Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane, without
any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and that you are in
full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month. If you
don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit against you for
abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

Lionel Chapuis

"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.










You and Lionel have no proof of anything other than the fact you are woefully
ignorant of the difference between libel and the types of pathological lies
spewed by delusional cretins such as yourself and LIonel.

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer elicit any
direct responses to anything he has to say.

Also, neither he nor you have even the remotest understanding of what libel is
and is not. Your stupidity, coupled with his, would be laughed at by any
attorney, judge or jury shoul you ever try and attach that description to
anything I've ever said or done on Usenet.

Also, I've never diagnosed anybody on RAO and can prove it. I also can prove
that you have repeatedly libeled me on RAO, as has Ferstler & McKelvy.

Since Krueger likes to claim that Scott's libel suit was thrown out of court,
even though that is obviously a lie believed only by bottom feeders like Lionel
and Krueger,
he obviously is being hypocritical and contradicting his own delusional beliefs
if he thinks *his* libel suit against me will even get as far as Scott's did.
He's, as usual, full of it.

I suggest that Krueger make a list of all the many enemies he has that have
"libeled" him on RAO, and then ask them to provide legitimate names and
addresses so that he and his fellow dummy, Lionel, can demonstrate their legal
stupidity in a court of law. Perhaps the 2 of them can get Mikey and Howierd
to join them and file a class action suit against all of us.

ROFLMAO !!!

BTW, it's very easy for all but the totally obtunded idots like Krueger and
Lionel to easily verify both my name and address.
Their ignorance is their problem, not mine.




Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your
are sane, without any mental affections which could bias your
judgement, and that you are in full possession of your
intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his
true name and legal address. Absent that, we have proof that he is
hiding behind the anonymity of his AOL posting address in order to
be abusive without taking any responsibility for his behavior.

Snip Richman's lengthy obfusctaion the fact that he doesn't want his
habitual libelous reprehensible behavior put to a court test

Thanks for your response, Bruce

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer elicit any
direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am honored !

LOL!!!

:O)

"Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog with
me.

Arny Krueger a écrit :

"Lionel" wrote in message


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :


Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!


O)


That's basically a Score! Lionel.

Thank you.

But don't get the big head.

No need I have it already. ;-)

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

When ayatollah Khomeiny went back in Iran after is "sojourn" in France
during the late 70 one of his disciple asked him :
"How did you survive in this depraved Occident ?"
Khomeiny answered "I was always looking the ground"

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog with
me.

I guess that Middius never *dialogued* with anybody.

Arny Krueger a écrit :

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Arny Krueger wrote:



"Lionel" wrote in message


Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your
are sane, without any mental affections which could bias your
judgement, and that you are in full possession of your
intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his
true name and legal address. Absent that, we have proof that he is
hiding behind the anonymity of his AOL posting address in order to
be abusive without taking any responsibility for his behavior.


Snip Richman's lengthy obfusctaion the fact that he doesn't want his
habitual libelous reprehensible behavior put to a court test

It is always possible to have a bad surprise. Who know ?

Thanks for your response, Bruce

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :


BTW, it's very easy for all but the totally obtunded idots like Krueger and
Lionel to easily verify both my name and address.
Their ignorance is their problem, not mine.

I was laughing so much that I missed this one...

What a delusion Doc. I've never doubted that it will be very easy to
find your address. Where have you read that I said the contrary ?
You are losing your self-control control Doc and a psychologist without
control isn't anymore a psychologist. :-)

Don't worry for me. I already have your address, your licence number and
all the needed datas. ;-)

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.










You and Lionel have no proof of anything other than the fact you are
woefully
ignorant of the difference between libel and the types of pathological
lies
spewed by delusional cretins such as yourself and LIonel.

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer elicit any
direct responses to anything he has to say.

Also, neither he nor you have even the remotest understanding of what
libel is
and is not.

li·bel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbl)
n.
1..
1.. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures,
that damages a person's reputation.
2.. The act of presenting such material to the public.
2.. The written claims presented by a plaintiff in an action at
admiralty law or to an ecclesiastical court.




Your stupidity, coupled with his, would be laughed at by any
attorney, judge or jury shoul you ever try and attach that description to
anything I've ever said or done on Usenet.

Also, I've never diagnosed anybody on RAO and can prove it. I also can
prove
that you have repeatedly libeled me on RAO, as has Ferstler & McKelvy.


