"soundhaspriority" wrote in
:


"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...
soundhaspriority wrote:

Gary,

Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual,
however, for
him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to
engage in _any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another
pathological stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared
express anything positive toward me either personally or with respect
to my technical input.


This has a certain humorous irony about it. Here we are, three guys,
each claiming to be dogged by stalkers. This, of course, robs us of
credibility with each, as in Groucho Marx's quote, "I wouldn't belong
to any club that would have me as a member."


Bob, all I can say is that your knowledge and comport were exemplary
in the recent thread. Gary, I haven't had a chance to see the problem
in action, but I hope for the best.

Bob Morein


No need for hope. For a variety of numerous reasons, the likelihood of a
problem developing between us is zip to none. You can take that to the
bank.


Given that Bob Cain has taken this thread as yet another opportunity to
slam me one more time, I will take this opportunity to tell you a little
bit about the "real" Bob Cain.


As you infer, Bob Cain is indeed knowledgeable in certain areas.
Additionally, more often than not, his posts reflect a very pleasant and
professional demeanor. That is the Dr. Jekyll side of Bob Cain, and that
is the side that you and others will see as long as you and others continue
to stroke him.


The "real" Bob Cain, however, is a pathological narcissist who is addicted
to the admiration and attention of others. In order to feed and satisfy
that addiction, Bob Cain will occasionally step outside of the boundaries
of his areas of technical expertise and will make technical assertions that
are blatantly incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no room for either
correction or criticism inside Bob Cain's swollen head. Consequently, when
someone like myself comes along and calls attention to Bob Cain's
technically-incorrect assertions, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Cain emerges
with a vengeance.


Bob Cain is also a hypocrite, and often criticizes others for the very
behavior in which he repeatedly engages. Since Bob Cain is in total denial
of his own pathological behavior, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Cain also
emerges with a vengeance whenever someone like myself calls attention to
his blatant hypocrisy.

Last but not least, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Cain is a congenital liar and
sociopath. As a result, there is no level below which Bob Cain will not
stoop, and no lies that Bob Cain will not post in order to get revenge
against someone, like me, who would dare to call attention to the truth
about the psychotic and sadistic dark side of the "real" Bob Cain.

Gary Sokolich wrote:

"soundhaspriority" wrote in
:


"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...
soundhaspriority wrote:

Gary,

Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual,
however, for
him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to
engage in _any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another
pathological stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared
express anything positive toward me either personally or with respect
to my technical input.


This has a certain humorous irony about it. Here we are, three guys,
each claiming to be dogged by stalkers. This, of course, robs us of
credibility with each, as in Groucho Marx's quote, "I wouldn't belong
to any club that would have me as a member."


Bob, all I can say is that your knowledge and comport were exemplary
in the recent thread. Gary, I haven't had a chance to see the problem
in action, but I hope for the best.

Bob Morein


No need for hope. For a variety of numerous reasons, the likelihood of a
problem developing between us is zip to none. You can take that to the
bank.


And while you're there, bank on the fact that there will never be a
problem developing between you and me. Me and your new friend Bob
Morein, that's another story. But I'm glad you're seated, because I
will tell you the Story of Bob Morein. It goes like this:

As you infer, Bob Morein is indeed knowledgeable in certain areas.
Additionally, more often than not, his posts reflect a very pleasant
and
professional demeanor. That is the Dr. Jekyll side of Bob Morein, and
that
is the side that you and others will see as long as you and others
continue
to stroke him.


The "real" Bob Morein, however, is a pathological narcissist who is
addicted
to the admiration and attention of others. In order to feed and
satisfy
that addiction, Bob Morein will occasionally step outside of the
boundaries
of his areas of technical expertise and will make technical assertions
that
are blatantly incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no room for either
correction or criticism inside Bob Morein's swollen head.
Consequently, when
someone like myself comes along and calls attention to Bob Morein's
technically-incorrect assertions, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein
emerges
with a vengeance.


Bob Morein is also a hypocrite, and often criticizes others for the
very
behavior in which he repeatedly engages. Since Bob Morein is in total
denial
of his own pathological behavior, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein also

emerges with a vengeance whenever someone like myself calls attention
to
his blatant hypocrisy.

