[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg snotted:

Hearing them

Ignored feces.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg snotted:

Hearing them

Ignored feces.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg snotted:

Note

Ignored feces.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg snotted:

broken reverb tails,

Ignored feces.

[Harry Lavo]

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"John Corbett" wrote in message

In article ,
dizzy wrote:

John Corbett wrote:

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone
who knows how to use a web browser should be able to
download them without a problem. In fact, you don't
need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just
point and click,

Wrong. I saw no way to "download" them.

As I wrote, "... anyone who knows how to use a web
browser ..."
It ain't rocket surgery. ;-)


For example (using Firefox on a Linux box)

Go to Page Info (Tools menu, or just right-click in the
page if you prefer that) Select the Media tab
Select the desired file in the list, and then click the
"Save As ..." button.

Give us an example using Internet Explorer on an XP box, if it so simple.

Arny....I don't know what your problem is, but Jenn's page prompts you to
download Quicktime if you don't already have it installed and configured,
and then downloads the wave files and sets up mini-quicktime "controls" to
play them. Couldn't be simpler. Has the great PC builder forgotten the
basics, or have you so screwed up your machine that it doesn't operate
correctly, or have you simply lost you marbles over Jenn actually putting
music up on the web, when we all know it is reserved instead for samples.
And using a Mac as well to do that. Horrors!!

[dizzy]

John Corbett wrote:

In article , dizzy
wrote:

John Corbett wrote:

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who knows how to use
a web browser should be able to download them without a problem. In fact,
you don't need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just point and
click,

Wrong. I saw no way to "download" them.

As I wrote, "... anyone who knows how to use a web browser ..."
It ain't rocket surgery. ;-)

For example (using Firefox on a Linux box)

Go to Page Info (Tools menu, or just right-click in the page if you prefer that)
Select the Media tab
Select the desired file in the list, and then click the "Save As ..." button.

Using Firefox under XP here, and that does work (the right-click
method, but not the "Tools Menu" method).

Learn something new every day, I guess...

[Jenn]

In article ,
(John Corbett) wrote:

In article , "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

om
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

No, it is something that is not visible to web users as a standard .wav
file. It's all tied up in apple land.

Apparently Jenn, you've never downloaded a .wav file in your life, and so
you don't know the difference between a simply downloadable .wav file and
the abortion you're tried to foist on the world.

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who knows how to use
a web browser should be able to download them without a problem. In fact,
you don't need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just point and
click, and you don't even need to use the middle or right buttons on a
mouse. It's so simple a child could do it. However, you may want to wait
until the mp3 versions get posted---one .wav file is about 20 MB and the
other is about 50 MB.

First impressions: the recordings sound very nice. I'm not a guitarist,
so I'm not going to try to be picky about the performance. The recording
is successful in that I find it easier to listen to the music than to try
to focus on technical issues of the recording.

--JC

Thanks, John

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

There's a way to circumvent this,* which I used to get the actual .wav files
which are not the size that has been posted here. In the spirit of John
Corbett style nit picking I must point out that the files are not 50 and 20
megabytes as John said, but are instead 50,733 and 21,104 bytes.

The files are very crudely edited with considerable excess head room,

If you wish to be helpful, please explain.

way to
much silence at the beginnings

Not if you play the files as they are posted.


and crudely chopped-off reverb tails.

Especially on the Denver, I know. I wasn't sure if I should just let
them ring until inaudible, or what.


The chopped-off reverb tails suggest to me that as I suspected, the person
who edited them is losing their hearing.