How has your reputation been damaged by any of us?
The real damage done to you is by yor own hand.

Since Krueger likes to claim that Scott's libel suit was thrown out of
court,
even though that is obviously a lie believed only by bottom feeders like
Lionel
and Krueger,
he obviously is being hypocritical and contradicting his own delusional
beliefs
if he thinks *his* libel suit against me will even get as far as Scott's
did.
He's, as usual, full of it.


It looks as though he has grounds according to the above definition.

I suggest that Krueger make a list of all the many enemies he has that
have
"libeled" him on RAO, and then ask them to provide legitimate names and
addresses so that he and his fellow dummy, Lionel, can demonstrate their
legal
stupidity in a court of law. Perhaps the 2 of them can get Mikey and
Howierd
to join them and file a class action suit against all of us.

Not the worst idea I've heard.

ROFLMAO !!!

BTW, it's very easy for all but the totally obtunded idots like Krueger
and
Lionel to easily verify both my name and address.
Their ignorance is their problem, not mine.

And the vulgarity and vitriol are yours.

How many beans have you counted today?
Bruce J. Richman

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person claiming to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your
are sane, without any mental affections which could bias your
judgement, and that you are in full possession of your
intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his
true name and legal address. Absent that, we have proof that he is
hiding behind the anonymity of his AOL posting address in order to
be abusive without taking any responsibility for his behavior.

Snip Richman's lengthy obfusctaion the fact that he doesn't want his
habitual libelous reprehensible behavior put to a court test

Thanks for your response, Bruce


Who is Bruce? Prove that my name is
Bruce. For all you and Lionel know, it could be Tommy Flanagan. Yeah, that's
the ticket !!!! Or it could be Birchum, and I'm a Viet Nam vet. Ferstler,
thinks my name (and everybody else's name) is Clyde. And McKelvy thinks I
don't exist.
Tell it to the judge !

ROFLMAO !!!!








As usual, Krueger has lied about what I have said, without bothering to repost
it.
His silly, typical, decepttive deletion of my reasonable adn logical response
to his post was done, obviously, to hide the fact he and Lionel don't know what
they are talking about when it comes to libel law.

Unfortunately, for these 2 legal know-nothings, the Google record can not be
deleted by them, so their stupidity and bringing up libel suits against me
stands.
Also, what stands is their provable record of libel against me by Krueger,
Ferstler & McKelvy.

As I indicated earlier, it appears that Krueger & Lionel are to stupid to
verify any legitimate information about other people even when given a
multitude of clues - since they have none. Their stupidity is their problem,
not mine.

Since these morons choose to believe thqt Bruce J. Richman is not who he says
he is, their attempts to engage in any legal action wll be laughed at by
virtually all rational people familiar with facts, not fiction.

As mentioned earler, I encourage these imbeciles to quickly ask for the names
and addresses of all their RAO "enemies".
They have a much better chance for winning a libel suit against all of us,
also, if the get together with Ferstler & McKelvy and make it a class action
suit.

LOL !!!!


(Name deleted since they won't believe it anyhow ).

As indicated earlier, Krueger is encouraged to provide further evidence of his
stupidity

Arny Krueger wrote:

Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog with
me.










Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to ignore the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win". Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an alliance with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the light of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping" us in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.


Bruce J. Richman

Clyde wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.










I've actually, in past times, revealed a lot more verifiable information about
myself than Krueger. Since Krueger believes that there is an AOL-assisted
conspiracy plot against him to hide the identities of RAO posters, I certainly
don't expect Krueger to believe anything as mundane as...............
verifiable facts.


Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not that I care about their paranoid rantings all that
much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations
of cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores.

Here's what Richman is bragging about:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnews txt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.


Especially since they simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological
problems.

Yes, I don't like seeing my mother libelled. So, here's Richman's
diagnosis -The fact that I don't like seeing my mother libeled means that I
have a serious psychological problem.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person claiming to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.











You and Krueger have no idea about most factual matters that are easily
verified.

If you would like my assistance in helping you and Krueger to complain to the
legal authorities that somebody is impersonating a licensed Psychologist named
Dr. Bruce J. Richman, you know how to reach by private email or even by
telephone.

Since impersonating a psychologist publically (as on Usenet) is a crime which
carries various penalties, here's McKelvy and Krueger's big opportunity. I'd
suggest they run, not walk, to the phone and contact the Florida State Police.