Last but not least, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein is a congenital
liar and
sociopath. As a result, there is no level below which Bob Morein will
not
stoop, and no lies that Bob Morein will not post in order to get
revenge
against someone, like me, who would dare to call attention to the
truth
about the psychotic and sadistic dark side of the "real" Bob Morein.

On 4 May 2006 19:01:00 -0700, wrote:


Gary Sokolich wrote:

"soundhaspriority" wrote in
:


"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...
soundhaspriority wrote:

Gary,

Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual,
however, for
him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to
engage in _any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another
pathological stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared
express anything positive toward me either personally or with respect
to my technical input.


This has a certain humorous irony about it. Here we are, three guys,
each claiming to be dogged by stalkers. This, of course, robs us of
credibility with each, as in Groucho Marx's quote, "I wouldn't belong
to any club that would have me as a member."


Bob, all I can say is that your knowledge and comport were exemplary
in the recent thread. Gary, I haven't had a chance to see the problem
in action, but I hope for the best.

Bob Morein


No need for hope. For a variety of numerous reasons, the likelihood of a
problem developing between us is zip to none. You can take that to the
bank.


And while you're there, bank on the fact that there will never be a
problem developing between you and me. Me and your new friend Bob
Morein, that's another story. But I'm glad you're seated, because I
will tell you the Story of Bob Morein. It goes like this:

As you infer, Bob Morein is indeed knowledgeable in certain areas.
Additionally, more often than not, his posts reflect a very pleasant
and
professional demeanor. That is the Dr. Jekyll side of Bob Morein, and
that
is the side that you and others will see as long as you and others
continue
to stroke him.


The "real" Bob Morein, however, is a pathological narcissist who is
addicted
to the admiration and attention of others. In order to feed and
satisfy
that addiction, Bob Morein will occasionally step outside of the
boundaries
of his areas of technical expertise and will make technical assertions
that
are blatantly incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no room for either
correction or criticism inside Bob Morein's swollen head.
Consequently, when
someone like myself comes along and calls attention to Bob Morein's
technically-incorrect assertions, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein
emerges
with a vengeance.


Bob Morein is also a hypocrite, and often criticizes others for the
very
behavior in which he repeatedly engages. Since Bob Morein is in total
denial
of his own pathological behavior, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein also

emerges with a vengeance whenever someone like myself calls attention
to
his blatant hypocrisy.

Last but not least, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein is a congenital
liar and
sociopath. As a result, there is no level below which Bob Morein will
not
stoop, and no lies that Bob Morein will not post in order to get
revenge
against someone, like me, who would dare to call attention to the
truth
about the psychotic and sadistic dark side of the "real" Bob Morein.


So you don't like him. We'll take that as a given.

paul packer wrote:

On 4 May 2006 19:01:00 -0700, wrote:


Gary Sokolich wrote:

"soundhaspriority" wrote in
:


"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...
soundhaspriority wrote:

Gary,

Bob, that's him. He's pretty well known hereabouts. Unusual,
however, for
him to use his real name this way. Trust me you do not wish to
engage in _any_ form of dialog with him lest you attract another
pathological stalker. He's attached himself to others who dared
express anything positive toward me either personally or with respect
to my technical input.


This has a certain humorous irony about it. Here we are, three guys,
each claiming to be dogged by stalkers. This, of course, robs us of
credibility with each, as in Groucho Marx's quote, "I wouldn't belong
to any club that would have me as a member."


Bob, all I can say is that your knowledge and comport were exemplary
in the recent thread. Gary, I haven't had a chance to see the problem
in action, but I hope for the best.

Bob Morein


No need for hope. For a variety of numerous reasons, the likelihood of a
problem developing between us is zip to none. You can take that to the
bank.


And while you're there, bank on the fact that there will never be a
problem developing between you and me. Me and your new friend Bob
Morein, that's another story. But I'm glad you're seated, because I
will tell you the Story of Bob Morein. It goes like this:

As you infer, Bob Morein is indeed knowledgeable in certain areas.
Additionally, more often than not, his posts reflect a very pleasant
and
professional demeanor. That is the Dr. Jekyll side of Bob Morein, and
that
is the side that you and others will see as long as you and others
continue
to stroke him.