My God, you're a pitiful little man. I told you that I'm a rookie at
this stuff. The tails are as they are because I'm experimenting with
this stuff. I was also in a hurry to get them done before leaving on my
NAMM trip (where I am tonight). I placed the mics after doing a bit of
reading and getting advice from other guitarists, hit the record button,
played each tune twice, and did some crude editing. I was looking for
advice on the sound quality (should I do something to the room? should
I use more or less reverb? Are the mics too close or too far? etc.)
Once I get better at some of those things, I'll work on the production
values, I'll do several more takes (both of these tunes are pretty new
to me, and they are new arrangements by me. One of the reasons I was
rushing to get them down before NAMM, was so I could get advice on the
arrangements from some of the world-class players in this style who will
be here), be more careful with the editing (which I'm also new to,
remember?), and so forth. But all of this is evidently beyond you.
Some people obviously have a teacher's spirit, and others don't. You
know, if you sent me a recording of your piano playing and asked for
comments on the quality, I would approach the task in an entirely
different way than you have here. And I certainly wouldn't blame errors
caused by your relative lack of experience on a made-up issue of your
hearing. What a jerk you are, Arny.

By the way, want to go get an audiometer test done and compare it with
mine here?

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"dizzy" wrote in message

John Atkinson wrote:

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

Touche.

"Touche" my arse.

Hearing them isn't the same as downloading them. Apparently this distinction
is lost on Jenn.

Did I say that they are the same? I must have missed that. My goal was
for people to be able to hear the files and offer comment on the sound,
that's all. I'm happy that you were able to do that, at last.

[Arny Krueger]

"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


Arny....I don't know what your problem is, but Jenn's
page prompts you to download Quicktime if you don't
already have it installed and configured, and then
downloads the wave files and sets up mini-quicktime
"controls" to play them.

Wrong. I have already quicktime already loaded - the free version. The
prompt that comes up says that I have to give Apple money if I want to save
the file.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

There's a way to circumvent this,* which I used to get
the actual .wav files which are not the size that has
been posted here. In the spirit of John Corbett style
nit picking I must point out that the files are not 50
and 20 megabytes as John said, but are instead 50,733
and 21,104 bytes.

The files are very crudely edited with considerable
excess head room,

If you wish to be helpful, please explain.

way to
much silence at the beginnings

Not if you play the files as they are posted.

If I do that, it takes more than 3 minutes from when I click the link to the
page until one of them will start playing.


and crudely chopped-off reverb tails.

Especially on the Denver, I know. I wasn't sure if I
should just let them ring until inaudible, or what.

Nahh Jenn, you didn't know about this fault until I pointed it out to you.
On Vinyl which you worship, all reverb tails end prematurely because they
are lost in the mud. You're out of the habit of listening to them.

The chopped-off reverb tails suggest to me that as I
suspected, the person who edited them is losing their
hearing.

My God, you're a pitiful little man.

That's it Jenn, I'm tired of your incessant biting of the hand that feeds.
You can go back to talking about me behind my face in public, you
passive-agressive creep! :-(

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

There's a way to circumvent this,* which I used to get
the actual .wav files which are not the size that has
been posted here. In the spirit of John Corbett style
nit picking I must point out that the files are not 50
and 20 megabytes as John said, but are instead 50,733
and 21,104 bytes.

The files are very crudely edited with considerable
excess head room,

If you wish to be helpful, please explain.

way to
much silence at the beginnings

Not if you play the files as they are posted.

If I do that, it takes more than 3 minutes from when I click the link to the
page until one of them will start playing.

Sorry. Go do dishes or something and come back. Or better yet, simply
ignore the whole thing.



and crudely chopped-off reverb tails.

Especially on the Denver, I know. I wasn't sure if I
should just let them ring until inaudible, or what.

Nahh Jenn, you didn't know about this fault until I pointed it out to you.

More BS by Arny.

On Vinyl which you worship,

More BS by Arny.

all reverb tails end prematurely because they
are lost in the mud. You're out of the habit of listening to them.

Whatever you do, make sure that you don't offer something useful, OK?


The chopped-off reverb tails suggest to me that as I
suspected, the person who edited them is losing their
hearing.

My God, you're a pitiful little man.

That's it Jenn, I'm tired of your incessant biting of the hand that feeds.

What is it that you believe you're "feeding"? And if you want the
"biting" (known by most people as "self defense"), simply stop being a
jerk and offer something useful.

You can go back to talking about me behind my face in public,

Huh? What is "behind your face"?

you
passive-agressive creep! :-(

As opposed to simply aggressive? Does this mean that you'll ignore me
from now on? :-)