Once this is done, they will get the answers to all their questions. In a
courtroom, with the able assistance of my attornies, since filing false police
reports is also a crime and can also be pursued via civil litigation against
them.




Bruce J. Richman

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not that I care about their paranoid rantings all that
much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations
of cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores.

Here's what Richman is bragging about:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnew stxt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.


Especially since they simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological
problems.

Yes, I don't like seeing my mother libelled. So, here's Richman's
diagnosis -The fact that I don't like seeing my mother libeled means that I
have a serious psychological problem.










You don't like seeing your mother libelled? Here's a clue for you, Attorney
Krueger - she was not libeled. She was ridiculed and/or included in an
obviously satirical piece by The Devil.

Note that contrary to Krueger's latest lie, no diagnosis was made by me of him.
My opinion that he has "serious psychological problems" was based on his
behavior over a seven year history on RAO. His claims that because Dave
Weil and I did not condemn The Devil's post means we're cowards - was further
evidence of his serious problems. How come he didn't complain about all the
other people that did not condemn The Devil's post? Are they cowards also?

If you say yes, you've provided excellent evidence to support my opinion about
you.
And if you say no, you've also provided excellent evidence to support my
opinion about you.

Now, that's a *real* score.



Bruce J. Richman

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: (Bruce J. Richman)
Date: 8/19/2004 3:33 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Arny Krueger wrote:

Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog with
me.










Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to ignore the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win".
Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an alliance
with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the light
of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid
rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping" us in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.


Bruce J. Richman, Crazy Person
Diagnosed Paranoid
Insecure Blowhard


Fact? ;-)

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 8/19/2004 3:38 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not that I care about their paranoid rantings all that
much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations
of cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores.

Here's what Richman is bragging about:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnew stxt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.


Especially since they simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological
problems.

Yes, I don't like seeing my mother libelled. So, here's Richman's
diagnosis -The fact that I don't like seeing my mother libeled means that I
have a serious psychological problem.

Quite the "licensed mental health professional", eh? :-0

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: (Bruce J. Richman)
Date: 8/19/2004 3:26 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Dr. Quackenbush is *fully torqued up*! :-))

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your
are sane, without any mental affections which could bias your
judgement, and that you are in full possession of your
intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his
true name and legal address. Absent that, we have proof that he is
hiding behind the anonymity of his AOL posting address in order to
be abusive without taking any responsibility for his behavior.

Snip Richman's lengthy obfusctaion the fact that he doesn't want his
habitual libelous reprehensible behavior put to a court test

Thanks for your response, Bruce


Who is Bruce? Prove that my name is
Bruce. For all you and Lionel know, it could be Tommy Flanagan. Yeah,
that's
the ticket !!!! Or it could be Birchum, and I'm a Viet Nam vet. Ferstler,
thinks my name (and everybody else's name) is Clyde. And McKelvy thinks I
don't exist.
Tell it to the judge !

ROFLMAO !!!!








As usual, Krueger has lied about what I have said, without bothering to
repost
it.
His silly, typical, decepttive deletion of my reasonable adn logical response
to his post was done, obviously, to hide the fact he and Lionel don't know
what
they are talking about when it comes to libel law.

Unfortunately, for these 2 legal know-nothings, the Google record can not be
deleted by them, so their stupidity and bringing up libel suits against me
stands.
Also, what stands is their provable record of libel against me by Krueger,
Ferstler & McKelvy.

As I indicated earlier, it appears that Krueger & Lionel are to stupid to
verify any legitimate information about other people even when given a
multitude of clues - since they have none. Their stupidity is their problem,
not mine.

Since these morons choose to believe thqt Bruce J. Richman is not who he says
he is, their attempts to engage in any legal action wll be laughed at by
virtually all rational people familiar with facts, not fiction.

As mentioned earler, I encourage these imbeciles to quickly ask for the names
and addresses of all their RAO "enemies".
They have a much better chance for winning a libel suit against all of us,
also, if the get together with Ferstler & McKelvy and make it a class action
suit.

LOL !!!!


(Name deleted since they won't believe it anyhow ).

As indicated earlier, Krueger is encouraged to provide further evidence of
his
stupidity

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

[snip. Sorry, too long !...]

When you killfile a guy it's just like if you was deafening yourself.

You continue to speak of the same old things without possible notice
that the discussion has already slighty changed... and from comical the
first time the situation quickly turn to grosteque. :-)

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to ignore the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win". Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an alliance with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the light of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping" us in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.

