[Jenn]

Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting in recording my
playing. I just together a crude website with two tunes on it. I'd
appreciate any comments on the SOUND that is present. Both files have a
bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be welcome as I try to get
better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and dirty", wanting
to get some comments before I leave for NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second page, labeled
"Blank".

Thanks for any help!

Jenn

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. I just together a crude website
with two tunes on it. I'd appreciate any comments on the
SOUND that is present. Both files have a bit of reverb,
otherwise no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be welcome
as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3 format, not some ^%#!
Apple junk that requires people purchase more Apple software just to
download.

[Arny Krueger]

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. I just together a crude
website with two tunes on it. I'd appreciate any
comments on the SOUND that is present. Both files have
a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing.
Too much highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would
be welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires people
purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in the generally-accepted
way, and not ram Apple cores down our throats.

[Jenn]

In article
,
MiNe 109 wrote:

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

et
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. I just together a crude website
with two tunes on it. I'd appreciate any comments on the
SOUND that is present. Both files have a bit of reverb,
otherwise no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be welcome
as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3 format, not some
^%#!
Apple junk that requires people purchase more Apple software just to
download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

Stephen

Correct.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. I just together a crude website
with two tunes on it. I'd appreciate any comments on the
SOUND that is present. Both files have a bit of reverb,
otherwise no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be welcome
as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3 format, not some ^%#!
Apple junk that requires people purchase more Apple software just to
download.

It's a .wav file, to be listened to on the site.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
net
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. I just together a crude
website with two tunes on it. I'd appreciate any
comments on the SOUND that is present. Both files have
a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing.
Too much highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would
be welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires people
purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in the generally-accepted
way, and not ram Apple cores down our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps you should take
yours to a qualified technician.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
net
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been
experimenting in recording my playing. I just
together a crude website with two tunes on it. I'd
appreciate any comments on the SOUND that is present.
Both files have a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or
other processing. Too much highs/lows/noise, etc....
any comments would be welcome as I try to get better
at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick
and dirty", wanting to get some comments before I
leave for NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the
second page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires people
purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in
the generally-accepted way, and not ram Apple cores down
our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

As usual Jenn, you've missed the point and covered it with snot.

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

[John Atkinson[_2_]]

On Jan 17, 9:46*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
net
As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. *I just together a crude
website with two tunes on it. *I'd appreciate any
comments on the SOUND that is present. *Both files have
a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing.
Too much highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would
be welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! *I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts *Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

I think that someone should learn how to do things in the
generally accepted way, and not ram Apple cores down our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. *Perhaps you
should take yours to a qualified technician.

Touche. The files played fine on my PC using Internet Explorer,
Jenn. Nice playing. I especially liked the sound of the Spence:
a suitably warm midrange which can easily be diminished on
recordings of steel-strung guitars.

Interesting to see you play with the instrument on your right
thigh than in the approved classical manner.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[Jenn]

In article
,
John Atkinson wrote:

On Jan 17, 9:46*am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in
message

gy.
net
As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. *I just together a crude
website with two tunes on it. *I'd appreciate any
comments on the SOUND that is present. *Both files have
a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing.
Too much highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would
be welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! *I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts *Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

I think that someone should learn how to do things in the
generally accepted way, and not ram Apple cores down our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. *Perhaps you
should take yours to a qualified technician.

Touche. The files played fine on my PC using Internet Explorer,
Jenn. Nice playing. I especially liked the sound of the Spence:
a suitably warm midrange which can easily be diminished on
recordings of steel-strung guitars.

Thanks, John. That midrange may well be the instrument. They are both
really great instruments, but that Martin Custom Laurence Juber (my
friend and teacher) has GREAT warmth, I think.


Interesting to see you play with the instrument on your right
thigh than in the approved classical manner.

Yeah, I have no classical technique at all (ironically). I'm in the
style of LJ, Ed Gerhard, Doug Smith, Tommy Emmanuel, et al. all of whom
play "right legged". BTW, if you like that kind of music, you should
look up those players. Unbelievable great.