The "real" Bob Morein, however, is a pathological narcissist who is
addicted
to the admiration and attention of others. In order to feed and
satisfy
that addiction, Bob Morein will occasionally step outside of the
boundaries
of his areas of technical expertise and will make technical assertions
that
are blatantly incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no room for either
correction or criticism inside Bob Morein's swollen head.
Consequently, when
someone like myself comes along and calls attention to Bob Morein's
technically-incorrect assertions, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein
emerges
with a vengeance.


Bob Morein is also a hypocrite, and often criticizes others for the
very
behavior in which he repeatedly engages. Since Bob Morein is in total
denial
of his own pathological behavior, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein also

emerges with a vengeance whenever someone like myself calls attention
to
his blatant hypocrisy.

Last but not least, the Mr. Hyde side of Bob Morein is a congenital
liar and
sociopath. As a result, there is no level below which Bob Morein will
not
stoop, and no lies that Bob Morein will not post in order to get
revenge
against someone, like me, who would dare to call attention to the
truth
about the psychotic and sadistic dark side of the "real" Bob Morein.


So you don't like him.

No, I like him. Even though he's a lying psychopath, is killing himself
to defame someone he mistakenly thinks I am, and recently made violent
death threats against me, doesn't mean that I don't like my funny bunny
friend, Robert "Psycho Bob" Morein.
How could you not like someone who works so hard to be a
self-diminishing clown and provide so much for your entertainment
dollar?

We'll take that as a given.

Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
not to take anything as a "given", Paul. You're not that bright to
begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.

On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, wrote:


We'll take that as a given.

Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
not to take anything as a "given", Paul.

And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
Because I referred to you as such, due to a lack of alternatives? I've
seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
plausible--still less so now, when you spend hours and hours (even at
your average speed of 150wpm) doing nothing but posting and appear to
be close to meltdown in every thread. Or maybe that's just your style.

You're not that bright to
begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.

Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound? Be a little
generous: buy a packet of sparkly stars. We littlies appreciate stuff
like that.

paul packer wrote:
On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, wrote:


We'll take that as a given.

Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
not to take anything as a "given", Paul.

And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
Because I referred to you as such

Yes, but that's generally the accepted standard for "accepting who
someone is".

due to a lack of alternatives?

Well I don't call you "Bugs ****ing Bunny" because I find there aren't
enough alternatives to "Paul Packer", do I?

I've
seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
plausible--still less so now

A reasonable conclusion. But I already know I'm not Richard Graham...
why aren't you explaining this to Psycho Bob?

Or maybe that's just your style.

That's just my style. Interpret it as you wish. You look like a moron
to me judging some of the things you write but maybe you're not. Maybe
that's just "your" style.


You're not that bright to
begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.

Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound?

It's "dunce caps" Mr. Packer, and it's full of them because when I
leave, I'm going to be handing out one to every member here, for their
thrilling participation in my amusement. Don't worry, I've already got
your size.

Be a little
generous: buy a packet of sparkly stars. We littlies appreciate stuff
like that.

Hmmm.... "sparkly stars"..... I wonder if that might improve the sound
of my audio system.....

wrote:
paul packer wrote:
On 5 May 2006 10:04:06 -0700, wrote:


We'll take that as a given.

Oh, like you "took it as a given" that I'm Graham, a London-based
adolescent psychiatrist and maths professor? I think you should learn
not to take anything as a "given", Paul.

And what makes you think I instantly accepted you were Dr. Graham?
Because I referred to you as such

Yes, but that's generally the accepted standard for "accepting who
someone is".

Not really. "Soundhaspriority" is not a monicker. It's kind of
pretentious really. No, actually it is pretentious. I was just glad to
have an actual human being-type name for you.

due to a lack of alternatives?

Well I don't call you "Bugs ****ing Bunny" because I find there aren't
enough alternatives to "Paul Packer", do I?

Stupid answer. If someone provides you a name you call them by that. If
someone says, "My name's Doodlypoo," you generally smile and avoid
calling them anything, because you assume they're an idiot.
"Soundhaspriority" wasn't much better in my opinion.

I've
seen no evidence to support that contention and it never seemed very
plausible--still less so now

A reasonable conclusion. But I already know I'm not Richard Graham...
why aren't you explaining this to Psycho Bob?

Hey, this's a newsgroup. Here's a flash---Robert will probably read
this.

Or maybe that's just your style.