LOL, I am ready to pay for an other one like that !

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person claiming to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.

In article ,
(Bruce J. Richman) writes:
Arny Krueger wrote:

Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog with
me.










Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to ignore the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win". Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an alliance with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the light of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping" us in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.


Bruce J. Richman

I thought you killfiled Arny?

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.

There is no reason to believe an asshole like Richman. The only reason to
believe that he's real at all is that I got an e-mail from someone well know
to the group that said he is a real person. Of course they also described
him as essentially 3rd rate, which I'm fine with. I question his
professionalism more than his existence, (unless I just want to jerk his
chain).

I've said it before, I don't really care if he is who he say or not, since
the real issue is that he is a complete waste of air.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.


I am personally known to four people who post or have posted here.
Of course, in Arny's twisted mind, he might consider that those
people aren't real

Michael McStupid lies as usual:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.

There is no reason to believe an asshole like Richman. The only reason to
believe that he's real at all is that I got an e-mail from someone well know
to the group that said he is a real person. Of course they also described
him as essentially 3rd rate, which I'm fine with. I question his
professionalism more than his existence, (unless I just want to jerk his
chain).

I've said it before, I don't really care if he is who he say or not, since
the real issue is that he is a complete waste of air.










The pathological liar McKelvy, deluded ****head that we all know him to be, has
spread this lie based on hearsay information in the past. He's been challenged
to back it up with facts. He ahs none, and the person he claims to have
received information from either doesn't exist, or if he does, has absolutely
no credible information about me.

As usual, McKelvfy is full of ****. He's totally devoid of even the smallest
degree of honesty. His actions are beneath contempt. He is delusional. His
words are not worth the paper or bandwidth they are printed on.

This asshole, who has a history of libel against me stretching back almost 7
years, has been challenged many times substantiate his bull****. He hasn't
because he can't. He has been recently invited to present his bull**** about
people impersonating psychologists to the Florida Stqte Police because
impersonation of a psychologist publically is a crime. Needless to say, this
gutless, liar and complete scumbag has failed to do so. He is all talk, and
no action, and his words are worthless.


Bruce J. Richman

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.


I am personally known to four people who post or have posted here.
Of course, in Arny's twisted mind, he might consider that those
people aren't real










Only paranoid posters with loosened reality ties such as Krueger and McKelvy
even delude themselves into thinking that people are not who they say they are.
McKelvy, with every new set of lies about me, just confirms the fact that he's
not playing with a full deck.


Bruce J. Richman

Huh?

In article ,
(Bruce J. Richman) writes:
Arny Krueger wrote:

Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog with

me.










Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to ignore
the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win".
Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an alliance
with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the
light of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid
rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings
about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since
they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his
claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping" us
in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.


Bruce J. Richman

I thought you killfiled Arny?








And whose sockpuppet might you be? Krueger's or Lionel's?

I never claimed that I killfiled Krueger. I suggest you cut a few eye holes in
the sock before you try and read the posts.
Ask your manipulator if he/she can help you out.

Bruce J. Richman

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: (Bruce J. Richman)
Date: 8/19/2004 8:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Huh?

In article ,
(Bruce J. Richman) writes:
Arny Krueger wrote:

Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog
with

me.










Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to ignore
the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win".
Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an alliance
with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the
light of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid
rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings
about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since
they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his
claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping" us
in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.


Bruce J. Richman

I thought you killfiled Arny?








And whose sockpuppet might you be? Krueger's or Lionel's?


Paranoia strikes deep ;-)


I never claimed that I killfiled Krueger. I suggest you cut a few eye holes
in
the sock before you try and read the posts.
Ask your manipulator if he/she can help you out.


into your miserable, fearful existance it will creep :-0


Bruce J. Richman, Paranoid Poseur
Life-long Fraud
Phucked-up Failure
A Shame to his Family

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your
judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals
faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request
official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your
cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name
and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind
the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without
taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.


I am personally known to four people who post or have posted here.
Of course, in Arny's twisted mind, he might consider that those
people aren't real










Only paranoid posters with loosened reality ties such as Krueger and
McKelvy
even delude themselves into thinking that people are not who they say they
are.

And only 3rd rate quacks pass any sort of psycological judgement on people
they've never met.