Thanks again!

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
net
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been
experimenting in recording my playing. I just
together a crude website with two tunes on it. I'd
appreciate any comments on the SOUND that is present.
Both files have a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or
other processing. Too much highs/lows/noise, etc....
any comments would be welcome as I try to get better
at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick
and dirty", wanting to get some comments before I
leave for NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the
second page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires people
purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in
the generally-accepted way, and not ram Apple cores down
our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

As usual Jenn, you've missed the point and covered it with snot.

No, I got the point exactly. And am replying to YOUR snot. As far as
anyone can show, I never have snotted you first.


Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

[Jenn]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

...
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting in recording my
playing. I just together a crude website with two tunes on it. I'd
appreciate any comments on the SOUND that is present. Both files have a
bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be welcome as I try to get
better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and dirty", wanting
to get some comments before I leave for NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second page, labeled
"Blank".

Thanks for any help!

I had to install Quicktime to listen.

Yeah, seem like that's the thing. I'm new to the recording software,
and I've not made a website with Apple's software, so I'm learning.
I'll load mp3 files later today.


Both sounded great on a quick listen on my office system
(old large Advents).

Thanks.


There was one early neck screech on My Sweet Lady
that made my teeth hurt...or maybe its just cuz I'm on my
way to my dentist

Ouch. Good luck with that.


I did find something on my speaker project.
Tool coat appears to be the same stuff they use
as that neck lube spray I got at quitar center
except it holds up longer and you get
about 100 times volume for the same price.
Stuff is made for putting a durable low friction
surface on table saws. Compatible with wood
surfaces according to the can. I bet it would
work great on a quitar neck...maybe try an old
one first.

ScottW

The sound isn't the neck, but rather from the strings. If my technique
were better, I could eliminate that somewhat. I'll work on it!

Thanks for commenting.

[Jenn]

In article
,
MiNe 109 wrote:

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
net
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been experimenting
in recording my playing. I just together a crude
website with two tunes on it. I'd appreciate any
comments on the SOUND that is present. Both files have
a bit of reverb, otherwise no EQ or other processing.
Too much highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would
be welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick and
dirty", wanting to get some comments before I leave for
NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the second
page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires people
purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in the
generally-accepted
way, and not ram Apple cores down our throats.

Hmm...(fires up IE), no, the second page no longer appears. Better read
the rest of the thread...

Well, a google including quicktime, plugin and windows brings up plenty
o' free stuff if your browser can't handle playback.

I also believe it's generally accepted for artists to want to share
playback but to disable downloads at their prerogative.

Stephen

THanks, Stephen. The Apple program did it as Quicktime by default.
I'll do mp3 files later today. I'm in the early learning stages of both
pieces of software.

[Bill Riel]

In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-9DDC39.09451417012008
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
says...

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

Indeed - and I had no problem listening to the files on my windows
machine.

Sounds very nice to me, but I'm hardly an expert in such matters.

--
Bill

[Jenn]

In article ,
Bill Riel wrote:

In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-9DDC39.09451417012008
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
says...

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

Indeed - and I had no problem listening to the files on my windows
machine.

Sounds very nice to me, but I'm hardly an expert in such matters.

--
Bill

Thanks, Bill

[Bill Riel]

In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-0C7716.09493317012008
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
says...

THanks, Stephen. The Apple program did it as Quicktime by default.
I'll do mp3 files later today. I'm in the early learning stages of both
pieces of software.

If you don't mind others downloading the audio files, you can simply
link directly to the .mp3 or .wav files. Otherwise there's nothing wrong
with Quicktime. Most windows (and all Mac) users will have a copy of the
player.

--
Bill

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

y.
net
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been
experimenting in recording my playing. I just
together a crude website with two tunes on it. I'd
appreciate any comments on the SOUND that is
present. Both files have a bit of reverb, otherwise
no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be
welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick
and dirty", wanting to get some comments before I
leave for NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the
second page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or
.mp3 format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires
people purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in
the generally-accepted way, and not ram Apple cores
down our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

As usual Jenn, you've missed the point and covered it
with snot.

