[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" said:


Usenet is dying.


No, but RAO is pretty dead as audio groups go.


I know you're still hoping to be notived by the "real
audio guys" by working fiercely on your "usenet career",

You're delusional, Sander.

but if you'd care to look outside your little scope of
vision, you'd notice that web-based forums are far more
active places.

Been there, done that probably long before you did, Sander. Unlike you, I
can tell the difference between quantity and quality. Not that RAO has much
of either, but what do you expect from a group that is dominated by you and
your kind of ilk? I just stop by every now and then and throw out some
rotten boney meat for the local pack of mad dogs to gnaw on. Enjoy this
bone, Sander.

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" said:


Usenet is dying.


No, but RAO is pretty dead as audio groups go.


I know you're still hoping to be noticed by the "real
audio guys" by working fiercely on your "usenet career",


You're delusional, Sander.


Unlike you, I'm willing to concede that fact.


but if you'd care to look outside your little scope of
vision, you'd notice that web-based forums are far more
active places.


Been there, done that probably long before you did, Sander. Unlike you, I
can tell the difference between quantity and quality.


Yes, like why needing 1200 watts.ch. in a home audio system, versus a
nicely built 100 watts amp that is enough for 99.9 % of all speakers.
Certain Infinity speakers are excluded, just ask Trevor.


Not that RAO has much
of either, but what do you expect from a group that is dominated by you and
your kind of ilk?


RAO dominated by me? Hardly. I rarely post here anymore, and most
posts are crossposted from RATubes.
My "ilk"? You mean people like Graham or Peter Wieck, who are
gainfully employed or self-employed in the field of audio, a field you
so desperately want to belong to that you devote large parts of your
time to post to Usenet?

I simply don't have the time (or rather: don't want to make time) for
wading through thousands of messages about US politics and the
occasional snot post by "you and your ilk"about tube and vinyl bigots,
thank you very much.


I just stop by every now and then and throw out some
rotten boney meat for the local pack of mad dogs to gnaw on. Enjoy this
bone, Sander.


I'd prefer to gnaw on a rotten meaty bone any day than to become as
bitter and self-pitying as you seem to be, Arny.

--
"Due knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl miss steaks."

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" said:


Usenet is dying.


No, but RAO is pretty dead as audio groups go.

I know you're still hoping to be noticed by the "real
audio guys" by working fiercely on your "usenet career",

You're delusional, Sander.

Unlike you, I'm willing to concede that fact.

Then why bother?


but if you'd care to look outside your little scope of
vision, you'd notice that web-based forums are far more
active places.


Been there, done that probably long before you did,
Sander. Unlike you, I can tell the difference between
quantity and quality.

Yes, like why needing 1200 watts.ch. in a home audio
system,

What are you ranting and raving about now? Who do you think has 1200 wpc in
a home audio system?

versus a nicely built 100 watts amp that is
enough for 99.9 % of all speakers. Certain Infinity
speakers are excluded, just ask Trevor.

As if that was all that matters.

Not that RAO has much
of either, but what do you expect from a group that is
dominated by you and your kind of ilk?

RAO dominated by me?

Thats not what I said Sander, but I guess I should just let you rant on,
incoherently.

Hardly. I rarely post here anymore,
and most posts are crossposted from RATubes.

Why bother?

My "ilk"? You mean people like Graham or Peter Wieck, who
are gainfully employed or self-employed in the field of
audio, a field you so desperately want to belong to that
you devote large parts of your time to post to Usenet?

Who told you that? What indicates that to you?

I simply don't have the time (or rather: don't want to
make time) for wading through thousands of messages about
US politics and the occasional snot post by "you and your
ilk"about tube and vinyl bigots, thank you very much.

As if that isn't what you are doing right now, Sander.

I just stop by every now and then and throw out some
rotten boney meat for the local pack of mad dogs to gnaw
on. Enjoy this bone, Sander.

I'd prefer to gnaw on a rotten meaty bone any day than to
become as bitter and self-pitying as you seem to be, Arny.

What self-pity is that, Sander? The self-pity that you, Middius, Paul and
Jenn project every time you post?

[Jenn]

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


What self-pity is that, Sander? The self-pity that you, Middius, Paul and
Jenn project every time you post?

LOL What a card!

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said:

The self-pity that you, Middius, Paul and
Jenn project every time you post?

LOL What a card!

Congratulations, Jenn. You've been promoted to the first rank of Most
Feared Normals, and you've been posting to RAO for less than a year. You
know you're scaring the krap out of Krooger when he bitches about you
every day even without posting to the thread. Most of us need at least
three years to attain that level.




--

"Christians have to ... work to make the world as loving, just, and supportive as is possible."
A. Krooger, Aug. 2006

[paul packer]

On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:40:09 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:

You know you're scaring the krap out of Krooger when he bitches about you
every day even without posting to the thread.

Is there an error here, George? Shouldn't it be "even without you
posting to the thread"?

[paul packer]

On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:19:39 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


What self-pity is that, Sander? The self-pity that you, Middius, Paul and
Jenn project every time you post?

LOL What a card!

A joker. I fear.

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" said:


Yes, like why needing 1200 watts.ch. in a home audio
system,


What are you ranting and raving about now? Who do you think has 1200 wpc in
a home audio system?


What? Are you telling me you sold off your QSC amplifiers?

Good move!


My "ilk"? You mean people like Graham or Peter Wieck, who
are gainfully employed or self-employed in the field of
audio, a field you so desperately want to belong to that
you devote large parts of your time to post to Usenet?


Who told you that?


A little fairy whispered it in my ear.


What indicates that to you?


That you still didn't define "people of my ilk", and didn't deny that
"my ilk" consists of people like Graham or Peter Wieck, who are
gainfully employed or self-employed in the field of audio.
A field, you so desperately want to belong to that you devote large
chunks of your time to post to Usenet audio groups, in the (vain) hope
that once, a "real audio guy" will notice, and hire you?


I simply don't have the time (or rather: don't want to
make time) for wading through thousands of messages about
US politics and the occasional snot post by "you and your
ilk"about tube and vinyl bigots, thank you very much.


As if that isn't what you are doing right now, Sander.


I haven't seen any political crap, nor the words "tube bigot" or
"vinyl bigot" in this conversation from you, Arny.
That's why I am still here ;-)


I'd prefer to gnaw on a rotten meaty bone any day than to
become as bitter and self-pitying as you seem to be, Arny.


What self-pity is that, Sander? The self-pity that you, Middius, Paul and
Jenn project every time you post?


I'm sure I will stay up late all night, worrying about what you think
of me, Arny.

Did your father hit you over the head with an output transformer once,
Arny? Is that where your hatred of tubes comes from?

You can tell me, it will make me understand why you are doing the
things you're doing, and it will lighten your burden.

Trust me.

--
"Due knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl miss steaks."

[Eeyore]

Arny Krueger wrote:

what do you expect from a group that is dominated by you and
your kind of ilk?

Surely you mean 'your ilk' ?

Reminds me of the popular and incorrect use in the USA of a 'high rate of speed'
!

Graham