That's just my style. Interpret it as you wish. You look like a moron
to me judging some of the things you write but maybe you're not. Maybe
that's just "your" style.

Cheap shot. A bit Krueger-like actually. Which means (here's a
backhanded compliment coming up)....which means it's beneath you.

You're not that bright to
begin with and that doesn't help make you any less ignorant.

Why is your closet full of dunce's caps, Mr. Sound?

It's "dunce caps" Mr. Packer, and it's full of them because when I
leave, I'm going to be handing out one to every member here, for their
thrilling participation in my amusement. Don't worry, I've already got
your size.

So in this little pond, which nevertheless has quite a few fish waving
a number of impressive degrees and certificates, you're the only one
with two brain cells to rub together, is that it? Well,
well...."meglomania" hardly fits. And where will you move to from
here---the domination of all Usenet? the invasion of Poland? (No, I
didn't say "Hitler"). I'm worried about you, Mr. Sound. Your fingers
must be bleeding from all this typing but it's the blood on your
forehead that worries me more. How long can this mania go on? How
contemptuous of his fellow creatures can one man get? How much abuse
can one individual scream at a sitting, in a day, a week? All this
negativity is cumulative, don't you know? Very soon, probably now,
you'll start growing strange appendages from each side of your
forehead...strange, horn-like appendages which will prove to be a real
handicap to combing your fringe across. I would be wary of these, Mr.
Sound--they're a bad sign. It will be Nature's way of telling you it's
time to move on, but because you're a meglomaniac who believes he
bestrides this NG like a collossus you won't be able to move on.
You'll continue with bloodied brow shurning out your 150wpm until one
day you look in the mirror and realize the appendages are full-blown
horns, your eyes have turned a spooky, glowing green and there's an
evil smell about you. Then of course you'll have to buy a Darth Vader
helmet and turn fully to the Dark Side in order to get any work....and
all this because you wouldn't desist from your abuse on RAO when you
knew in your heart it was time to do so. Think about it, Mr. Sound.
There's still time for repentance and, if we're all agreed,
forgiveness. I'm sure even Robert would forgive you if you approached
him the right way, like on your knees, grovelling. But it has to be
now, Mr. Sound. One more day of these wild, ranting posts and you may
be too far gone.....



Be a little
generous: buy a packet of sparkly stars. We littlies appreciate stuff
like that.

Hmmm.... "sparkly stars"..... I wonder if that might improve the sound
of my audio system.....

No, but it could do wonders for your temperament.

wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote:
wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.

Bob

Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature. However,
I suspected you were Bob Morein, from the similarity of your psycho
rants. You know what? Don't explain it to me, I don't think I want to
know whether you're Gary, or whatever silly name games you're playing
at. I'm not interested.

wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:
wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.

Bob

Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.

You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote:
wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:
wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.

Bob

Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.

You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?

Attach my name to your psychopathic babble? Er, no. But I know someone
who does do just that. I think you know him, his name is "Robert
Morein", but you may know him better under the name "Psycho Bob". Of
course, he has begun attaching my name (soundhaspriority) to all of HIS
"psychopathic babble". And trust me, "psychopathic babble" is -exactly-
what it can be described as.

We have a lot more in common than you know, apparently.

Bob Cain wrote in
:

wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:
wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other.
For a while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of
your psycho rants.

Bob

Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.

You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?
Bob


Yet another example of Bob Cain's unbounded hypocrisy in action.

The real question is does Bob Cain ever do that? Do bears **** in the
woods? Is the pope Catholic? The answer to all three is, of course.

A quick google search will readily reveal numerous recent posts, under my
name and with my signature, that are being made by an imposter who posts
via giganews using Thunderbird 1.5.0.2. I post via easynews using Xnews
5.04.25, and I NEVER sign my posts.

Given that psycho Bob Cain recently started posting via giganews using
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2., you don't need to be a rocket scientist to realize
that psycho Bob Cain is my stalking imposter.










Given

Gary Sokolich wrote:

Bob Cain wrote in
:

wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:
wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other.
For a while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of
your psycho rants.

Bob

Who's "Gary"? I thought you were Gary, since "Gary", whoever that is,
seems to have the name Bob Cain in his headers and signature.

