Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi:
Creative Music Synth -- my favorite *soundcard*-based MIDI synth-- is the chip-based, hardware, digital FM synth present on the SoundBlaster 16 ISA card. Creative Music Synth usually has and I/O address of 220 -- hence, Creative Music Synth [220]. However, I have seen Creative Music Synth set at 240 on some PCs. Creative Music Synth does not -- to any extent -- playback samples from memory. It freshly generates its tones. It is physically built to generates its tones from scratch without stealing any energy from the PC's main CPU. As such, Creative Music Synth does not have or need any moving parts -- no discs, no fans, etc. Notes on out-of-phase stereo signals in Creative Music Synth: 1. I try playing Creative Music Synth, through my so called 'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel -- which results in anything identical in both the left and right channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left and right channels. When I play the Creative Music Synth audio through the voice-canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and crisper [qualities that I like] than when I don't use the voice canceller. The waveforms with sawtooth-wave characteristics are phased differently in the L and R channels, while those with sine-wave characteristics are phased identically in the L and R channels. 2. The voice-cancellor remove whats phased similarly in L and R while preserving what phased differently in the L and R channels. Sawtooth waves tend to give a much brighter and warmer feel than sine waves do. If anyone has a valid email address, I can email him/her two WMA audio files from the MIDI audio of Creative Music Synth. File A is converted to mono without inverting the phase of either channel. File B is converted to mono after inverting the phase of the left channel. IOW, file A is not "voice-cancelled", while file B is. After listening to them, you certainly will notice the difference I describe. 3. The signals that are phased similarly in L and R are removed, while signals phased differently are not removed. I am sure -- though I could be wrong -- that Creative Labs deliberately made these phase differences in the stereo Creative-Music-Synth. The sounds that are phased similarly in L and R sound like sine-waves [such as a "whine" or "hum"] while the tones that are phased differently in L and R sound like sawtooth waves [such as a "buzz" or "fiz"]. AFAIK, thats just how the company designed the synth. Due to the above, my MIDI synth dream would be a mono, 64-bit- resolution, 2.88-Ghz-sample-rate, 40,000-voice, 4,000-operators-per- voice, 10,000-channeled**, version of Creative Music Synth based on the signals that were phased differently in the original Creative Music Synth. Creative Music Synth is a stereo FM synth who left and right signals are phased differently, this is why I get a different sound when I play it through voice-canceller. The signals of Creative Music Synth that have the same phase for both L and R have a more cheesy sine-wave quality which I don't care for. The signals in Creative Music Synth that are phased differently in L and R tend to resemble a fresher sawtooth-wave quality which I like. That is why I want my version of Creative Music Synth to be based on the sounds that were phased differently in the original Creative Music Synth. I want my version to be monoaural because I want all speakers to give out the same signal. **Yamaha's OPL3 has 18 channels Regards, Radium |
#2
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 4:21 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:
For just one example - how many of the supposed "64 bits" in the samples you're talking about would you expect to contain valid and/or significant information? Why? 64 bit-resolution give 384 dB of dynamic range and 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 possible levels of loudness. x-bit-resolution gives 6x dB of dynamic range. 6(64) = 384 x-bit-resolution gives 2^x levels of loudness. 2^64 = 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 |
#3
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 4:46 pm, "Rick Massey" wrote:
The four thousand operator part gets me. Why particularly that one? |
#4
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 7:02 pm, wrote:
I'd love to see you program a 4,000 operator FM sound with decent results and make it musically useful, without being random noise. Why would 4,000-operator FM synth contain anymore random noise than a 6-operator FM synth? |
#5
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 6:07 am, (Bob Masta) wrote:
But back to your earlier question about the OPL3 and phase cancellation: You wonder what is happening in the OPL3 that causes the results you get when you run it through a "vocal cancellation" process. But why should you think this has anything at all to do with the OPL3, instead of the vocal cancellation circuit? I don't know anything about the particular device you are using, but it's common to allow some phase adjustment in case the vocalist isn't dead-center. You may be hearing the results of cancelling more low-frequency sounds than high-frequency due to this. The sound seems to be almost equally loud and equal-pitched whether I use the voice-cancellor or not. Its just that the waveshaped are different. For example, when I play the polysynth pads and I use the voice- cancellor I notice a more psychedelic, fresh, rejuvenating tone. Without the the voice-cancellor, it sounds more like a little kid whining from not getting what he wants. Whether I use the voice-cancellor or not, I still think Creative Music Synth beats all other *Soundcard-based* MIDI synths. |
#6
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 5:09 am, "Rick Massey" wrote:
(Hardware intensive, as well as computation intensive, in a time when you couldn't digitally create things in the chip realm like we can now) Which one are you describing above, additive or FM synthesis? |
#7
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 9:03 pm, "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:
What about the old Yamaha cards then. They used the same FM techniques only better. I'll first have to listen to them, only then can I compare. |
#8
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 1:15 pm, "Rick Massey" wrote:
"HellPopeHuey" wrote in message ... Um, guys... Radium is a numbnutted troll and is only on here to bait the crowd with bandwidth-clogging drivel. Stop encouraging him or he'll just keep staining the carpets. You know, I don't agree. I have noticed some forward progress with him. Normally, I'd agree with you wholeheartedly, but Radium seems to actually want to know things, and the responses it (not sure of gender) makes indicate that it is really interested in this topic, just highly confused and not firing on all cylinders. If we can make it see that it's coming off as a whackjob on this, and get it to actually learn a bit what it's talking about, which it has already shown some progress in, then there will be a net sum gain in humanity. Try this posting for size: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...e078def7a3bd3a Whatever you do, don't let him inside your head. groups trimmed to 5 |
#9
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.basics,comp.music.midi,rec.music.makers.synth,rec.audio.tech,alt.music.midi
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pastor Kutchie wrote:
On Mar 6, 1:15 pm, "Rick Massey" wrote: "HellPopeHuey" wrote in message et... Um, guys... Radium is a numbnutted troll and is only on here to bait the crowd with bandwidth-clogging drivel. Stop encouraging him or he'll just keep staining the carpets. You know, I don't agree. I have noticed some forward progress with him. Normally, I'd agree with you wholeheartedly, but Radium seems to actually want to know things, and the responses it (not sure of gender) makes indicate that it is really interested in this topic, just highly confused and not firing on all cylinders. If we can make it see that it's coming off as a whackjob on this, and get it to actually learn a bit what it's talking about, which it has already shown some progress in, then there will be a net sum gain in humanity. Try this posting for size: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...e078def7a3bd3a Whatever you do, don't let him inside your head. I REST MY CASE. Gimme Xphraze or gimme death or gimme pie. -- HellPope Huey Life is like some crazy biker, angrily driving his hog through your front door because some dark deal he made went sour, but he's dyslexic and inverted the address numbers, so the guy he wants to kill is 20 blocks away "It wasn't until I started reading and found books they wouldn't let me read in school that I discovered you could be insane and happy and have a good life without being like everybody else." ~ John Waters "I could never love you enough." "You do fine." ~ "Heroes" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My MIDI Synth Dream | Audio Opinions | |||
My MIDI Synth Dream | Tech | |||
Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth. Please Don't Ignore. | Audio Opinions | |||
Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth. Please Don't Ignore. | Tech | |||
Creative Music Synth [220] is the best MIDI synth. Sample-playback is human kakaa. | Tech |