Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff: My 1995 JVC receiver specifies 8-16ohms. Guess that's an oldie then!
|
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Trevor! Everyone who visits my place think I have a nice sounding system, cheapo receiver aside. smh...
http://www.hifiengine.com/files/imag....prev iew.jpg |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor wrote:
"On 3/12/2014 10:28 AM, wrote: Thanks Trevor! Everyone who visits my place think I have a nice sounding system, cheapo receiver aside. smh... http://www.hifiengine.com/files/imag....prev iew.jpg As always, as long as it can drive your speakers, the speakers and room (and quality of source material) determine the sound quality, NOT your receiver! And your friends probably have no idea what good sound is anyway. Most don't. Trevor. " Well, perhaps we could arrange for you to come and listen to my cheap, crappy receiver & speakers and decide for yourself, thank you very much. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/12/2014 12:08 AM, wrote:
Trevor wrote: "On 3/12/2014 10:28 AM, wrote: Thanks Trevor! Everyone who visits my place think I have a nice sounding system, cheapo receiver aside. smh... http://www.hifiengine.com/files/imag....prev iew.jpg As always, as long as it can drive your speakers, the speakers and room (and quality of source material) determine the sound quality, NOT your receiver! And your friends probably have no idea what good sound is anyway. Most don't. Well, perhaps we could arrange for you to come and listen to my cheap, crappy receiver & speakers and decide for yourself, thank you very much. I seriously doubt that's gonna happen, but the real question is "why do you care what others think anyway"? As long as YOU are happy! Trevor. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Trevor" wrote in message
... On 2/12/2014 12:19 AM, wrote: geoff: My 1995 JVC receiver specifies 8-16ohms. Guess that's an oldie then! Many cheap receivers with limited current capability specify 8 ohms or more, regardless of age. Conversely many good amps can handle loads as low as 2 ohms without a problem. Trevor. Speaker impedances have not really changed - they are rating them a bit more accurately these days. Mark Z. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/12/2014 12:21 AM, Mark Zacharias wrote:
"Trevor" wrote in message ... On 2/12/2014 12:19 AM, wrote: geoff: My 1995 JVC receiver specifies 8-16ohms. Guess that's an oldie then! Many cheap receivers with limited current capability specify 8 ohms or more, regardless of age. Conversely many good amps can handle loads as low as 2 ohms without a problem. Speaker impedances have not really changed - they are rating them a bit more accurately these days. Mark Z. Partly true to the second part, mostly no to the first part. Some manufacturers use the impedance minimum fairly closely these days. Others are just an estimate of what they think the amp rating should be. But speaker impedances HAVE generally dropped over the last 50 years or so. First with the change from valve amps they generally went from ~16ohm to 8ohm. Then with the improvement in current handling of transistor amps (and the increase in multiple small bass drivers vs one larger driver), many have dropped from ~8ohm to ~6 or 4 ohm. In any case ALL speakers vary wildly in *impedance* across the frequency range, especially ported speakers, but the voice coil *resistance* of many drivers has decreased. That affects the system impedance, and is easy to measure. And some manufacturers still produce their drivers with voice coil resistance options, or even custom make them if you buy enough. Trevor. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor wrote: "In any case ALL speakers vary wildly in *impedance* across the frequency
range, especially ported speakers, but" So given that, the question should be, are mfgs listing the avg, max, or min impedance on the cabinet spec sticker? |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Trevor" wrote in message
