Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm searching for a new house to live in, and one of the criteria is a nice
room to be used as a dedicated stereo room (2 channel). I'm looking at one house that doesn't have a room yet, but has the space for it. It's a prewired for power and prevented for HVAC. Basically an unfinished bonus room over the garage. The problem is, it's not exactly a rectangle shape. Although it is symmetrical. But I just don't know how the shape of the room might affect the acoustics. Basically it has 2 rafters that would jut below the ceiling at one end of the room (this could be either the listening end or speaker end). I don't have photos, which I could get next time I look at the house, but in the meantime is there a starting point for me to learn more about the negative (or positive) affects of these sorts of room idiosynchrasies? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jeffc" wrote in message
... I'm searching for a new house to live in, and one of the criteria is a nice room to be used as a dedicated stereo room (2 channel). I'm looking at one house that doesn't have a room yet, but has the space for it. It's a prewired for power and prevented for HVAC. Basically an unfinished bonus room over the garage. The problem is, it's not exactly a rectangle shape. Although it is symmetrical. But I just don't know how the shape of the room might affect the acoustics. Basically it has 2 rafters that would jut below the ceiling at one end of the room (this could be either the listening end or speaker end). I don't have photos, which I could get next time I look at the house, but in the meantime is there a starting point for me to learn more about the negative (or positive) affects of these sorts of room idiosynchrasies? A few: * You don't want it to be approximately square...that will almost certainly create an obnoxious set of bass standing waves. * An open, so-called cathedral ceiling would definitely be a plus. * The set of rafters probably would not be an issue (but this is based on imperfect understanding from your description). Let us know more. Dimensions or a link to photos would definitely help. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some info on room acoustics can be found at
http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/gen...ges/73758.html On non-rectangular rooms I've found two papers Noise control engineering 1979, Nov., p.112 : Van Nieuwland : Eigenmodes in non-rectangular reverberation rooms Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989, vol.85, p.772 : Milner : An investigationof the modal characteristics on nonrectangular reverberation rooms The main difference between the rectangular and the nonrectangular room is the fact that the axial and tangential modes are not existing, only the oblique modes are active. This results in a more regular distribution of the modes than one would find in a rectangular room with optimum dimension ratios. A regular distribution of modes avoids the occurrence of large dips or peaks in the frequency response curve. This led to the conclusion that nonrectangular rooms are superior (Nieuwland). Milner determined optimum dimensions of a nonrectangular room with parallel floor and ceiling to be : a = 6,30 m, b = 5,24 m, c = 10,35 m , d = 7,00 m, e = 7,91 m, with a height of 4,93 m (see Fig. 14 from Milner). The pressure variation from maximum to minimum for each individual mode will be the same as in a rectangular room. The superposition of modes, however, will yield smaller spatial variations. Figures 5a and 5d (from Nieuwland) show modal patterns of a two- dimensional room of 5 by 7 m for two different frequencies. The lines connect points with equal sound pressure. The thick lines represent the nodal lines of the standing waves. Figure 9 (from Nieuwland) shows the pattern for a three-dimensional room. Again, the lines connect points with equal sound pressure. The dotted lines represent the nodal lines of the standing waves. Due to the somewhat unexpected behaviour of the modal characteristics of nonrectangular rooms, the resonance frequencies for each particular room shape have to be calculated (Finite Element methods) in order to know whether the frequency distribution is as desired. Klaus |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Lavo wrote:
"jeffc" wrote in message ... I'm searching for a new house to live in, and one of the criteria is a nice room to be used as a dedicated stereo room (2 channel). I'm looking at one house that doesn't have a room yet, but has the space for it. It's a prewired for power and prevented for HVAC. Basically an unfinished bonus room over the garage. The problem is, it's not exactly a rectangle shape. Although it is symmetrical. But I just don't know how the shape of the room might affect the acoustics. Basically it has 2 rafters that would jut below the ceiling at one end of the room (this could be either the listening end or speaker end). I don't have photos, which I could get next time I look at the house, but in the meantime is there a starting point for me to learn more about the negative (or positive) affects of these sorts of room idiosynchrasies? A few: * You don't want it to be approximately square...that will almost certainly create an obnoxious set of bass standing waves. * An open, so-called cathedral ceiling would definitely be a plus. * The set of rafters probably would not be an issue (but this is based on imperfect understanding from your description). Let us know more. Dimensions or a link to photos would definitely help. I agree and I have seen all manner of rooms have their effective shape changed with acoustical panels. Also if it is a true "bonus room" with no other function, you can throw up a wall or ceiling anywhere you like. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Room acoustics | Audio Opinions | |||
room acoustics | High End Audio | |||
Room acoustics | Audio Opinions | |||
small room acoustics | Pro Audio | |||
room acoustics | General |