Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() paul packer wrote: On 27 Jun 2006 04:14:56 -0700, "John Atkinson" wrote: Kal gave you the URL for Stereophile's coverage of the Tice Clock. Hardly the ringing endorsement the original poster appears to think, as Tice canceled all of its advertising following publication. I wonder if the concellation caused you surprise or---dare I say it?--grief? No. None. Was the possibility discussed before publication? I have no idea. I don't discuss advertising with companies. Did you contact Tice beforehand to warn them the review would contain negative material? Not a warning, no. But every manufacturer whose products are reviewed in Stereophile is sent a preprint of the edited review, so that they can prepare a "Manufacturer's Comment" letter for publication. This happened with our Tice coverage, as with every other review. Did you feel before agreeing to the review that there was an inherent conflict of interest (since you were carrying Tice ads). No. Have you since agreed to review products you carry advertising for? Stereophile reviews approximately equal numbers of products from advertisers and non-advertisers. Is there now a tendency to shy away from reviewing products you carry advertising for? No. Why should there be? Do you like ice cream? Yes, but I do try to remember that ice cream is basically lard, sugar, and ice. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Atkinson said: Do you like ice cream? Yes, but I do try to remember that ice cream is basically lard, sugar, and ice. Does that help if you're trying to remember how to spell Arnii Krooborg's name? Apparently my refusal to eat ice cream every day has, in fact, interfered with that important aspect of my memory. BTW, paul packer is impervious to patronizing. -- A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:14:15 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote: BTW, paul packer is impervious to patronizing. But not ice cream, George. :-) Actually I'm not sure I understand your statement. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() paul packer said: BTW, paul packer is impervious to patronizing. But not ice cream, George. :-) Watch those empty calories, old man. Actually I'm not sure I understand your statement. As I read it, John was mock-patronizing in response to your attempt to be jocular about the deadly serious business of audio publishing. I could be wrong, of course. (But probably not.) -- A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote in message ... paul packer said: BTW, paul packer is impervious to patronizing. But not ice cream, George. :-) Watch those empty calories, old man. Actually I'm not sure I understand your statement. As I read it, John was mock-patronizing in response to your attempt to be jocular about the deadly serious business of audio publishing. I could be wrong, of course. (But probably not.) ARe you ridiculing him again? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:47:31 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote: paul packer said: BTW, paul packer is impervious to patronizing. But not ice cream, George. :-) Watch those empty calories, old man. I'm a whale these days. At 20 I weighed 8 stone. Now I'm nearly 60 and twice that. "Now I'm twice the man I used to be, there's a shadow hanging over me but I believe in Yesterday" Actually I'm not sure I understand your statement. As I read it, John was mock-patronizing in response to your attempt to be jocular about the deadly serious business of audio publishing. I could be wrong, of course. (But probably not.) I'd have said unhelpful or a little defensive rather than patronising. But as this whole business is a minefield, with any mis-statement by John likely to be pounced on by any number of posters, that's understandable. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jun 2006 11:16:53 -0700, "John Atkinson"
wrote: Is there now a tendency to shy away from reviewing products you carry advertising for? No. Why should there be? Hmmm. What an interesting answer. I had a sudden vision of a naked (but bearded) cherub floating in the air, innocent of the wiles of the world. Do you like ice cream? Yes, but I do try to remember that ice cream is basically lard, sugar, and ice. But no less delicious for that. :-) |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "paul packer" wrote in message Hmmm. What an interesting answer. I had a sudden vision of a naked (but bearded) cherub floating in the air, innocent of the wiles of the world. But no less delicious for that. :-) Explains everything. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:11:30 +1000, "bassett"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Hmmm. What an interesting answer. I had a sudden vision of a naked (but bearded) cherub floating in the air, innocent of the wiles of the world. But no less delicious for that. :-) Explains everything. And that means what, bassett? woof, woof. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "paul packer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:11:30 +1000, "bassett" wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Hmmm. What an interesting answer. I had a sudden vision of a naked (but bearded) cherub floating in the air, innocent of the wiles of the world. But no less delicious for that. :-) Explains everything. And that means what, bassett? woof, woof. Please to consider, the effects of a cold product on what passes for your brain howl, howl. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:26:01 +1000, "bassett"
wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:11:30 +1000, "bassett" wrote: "paul packer" wrote in message Hmmm. What an interesting answer. I had a sudden vision of a naked (but bearded) cherub floating in the air, innocent of the wiles of the world. But no less delicious for that. :-) Explains everything. And that means what, bassett? woof, woof. Please to consider, the effects of a cold product on what passes for your brain howl, howl. Whatever passes for my brain, it can't make anything out of what passed from your brain into this post. Please to explain. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Do you like ice cream? Yes, but I do try to remember that ice cream is basically lard, sugar, and ice. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile Damn; you make it sound so tasty. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stereophile still under Randi's radar | Audio Opinions | |||
Stereophile still under Randi's radar | Pro Audio | |||
Stereophile...source of all this bitterness?...Not! | Audio Opinions | |||
Does anyone know of this challenge? | High End Audio | |||
Note to the Idiot | Audio Opinions |