No, I got the point exactly. And am replying to YOUR
snot. As far as anyone can show, I never have snotted
you first.


Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

No, it is something that is not visible to web users as a standard .wav
file. It's all tied up in apple land.

Apparently Jenn, you've never downloaded a .wav file in your life, and so
you don't know the difference between a simply downloadable .wav file and
the abortion you're tried to foist on the world.

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message
.
com
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"MiNe 109" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

ig
y.
net
Hi all,

As I've written of earlier here, I've been
experimenting in recording my playing. I just
together a crude website with two tunes on it. I'd
appreciate any comments on the SOUND that is
present. Both files have a bit of reverb, otherwise
no EQ or other processing. Too much
highs/lows/noise, etc.... any comments would be
welcome as I try to get better at this.

Please forgive the playing! I did it kind of "quick
and dirty", wanting to get some comments before I
leave for NAMM weekend.

The site is: web.mac.com/jennconducts Go to the
second page, labeled "Blank".

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or
.mp3 format, not some ^%#! Apple junk that requires
people purchase more Apple software just to download.

I think you're meant to play them in your browser.

I think that someone should learn how to do things in
the generally-accepted way, and not ram Apple cores
down our throats.

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

As usual Jenn, you've missed the point and covered it
with snot.

No, I got the point exactly. And am replying to YOUR
snot. As far as anyone can show, I never have snotted
you first.


Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

No, it is something that is not visible to web users as a standard .wav
file. It's all tied up in apple land.

First of all, as I've stated, I'm new to these things. I'm new to the
recording software, and I've never created a webpage with Apple's
program. So I'm learning. When I learn how to put the file up without
using Quicktime, I'll do so. Second, I thought that Quicktime was all
over the place these days. A Dell that we just purchased came with it,
for example. Scott can listen to it on his Windows machine. I haven't
heard from anyone else telling me that they can't listen to it.


Apparently Jenn, you've never downloaded a .wav file in your life, and so
you don't know the difference between a simply downloadable .wav file

Of course I have. And, as I wrote above, when I figure out how to do it
another way, I'll do so.

and
the abortion you're tried to foist on the world.

"Abortion"? lol I'm sorry that you can't listen to it. If you don't
care to download Quicktime and listen, that's fine. I didn't expect you
to do me the favor of giving me your input.

[Bill Riel]

In article -
state.edu, says...

Why don't you just listen on your browser (with a free plug-in if you
don't have one already)?

Because there's no recordings of 'castanets' on Jenn's web page?

--
Bill

[Bill Riel]

In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-74DA49.14075217012008
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com,
says...

"Abortion"? lol

Well, Arny would know. Have you visited pcabx.com lately?

--
Bill

[Jenn]

On Jan 17, 2:46*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,
*Bill Riel wrote:

In article -
state.edu, says...

Why don't you just listen on your browser (with a free plug-in if you
don't have one already)?

Because there's no recordings of 'castanets' on Jenn's web page?

I wonder why The Soup's "Clip of the Week" synthesized 'tah-dah' seems
so familiar.

Stephen

Did Arny ever remember from where he got those synth files? Come to
think of it, did he ever admit that they are synth files? IIRC, he
first tried to say that they were real trumpets, horns, etc.

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said to The Big ****:

the abortion you're tried to foist on the world.

"Abortion"? lol I'm sorry that you can't listen to it. If you don't
care to download Quicktime and listen, that's fine. I didn't expect you
to do me the favor of giving me your input.

Krooger is the only living creature for whom inputs are what the rest of
the natural world calls outputs.

;-)

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

Why don't you just listen on your browser (with a free plug-in if you
don't have one already)?

That would defeat the purpose of self-perpetuating argumentation. Really,
Stephen, after all these years, I'm surprised you haven't learned that
serving as fodder for the "debating trade" is audio's highest and best
purpose.