McKelvy, with every new set of lies about me, just confirms the fact that
he's
not playing with a full deck.




At least my deck isn't full of only jokers. Quack, quack.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McStupid lies as usual:


Wow, how old are you, 4?

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals
faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your
cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name
and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.

There is no reason to believe an asshole like Richman. The only reason
to
believe that he's real at all is that I got an e-mail from someone well
know
to the group that said he is a real person. Of course they also
described
him as essentially 3rd rate, which I'm fine with. I question his
professionalism more than his existence, (unless I just want to jerk his
chain).

I've said it before, I don't really care if he is who he say or not,
since
the real issue is that he is a complete waste of air.










The pathological liar McKelvy, deluded ****head that we all know him to
be, has
spread this lie based on hearsay information in the past.

I have reported the contents of an e-mail You saying it isn't so doesn't
change anything.

He's been challenged
to back it up with facts. He ahs none, and the person he claims to have
received information from either doesn't exist, or if he does, has
absolutely
no credible information about me.


You're free to believe what you want.

As usual, McKelvfy is full of ****. He's totally devoid of even the
smallest
degree of honesty.

More projection from an obvious nut case.

His actions are beneath contempt. He is delusional. His
words are not worth the paper or bandwidth they are printed on.


Then why do you respond to them?

This asshole, who has a history of libel against me stretching back almost
7
years, has been challenged many times substantiate his bull****. He
hasn't
because he can't. He has been recently invited to present his bull****
about
people impersonating psychologists to the Florida Stqte Police because
impersonation of a psychologist publically is a crime.

Will it make you happy if I concede you are a psychologist? OK, you're a
3rd rate psychologist.


Needless to say, this
gutless, liar and complete scumbag has failed to do so. He is all talk,
and
no action, and his words are worthless.


See sometimes if you cry long enough you get what you want. Feel better?

Quack, quack.

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: "Michael McKelvy"
Date: 8/19/2004 9:53 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id: k.net


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McStupid lies as usual:


Wow, how old are you, 4?



Inane, Juvenile Bozo: that's our Quacko!


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals
faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your
cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name
and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.

There is no reason to believe an asshole like Richman. The only reason
to
believe that he's real at all is that I got an e-mail from someone well
know
to the group that said he is a real person. Of course they also
described
him as essentially 3rd rate, which I'm fine with. I question his
professionalism more than his existence, (unless I just want to jerk his
chain).

I've said it before, I don't really care if he is who he say or not,
since
the real issue is that he is a complete waste of air.










The pathological liar McKelvy, deluded ****head that we all know him to
be, has
spread this lie based on hearsay information in the past.

I have reported the contents of an e-mail You saying it isn't so doesn't
change anything.

He's been challenged
to back it up with facts. He ahs none, and the person he claims to have
received information from either doesn't exist, or if he does, has
absolutely
no credible information about me.


You're free to believe what you want.

As usual, McKelvfy is full of ****. He's totally devoid of even the
smallest
degree of honesty.

More projection from an obvious nut case.

His actions are beneath contempt. He is delusional. His
words are not worth the paper or bandwidth they are printed on.


Then why do you respond to them?

This asshole, who has a history of libel against me stretching back almost
7
years, has been challenged many times substantiate his bull****. He
hasn't
because he can't. He has been recently invited to present his bull****
about
people impersonating psychologists to the Florida Stqte Police because
impersonation of a psychologist publically is a crime.

Will it make you happy if I concede you are a psychologist? OK, you're a
3rd rate psychologist.


Needless to say, this
gutless, liar and complete scumbag has failed to do so. He is all talk,
and
no action, and his words are worthless.


See sometimes if you cry long enough you get what you want. Feel better?

Quack, quack.

Bruce J Richman, Fraud and Liar
A Shame to my Family
Arrogant to hide my insecurities

Fact! ;-)

McStupid admits he lied:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McStupid lies as usual:


Wow, how old are you, 4?

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals
faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your
cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name
and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.

There is no reason to believe an asshole like Richman. The only reason
to
believe that he's real at all is that I got an e-mail from someone well
know
to the group that said he is a real person. Of course they also
described
him as essentially 3rd rate, which I'm fine with. I question his
professionalism more than his existence, (unless I just want to jerk his
chain).

I've said it before, I don't really care if he is who he say or not,
since
the real issue is that he is a complete waste of air.










The pathological liar McKelvy, deluded ****head that we all know him to
be, has
spread this lie based on hearsay information in the past.

