right to you. . The question cannot really be answered. Reason? No speaker is perfect. This means that each of us latches on to some aspect of reproduction that we deem important for our own personal "willing suspension of disbelief." To some, flat frequency response is most important, to others its convincing low frequency reproduction. Others don't care so much about the frequency extremes as long as the midrange is accurate. Others value silken, extended highs, and still others value a wide, deep soundstage with excellent image specificity. To each one of these disparate tastes, a different speaker will qualify as the "world's best". Of course, some speakers do several things in a world-class way and will be on the short lists of audiophiles with wildly different criteria. To me (as I've said before) the speaker which ticks all of my personal boxes, is the new Martin Logan CLX. Imaging, speed, low distortion and silky highs are its long suits. Of course, they need good subwoofers to make them a complete full-range system, but if one can afford a US$22,000 speaker system, what's another US$5,000 for subwoofers? |
#35
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"WB" wrote in message ...
Wow, This one is really all but impossible to answer. A hifi system is a package by which each component must work well with all the others. So, what speaker will sound best in a system has a lot to do with the amplifier that will drive it, the type of music you like, and your room acoustics. In general, I find that the most accurate sound seems to come from speakers with 5.25 - 6.5" woofers and a high quality tweeter. Although there is a law of diminishing returns, there is still a lot to be said for the old adage that you get what you pay for. Myself, I have had good luck with Sonus Faber, and Mirage (the stuff geared toward hifi and not home theater). I like the Paradigm Mini monitors as well (the bi ampable ones, not the cheap ones). None of these speakers are super expensive, but they do sound quite nice. I have heard some home made speakers that were amazing sounding as well. But, is there one 'perfect' speaker that is best? Probably not. I have never heard any speaker that sounds great with every amp and with every different type of music. Just listen to a few sets, preferably in your home with your other equipment, and let YOUR ears decide. We can suggest all the speakers in the world to you, but only you can say which sounds right to you. Ah, as I started reading this response, I thought it was related to my posting, but I realize it is not. But I do agree that a hifi system should be viewed as a whole and how the various components fit together. Speakers like the Teresonic Ingeniums sound very dry and realistic when driven by some amplifiers. With a big SET amplifier like the one I have driven by 211 tubes it sounds absolutely wonderful and with a lot of bass (it is a new version of the Teresonic 2A3 amp. shown here http://www.teresonic.com/product_amp.htm). With an Audio Note Oto SE tube amplifier it is sounding a bit thin and clinic although extremely detailed. Again acoustics in the room can change this balance too. -- Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards, Hans Kruse www.hanskrusephotography.com, www.hanskruse.com |
#36
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WB wrote:
Wow, This one is really all but impossible to answer. A hifi system is a package by which each component must work well with all the others. So, what speaker will sound best in a system has a lot to do with the amplifier that will drive it huh?? Huh?? Other than abnormal speakers (too low impedance) or amplifiers (not voltage sources) the amplifier simply does not matter. Its job is to produce a voltage at the speaker that is a magnified version of the source. the type of music you like, and your room acoustics. That's true. Doug McDonald |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In a world where...... | Audio Opinions | |||
The Best Property in The World….take look its….. | Audio Opinions | |||
The best speakers in the world are... | Audio Opinions | |||
The best speakers in the world are... | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Wad in the world is this?? | Vacuum Tubes |