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

Why don't you just listen on your browser (with a free plug-in if you
don't have one already)?

That would defeat the purpose of self-perpetuating argumentation. Really,
Stephen, after all these years, I'm surprised you haven't learned that
serving as fodder for the "debating trade" is audio's highest and best
purpose.

My other favorite game is "guess what I'm not telling you".

That's a good one. There's also the SoCal variation, which I think you've
called "I'm gonna argue with something I wish you'd said".

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 said:

Did Arny ever remember from where he got those synth files? Come to
think of it, did he ever admit that they are synth files? IIRC, he
first tried to say that they were real trumpets, horns, etc.

I think that's right, but discussions of those samples predates this
go-round.

As the Krooborg might say if he could find the words: "Honesty is for
Normals."

[John Corbett]

In article , "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

No, it is something that is not visible to web users as a standard .wav
file. It's all tied up in apple land.

Apparently Jenn, you've never downloaded a .wav file in your life, and so
you don't know the difference between a simply downloadable .wav file and
the abortion you're tried to foist on the world.

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who knows how to use
a web browser should be able to download them without a problem. In fact,
you don't need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just point and
click, and you don't even need to use the middle or right buttons on a
mouse. It's so simple a child could do it. However, you may want to wait
until the mp3 versions get posted---one .wav file is about 20 MB and the
other is about 50 MB.

First impressions: the recordings sound very nice. I'm not a guitarist,
so I'm not going to try to be picky about the performance. The recording
is successful in that I find it easier to listen to the music than to try
to focus on technical issues of the recording.

--JC

[dizzy]

Bill Riel wrote:

In article jennconductsREMOVETHIS-9DDC39.09451417012008
,
says...

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

Indeed - and I had no problem listening to the files on my windows
machine.

If you have QuickTime, which I certainly do not. Nor do I want it.

[dizzy]

John Corbett wrote:

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who knows how to use
a web browser should be able to download them without a problem. In fact,
you don't need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just point and
click,

Wrong. I saw no way to "download" them.

[dizzy]

Jenn wrote:

I had to install Quicktime to listen.

Yeah, seem like that's the thing. I'm new to the recording software,
and I've not made a website with Apple's software, so I'm learning.
I'll load mp3 files later today.

Also, best form, when requesting people visit a site, is to provide a
clickable link, instead of something that needs to be copied and
pasted.

http://web.mac.com/jennconducts/Site/Blank.html

[dizzy]

John Atkinson wrote:

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. *Perhaps you
should take yours to a qualified technician.

Touche.

"Touche" my arse.

[George M. Middius]

John Corbett said ****-for-Dinner:

Apparently Jenn, you've never downloaded a .wav file in your life, and so
you don't know the difference between a simply downloadable .wav file and
the abortion[sic] you're tried to foist on the world.

Religious proselytizing noted, LOt"S.

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who knows how to use
a web browser should be able to download them without a problem.

Thank's Johhn for, dumping snot Jonh all over Arnii Krooborg's latest
attempt to martyr himself Jonn.

you don't need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just point and
click, and you don't even need to use the middle or right buttons on a
mouse. It's so simple a child could do it.

The Krooborg wants to know where this alleged "child" is. Clearly some
"training sessions" are in order. ;-)

[John Atkinson[_2_]]

On Jan 17, 9:11 pm, dizzy wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

Touche.

"Touche" my arse.

Sorry, I meant touché, of course.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[John Corbett]

In article , dizzy
wrote:

John Corbett wrote:

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who knows how to use
a web browser should be able to download them without a problem. In fact,
you don't need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just point and
click,

Wrong. I saw no way to "download" them.

As I wrote, "... anyone who knows how to use a web browser ..."
It ain't rocket surgery. ;-)


For example (using Firefox on a Linux box)

Go to Page Info (Tools menu, or just right-click in the page if you prefer that)
Select the Media tab
Select the desired file in the list, and then click the "Save As ..." button.


