Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:18:58 -0700 (PDT), RichD
wrote: I have the standard earpod set, which came with my armband MP3 player. It pops out every 2 minutes. How did these things become the standard design? They suck. So now i'm looking for the earbud style, i.e. inside the ear. They range from $8 to $40, and Shure offers a set, over $100?!? For something so small, how can there be such a range? Is there really such quality difference? They are all sealed in blister packs, there's no chance to compare. Even if there were, differences in environment, time of day, etc. swamp perceptual discernment. How would you go about testing these things, in the lab? Actually,Shure had a set for $500 at one time. What they are, from an engineering standpoint, is a closed cell audio environment, which wouldn't be much different than the engineering behind the old, "acoustic suspension" speaker systems, where your inner ear is the "speaker box" side. The transducers can blow out your eardrum if they are made (read engineered) incorrectly. They have to be limited, but the limitation cannot cause any dampening either. Of course, you can blow your own ears out by cranking some amp though them, but most headphone amps (battery operated) are limited. Any of the good speaker makers would probably be a good choice. Klipsch, Shure. I wouldn't pay for any hyped company like Monster or those rapper 'products'. They only prove that 'sucker born every minute' thing. Mine cost $12 (JVC), and they sound great! I am sure something 2 or 3 times that would certainly sound better, I just do not have the cash for something I do not use that often right now. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Earbuds? | Pro Audio | |||
Using Consumer Earbuds | Pro Audio | |||
Earbuds break | Tech | |||
Wireless earbuds | Audio Opinions | |||
looking for good earbuds | General |