"tor b" wrote in message
om
(S888Wheel) wrote in message
...
S888Wheel
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 6/22/2004 2:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"tor b" wrote in message
m

Whatever happened to your lawsuit against Arny Krueger, ****head?

He's finding out what "show cause" means, and has responded to the
court's challenge to show cause with a succession of continuances.

Actually there is a problem. The proof of service of the lawsuit was
lost and in this case there is no way to redo it.

Looking at the transcript of the case proceedings, this could easily be a
lie. The real question at this point is how many continuances the court will
give him.

Oh, sure....and your dog ate your homework. :-(

Actually, the dog ate any valid cause for his lawsuit. The court knows it.
They don't want any part of this trivial business. Furthermore, its a
constitutional nightmare. For all they know, the ACLU is sitting out there
waiting to pounce on them with an appeal.

Things are getting very busy for me starting at
the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have the
lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will do so.

What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.

Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze any power
or control out of this situation he can. The real question is how far he's
gone in terms of trying to take his bragging rights to the bank., with say a
well-known magazine publisher with a vendetta against me.

Arny Krueger a écrit :

"tor b" wrote in message
om

(S888Wheel) wrote in message
...

S888Wheel
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 6/22/2004 2:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"tor b" wrote in message
e.com


Whatever happened to your lawsuit against Arny Krueger, ****head?


He's finding out what "show cause" means, and has responded to the
court's challenge to show cause with a succession of continuances.


Actually there is a problem. The proof of service of the lawsuit was
lost and in this case there is no way to redo it.


Looking at the transcript of the case proceedings, this could easily be a
lie. The real question at this point is how many continuances the court will
give him.


Oh, sure....and your dog ate your homework. :-(


Actually, the dog ate any valid cause for his lawsuit. The court knows it.
They don't want any part of this trivial business. Furthermore, its a
constitutional nightmare. For all they know, the ACLU is sitting out there
waiting to pounce on them with an appeal.


Things are getting very busy for me starting at

the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have the
lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will do so.


What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.


Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze any power
or control out of this situation he can.

Nearly nobody answers him anymore on RAHE.
Here, he is already taking the control of McKelvy life.
He is discussing and managing Michael's health insurance with the others
without any embarrassment.
This guy is really sick.

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:02:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Things are getting very busy for me starting at
the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have the
lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will do so.

What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.

Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze any power
or control out of this situation he can. The real question is how far he's
gone in terms of trying to take his bragging rights to the bank., with say a
well-known magazine publisher with a vendetta against me.

No, that's not a real question. It's a "debating trade" tactic and
pretty deplorable and perilously close to libel. But I doubt that John
Atkinson would bother to take the bait.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:02:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Things are getting very busy for me starting at
the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have the
lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will do so.

What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.

Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze any
power or control out of this situation he can. The real question is
how far he's gone in terms of trying to take his bragging rights to
the bank., with say a well-known magazine publisher with a vendetta
against me.

No, that's not a real question. It's a "debating trade" tactic and
pretty deplorable and perilously close to libel. But I doubt that John
Atkinson would bother to take the bait.

Why, it's David Buttinsky Weil, trying to save the world from the mean old
nasty Arny Krueger, again.

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:47:44 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:02:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Things are getting very busy for me starting at
the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have the
lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will do so.

What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.

Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze any
power or control out of this situation he can. The real question is
how far he's gone in terms of trying to take his bragging rights to
the bank., with say a well-known magazine publisher with a vendetta
against me.

No, that's not a real question. It's a "debating trade" tactic and
pretty deplorable and perilously close to libel. But I doubt that John
Atkinson would bother to take the bait.

Why, it's David Buttinsky Weil, trying to save the world from the mean old
nasty Arny Krueger, again.

No, frankly I don't think there's a chance in hell of that. I don't
think the world can be saved from you, although, I'll have to say that
I'm impressed with the level of self-awareness that you have attained.
You're making progress, old chap.

I'm just curious how someone can "butt in" on comments made on a
public unmoderated forum...

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:47:44 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:02:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Things are getting very busy for me starting at
the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have
the lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will
do so.

What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.

Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze
any power or control out of this situation he can. The real
question is how far he's gone in terms of trying to take his
bragging rights to the bank., with say a well-known magazine
publisher with a vendetta against me.

No, that's not a real question. It's a "debating trade" tactic and
pretty deplorable and perilously close to libel. But I doubt that
John Atkinson would bother to take the bait.

Why, it's David Buttinsky Weil, trying to save the world from the
mean old nasty Arny Krueger, again.

No, frankly I don't think there's a chance in hell of that.

So Weil that puts you in the Don Quixote seat, eh?

I don't think the world can be saved from you, although, I'll have to say
that
I'm impressed with the level of self-awareness that you have attained.

Too bad you're so tremendously lacking in the same area Weil. But you get
points for recognizing what you lack, when its apparent in others. Not a lot
of points, though.

You're making progress, old chap.

Been there done that, even back when you were smoking dope in the Army.

I'm just curious how someone can "butt in" on comments made on a
public unmoderated forum...

There's that self-awareness thing tripping you up again Weil. See what I
mean?

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:07:12 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Too bad you're so tremendously lacking in the same area Weil. But you get
points for recognizing what you lack, when its apparent in others. Not a lot
of points, though.

You're making progress, old chap.

Been there done that, even back when you were smoking dope in the Army.

Frankly, this sort of false claim shows more about your tactics than
any description that I could muster. It's easy enough to show a
preponderance of evidence that it is patently false (drug tests every
two months, etc.) but why bother?

I know that you're just waiting to pounce on me, so quick, hit the
send button immediately. At least I can hold claim to keeping you
occupied.

dave weil a écrit :

I'm just curious how someone can "butt in" on comments made on a
public unmoderated forum...

Depends on which side of the gun you are, Dave.
Considering the time you have spent in the army and on RAO, you should
know that since a long time.

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:23:16 +0200, Lionel
wrote:

dave weil a écrit :

I'm just curious how someone can "butt in" on comments made on a
public unmoderated forum...

Depends on which side of the gun you are, Dave.

Not to me. I don't think that any conversation on a public unmoderated
forum is private enough to consider someone "butting in" when they
comment on those comments. You throw them out and you should expect
8anyone* to comment.

Considering the time you have spent in the army and on RAO, you should
know that since a long time.

On the contrary. Those are some of the reasons why I made my comment.

So, how do you feel about Arnold lying about my alleged drug use just
to get such an association into the public record? Do you find it as
bad as those who have accused him of pedophilia?

And, again, for the record, I have never condoned those tactics by
ANYONE.

Hit that send button quickly Lionel. Time's awastin'.

From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 6/23/2004 4:02 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"tor b" wrote in message
. com
(S888Wheel) wrote in message
...
S888Wheel
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 6/22/2004 2:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"tor b" wrote in message
m

Whatever happened to your lawsuit against Arny Krueger, ****head?

He's finding out what "show cause" means, and has responded to the
court's challenge to show cause with a succession of continuances.

Actually there is a problem. The proof of service of the lawsuit was
lost and in this case there is no way to redo it.

Looking at the transcript of the case proceedings, this could easily be a
lie.

Nonsense.

The real question at this point is how many continuances the court will
give him.

They'll give them to me until the time to serve the lawsuit is expired.



Oh, sure....and your dog ate your homework. :-(

Actually, the dog ate any valid cause for his lawsuit. The court knows it.

As if you have any idea what the court knows.


They don't want any part of this trivial business. Furthermore, its a
constitutional nightmare. For all they know, the ACLU is sitting out there
waiting to pounce on them with an appeal.

God you are delusional.



Things are getting very busy for me starting at
the end of this week. No one has asked me to show anything other
than the missing proof of service. So Arny, you want me to have the
lawsuit as it is reserved? Just be ****ty enough and I will do so.

What a stupid, transparent asshole you are, Wheeler.

Right, he's a sociopathic control freak who is trying to squeeze any power
or control out of this situation he can. The real question is how far he's
gone in terms of trying to take his bragging rights to the bank., with say a
well-known magazine publisher with a vendetta against me.









OK. you were snotty enough. I guess I'll look into serving the suit against you
again.