You've got the wrong Guy. Gary Sokolich has begun attaching mine and
other's names to his psychopathic babble. Do you ever do that?
Bob


Yet another example of Bob Cain's unbounded hypocrisy in action.

The real question is does Bob Cain ever do that? Do bears **** in the
woods? Is the pope Catholic? The answer to all three is, of course.

A quick google search will readily reveal numerous recent posts, under my
name and with my signature, that are being made by an imposter who posts
via giganews using Thunderbird 1.5.0.2. I post via easynews using Xnews
5.04.25, and I NEVER sign my posts.

Given that psycho Bob Cain recently started posting via giganews using
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2., you don't need to be a rocket scientist to realize
that psycho Bob Cain is my stalking imposter.

Sorry, but I've already registered "Psycho Bob" for -my- psychostalking
troll, "Psycho Bob Morein". You can't use it for your psychostalking
troll, Psycho Bob Cain. I mean "Bob Cain". Not without my permission
and that's going to require copyright payments.

Bob Cain wrote:

wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Well, you piqued my curiousity, Bob. Found that you have over 7,000
posts on Usenet. I guess you're quite proud of your "usenet career", in
comparison with the couple of hundred I have made. Then I found how so
many of them were "psycho rants", only one of which I have reprinted
below, since you seem to have forgotten what a psychotic troll you are.
Judging by your usenet record, I don't think me and Gary could fit in a
room together, what with him and your massively inflated psycho-ego
already in that room......

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Einstein Procrusteanizes Time Dilation - Response to Gary
Sokolich
From: Bob Cain - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:20 pm
Email: Bob Cain
Groups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

kenseto wrote:

The mindless discussions of Doppler distortion, which you led in the audio
groups last year, demonstrate that you don't understand Doppler shift
either. Your most recent posts on the issue demonstrate that you still
don't understand it. Nonetheless, you still pretend that you do, and,
worse yet, you criticize others for doing the same thing. At least you are
consistent and true to your long-standing and well-documented reputation as
a fraud and a hypocrite.

Idiot (and delusional psychopath.) At the end of the day I was the one
with the answer in hand. You didn't even try; you just spewed all over
the efforts to get to the bottom of it contributing nothing but bitter
bile. To say that I didn't have the answer or that you or anyone else
did is an easily demonstrable lie like everything you have to spew.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:

wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Well, you piqued my curiousity, Bob. Found that you have over 7,000
posts on Usenet. I guess you're quite proud of your "usenet career", in
comparison with the couple of hundred I have made. Then I found how so
many of them were "psycho rants", only one of which I have reprinted
below, since you seem to have forgotten what a psychotic troll you are.
Judging by your usenet record, I don't think me and Gary could fit in a
room together, what with him and your massively inflated psycho-ego
already in that room......

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Einstein Procrusteanizes Time Dilation - Response to Gary
Sokolich
From: Bob Cain - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:20 pm
Email: Bob Cain
Groups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

kenseto wrote:

The mindless discussions of Doppler distortion, which you led in the audio
groups last year, demonstrate that you don't understand Doppler shift
either. Your most recent posts on the issue demonstrate that you still
don't understand it. Nonetheless, you still pretend that you do, and,
worse yet, you criticize others for doing the same thing. At least you are
consistent and true to your long-standing and well-documented reputation as
a fraud and a hypocrite.

Idiot (and delusional psychopath.) At the end of the day I was the one
with the answer in hand. You didn't even try; you just spewed all over
the efforts to get to the bottom of it contributing nothing but bitter
bile. To say that I didn't have the answer or that you or anyone else
did is an easily demonstrable lie like everything you have to spew.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein


Yeah, that's mine and it's absolutely accurate. Whoever you are, and I
suspect you are the person my post is in response to, Gary Sokolich. Your
lies about my posting history are all too familiar as is your mention of
searching usenet for me. You are obsessed. It must be hell being you.


Outa Here,

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote:

wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:

wrote:

[garbage]

You and Gary really should get a room. Glad you found each other. For a
while I suspected that you were him from the similarity of your psycho rants.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein

Well, you piqued my curiousity, Bob. Found that you have over 7,000
posts on Usenet. I guess you're quite proud of your "usenet career", in
comparison with the couple of hundred I have made. Then I found how so
many of them were "psycho rants", only one of which I have reprinted
below, since you seem to have forgotten what a psychotic troll you are.
Judging by your usenet record, I don't think me and Gary could fit in a
room together, what with him and your massively inflated psycho-ego
already in that room......