--JC

[Arny Krueger]

"John Corbett" wrote in message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in
message

In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:


Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if
you can get this:

The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3
The standards for downloads like this are .wav or .mp3

Since you didn't get it the first time, let's see if you
can get this:

It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file
It IS a .wav file

No, it is something that is not visible to web users as
a standard .wav file. It's all tied up in apple land.

Apparently Jenn, you've never downloaded a .wav file in
your life, and so you don't know the difference between
a simply downloadable .wav file and the abortion you're
tried to foist on the world.

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone who
knows how to use a web browser should be able to download
them without a problem.

Good John, why don't you tell us how you downloaded those files into the My
Documents folder of your computer.
Good

[Arny Krueger]

"John Corbett" wrote in message

In article ,
dizzy wrote:

John Corbett wrote:

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone
who knows how to use a web browser should be able to
download them without a problem. In fact, you don't
need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just
point and click,

Wrong. I saw no way to "download" them.

As I wrote, "... anyone who knows how to use a web
browser ..."
It ain't rocket surgery. ;-)


For example (using Firefox on a Linux box)

Go to Page Info (Tools menu, or just right-click in the
page if you prefer that) Select the Media tab
Select the desired file in the list, and then click the
"Save As ..." button.

Give us an example using Internet Explorer on an XP box, if it so simple.

[Arny Krueger]

"dizzy" wrote in message

John Atkinson wrote:

I've heard the files on two Windows machines. Perhaps
you should take yours to a qualified technician.

Touche.

"Touche" my arse.

Hearing them isn't the same as downloading them. Apparently this distinction
is lost on Jenn.

[Arny Krueger]

"John Corbett" wrote in message

In article ,
dizzy wrote:

John Corbett wrote:

The two files in question ARE .wav files, and anyone
who knows how to use a web browser should be able to
download them without a problem. In fact, you don't
need to touch a keyboard to do that---it's all just
point and click,

Wrong. I saw no way to "download" them.

As I wrote, "... anyone who knows how to use a web
browser ..."
It ain't rocket surgery. ;-)


For example (using Firefox on a Linux box)

Go to Page Info (Tools menu, or just right-click in the
page if you prefer that) Select the Media tab
Select the desired file in the list, and then click the
"Save As ..." button.

Doesn't work that way using the mainstream browser running on the mainstream
operating system, IOW IE7 running under XP. When you right click, you get
an ad telling you to buy apple software.

Common sense would suggest that anything posted on the web should be tested
to see how it downloads using the most widely used browser running on the
most widely used operating

There's a way to circumvent this,* which I used to get the actual .wav files
which are not the size that has been posted here. In the spirit of John
Corbett style nit picking I must point out that the files are not 50 and 20
megabytes as John said, but are instead 50,733 and 21,104 bytes.

The files are very crudely edited with considerable excess head room, way to
much silence at the beginnings and crudely chopped-off reverb tails.

The chopped-off reverb tails suggest to me that as I suspected, the person
who edited them is losing their hearing.

* One can find the files in Temporary Internet Files after they download.
Note that you have to wait for both of them to download before Jenn's page
displays itself completely. IOW, you have to download 70 megabytes of data
before the page will even display properly.

[Arny Krueger]

"John Atkinson" wrote in
message


Touche. The files played fine on my PC using Internet
Explorer,
Jenn. Nice playing. I especially liked the sound of the
Spence:
a suitably warm midrange which can easily be diminished on
recordings of steel-strung guitars.

Note that John didn't hear the truncated reverb tails, either.

[Arny Krueger]

"dizzy" wrote in message

Jenn wrote:

I had to install Quicktime to listen.

Yeah, seem like that's the thing. I'm new to the
recording software, and I've not made a website with
Apple's software, so I'm learning. I'll load mp3 files
later today.

Also, best form, when requesting people visit a site, is
to provide a clickable link, instead of something that
needs to be copied and pasted.

http://web.mac.com/jennconducts/Site/Blank.html

If you want to take a look at the broken reverb tails, you can find copies
of the files in temporary internet files.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg snotted:

Good John

Ignored feces.

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg snotted:

Give us

Ignored feces.