| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond
"Steven Sullivan" wrote in message
... Farrell8882 wrote: From: "langvid" I cannot say the same for the mass production labels such as DG. (So far, I have not been impressed with the few DG SACDs that I have listened to). I don't buy DG unless it's something I really, really, really want to hear. I've felt this way since the LP era. There are a few exceptions, but DG sound is usually shrill-sounding to moi. Which would tend to be due to their recording/miking methods, rather than PCM vs DSD. IIRC, Yep, multi-mic'rs to the hilt. DGM chose PCM over SACD as an archiving method after some consideration of the technical and audible merits of each. Given their reputation for having a "tin ear" when it comes to the sound of their recordings, I'm not sure that is much of an endorsement.. ;-) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 2/5) | Car Audio | |||
| "DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond | High End Audio | |||
| Why all the bad recordings | High End Audio | |||
| Why don't classical piano recordings sound as good as pop recordings? | High End Audio | |||
| Newbie question: system upgrade | High End Audio | |||
Threaded Mode