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Einstein Procrusteanizes Time Dilation - Response to Gary
Sokolich
From: Bob Cain - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:20 pm
Email: Bob Cain
Groups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

kenseto wrote:

The mindless discussions of Doppler distortion, which you led in the audio
groups last year, demonstrate that you don't understand Doppler shift
either. Your most recent posts on the issue demonstrate that you still
don't understand it. Nonetheless, you still pretend that you do, and,
worse yet, you criticize others for doing the same thing. At least you are
consistent and true to your long-standing and well-documented reputation as
a fraud and a hypocrite.

Idiot (and delusional psychopath.) At the end of the day I was the one
with the answer in hand. You didn't even try; you just spewed all over
the efforts to get to the bottom of it contributing nothing but bitter
bile. To say that I didn't have the answer or that you or anyone else
did is an easily demonstrable lie like everything you have to spew.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein


Yeah, that's mine and it's absolutely accurate. Whoever you are, and I
suspect you are the person my post is in response to, Gary Sokolich.

No sorry, I'm Bob Morein. But a lot of people get me and Gary confused,
so I don't blame you.

Your lies about my posting history are all too familiar

Excuse me? You just finished telling me that it was "absolutely
accurate"? Please let us know when the worms have stopped messing with
your brain, will you?

as is your mention of
searching usenet for me. You are obsessed.

For clicking on your profile in Google, which takes half a second? If
that's obsessed, then what do you call writing 7,000 posts on usenet,
most of which are obsessing about a guy named "Gary Sokovich" or
whatever? How about "psychotically obsessed", will that do?

It must be hell being you.

No, its pretty sweet being me. You know what my secret is? I don't
spend half my freaking life on usenet writing thousands of posts
against a guy I never met named "Gary Sokoslich". I have something you
could never hope to get beg, steal or borrow: it's called "a real
life".

Bob Cain wrote in
:

snip....snip

Yeah, that's mine and it's absolutely accurate. Whoever you are, and
I suspect you are the person my post is in response to, Gary Sokolich.
Your lies about my posting history are all too familiar as is your
mention of searching usenet for me. You are obsessed. It must be
hell being you.


Outa Here,
Bob

Outa Here? Apparently, with none of his lab dogs available to mindlessly
support him, Bob Cain isn't just a lying, hypocritical sociopath. Bob Cain
is a lying, hypocritical sociopathic coward.

Bob Cain wrote:

snip - who cares?

Bob, you piqued my curiousity here. I did a background check on your
profile and found you had some 7,000 posts to your name. Most of which
were psycho rants like the one below, mostly aimed at what appears to
be your arch enemy and stalking victim, Gary. Here you're calling
someone an "idiot" and a "psychopath" for "spewing out bitter bile", in
a post in which you're "spewing out bitter bile". Can you see why I
mistook you for Bob Morein? He has that same sense of deluded irony
that you do.

You must be proud of your usenet career in comparison to my paltry
couple of hundred posts. But I don't think there's enough room in that
room for me, you and your stalking victim. Because with him and your
massively inflated ego, I can't get even get a foot in. Maybe if you
ever managed to pry yourself off his ankles, someone else might be able
to join you two. But since you're having so much fun together, better
you stay that way......

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Einstein Procrusteanizes Time Dilation - Response to Gary Sokolich

From: Bob Cain - view profile
Date: Sun, Feb 12 2006 9:20 pm
Email: Bob Cain
Groups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics

kenseto wrote:

The mindless discussions of Doppler distortion, which you led in the audio
groups last year, demonstrate that you don't understand Doppler shift
either. Your most recent posts on the issue demonstrate that you still
don't understand it. Nonetheless, you still pretend that you do, and,
worse yet, you criticize others for doing the same thing. At least you are
consistent and true to your long-standing and well-documented reputation as
a fraud and a hypocrite.

Idiot (and delusional psychopath.) At the end of the day I was the one
with the answer in hand. You didn't even try; you just spewed all over
the efforts to get to the bottom of it contributing nothing but bitter
bile. To say that I didn't have the answer or that you or anyone else
did is an easily demonstrable lie like everything you have to spew.

Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein