In article 9R_Qa.71915$ye4.48033@sccrnsc01,
All Ears wrote:
-snip-

I am not saying that it is
measurable in a conventional manner, but it sure is audible, at least to
my
ears. Furthermore I would say that it is not slightly audible, but
clearly
and obviously audible.

Great, then it should certainly be conventionally measurable. Have you
tried measuring for difference? You claim to have the equipment to do so.

Nope, Dick has all the fancy stuff, and he cannot hear or measure any
difference...

Now, precisely WHEN did I say this? (Hint: I DIDN'T) WHy do make
the false claim that I did?

Sir, I measure HUGE differences between LOTS of things every
day, and I would thank you not to make false claims about what I
can and cannot do, about what I have and have not done. It is
clear, sir, that you have little, if ANY data to make such
claims.

You're in a pretty precarious position having made the claim
that others don't have the equipment necessary to detect the
difference, when it seems that YOU, indeed, are lacking such.

You are right, I did not do a blind test, but then again, the difference is
so significant that it would seem foolish to do so...

If the difference is, as you claim, so large, it seems patently
foolish NOT to employ a technique that would remove as much
doubt and variability as possible. If it's as big as you claim,
having reliable results, results that could be trusted an
repeated by others would do nothing but bolster your assertion.

I am not into this for the science, but merely because i enjoy
listening to good music.

So go listen to your music stop making "scientific"
proclamations.

--
| Dick Pierce |
| Professional Audio Development |
| 1-781/826-4953 Voice and FAX |
| |