I have reported the contents of an e-mail You saying it isn't so doesn't
change anything.

He's been challenged
to back it up with facts. He ahs none, and the person he claims to have
received information from either doesn't exist, or if he does, has
absolutely
no credible information about me.


You're free to believe what you want.

As usual, McKelvfy is full of ****. He's totally devoid of even the
smallest
degree of honesty.

More projection from an obvious nut case.

His actions are beneath contempt. He is delusional. His
words are not worth the paper or bandwidth they are printed on.


Then why do you respond to them?

This asshole, who has a history of libel against me stretching back almost
7
years, has been challenged many times substantiate his bull****. He
hasn't
because he can't. He has been recently invited to present his bull****
about
people impersonating psychologists to the Florida Stqte Police because
impersonation of a psychologist publically is a crime.

Will it make you happy if I concede you are a psychologist? OK, you're a
3rd rate psychologist.


Needless to say, this
gutless, liar and complete scumbag has failed to do so. He is all talk,
and
no action, and his words are worthless.


See sometimes if you cry long enough you get what you want. Feel better?

Quack, quack.













Thanks for confirming your a pathological liar. Your quacking is about the
only thing in the above post that is truthful.

This gutless creep hasn't the cajones to take his bull**** to either the police
or any printed medium.

Thanks for proving you're a deluded pile of **** that invents fictious emails,
McStupid.

Now, I'll let you return to the voices in your head, scumbag.

SCORE !!!!

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: (Bruce J. Richman)
Date: 8/19/2004 10:02 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


The Crazy Person Poseur is all torqued up!


McStupid admits he lied:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McStupid lies as usual:


Wow, how old are you, 4?

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Doctor,

Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic
diagnostics
on
RAO.

In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an
official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are
sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement,
and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals
faculties.

We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1
month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a
lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your
cost.

I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name
and
legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking
any
responsibility for his behavior.


You know who he is, therefore he is not anonymous.
He has posted the number of his license to
practice clinical psychology.


He has posted someone's license, we have no idea if the person
claiming
to
be B.J. Richman is in fact the owner of that license.

Get off your paranoia kick. Anybody could say that about
anyone else who postsher, me, you, Arny, Dave. I for one, assume
the five of us are who we say we are.
Can you go that far? That Bruce, Arny, you, Dave and me are who
we say we are? IF you doubt one, there is eqaul doubt for any
of the others.



Arny is known to many people.
Dave at least we know has a real address because Singh sent him some
speakers.
We have reason to believe you're who you say you are.

There is no reason to believe an asshole like Richman. The only reason
to
believe that he's real at all is that I got an e-mail from someone well
know
to the group that said he is a real person. Of course they also
described
him as essentially 3rd rate, which I'm fine with. I question his
professionalism more than his existence, (unless I just want to jerk his
chain).

I've said it before, I don't really care if he is who he say or not,
since
the real issue is that he is a complete waste of air.










The pathological liar McKelvy, deluded ****head that we all know him to
be, has
spread this lie based on hearsay information in the past.

I have reported the contents of an e-mail You saying it isn't so doesn't
change anything.

He's been challenged
to back it up with facts. He ahs none, and the person he claims to have
received information from either doesn't exist, or if he does, has
absolutely
no credible information about me.


You're free to believe what you want.

As usual, McKelvfy is full of ****. He's totally devoid of even the
smallest
degree of honesty.

More projection from an obvious nut case.

His actions are beneath contempt. He is delusional. His
words are not worth the paper or bandwidth they are printed on.


Then why do you respond to them?

This asshole, who has a history of libel against me stretching back almost
7
years, has been challenged many times substantiate his bull****. He
hasn't
because he can't. He has been recently invited to present his bull****
about
people impersonating psychologists to the Florida Stqte Police because
impersonation of a psychologist publically is a crime.

Will it make you happy if I concede you are a psychologist? OK, you're a
3rd rate psychologist.


Needless to say, this
gutless, liar and complete scumbag has failed to do so. He is all talk,
and
no action, and his words are worthless.


See sometimes if you cry long enough you get what you want. Feel better?

Quack, quack.













Thanks for confirming your a pathological liar.


Say what???




Your quacking is about the
only thing in the above post that is truthful.

This gutless creep hasn't the cajones to take his bull**** to either the
police
or any printed medium.

Thanks for proving you're a deluded pile of **** that invents fictious
emails,
McStupid.

Now, I'll let you return to the voices in your head, scumbag.

SCORE !!!!


Bruce J Richman, Poseur
The Shame of my Mother's life
Life-long Failure and Fraud

Fact!

"Bruce J. Richman" a écrit dans le message de
...
Huh?

In article ,
(Bruce J. Richman) writes:
Arny Krueger wrote:

Lionel" wrote in message

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer
elicit any direct responses to anything he has to say.

Ooooooh, our good Doctor has killfiled me... and he is expecting that
this upset me !
What a bad psychologist he is... I am not upset Ô doctor, I am
honored !
LOL!!!

O)

That's basically a Score! Lionel.

But don't get the big head.

Middius has had me killfiled several times.

Yup, I mess his head up so badly that he doesn't want to risk a dialog
with

me.










Actually, pathological liar Krueger confuses the wise decision to
ignore
the
psychotic babblings of a retarded imbecile with some kind of "win".
Actually,
Krueger's decision to embarass himself even further by forming an
alliance
with
RAO's resident French imbecile in a libel suit that will never see the
light of
day, constitutes a score for me. Not that I care about their paranoid
rantings
all that much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings
about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations
of
cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores. Especially since
they
simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological problems.
And then, of course, we have a more recent score against Krueger - his
claims
that many of us are hidinig behind AOL - which he presumes is "helping"
us
in
our evil conspiracies against him and his little band of lunatics.


Bruce J. Richman

I thought you killfiled Arny?








And whose sockpuppet might you be? Krueger's or Lionel's?

I never claimed that I killfiled Krueger.

Like other RAO's morons Bruce J. Richman will *never* killfile Arnold
Krueger.

They are acting like moths around a light in the night...
....Ask a moth if it wants that you switch off the light ! :-)

"Torresists" wrote in message

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 8/19/2004 3:38 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not that I care about their paranoid rantings all that
much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his
allegations of cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores.

Here's what Richman is bragging about:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnewst xt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we
see today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the
floors of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was
tethered upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus
attaching his teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's
feet. Your mother, enchanted by upside-down things (particularly
people), decided that she would mop the floor of his dungeon first
and **** him afterwards. The impassioned upside-down **** created a
child. To mother's delight, the child much preferred being kicked
than hugged. It also enjoyed being taped upside down to the wall,
with its pacifier in its arse, while mommy whipped it with light
flex and breast fed its nostrils.


Especially since they simply illustrated Krueger's serious
psychological problems.

Yes, I don't like seeing my mother libelled. So, here's Richman's
diagnosis -The fact that I don't like seeing my mother libeled means
that I have a serious psychological problem.

Quite the "licensed mental health professional", eh? :-0

Hey, he's got that AOL ID to hide behind.

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Torresists" wrote in message

Subject: Note to Dr Bruce J. Richman
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 8/19/2004 3:38 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not that I care about their paranoid rantings all that
much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his
allegations of cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores.

Here's what Richman is bragging about:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnewst xt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we
see today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the
floors of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was
tethered upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus
attaching his teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's
feet. Your mother, enchanted by upside-down things (particularly
people), decided that she would mop the floor of his dungeon first
and **** him afterwards. The impassioned upside-down **** created a
child. To mother's delight, the child much preferred being kicked
than hugged. It also enjoyed being taped upside down to the wall,
with its pacifier in its arse, while mommy whipped it with light
flex and breast fed its nostrils.


Especially since they simply illustrated Krueger's serious
psychological problems.

Yes, I don't like seeing my mother libelled. So, here's Richman's
diagnosis -The fact that I don't like seeing my mother libeled means
that I have a serious psychological problem.

Quite the "licensed mental health professional", eh? :-0

Hey, he's got that AOL ID to hide behind.










And Krueger has his sockpuppet, Torresists, to talk to and pretend that a
nameless, anonymous, cowardly troller agrees with him.

Also, Krueger's paranoid claims re. people hiding behind AOL ID's are just
further indications of his lack of contact with reality. As with almost
everything Krueger has said about me (and many others) over a 7 year perio,
this statement of his a complete fabrication.


Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


And Krueger has his sockpuppet, Torresists, to talk to and pretend
that a nameless, anonymous, cowardly troller agrees with him.

Sorry Bruce, but I'm as mystfied as to his true identity as anyone.