Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... That's sort of what the aural exciter is. It's so clean it hurts. I assume the smiley is implied? Otherwise how can deliberately adding distortion be "so clean it hurts"! Because the distortion that it adds is exactly the sort of distortion that people perceive as being "cleaner." It make everything bright and shiny and with kind of a glassy sheen to the sound. It adds artificial detail, if you want to think about it that way. Just like the Pepsi challenge, if you do a quick A/B test people will always pick the brighter and snappier signal. With sustained listening they tend to change their mind, though. This is why I am always skeptical of claims of "more detail." Exactly. What you could have said was "so shiny it hurts", but it certainly aint CLEAN by any normal audio definition! Trevor. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Behringer Tube UltraGain T1953 | Pro Audio | |||
Behringer mic200 vs ART TUBE MP OPL | General | |||
behringer mic100 ultragain tube? opinions? | Pro Audio | |||
Behringer Tube Ultragain Mic200 | Pro Audio | |||
bass response sounded better at circuit city | Tech |