... On 3/12/2014 12:21 AM, Mark Zacharias wrote: "Trevor" wrote in message ... On 2/12/2014 12:19 AM, wrote: geoff: My 1995 JVC receiver specifies 8-16ohms. Guess that's an oldie then! Many cheap receivers with limited current capability specify 8 ohms or more, regardless of age. Conversely many good amps can handle loads as low as 2 ohms without a problem. Speaker impedances have not really changed - they are rating them a bit more accurately these days. Mark Z. Partly true to the second part, mostly no to the first part. Some manufacturers use the impedance minimum fairly closely these days. Others are just an estimate of what they think the amp rating should be. But speaker impedances HAVE generally dropped over the last 50 years or so. First with the change from valve amps they generally went from ~16ohm to 8ohm. Then with the improvement in current handling of transistor amps (and the increase in multiple small bass drivers vs one larger driver), many have dropped from ~8ohm to ~6 or 4 ohm. In any case ALL speakers vary wildly in *impedance* across the frequency range, especially ported speakers, but the voice coil *resistance* of many drivers has decreased. That affects the system impedance, and is easy to measure. And some manufacturers still produce their drivers with voice coil resistance options, or even custom make them if you buy enough. Trevor. What I meant to suggest is that so-called "8-ohm" speakers have always actually been closer to 5 or 6 ohms. Should have been clearer. mz |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Zacharias" skrev i en meddelelse
... What I meant to suggest is that so-called "8-ohm" speakers have always actually been closer to 5 or 6 ohms. Should have been clearer. And this is because the loudspeaker impedance spec still just tries to tell you what tap on an output transformer it is suggested that you should use. It does however appears to be so that some manufacturers "slide" some of their "8 ohm" designs down in load impedance to get them just a wee bit louder in practical use because it allows them to use less magnet or because more magnet does not fit the chassis well, as could be the case with the Coral 8F60. Unfortunately it didn't have the powerhandling to match the increased power drawn from the amplifier and/or was optimistically spec'ed by Coral, be warned ye that gather Coral stuff, divide its powerhandling spec by 2 or 3, there are no more repkits, even if the 2420 kit will fit a M100 physically. I don't really know whether they also get away with using less copper, that would be a win win. But I wonder, I remember Dick Pierce explaining how design parameters fit in a way that suggests that a nominal 8 Ohm design is the most cost & power efficient. On a more serious note: transistor amplifiers should be able to drive half the nominal loudspeaker load because that is how the real world loudspeaker load is likely to look anyway once phase between voltage and current is allowed for. Note that this phase angle issue between voltage and current means that the zero crossing in AC is an unplesant place to be for an amplifier with current being ordered from the loudspeaker and no output voltage available. mz Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/12/2014 1:01 p.m., Mark Zacharias wrote:
Trevor. What I meant to suggest is that so-called "8-ohm" speakers have always actually been closer to 5 or 6 ohms. Should have been clearer. mz That is equally false. An 8 ohm driver will often have a DC RESISTANCE often around 6 ohms, but it's impedance will likely be very different, and change with frequency. Then throw in a crossover network and you'll have even wider variation. geoff |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote: "On 2/12/2014 2:19 a.m., wrote:
geoff: My 1995 JVC receiver specifies 8-16ohms. Guess that's an oldie then! Certainly pandering to people from a different era. Probably said that to avoid tech-support calls from the elderly. Doubt there have been any (domestic hifi) speakers sold since mid-70s that spec at 16 ohms ! geoff" My dB Plus 880s are speced 8ohms. Not all that outlandish. ![]() |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, December 5, 2014 11:10:29 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
On 5/12/2014 12:00 p.m., .com wrote: geoff wrote: "On 2/12/2014 2:19 a.m., wrote: geoff: My 1995 JVC receiver specifies 8-16ohms. Guess that's an oldie then! Certainly pandering to people from a different era. Probably said that to avoid tech-support calls from the elderly. Doubt there have been any (domestic hifi) speakers sold since mid-70s that spec at 16 ohms ! geoff" My dB Plus 880s are speced 8ohms. Not all that outlandish. ![]() Read again . geoff Read what again, geoff? I'm not psychic. |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pioneer Stereo Receiver Model SX-939- No audio coming out of the receiver. | High End Audio | |||
Crackling/popping coming from speakers, cutting out at higher volume | Car Audio | |||
Second Coming? | Pro Audio | |||
Static coming from speakers | Car Audio |