Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
paul packer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stereophile

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:47:31 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



paul packer said:

BTW, paul packer is impervious to patronizing.


But not ice cream, George. :-)


Watch those empty calories, old man.


I'm a whale these days. At 20 I weighed 8 stone. Now I'm nearly 60 and
twice that.

"Now I'm twice the man I used to be,
there's a shadow hanging over me
but I believe in Yesterday"

Actually I'm not sure I understand your statement.


As I read it, John was mock-patronizing in response to your attempt to be
jocular about the deadly serious business of audio publishing. I could be
wrong, of course. (But probably not.)


I'd have said unhelpful or a little defensive rather than patronising.
But as this whole business is a minefield, with any mis-statement by
John likely to be pounced on by any number of posters, that's
understandable.
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stereophile still under Randi's radar [email protected] Audio Opinions 8 November 11th 05 05:59 PM
Stereophile still under Randi's radar Chevdo Pro Audio 79 November 5th 05 04:18 AM
Stereophile...source of all this bitterness?...Not! lcw999 Audio Opinions 6 June 27th 05 03:17 PM
Does anyone know of this challenge? [email protected] High End Audio 453 June 28th 04 03:43 AM
Note to the Idiot George M. Middius Audio Opinions 222 January 8th 04 07:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"